Wikipedia:Files for deletion/2013 January 17



File:Cable technology.JPG

 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  03:03, 25 January 2013 (UTC)
 * File:Cable technology.JPG ([ delete] | talk | [ history] | links | [ logs]) – uploaded by Gmkishor ( [ notify] | contribs | uploads | upload log).

Orphan image with no good encyclopedic value, could all be replaced with plain text and or simple explanation -- Тимофей ЛееСуда . 00:43, 17 January 2013 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Cross cabl.JPG

 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  03:03, 25 January 2013 (UTC)
 * File:Cross cabl.JPG ([ delete] | talk | [ history] | links | [ logs]) – uploaded by Gmkishor ( [ notify] | contribs | uploads | upload log).

Orphan image with no good encyclopedic value, could all be replaced with plain text and or simple explanation. Also includes additional images that may or not be owned by uploader. -- Тимофей ЛееСуда . 00:44, 17 January 2013 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section.

File:DOubleEE343.jpg

 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  03:03, 25 January 2013 (UTC)
 * File:DOubleEE343.jpg ([ delete] | talk | [ history] | links | [ logs]) – uploaded by Wikieditor4000 ( [ notify] | contribs | uploads | upload log).

Orphan image with too many edited filters and graphic work that there is no encyclopedic value -- Тимофей ЛееСуда . 01:03, 17 January 2013 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Don Bosco School Liluah.JPG

 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  03:03, 25 January 2013 (UTC)
 * File:Don Bosco School Liluah.JPG ([ delete] | talk | [ history] | links | [ logs]) – uploaded by Soham dbl ( [ notify] | contribs | uploads | upload log).

Unrealistic photo of a school with a person's head (presumably Don Bosco) superimposed into the sky. This image is beyond any reasonable use in an encyclopedic -- Тимофей ЛееСуда . 01:04, 17 January 2013 (UTC)
 * delete I cannot see how we could ever use this. Mangoe (talk) 14:03, 17 January 2013 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Drizzt painting.jpg

 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  03:03, 25 January 2013 (UTC)
 * File:Drizzt painting.jpg ([ delete] | talk | [ history] | links | [ logs]) – uploaded by Irishmile ( [ notify] | contribs | uploads | upload log).

Looks to be a CGI created image with no encyclopedic value. Also says "Justin McMenamin" on image, which may or may not be the uploader and/or creator -- Тимофей ЛееСуда . 01:08, 17 January 2013 (UTC)
 * Comment - The fact that it is a derivative work is also something to keep in mind.--Rockfang (talk) 06:11, 21 January 2013 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section.

File:ElectrowaveZ2.jpg

 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  03:03, 25 January 2013 (UTC)
 * File:ElectrowaveZ2.jpg ([ delete] | talk | [ history] | links | [ logs]) – uploaded by Chuck6969 ( [ notify] | contribs | uploads | upload log).

Orphan highly edited photo with no encyclopedic value. -- Тимофей ЛееСуда . 01:15, 17 January 2013 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Evil Inside.JPG

 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  03:03, 25 January 2013 (UTC)
 * File:Evil Inside.JPG ([ delete] | talk | [ history] | links | [ logs]) – uploaded by Marshall Williams2 ( [ notify] | contribs | uploads | upload log).

Orphan image of a clothing patch that reads "evil inside" made to look like Intel's Intel Inside logo. Image is blurry for the patch, and there is no encyclopedic value -- Тимофей ЛееСуда . 01:20, 17 January 2013 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Francoispic.jpg

 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  03:03, 25 January 2013 (UTC)
 * File:Francoispic.jpg ([ delete] | talk | [ history] | links | [ logs]) – uploaded by Thebestjohn ( [ notify] | contribs | uploads | upload log).

Orphan poor cropped personal photo with no encyclopedic value -- Тимофей ЛееСуда . 01:37, 17 January 2013 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Gimmore.jpg

 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  03:03, 25 January 2013 (UTC)
 * File:Gimmore.jpg ([ delete] | talk | [ history] | links | [ logs]) – uploaded by Post Falls Man ( [ notify] | contribs | uploads | upload log).

Orphan image is low resolution, no encyclopedic value -- Тимофей ЛееСуда . 01:40, 17 January 2013 (UTC)
 * delete Not sure what this was ever for, no evidence it was ever used. Mangoe (talk) 14:05, 17 January 2013 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section.

File:YCFC1993.jpg

 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  03:03, 25 January 2013 (UTC)
 * File:YCFC1993.jpg ([ delete] | talk | [ history] | links | [ logs]) – uploaded by Mattythewhite ( [ notify] | contribs | uploads | upload log).

Non-free photograph showing players of a football team celebrating a victory, used in history section of team article. Typical case of notability and NFCC#8 criteria being mixed up: while the historical situation from which this is taken may be important and notable (for purposes of this article), the image itself offers the reader no factual information about that situation that couldn't be conveyed in words. The only things it conveys is that the players were happy, and that they wore red garb; both of these are trivial.) Per multiple precedents, we don't use non-free images for such cases.

Also has a blatantly false rationale, copying the boilerplate "the photo and its historical significance are the object of discussion in the article" (which is obviously factually untrue.) Fut.Perf. ☼ 08:48, 17 January 2013 (UTC)
 * When uploading the image, I likely misinterpreted "the photo and its historical significance are the object of discussion in the article" as meaning what was in the photo (i.e. the team winning the trophy), rather than the photo itself. But, it was over five years ago that I uploaded it, so it's impossible to remember and explain what my thinking was precisely... Mattythewhite (talk) 17:57, 17 January 2013 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section.

File:2AM1stAlbumSaintO&

 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  03:03, 25 January 2013 (UTC)
 * File:2AM1stAlbumSaintO& ([ delete] | talk | [ history] | links | [ logs]) – uploaded by He Arche ( [ notify] | contribs | uploads | upload log).

Violates WP:NFCC since there already is a different cover image in the article. Stefan2 (talk) 13:09, 17 January 2013 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section.

File:WG ChinaSE.jpg

 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  03:03, 25 January 2013 (UTC)
 * File:WG ChinaSE.jpg ([ delete] | talk | [ history] | links | [ logs]) – uploaded by Phuiyarn ( [ notify] | contribs | uploads | upload log).

Violates WP:NFCC: there is already a different cover image there. Stefan2 (talk) 13:14, 17 January 2013 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section.

File:WG HK Special Edition.jpg

 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  03:03, 25 January 2013 (UTC)
 * File:WG HK Special Edition.jpg ([ delete] | talk | [ history] | links | [ logs]) – uploaded by Phuiyarn ( [ notify] | contribs | uploads | upload log).

Violates WP:NFCC: there is already a different cover image there. Stefan2 (talk) 13:14, 17 January 2013 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section.

File:WG chineseSE.jpg

 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  03:03, 25 January 2013 (UTC)
 * File:WG chineseSE.jpg ([ delete] | talk | [ history] | links | [ logs]) – uploaded by Phuiyarn ( [ notify] | contribs | uploads | upload log).

Violates WP:NFCC: there is already a different cover image there. Stefan2 (talk) 13:14, 17 January 2013 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Portable solar charger for mobile devices Strawberry Mini.jpg

 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  03:03, 25 January 2013 (UTC)
 * File:Portable solar charger for mobile devices Strawberry Mini.jpg ([ delete] | talk | [ history] | links | [ logs]) – uploaded by Renewablesfuture ( [ notify] | contribs | uploads | upload log).

I'm not convinced that the underlying work is protected by copyright in the United States. This looks like a utilitarian item which are usually ineligible for copyright in the United States. Additionally, there is no licence for the photographic aspects of the photo. Stefan2 (talk) 13:26, 17 January 2013 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section.