Wikipedia:Files for deletion/2012 October 19



File:Accordion v1.jpg

 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  05:03, 26 October 2012 (UTC)
 * File:Accordion v1.jpg ([ delete] | talk | [ history] | links | [ logs]) – uploaded by Nanami Kamimura ( [ notify] | contribs | uploads | upload log).

Fails WP:NFCC (replaceability); someone can just grab a deck of cards and illustrate the variation of the game where cards are dealt one at a time. RJaguar3 &#124; u  &#124;  t  03:16, 19 October 2012 (UTC)
 * Delete. "This screenshot cannot be replicated under free conditions, especially because of the randomness of the card shuffle." Well, stack the deck then! PleaseStand (talk) 07:23, 24 October 2012 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Videogame.png

 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  03:01, 27 October 2012 (UTC)
 * File:Videogame.png ([ delete] | talk | [ history] | links | [ logs]) – uploaded by Frostibrae ( [ notify] | contribs | uploads | upload log).

Invalid FUR--not needed for critical discussion —Justin ( koavf ) ❤T☮C☺M☯ 09:13, 19 October 2012 (UTC)
 * Oppose: Information in the article is substantial enough to be kept. --MrIndustry (talk) 00:48, 20 October 2012 (UTC)
 * Response How so? It's just a picture of her torso. How is this fair use? —Justin ( koavf ) ❤T☮C☺M☯ 06:03, 20 October 2012 (UTC)
 * LDR states in numerous interviews that she likes to make videos with clips. This is one of her videos where she uses clips and lip syncs. This is also her first single. This fits fair use criteria. --MrIndustry (talk) 09:27, 20 October 2012 (UTC)
 * Response "Non-free content is used only if its presence would significantly increase readers' understanding of the topic, and its omission would be detrimental to that understanding." How would readers' understanding be significantly diminished if this image was removed from the article? —Justin ( koavf ) ❤T☮C☺M☯ 07:12, 21 October 2012 (UTC)
 * Delete The readers' understanding would be unaffected by the removal of the image. --Stefan2 (talk) 18:35, 21 October 2012 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Ride Screenshot.JPG

 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  03:01, 27 October 2012 (UTC)
 * File:Ride Screenshot.JPG ([ delete] | talk | [ history] | links | [ logs]) – uploaded by Thevampireashlee ( [ notify] | contribs | uploads | upload log).

Invalid FUR--not discussed critically. —Justin ( koavf ) ❤T☮C☺M☯ 09:23, 19 October 2012 (UTC)
 * Oppose: The content of this image is examined critically in the article Ride (Lana Del Rey song), where it is being used. There are three reliable sources attached to the commentary. --Thevampireashlee (talk) 23:50, 19 October 2012 (UTC)
 * Response But are you arguing that readers can't understand the topic sufficiently with text? Do we need a photo of her in a Native American headdress? —Justin ( koavf ) ❤T☮C☺M☯ 06:07, 20 October 2012 (UTC)


 * Oppose: Information in the article is substantial enough to be kept. --MrIndustry (talk) 00:48, 20 October 2012 (UTC)
 * Response "Non-free content is used only if its presence would significantly increase readers' understanding of the topic, and its omission would be detrimental to that understanding." How would readers' understanding be significantly diminished if this image was removed from the article? —Justin ( koavf ) ❤T☮C☺M☯ 07:12, 21 October 2012 (UTC)


 * Delete Removal of the image wouldn't affect the understanding of the article at all. If a photo of traditional American clothing is needed, then a freely licensed image of such clothing can be used instead. If a photo of the performer is needed, then a freely licensed image of her could be used instead. --Stefan2 (talk) 18:37, 21 October 2012 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Lana Del Rey - Summertime Sadness.png

 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  03:01, 27 October 2012 (UTC)
 * File:Lana Del Rey - Summertime Sadness.png ([ delete] | talk | [ history] | links | [ logs]) – uploaded by Aaa16 ( [ notify] | contribs | uploads | upload log).

Invalid FUR--not discussed critically —Justin ( koavf ) ❤T☮C☺M☯ 09:25, 19 October 2012 (UTC)
 * Oppose: Information in the article is substantial enough to be kept. --MrIndustry (talk) 00:48, 20 October 2012 (UTC)
 * Response How is this fair use? It's just a screenshot of her back. —Justin ( koavf ) ❤T☮C☺M☯ 06:05, 20 October 2012 (UTC)
 * Please don't nominate a picture if you don't understand WHY it's being used. Summertime SADNESS. She's KILLING HERSELF in this screen grab. Did you do any research before nominating this? --MrIndustry (talk) 09:19, 20 October 2012 (UTC)
 * Response "Non-free content is used only if its presence would significantly increase readers' understanding of the topic, and its omission would be detrimental to that understanding." How would readers' understanding be significantly diminished if this image was removed from the article? —Justin ( koavf ) ❤T☮C☺M☯ 07:12, 21 October 2012 (UTC)


 * Delete Removal of this image would leave the reader's understanding unchanged. --Stefan2 (talk) 18:39, 21 October 2012 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Lana Del Rey - Born to Die.png

 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  03:01, 27 October 2012 (UTC)
 * File:Lana Del Rey - Born to Die.png ([ delete] | talk | [ history] | links | [ logs]) – uploaded by Sauloviegas ( [ notify] | contribs | uploads | upload log).

Invalid FUR--not discussed critically. —Justin ( koavf ) ❤T☮C☺M☯ 09:26, 19 October 2012 (UTC)
 * Oppose: Information in the article is substantial enough to be kept. --MrIndustry (talk) 00:48, 20 October 2012 (UTC)
 * Response How is this fair use? Are readers' understanding of this topic significantly enhanced in a way that is insufficient with text? If so, how? —Justin ( koavf ) ❤T☮C☺M☯ 06:05, 20 October 2012 (UTC)


 * Delete Removal of the image would leave the reader's understanding unchanged, so the image fails WP:NFCC. --Stefan2 (talk) 18:40, 21 October 2012 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Blue Velvet Lana Del Rey.JPG

 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the discussion was: no consensus. SchuminWeb (Talk) 01:25, 27 October 2012 (UTC)
 * File:Blue Velvet Lana Del Rey.JPG ([ delete] | talk | [ history] | links | [ logs]) – uploaded by Thevampireashlee ( [ notify] | contribs | uploads | upload log).

Invalid FUR--not discussed critically. —Justin ( koavf ) ❤T☮C☺M☯ 09:26, 19 October 2012 (UTC)
 * Oppose: There is enough commentary in both articles that include this image to warrant its inclusion. Sources that discuss it include Rolling Stone and Spin, both of which are cited in the articles. --Thevampireashlee (talk) 23:50, 19 October 2012 (UTC)
 * Response But can users understand the topic without the picture? If so, then it's not fair use and must be deleted. —Justin ( koavf ) ❤T☮C☺M☯ 06:06, 20 October 2012 (UTC)


 * Oppose: Information in the article is substantial enough to be kept. --MrIndustry (talk) 00:48, 20 October 2012 (UTC)
 * Response "Non-free content is used only if its presence would significantly increase readers' understanding of the topic, and its omission would be detrimental to that understanding." How would readers' understanding be significantly diminished if this image was removed from the article? —Justin ( koavf ) ❤T☮C☺M☯ 07:12, 21 October 2012 (UTC)
 * The simple answer is that the removal of the image wouldn't affect the understanding of the topic at all. Thus, delete. --Stefan2 (talk) 18:42, 21 October 2012 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:Outlook logo.png

 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  02:01, 27 October 2012 (UTC)
 * File:Outlook logo.png ([ delete] | talk | [ history] | links | [ logs]) – uploaded by Mr White ( [ notify] | contribs | uploads | upload log).

Unused, superceded by File:Outlook logo.svg. Cloudbound (talk) 20:22, 19 October 2012 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section.