Wikipedia:Files for deletion/2013 August 7



File:Lifesave raft alternative3219304.jpg

 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  23:01, 17 August 2013 (UTC)
 * File:Lifesave raft alternative3219304.jpg ([ delete] | talk | [ history] | links | [ logs]) – uploaded by Qxukhgiels ( [ notify] | contribs | uploads | upload log).

Poor quality and unued. If needed, should be converted to SVG. Eeekster (talk) 01:01, 7 August 2013 (UTC)
 * Delete Soo bad! Secondarywaltz (talk) 00:19, 13 August 2013 (UTC)
 * Delete "Images with inappropriate JPEG compression" is right. OSborn arfcontribs. 04:07, 13 August 2013 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Cartman as Pope.jpg

 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the discussion was: Delete per nom. Image is not discussed in any way in the article, therefore fails NFCC#8
 * File:Cartman as Pope.jpg ([ delete] | talk | [ history] | links | [ logs]) – uploaded by JesseMeza ( [ notify] | contribs | uploads | upload log).

Violates WP:NFCC as the image does not significantly increase reader's understanding of the topic and is used purely for the sake of having an infobox photo. Beerest355 Talk 01:47, 7 August 2013 (UTC)
 * Keep - Screencaps of television episodes are ipso facto relevant to articles about the episodes. One gains a better understanding of the episode simply by looking at the image. To state anything else is a form of extreme reductionism attacking fair use itself. Magog the Ogre (t • c) 21:33, 17 August 2013 (UTC)
 * Weak keep - The article is poorly structured, but average at best. Someone can improve the page and make this image relevant. --George Ho (talk) 02:30, 10 September 2013 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section.

File:AsssBurger.png

 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the discussion was: Delete, fail NFCC#8 as doesn't add significant context to the article.
 * File:AsssBurger.png ([ delete] | talk | [ history] | links | [ logs]) – uploaded by MelHart94 ( [ notify] | contribs | uploads | upload log).

Violates WP:NFCC as the image does not significantly increase reader's understanding of the topic and is used purely for the sake of having an infobox photo. Beerest355 Talk 01:47, 7 August 2013 (UTC)
 * Keep - Screencaps of television episodes are ipso facto relevant to articles about the episodes. One gains a better understanding of the episode simply by looking at the image. To state anything else is a form of extreme reductionism attacking fair use itself. Magog the Ogre (t • c) 21:33, 17 August 2013 (UTC)
 * Delete (or upload a different image) - The article is in bad shape. And this image does nothing to help matters; instead, it is insignificant, and I can really understand what the Plot section says. A different scene can help? --George Ho (talk) 02:35, 10 September 2013 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Gaston Dethier.jpg

 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the discussion was: Keep Magog the Ogre (t • c) 21:39, 17 August 2013 (UTC)
 * File:Gaston Dethier.jpg ([ delete] | talk | [ history] | links | [ logs]) – uploaded by Lukascb ( [ notify] | contribs | uploads | upload log).

Invalid source, listed alternately as "early part of the 20th century" or "wikipedia" - neither gives any clarity as to the actual source of the image. (ESkog)(Talk) 16:50, 7 August 2013 (UTC)
 * Keep This image is cropped from File:Dethier, Edouard and Gaston.jpg which gives a source. It also clarifies that said image in the public domain. So this should be kept, but marked as ready to transfer to Wikimedia Commons. Beerest355 Talk 20:03, 7 August 2013 (UTC)
 * Comment - I have fixed the licensing and tagged the image as being a candidate for Commons. If this file ends up on Commons, then I suggest it be deleted if/when it meets WP:CSD. If for some reason this file is not eligible for Commons but is fine here (which does happen on occasion) I suggest that this file be kept locally.--Rockfang (talk) 08:44, 9 August 2013 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section.

File:ARW somali.png

 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the discussion was: Wrong forum. The file is on Commons. Please nominate it for deletion there if you still feel it should be deleted. AnomieBOT ⚡ 20:14, 7 August 2013 (UTC)
 * File:ARW somali.png ([ delete] | talk | [ history] | links | [ logs]) – uploaded by SetantaDC ( [ notify] | contribs | uploads | upload log).

This is a copyrighted file in flicker in the link "http://www.flickr.com/photos/world_armies/6236485438/" Proshob (talk) 20:08, 7 August 2013 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Windows 8.1 Preview Default Start Screen.png

 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  00:01, 10 September 2013 (UTC)
 * File:Windows 8.1 Preview Default Start Screen.png ([ delete] | talk | [ history] | links | [ logs]) – uploaded by Himanis Das ( [ notify] | contribs | uploads | upload log).

This image of an unreleased program does not conform to WP:NFCC #1, #3 and #8 as its role can easily be replaced with words alone and File:Windows 8 Start Screen.png or File:Start screen on Windows Server 2012.png. Since in two out of three articles, it appears right after Windows 8 Start Screen.png, it does not have contextual significance either. Best regards, Codename Lisa (talk) 21:54, 7 August 2013 (UTC)
 * What unreleased program ? The screenshot itself provides visual information regarding the new features and the layout of Start screen that was revealed in Windows 8.1(Preview). No doubt it may be deleted after the release of RTM, but till now only the preview of 8.1 was released, I seem to remember in earlier there was a screenshot of the Start screen of Windows Developer Preview, Consumer Preview, Release Preview in the infobox of Windows 8 article, in respect to this situation, why those screenshots remained there till the new consecutive preview releases ? Why they haven't be deleted at first ? Again why the file still exist, File:Firefox 22 on Windows 8.1.png ? Here the Firefox is running in Windows 8.1 Preview, not 8.1, isn't this violate the laws as you said ? If yes, then why my file added for deletion ? There may be various files like this, hence, i think currently my mind has been fucked up regarding this kinds of shits. Himanis Das talk  10:04, 8 August 2013 (UTC)


 * Delete, in both of the articles this image is used in, if fails our non-free content criteria, in that it shows nothing more than what other images show, and a minor rearrangement which can fully be explained in text. – Quadell (talk) 19:59, 12 August 2013 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section.