Wikipedia:Files for deletion/2013 July 31



File:Leslie A Bellrichard.jpg

 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the discussion was: Delete – Quadell (talk) 12:08, 8 August 2013 (UTC)
 * File:Leslie A Bellrichard.jpg ([ delete] | talk | [ history] | links | [ logs]) – uploaded by DrCDCamp ( [ notify] | contribs | uploads | upload log).

Two issues with the use of this image, first as a member of the US armed forces a free image will exist of this person, secondary the use does not significantly increase readers' understanding of the page it is used on, and its omission would be detrimental to that understanding.  LGA talk  edits   01:09, 31 July 2013 (UTC)


 * questionable rationale First, given that this came form the Military Times I could just as well suppose that if an official image existed, they in particular would surely have been able to obtain it; therefore I have to doubt the accuracy of the claim that such an image does exist and is obtainable. Second, in any article about a person it could be claimed that a picutre of them "increases understanding". Mangoe (talk) 15:14, 31 July 2013 (UTC)
 * As a member of the US forces he will have had his picture taken at some point for a ID pass, that will be a free image (as a work of the US government). The article that the FUR is for, is a list article, however the image is currently not used.  LGA talk  edits   22:38, 31 July 2013 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Roxanne Qualls.JPG

 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the discussion was: Delete – Quadell (talk) 12:08, 8 August 2013 (UTC)
 * File:Roxanne Qualls.JPG ([ delete] | talk | [ history] | links | [ logs]) – uploaded by User:Saschki ( [ notify] | contribs | uploads | upload log).

copyright violation, uploader does not show she has rights to this photo Roseohioresident (talk) 01:32, 31 July 2013 (UTC)


 * delete This would require OTRS justification as this is obviously a professional image from the subject's offices. Mangoe (talk) 15:21, 31 July 2013 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section.

File:STPrivateWar.jpg

 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the discussion was: Delete – Quadell (talk) 12:08, 8 August 2013 (UTC)
 * File:STPrivateWar.jpg ([ delete] | talk | [ history] | links | [ logs]) – uploaded by Cyberia23 ( [ notify] | contribs | uploads | upload log).

Invalid FUR: Non-free content is used only if its presence would significantly increase readers' understanding of the topic, and its omission would be detrimental to that understanding. This image is not critical for understanding, but is used in a decorative fashion. Since this file does not greatly enhance understanding, nor will its omission greatly decrease understanding, it must be deleted. Cf. with several similar nominations here, here, and here (for instance). The burden of proof is on the uploader and keep !voters to show how this particular piece of media is meaningful for understanding the episode and how critical and sourced commentary is given in the article to provide context. —Justin ( koavf ) ❤T☮C☺M☯ 05:16, 31 July 2013 (UTC)
 * Delete as failing WP:NFCC and 8. The Mugato is only discussed in the plot, and nothing in the article needs its illustration to be understood.  —   fourthords  &#124; =Λ= &#124;  20:39, 31 July 2013 (UTC)
 * DELETE or REPLACE under a different user. I want all the Star Trek images that I uploaded off Wikipedia so that I'm no longer attached to the image. Cyberia23 (talk) 22:16, 7 August 2013 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section.

File:All Our Yesterdays Nova.jpg

 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the discussion was: Delete – Quadell (talk) 12:08, 8 August 2013 (UTC)
 * File:All Our Yesterdays Nova.jpg ([ delete] | talk | [ history] | links | [ logs]) – uploaded by Cathytreks ( [ notify] | contribs | uploads | upload log).

Invalid FUR: Non-free content is used only if its presence would significantly increase readers' understanding of the topic, and its omission would be detrimental to that understanding. This image is not critical for understanding, but is used in a decorative fashion. Since this file does not greatly enhance understanding, nor will its omission greatly decrease understanding, it must be deleted. Cf. with several similar nominations here, here, and here (for instance). The burden of proof is on the uploader and keep !voters to show how this particular piece of media is meaningful for understanding the episode and how critical and sourced commentary is given in the article to provide context. —Justin ( koavf ) ❤T☮C☺M☯ 05:16, 31 July 2013 (UTC)
 * Delete as failing WP:NFCC & 8. The image's caption explains this well: it's but a reiteration of a plot point that doesn't require NFC to understand.  —   fourthords  &#124; =Λ= &#124;  20:41, 31 July 2013 (UTC)
 * Delete Doesn't meet the NFCC. Miyagawa (talk) 22:33, 31 July 2013 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section.

File:STAssignEarth2.jpg

 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the discussion was: Delete – Quadell (talk) 12:13, 8 August 2013 (UTC)
 * File:STAssignEarth2.jpg ([ delete] | talk | [ history] | links | [ logs]) – uploaded by Cyberia23 ( [ notify] | contribs | uploads | upload log).

Invalid FUR: Non-free content is used only if its presence would significantly increase readers' understanding of the topic, and its omission would be detrimental to that understanding. This image is not critical for understanding, but is used in a decorative fashion. Since this file does not greatly enhance understanding, nor will its omission greatly decrease understanding, it must be deleted. Cf. with several similar nominations here, here, and here (for instance). The burden of proof is on the uploader and keep !voters to show how this particular piece of media is meaningful for understanding the episode and how critical and sourced commentary is given in the article to provide context. —Justin ( koavf ) ❤T☮C☺M☯ 05:17, 31 July 2013 (UTC)
 * Delete Appears to be used purely in a decorative manner. Miyagawa (talk) 22:34, 31 July 2013 (UTC)
 * Comment Where was this image used? It's impossible to evaluate context when the image has been removed from the article it was included at. The image should be restored until the discussion ends, otherwise it's impossible to determine a consensus based on WP:NFCC#8. Diego Moya (talk) 13:33, 6 August 2013 (UTC)
 * The nom should have listed all article uses. It was actually the frustrated uploader who removed it from the article and removed its NFUR; I've restored the latter. The episode article was Assignment: Earth. postdlf (talk) 15:08, 6 August 2013 (UTC)
 * Delete, fails NFCC#8 because the appearance of this character (really just one identity of a character) does not significantly increase readers' understanding of the episode. No important information is depicted. postdlf (talk) 15:50, 6 August 2013 (UTC)
 * DELETE or REPLACE under a different user. I want all the Star Trek images that I uploaded off Wikipedia so that I'm no longer attached to the image. Cyberia23 (talk) 22:16, 7 August 2013 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Kirk seduces Kelinda.PNG

 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the discussion was: Delete – Quadell (talk) 12:13, 8 August 2013 (UTC)
 * File:Kirk seduces Kelinda.PNG ([ delete] | talk | [ history] | links | [ logs]) – uploaded by Colonel Warden ( [ notify] | contribs | uploads | upload log).

Invalid FUR: Non-free content is used only if its presence would significantly increase readers' understanding of the topic, and its omission would be detrimental to that understanding. This image is not critical for understanding, but is used in a decorative fashion. Since this file does not greatly enhance understanding, nor will its omission greatly decrease understanding, it must be deleted. Cf. with several similar nominations here, here, and here (for instance). The burden of proof is on the uploader and keep !voters to show how this particular piece of media is meaningful for understanding the episode and how critical and sourced commentary is given in the article to provide context. —Justin ( koavf ) ❤T☮C☺M☯ 05:17, 31 July 2013 (UTC)
 * Delete Kirk kissing someone happens a fair deal. An image of it isn't required. Miyagawa (talk) 22:35, 31 July 2013 (UTC)
 * Delete Of all the image clips, the Colonel chose this one? A tad generic, I think. --Leoboudv (talk) 08:42, 8 August 2013 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section.

File:ST-TNG Romulan-Troi.jpg

 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the discussion was: Delete – Quadell (talk) 12:13, 8 August 2013 (UTC)
 * File:ST-TNG Romulan-Troi.jpg ([ delete] | talk | [ history] | links | [ logs]) – uploaded by Artene50 ( [ notify] | contribs | uploads | upload log).

Invalid FUR: Non-free content is used only if its presence would significantly increase readers' understanding of the topic, and its omission would be detrimental to that understanding. This image is not critical for understanding, but is used in a decorative fashion. Since this file does not greatly enhance understanding, nor will its omission greatly decrease understanding, it must be deleted. Cf. with several similar nominations here, here, and here (for instance). The burden of proof is on the uploader and keep !voters to show how this particular piece of media is meaningful for understanding the episode and how critical and sourced commentary is given in the article to provide context. —Justin ( koavf ) ❤T☮C☺M☯ 05:17, 31 July 2013 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section.

File:TalTelfer.jpg
<div class="boilerplate metadata vfd xfd-closed" style="background-color:#f3f9ff; margin:1em 0 0 0; padding:0 10px 0 10px; border:1px solid #aaa;">
 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the discussion was: Delete – Quadell (talk) 12:13, 8 August 2013 (UTC)
 * File:TalTelfer.jpg ([ delete] | talk | [ history] | links | [ logs]) – uploaded by Nightscream ( [ notify] | contribs | uploads | upload log).

Invalid FUR: Non-free content is used only if its presence would significantly increase readers' understanding of the topic, and its omission would be detrimental to that understanding. This image is not critical for understanding, but is used in a decorative fashion. Since this file does not greatly enhance understanding, nor will its omission greatly decrease understanding, it must be deleted. Cf. with several similar nominations here, here, and here (for instance). The burden of proof is on the uploader and keep !voters to show how this particular piece of media is meaningful for understanding the episode and how critical and sourced commentary is given in the article to provide context. Note also that the source is "probably startrek.com". —Justin ( koavf ) ❤T☮C☺M☯ 05:18, 31 July 2013 (UTC)
 * Delete It appears to be decorative for a plot section. Clearly does not meet NFCC. Miyagawa (talk) 22:36, 31 July 2013 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section.

File:ST-TNG Final Mission.jpg
<div class="boilerplate metadata vfd xfd-closed" style="background-color:#f3f9ff; margin:1em 0 0 0; padding:0 10px 0 10px; border:1px solid #aaa;">
 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the discussion was: Delete – Quadell (talk) 12:22, 8 August 2013 (UTC)
 * File:ST-TNG Final Mission.jpg ([ delete] | talk | [ history] | links | [ logs]) – uploaded by Cburnett ( [ notify] | contribs | uploads | upload log).

Invalid FUR: Non-free content is used only if its presence would significantly increase readers' understanding of the topic, and its omission would be detrimental to that understanding. This image is not critical for understanding, but is used in a decorative fashion. Since this file does not greatly enhance understanding, nor will its omission greatly decrease understanding, it must be deleted. Cf. with several similar nominations here, here, and here (for instance). The burden of proof is on the uploader and keep !voters to show how this particular piece of media is meaningful for understanding the episode and how critical and sourced commentary is given in the article to provide context. —Justin ( koavf ) ❤T☮C☺M☯ 05:18, 31 July 2013 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section.

File:GoodShep5.jpg
<div class="boilerplate metadata vfd xfd-closed" style="background-color:#f3f9ff; margin:1em 0 0 0; padding:0 10px 0 10px; border:1px solid #aaa;">
 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the discussion was: Delete – Quadell (talk) 12:22, 8 August 2013 (UTC)
 * File:GoodShep5.jpg ([ delete] | talk | [ history] | links | [ logs]) – uploaded by Nightscream ( [ notify] | contribs | uploads | upload log).

Invalid FUR: Non-free content is used only if its presence would significantly increase readers' understanding of the topic, and its omission would be detrimental to that understanding. This image is not critical for understanding, but is used in a decorative fashion. Since this file does not greatly enhance understanding, nor will its omission greatly decrease understanding, it must be deleted. Cf. with several similar nominations here, here, and here (for instance). The burden of proof is on the uploader and keep !voters to show how this particular piece of media is meaningful for understanding the episode and how critical and sourced commentary is given in the article to provide context. —Justin ( koavf ) ❤T☮C☺M☯ 05:18, 31 July 2013 (UTC)
 * Delete per NFCC#8; the image adds little relevant information to the article. It merely shows (and not very well) a cameo by someone known as a musician in real life, that wasn't even a key point in the episode nor a portrayal of a significant character. Nothing distinctive about this scene, this screenshot, or this cameo character in any way. postdlf (talk) 20:44, 31 July 2013 (UTC)
 * Delete per NFCC#8 as the nominator states. --Leoboudv (talk) 01:41, 1 August 2013 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Plato&
<div class="boilerplate metadata vfd xfd-closed" style="background-color:#f3f9ff; margin:1em 0 0 0; padding:0 10px 0 10px; border:1px solid #aaa;">
 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the discussion was: Keep – Quadell (talk) 12:22, 8 August 2013 (UTC)
 * File:Plato& ([ delete] | talk | [ history] | links | [ logs]) – uploaded by Postdlf ( [ notify] | contribs | uploads | upload log).

Invalid FUR: Non-free content is used only if its presence would significantly increase readers' understanding of the topic, and its omission would be detrimental to that understanding. This image is not critical for understanding, but is used in a decorative fashion. Since this file does not greatly enhance understanding, nor will its omission greatly decrease understanding, it must be deleted. Cf. with several similar nominations here, here, and here (for instance). The burden of proof is on the uploader and keep !voters to show how this particular piece of media is meaningful for understanding the episode and how critical and sourced commentary is given in the article to provide context. The purpose of this media is ostensibly to display the kiss between these two characters but it doesn't and there really isn't a need for an image anyway&mdash;readers can easily visualize what it's like to see a white man and black woman kiss. —Justin ( koavf ) ❤T☮C☺M☯ 05:38, 31 July 2013 (UTC)
 * Keep It depicts what was to be one of the first interracial kisses on modern 1960's television (certainly on a sci-fi TV show) at a time when such scenes were discouraged by US TV broadcasters. Most viewers remember Plato's Stepchildren due to the kiss. --Leoboudv (talk) 09:08, 31 July 2013 (UTC)
 * Comment Did the nominator read the sourced footnotes No. 5, 8, 9, 10 and 11 for this kiss in the paragraph where this image is used? Even Nichelle Nichols wrote about the problems getting this scene done in her book, 'Beyond Uhura.' NBC didn't initially want this scene filmed...because it deals indirectly with Racism in America and that was a no no with NBC's executives. This is not a generic image--it has important cultural significance and that was what made the original Star Trek show special and leading edge for its time. So, I don't know why we would want to delete such a significant image in 1960's US television on wikipedia--especially where there are sourced references here. --Leoboudv (talk) 09:12, 31 July 2013 (UTC)
 * Response As I wrote above, "The purpose of this media is ostensibly to display the kiss between these two characters but it doesn't and there really isn't a need for an image anyway—readers can easily visualize what it's like to see a white man and black woman kiss." What understanding is gained from this media? How is it that prose is insufficient for readers in this instance? —Justin ( koavf ) ❤T☮C☺M☯ 10:00, 31 July 2013 (UTC)
 * The nominator has a point that a screen capture during the actual kiss would be even better than this one (the only one I could find online way back in 2005), so I think the file should be replaced with this one rendering the substantive part of the nomination moot. The nominator does not have a point that "readers can easily visualize" and so forth. That's a rather facile assertion here, one that I doubt will have any support in this discussion. Would this episode have been as controversial at the time and as historically significant if Star Trek just had a narrator describe the action of the kiss happening offscreen, on the theory that the audience could "easily visualize" what it looked like? Anyway, 'nuff said on that non-policy non-rationale. As a side note, I uploaded this image eight years ago. I happen to of course still be active here, but I think the typical 2005 editor is not. I was given a talk page notice of this discussion, but no message was left on the hosting article's talk page or in the image's caption. That's effectively no notice and not good practice. postdlf (talk) 13:39, 31 July 2013 (UTC)
 * Keep per my comments and Leoboudv's now that a better screenshot has been added. Contra the nom, the relevant part of the article is not just "interracial kisses", but rather this kiss, so generically claiming readers can visualize a white man kissing a black woman is rather fatuous. postdlf (talk) 20:39, 31 July 2013 (UTC)
 * Keep or alternatively Replace with actual kiss frame — I tend to agree with postdlf, while the average person will almost certainly have the ability to imagine a male and female of different races in the attitude the image depicts, they may not be able to appreciate the impact that these actors themselves depicting this attitude had. I think that in this case an image significantly increases the average viewer's understanding of the subject, and the overarching impact the image had. — Nicoli Maege (talk) 14:59, 31 July 2013 (UTC)
 * Comment The image is now replaced with an actual kiss frame between Kirk and Uhura. Written text cannot convey the ability to imagine the kiss as well as the use of a single frame behind this scene that Nichols discusses in her book, Beyond Uhura. The import of the subject here is Racism in America, not simply a kiss between a white male actor and a black female actress. Nichelle Nichols states how much NBC's executives resisted this scene being filmed since they feared offending their US southern viewers 'sensibilities' on race in the 1960's. Should we ignore Nichols' statements here? I hope not. Because of the broadcast history of this image, it should pass NFCC #8. --Leoboudv (talk) 18:08, 31 July 2013 (UTC)
 * Keep In some circles this would be the single most important image that Star Trek ever produced. Miyagawa (talk) 22:38, 31 July 2013 (UTC)
 * Keep As the first ever interracial black/white kiss shown on TV, it is quite notable on its own basis. --Artene50 (talk) 22:10, 3 August 2013 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section.

File:ISS Enterprise (NCC-1701).jpg
<div class="boilerplate metadata vfd xfd-closed" style="background-color:#f3f9ff; margin:1em 0 0 0; padding:0 10px 0 10px; border:1px solid #aaa;">
 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the discussion was: Delete – Quadell (talk) 12:30, 8 August 2013 (UTC)
 * File:ISS Enterprise (NCC-1701).jpg ([ delete] | talk | [ history] | links | [ logs]) – uploaded by MJBurrage ( [ notify] | contribs | uploads | upload log).

Invalid FUR: Non-free content is used only if its presence would significantly increase readers' understanding of the topic, and its omission would be detrimental to that understanding. This image is not critical for understanding, but is used in a decorative fashion. Since this file does not greatly enhance understanding, nor will its omission greatly decrease understanding, it must be deleted. Cf. with several similar nominations here, here, and here (for instance). The burden of proof is on the uploader and keep !voters to show how this particular piece of media is meaningful for understanding the episode and how critical and sourced commentary is given in the article to provide context. —Justin ( koavf ) ❤T☮C☺M☯ 05:45, 31 July 2013 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Observer Effect (ENT episode).jpg
<div class="boilerplate metadata vfd xfd-closed" style="background-color:#f3f9ff; margin:1em 0 0 0; padding:0 10px 0 10px; border:1px solid #aaa;">
 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the discussion was: Delete – Quadell (talk) 12:30, 8 August 2013 (UTC)
 * File:Observer Effect (ENT episode).jpg ([ delete] | talk | [ history] | links | [ logs]) – uploaded by とある白い猫 ( [ notify] | contribs | uploads | upload log).

Invalid FUR: Non-free content is used only if its presence would significantly increase readers' understanding of the topic, and its omission would be detrimental to that understanding. This image is not critical for understanding, but is used in a decorative fashion. Since this file does not greatly enhance understanding, nor will its omission greatly decrease understanding, it must be deleted. Cf. with several similar nominations here, here, and here (for instance). The burden of proof is on the uploader and keep !voters to show how this particular piece of media is meaningful for understanding the episode and how critical and sourced commentary is given in the article to provide context. —Justin ( koavf ) ❤T☮C☺M☯ 05:48, 31 July 2013 (UTC)
 * Delete per NFCC#1 and 8; generic shot (ship's doctor scans a crewmember) that is not of particular interest or relevance to this episode and easily replaceable with a text description of "Phlox scans Sato". postdlf (talk) 03:11, 1 August 2013 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section.

File:STQWho.jpg
<div class="boilerplate metadata vfd xfd-closed" style="background-color:#f3f9ff; margin:1em 0 0 0; padding:0 10px 0 10px; border:1px solid #aaa;">
 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the discussion was: Delete deleted as G7 by – Quadell (talk) 12:30, 8 August 2013 (UTC)
 * File:STQWho.jpg ([ delete] | talk | [ history] | links | [ logs]) – uploaded by Cyberia23 ( [ notify] | contribs | uploads | upload log).

Invalid FUR: Non-free content is used only if its presence would significantly increase readers' understanding of the topic, and its omission would be detrimental to that understanding. This image is not critical for understanding, but is used in a decorative fashion. Since this file does not greatly enhance understanding, nor will its omission greatly decrease understanding, it must be deleted. Cf. with several similar nominations here, here, and here (for instance). The burden of proof is on the uploader and keep !voters to show how this particular piece of media is meaningful for understanding the episode and how critical and sourced commentary is given in the article to provide context. —Justin ( koavf ) ❤T☮C☺M☯ 06:01, 31 July 2013 (UTC)
 * Keep, the visual impact of seeing the Enterprise dwarfed by the Borg cube, introduced in this episode, is integral to an understanding of the episode. The nominator's generic, boilerplate rationale (copied and pasted multiple times in this day's log for several different images) does not come close to rebutting this or discussing at all the informational relationship of this image to the article. postdlf (talk) 15:51, 31 July 2013 (UTC)
 * Response This image hardly even does what you're claiming though. If I granted that seeing a comparison of these two ships is integral to understanding (which I'm not), the other ship is mostly out of frame. —Justin ( koavf ) ❤T☮C☺M☯ 16:06, 31 July 2013 (UTC)
 * The other ship is so large it extends far beyond the frame that the Enterprise fits entirely within. That's part of the impact. postdlf (talk) 20:20, 31 July 2013 (UTC)
 * Keep The design of the Borg cube is distinct and the image helps to show the scale of the vessel. Simply describing it as "large" would not gain the same impact. Miyagawa (talk) 22:41, 31 July 2013 (UTC)
 * Keep What Miyagawa says is right. Without this image, one couldn't compare the size of the Borg ship relative to the size of the USS Enterprise unfortunately. --Leoboudv (talk) 07:44, 1 August 2013 (UTC)
 * DELETE or REPLACE under a different user. I want all the Star Trek images that I uploaded off Wikipedia so that I'm no longer attached to the image. Cyberia23 (talk) 22:17, 7 August 2013 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section.

File:ST-TNG Realm of Fear.jpg
<div class="boilerplate metadata vfd xfd-closed" style="background-color:#f3f9ff; margin:1em 0 0 0; padding:0 10px 0 10px; border:1px solid #aaa;">
 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the discussion was: Delete – Quadell (talk) 14:14, 8 August 2013 (UTC)
 * File:ST-TNG Realm of Fear.jpg ([ delete] | talk | [ history] | links | [ logs]) – uploaded by Cburnett ( [ notify] | contribs | uploads | upload log).

Invalid FUR: Non-free content is used only if its presence would significantly increase readers' understanding of the topic, and its omission would be detrimental to that understanding. This image is not critical for understanding, but is used in a decorative fashion. Since this file does not greatly enhance understanding, nor will its omission greatly decrease understanding, it must be deleted. Cf. with several similar nominations here, here, and here (for instance). The burden of proof is on the uploader and keep !voters to show how this particular piece of media is meaningful for understanding the episode and how critical and sourced commentary is given in the article to provide context. —Justin ( koavf ) ❤T☮C☺M☯ 06:04, 31 July 2013 (UTC)
 * Delete or Replace I think the "aliens" in this episode would need an image in order to understand them, but this particular image is pretty terrible as it just makes Barclay look like he has a funny extension on his arm. Miyagawa (talk) 22:42, 31 July 2013 (UTC)
 * Delete per Miyagawa; of very little informational value because it's mostly incoherent as a still frame out of context. Though I do think "Barclay gets a funny extension on his arm" was the plot of at least five different episodes. postdlf (talk) 03:14, 1 August 2013 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section.

File:ST-TNG Remember Me.jpg
<div class="boilerplate metadata vfd xfd-closed" style="background-color:#f3f9ff; margin:1em 0 0 0; padding:0 10px 0 10px; border:1px solid #aaa;">
 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the discussion was: Delete – Quadell (talk) 14:14, 8 August 2013 (UTC)
 * File:ST-TNG Remember Me.jpg ([ delete] | talk | [ history] | links | [ logs]) – uploaded by Cburnett ( [ notify] | contribs | uploads | upload log).

Invalid FUR: Non-free content is used only if its presence would significantly increase readers' understanding of the topic, and its omission would be detrimental to that understanding. This image is not critical for understanding, but is used in a decorative fashion. Since this file does not greatly enhance understanding, nor will its omission greatly decrease understanding, it must be deleted. Cf. with several similar nominations here, here, and here (for instance). The burden of proof is on the uploader and keep !voters to show how this particular piece of media is meaningful for understanding the episode and how critical and sourced commentary is given in the article to provide context. —Justin ( koavf ) ❤T☮C☺M☯ 06:05, 31 July 2013 (UTC)
 * Delete I think "Crusher is nearly sucked off her feet into a vortex" would cover it. Miyagawa (talk) 22:44, 31 July 2013 (UTC)
 * Delete on the nominator's reasons. --Artene50 (talk) 22:15, 3 August 2013 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section.

File:ST-TNG Redemption Part 2.jpg
<div class="boilerplate metadata vfd xfd-closed" style="background-color:#f3f9ff; margin:1em 0 0 0; padding:0 10px 0 10px; border:1px solid #aaa;">
 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the discussion was: Delete – Quadell (talk) 14:14, 8 August 2013 (UTC)
 * File:ST-TNG Redemption Part 2.jpg ([ delete] | talk | [ history] | links | [ logs]) – uploaded by Cburnett ( [ notify] | contribs | uploads | upload log).

Invalid FUR: Non-free content is used only if its presence would significantly increase readers' understanding of the topic, and its omission would be detrimental to that understanding. This image is not critical for understanding, but is used in a decorative fashion. Since this file does not greatly enhance understanding, nor will its omission greatly decrease understanding, it must be deleted. Cf. with several similar nominations here, here, and here (for instance). The burden of proof is on the uploader and keep !voters to show how this particular piece of media is meaningful for understanding the episode and how critical and sourced commentary is given in the article to provide context. —Justin ( koavf ) ❤T☮C☺M☯ 06:05, 31 July 2013 (UTC)
 * Delete This scene is very generic is of no plot or cultural significance. --Leoboudv (talk) 07:46, 1 August 2013 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section.

File:STReqMeth.jpg
<div class="boilerplate metadata vfd xfd-closed" style="background-color:#f3f9ff; margin:1em 0 0 0; padding:0 10px 0 10px; border:1px solid #aaa;">
 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the discussion was: Delete – Quadell (talk) 14:14, 8 August 2013 (UTC)
 * File:STReqMeth.jpg ([ delete] | talk | [ history] | links | [ logs]) – uploaded by Cyberia23 ( [ notify] | contribs | uploads | upload log).

Invalid FUR: Non-free content is used only if its presence would significantly increase readers' understanding of the topic, and its omission would be detrimental to that understanding. This image is not critical for understanding, but is used in a decorative fashion. Since this file does not greatly enhance understanding, nor will its omission greatly decrease understanding, it must be deleted. Cf. with several similar nominations here, here, and here (for instance). The burden of proof is on the uploader and keep !voters to show how this particular piece of media is meaningful for understanding the episode and how critical and sourced commentary is given in the article to provide context. —Justin ( koavf ) ❤T☮C☺M☯ 06:08, 31 July 2013 (UTC)
 * DELETE or REPLACE under a different user. I want all the Star Trek images that I uploaded off Wikipedia so that I'm no longer attached to the image. Cyberia23 (talk) 22:18, 7 August 2013 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Martymarchandsteiger.jpg
<div class="boilerplate metadata vfd xfd-closed" style="background-color:#f3f9ff; margin:1em 0 0 0; padding:0 10px 0 10px; border:1px solid #aaa;">
 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the discussion was: Consensus is to Keep the image. Diannaa (talk) 21:05, 9 September 2013 (UTC)
 * File:Martymarchandsteiger.jpg ([ delete] | talk | [ history] | links | [ logs]) – uploaded by Pepso2 ( [ notify] | contribs | uploads | upload log).

Invalid FUR: Non-free content is used only if its presence would significantly increase readers' understanding of the topic, and its omission would be detrimental to that understanding. This image is not critical for understanding, but is used in a decorative fashion. Since this file does not greatly enhance understanding, nor will its omission greatly decrease understanding, it must be deleted. Cf. with several similar nominations here, here, and here (for instance). The burden of proof is on the uploader and keep !voters to show how this particular piece of media is meaningful for understanding the episode and how critical and sourced commentary is given in the article to provide context. —Justin ( koavf ) ❤T☮C☺M☯ 06:17, 31 July 2013 (UTC)

Marty's "friends... insist that the girl is a homely loser not worth pursuing. The story hinges on whether he'll follow their advice or follow his own instincts to see her again." The photo is not "decorative". It shows the two actors who originated the roles, a key turning point in television history. Clara (Nancy Marchand) is labeled a "dog" by Marty's friends, and Marchand often portrayed unattractive women in her career. The photo certainly increases reader's understanding in that regard. Something was lost when the movie was made and an attractive actress (Betsy Blair) was cast as Clara. So both photos should stay for comparison purposes. Otherwise. the issues of male peer pressure and sexism intended by Chayefsky in the original teleplay become blurred and vanish into a memory hole. Pepso2 (talk) 18:31, 31 July 2013 (UTC)


 * Keep. The content of the screenshot is discussed in sourced text in the article body, in a couple different sections. ("...pining for the company of a woman in his life", "I didn't want my hero to be handsome, and I didn't want the girl to be pretty", "I want to do a play about a guy who goes to a ballroom", "Marty approaches her, and in their mutual misery they find a bond", etc.) – Quadell (talk) 14:19, 8 August 2013 (UTC)
 * Keep - Screencaps of television episodes are ipso facto relevant to articles about the episodes. One gains a better understanding of the episode simply by looking at the image. To state anything else is a form of extreme reductionism attacking fair use itself. Magog the Ogre (t • c) 16:28, 18 August 2013 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section.

File:The Mighty Casey.jpg
<div class="boilerplate metadata vfd xfd-closed" style="background-color:#f3f9ff; margin:1em 0 0 0; padding:0 10px 0 10px; border:1px solid #aaa;">
 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the discussion was: Delete – Quadell (talk) 14:25, 8 August 2013 (UTC)
 * File:The Mighty Casey.jpg ([ delete] | talk | [ history] | links | [ logs]) – uploaded by Shinerunner ( [ notify] | contribs | uploads | upload log).

Invalid FUR: Non-free content is used only if its presence would significantly increase readers' understanding of the topic, and its omission would be detrimental to that understanding. This image is not critical for understanding, but is used in a decorative fashion. Since this file does not greatly enhance understanding, nor will its omission greatly decrease understanding, it must be deleted. Cf. with several similar nominations here, here, and here (for instance). The burden of proof is on the uploader and keep !voters to show how this particular piece of media is meaningful for understanding the episode and how critical and sourced commentary is given in the article to provide context. —Justin ( koavf ) ❤T☮C☺M☯ 06:18, 31 July 2013 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section.

File:The Trouble With Templeton.jpg
<div class="boilerplate metadata vfd xfd-closed" style="background-color:#f3f9ff; margin:1em 0 0 0; padding:0 10px 0 10px; border:1px solid #aaa;">
 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the discussion was: Delete – Quadell (talk) 14:25, 8 August 2013 (UTC)
 * File:The Trouble With Templeton.jpg ([ delete] | talk | [ history] | links | [ logs]) – uploaded by Shinerunner ( [ notify] | contribs | uploads | upload log).

Invalid FUR: Non-free content is used only if its presence would significantly increase readers' understanding of the topic, and its omission would be detrimental to that understanding. This image is not critical for understanding, but is used in a decorative fashion. Since this file does not greatly enhance understanding, nor will its omission greatly decrease understanding, it must be deleted. Cf. with several similar nominations here, here, and here (for instance). The burden of proof is on the uploader and keep !voters to show how this particular piece of media is meaningful for understanding the episode and how critical and sourced commentary is given in the article to provide context. —Justin ( koavf ) ❤T☮C☺M☯ 06:18, 31 July 2013 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Underpantsgnomes1.jpg
<div class="boilerplate metadata vfd xfd-closed" style="background-color:#f3f9ff; margin:1em 0 0 0; padding:0 10px 0 10px; border:1px solid #aaa;">
 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the discussion was: Delete – Quadell (talk) 14:25, 8 August 2013 (UTC)
 * File:Underpantsgnomes1.jpg ([ delete] | talk | [ history] | links | [ logs]) – uploaded by SoSaysChappy ( [ notify] | contribs | uploads | upload log).

Invalid FUR: Non-free content is used only if its presence would significantly increase readers' understanding of the topic, and its omission would be detrimental to that understanding. This image is not critical for understanding, but is used in a decorative fashion. Since this file does not greatly enhance understanding, nor will its omission greatly decrease understanding, it must be deleted. Cf. with several similar nominations here, here, and here (for instance). The burden of proof is on the uploader and keep !voters to show how this particular piece of media is meaningful for understanding the episode and how critical and sourced commentary is given in the article to provide context. Some attempt is made at critical commentary but this image is still far from necessary for understanding the themes in the episode. —Justin ( koavf ) ❤T☮C☺M☯ 06:21, 31 July 2013 (UTC)


 * Keep This image is significant to the readers' understanding of how blatant propaganda is used in the episode for the advancement of the anti-corporate cause as opposed to actual valid arguments about why corporations are bad. This is certainly a significant theme of the episode which is quite conveniently well illustrated with this particular non-free screenshot. Therefore this non-free image has sufficient contextual significance to be kept. --Philpill691 (talk) 16:54, 3 August 2013 (UTC)
 * Delete Come on. It's an image of characters and a flag. Not possibly needed. <span style="font-family: Verdana, monospace;letter-spacing:1px;color:#ECCA61;padding-left:5px;">Beerest355 Talk 01:22, 7 August 2013 (UTC)
 * Delete, fails NFCC#1 and #8. Easily replaceable by a text description ("the children's disembodied faces are superimposed over an American flag"), and not an image that in and of itself communicates information that is significant to understanding the episode. postdlf (talk) 01:38, 7 August 2013 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Mr. Dingle the Strong.jpg
<div class="boilerplate metadata vfd xfd-closed" style="background-color:#f3f9ff; margin:1em 0 0 0; padding:0 10px 0 10px; border:1px solid #aaa;">
 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the discussion was: Delete – Quadell (talk) 14:25, 8 August 2013 (UTC)
 * File:Mr. Dingle the Strong.jpg ([ delete] | talk | [ history] | links | [ logs]) – uploaded by Shinerunner ( [ notify] | contribs | uploads | upload log).

Invalid FUR: Non-free content is used only if its presence would significantly increase readers' understanding of the topic, and its omission would be detrimental to that understanding. This image is not critical for understanding, but is used in a decorative fashion. Since this file does not greatly enhance understanding, nor will its omission greatly decrease understanding, it must be deleted. Cf. with several similar nominations here, here, and here (for instance). The burden of proof is on the uploader and keep !voters to show how this particular piece of media is meaningful for understanding the episode and how critical and sourced commentary is given in the article to provide context. —Justin ( koavf ) ❤T☮C☺M☯ 06:21, 31 July 2013 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section.

File:OnceMoreWithFeeling.jpg
<div class="boilerplate metadata vfd xfd-closed" style="background-color:#f3f9ff; margin:1em 0 0 0; padding:0 10px 0 10px; border:1px solid #aaa;">
 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the discussion was: Delete  Ron h jones  (Talk) 19:39, 3 October 2013 (UTC)
 * File:OnceMoreWithFeeling.jpg ([ delete] | talk | [ history] | links | [ logs]) – uploaded by Drovethrughosts ( [ notify] | contribs | uploads | upload log).

Invalid FUR: Non-free content is used only if its presence would significantly increase readers' understanding of the topic, and its omission would be detrimental to that understanding. This image is not critical for understanding, but is used in a decorative fashion. Since this file does not greatly enhance understanding, nor will its omission greatly decrease understanding, it must be deleted. Cf. with several similar nominations here, here, and here (for instance). The burden of proof is on the uploader and keep !voters to show how this particular piece of media is meaningful for understanding the episode and how critical and sourced commentary is given in the article to provide context. —Justin ( koavf ) ❤T☮C☺M☯ 06:21, 31 July 2013 (UTC)
 * Let's go nuts and actually discuss the content of the image and its relationship to the article, shall we? Title cards are usually taken for granted as being of identification value to articles about series, though we usually don't use them for individual episodes because most episodes don't have them. Another issue is that this particular screenshot is arguably geometrically simple to the point of being uncopyrightable, as it's just the text of the title overlaid across window blinds and curtains that have rendered abstractly as just a bunch of straight lines. postdlf (talk) 03:19, 1 August 2013 (UTC)
 * Delete Despite what postdlf says, this image is very much copyrightable. The text may be uncopyrightable, but the window blinds are. And come on... it's a title card. I can understand the article sans it. <span style="font-family: Verdana, monospace;letter-spacing:1px;color:#ECCA61;padding-left:5px;">Beerest355 Talk 22:23, 1 August 2013 (UTC)
 * Delete. I'm sympathetic to the idea that this image is not worthy of copyright protection, but I don't have any good reason to think a judge would agree. We have to assume this image is non-free. It's not discussed in the article at all, and so fails NFCC#8. – Quadell (talk) 14:29, 8 August 2013 (UTC)
 * Delete since the image fails one of the FUR criteria.--eh bien mon prince (talk) 21:50, 1 October 2013 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section.

File:South Park raisins scene.jpg
<div class="boilerplate vfd xfd-closed" style="background-color:#f3f9ff; margin:1em 0 0 0; padding:0 10px 0 10px; border:1px solid #aaa;">
 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the discussion was: Keep - it's borderline and decent compliance with NFCC#8 would have more about the parody of Hooters and Hooter girls but there is just enough to warrant retention.
 * File:South Park raisins scene.jpg ([ delete] | talk | [ history] | links | [ logs]) – uploaded by Sfufan2005 ( [ notify] | contribs | uploads | upload log).

Invalid FUR: Non-free content is used only if its presence would significantly increase readers' understanding of the topic, and its omission would be detrimental to that understanding. This image is not critical for understanding, but is used in a decorative fashion. Since this file does not greatly enhance understanding, nor will its omission greatly decrease understanding, it must be deleted. Cf. with several similar nominations here, here, and here (for instance). The burden of proof is on the uploader and keep !voters to show how this particular piece of media is meaningful for understanding the episode and how critical and sourced commentary is given in the article to provide context. —Justin ( koavf ) ❤T☮C☺M☯ 06:21, 31 July 2013 (UTC)
 * Keep, the image of the "Raisins" girl is integral to an understanding of the episode, operating both as a specific parody of Hooters and as a more general satire of the sexualization of girls. A text description isn't adequate to communicate that depiction. postdlf (talk) 02:36, 1 August 2013 (UTC)
 * Delete. I can't find any sourced statements at all in the article where the content of this screenshot is mentioned. – Quadell (talk) 14:33, 8 August 2013 (UTC)
 * Keep - Screencaps of television episodes are ipso facto relevant to articles about the episodes. One gains a better understanding of the episode simply by looking at the image. To state anything else is a form of extreme reductionism attacking fair use itself. Magog the Ogre (t • c) 16:29, 18 August 2013 (UTC)
 * Delete - Perhaps replace the image of some waitress and Butters with the exterior view image of the Raisins restaurant? --George Ho (talk) 20:41, 18 September 2013 (UTC)
 * That's not actually a deletion argument. postdlf (talk) 20:45, 18 September 2013 (UTC)
 * All right. Illustrating the preteen girl, especially one girl with Butters, isn't adequately covered by sources. The article mentions satirizing "Hooters", but not fully in context. --George Ho (talk) 08:07, 19 September 2013 (UTC)
 * ...and you think they were satirizing the exterior trade dress of a Hooters restaurant, not the waitresses? postdlf (talk) 13:17, 19 September 2013 (UTC)
 * No, no, no. I meant having an image of the restaurant's exterior view, i.e. the front view of "Raisins" outside. --George Ho (talk) 15:37, 19 September 2013 (UTC) Too redundant. --George Ho (talk) 17:38, 19 September 2013 (UTC)
 * I know that's what you meant. And I asked if you thought the point of the satire was the exterior look of the building rather than the sexualization of its waitresses. postdlf (talk) 16:34, 19 September 2013 (UTC)
 * The "Production" section doesn't mention the "sexualization" yet. It just says, "Hooters parody idea". Perhaps add more commentary details? --George Ho (talk) 17:38, 19 September 2013 (UTC)
 * Delete, including or excluding this image has no impact on the reader's understanding of this article.--eh bien mon prince (talk) 21:55, 1 October 2013 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Fat Butt and Pancake Head scene.jpg
<div class="boilerplate metadata vfd xfd-closed" style="background-color:#f3f9ff; margin:1em 0 0 0; padding:0 10px 0 10px; border:1px solid #aaa;">
 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the discussion was: Delete – Quadell (talk) 14:38, 8 August 2013 (UTC)
 * File:Fat Butt and Pancake Head scene.jpg ([ delete] | talk | [ history] | links | [ logs]) – uploaded by Skier Dude ( [ notify] | contribs | uploads | upload log).

Invalid FUR: Non-free content is used only if its presence would significantly increase readers' understanding of the topic, and its omission would be detrimental to that understanding. This image is not critical for understanding, but is used in a decorative fashion. Since this file does not greatly enhance understanding, nor will its omission greatly decrease understanding, it must be deleted. Cf. with several similar nominations here, here, and here (for instance). The burden of proof is on the uploader and keep !voters to show how this particular piece of media is meaningful for understanding the episode and how critical and sourced commentary is given in the article to provide context. —Justin ( koavf ) ❤T☮C☺M☯ 06:22, 31 July 2013 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section.

File:It&
<div class="boilerplate metadata vfd xfd-closed" style="background-color:#f3f9ff; margin:1em 0 0 0; padding:0 10px 0 10px; border:1px solid #aaa;">
 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the discussion was: Delete – Quadell (talk) 14:38, 8 August 2013 (UTC)
 * File:It& ([ delete] | talk | [ history] | links | [ logs]) – uploaded by Timmay! ( [ notify] | contribs | uploads | upload log).

Invalid FUR: Non-free content is used only if its presence would significantly increase readers' understanding of the topic, and its omission would be detrimental to that understanding. This image is not critical for understanding, but is used in a decorative fashion. Since this file does not greatly enhance understanding, nor will its omission greatly decrease understanding, it must be deleted. Cf. with several similar nominations here, here, and here (for instance). The burden of proof is on the uploader and keep !voters to show how this particular piece of media is meaningful for understanding the episode and how critical and sourced commentary is given in the article to provide context. —Justin ( koavf ) ❤T☮C☺M☯ 06:23, 31 July 2013 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section.

File:B5 Infection.png
<div class="boilerplate metadata vfd xfd-closed" style="background-color:#f3f9ff; margin:1em 0 0 0; padding:0 10px 0 10px; border:1px solid #aaa;">
 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the discussion was: Delete – Quadell (talk) 14:38, 8 August 2013 (UTC)
 * File:B5 Infection.png ([ delete] | talk | [ history] | links | [ logs]) – uploaded by Dablueeagle ( [ notify] | contribs | uploads | upload log).

Invalid FUR: Non-free content is used only if its presence would significantly increase readers' understanding of the topic, and its omission would be detrimental to that understanding. This image is not critical for understanding, but is used in a decorative fashion. Since this file does not greatly enhance understanding, nor will its omission greatly decrease understanding, it must be deleted. Cf. with several similar nominations here, here, and here (for instance). The burden of proof is on the uploader and keep !voters to show how this particular piece of media is meaningful for understanding the episode and how critical and sourced commentary is given in the article to provide context. —Justin ( koavf ) ❤T☮C☺M☯ 06:23, 31 July 2013 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section.

File:ST-TNG The Neutral Zone.jpg
<div class="boilerplate metadata vfd xfd-closed" style="background-color:#f3f9ff; margin:1em 0 0 0; padding:0 10px 0 10px; border:1px solid #aaa;">
 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the discussion was: Keep – Quadell (talk) 14:41, 8 August 2013 (UTC)
 * File:ST-TNG The Neutral Zone.jpg ([ delete] | talk | [ history] | links | [ logs]) – uploaded by Eladkse ( [ notify] | contribs | uploads | upload log).

Invalid FUR: Non-free content is used only if its presence would significantly increase readers' understanding of the topic, and its omission would be detrimental to that understanding. This image is not critical for understanding, but is used in a decorative fashion. Since this file does not greatly enhance understanding, nor will its omission greatly decrease understanding, it must be deleted. Cf. with several similar nominations here, here, and here (for instance). The burden of proof is on the uploader and keep !voters to show how this particular piece of media is meaningful for understanding the episode and how critical and sourced commentary is given in the article to provide context. —Justin ( koavf ) ❤T☮C☺M☯ 06:23, 31 July 2013 (UTC)
 * Keep This is an image showing the first appearance of the redesign of the Romulans and helps the reader to understand the descriptive information already contained within the article. Miyagawa (talk) 22:46, 31 July 2013 (UTC)
 * Keep per Miyagawa. There is substantial sourced commentary in the article on the development of the Next Gen look for the Romulans, and the reintroduction of that character race was a significant development in the franchise as a whole and the most important fact about this episode. The nominator's completely boilerplate rationale doesn't comment on any of this; really all of these should be speedy closed for lack of demonstrated reasoning. postdlf (talk) 02:43, 1 August 2013 (UTC)
 * Keep This season 1 episode was the first true appearance of the Romulans in the new Star Trek Next Generation franchise of the 1980's. So, its important to see how they were visually introduced into this TV series in the first place, I think. --Leoboudv (talk) 08:33, 8 August 2013 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section.

File:By Any Means Necessary.jpg
<div class="boilerplate metadata vfd xfd-closed" style="background-color:#f3f9ff; margin:1em 0 0 0; padding:0 10px 0 10px; border:1px solid #aaa;">
 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the discussion was: Delete – Quadell (talk) 17:36, 8 August 2013 (UTC)
 * File:By Any Means Necessary.jpg ([ delete] | talk | [ history] | links | [ logs]) – uploaded by EurekaLott ( [ notify] | contribs | uploads | upload log).

Invalid FUR: Non-free content is used only if its presence would significantly increase readers' understanding of the topic, and its omission would be detrimental to that understanding. This image is not critical for understanding, but is used in a decorative fashion. Since this file does not greatly enhance understanding, nor will its omission greatly decrease understanding, it must be deleted. Cf. with several similar nominations here, here, and here (for instance). The burden of proof is on the uploader and keep !voters to show how this particular piece of media is meaningful for understanding the episode and how critical and sourced commentary is given in the article to provide context. —Justin ( koavf ) ❤T☮C☺M☯ 06:24, 31 July 2013 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section.

File:B5 Soul Hunter 1.jpg
<div class="boilerplate metadata vfd xfd-closed" style="background-color:#f3f9ff; margin:1em 0 0 0; padding:0 10px 0 10px; border:1px solid #aaa;">
 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the discussion was: Delete – Quadell (talk) 17:37, 8 August 2013 (UTC)
 * File:B5 Soul Hunter 1.jpg ([ delete] | talk | [ history] | links | [ logs]) – uploaded by Julianonions ( [ notify] | contribs | uploads | upload log).

Invalid FUR: Non-free content is used only if its presence would significantly increase readers' understanding of the topic, and its omission would be detrimental to that understanding. This image is not critical for understanding, but is used in a decorative fashion. Since this file does not greatly enhance understanding, nor will its omission greatly decrease understanding, it must be deleted. Cf. with several similar nominations here, here, and here (for instance). The burden of proof is on the uploader and keep !voters to show how this particular piece of media is meaningful for understanding the episode and how critical and sourced commentary is given in the article to provide context. —Justin ( koavf ) ❤T☮C☺M☯ 06:24, 31 July 2013 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Spaceghost1.jpg
<div class="boilerplate vfd xfd-closed" style="background-color:#f3f9ff; margin:1em 0 0 0; padding:0 10px 0 10px; border:1px solid #aaa;">
 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the discussion was: Delete fails NFCC#8 - no context on inclusion. Deleted by
 * File:Spaceghost1.jpg ([ delete] | talk | [ history] | links | [ logs]) – uploaded by Dondello ( [ notify] | contribs | uploads | upload log).

Invalid FUR: Non-free content is used only if its presence would significantly increase readers' understanding of the topic, and its omission would be detrimental to that understanding. This image is not critical for understanding, but is used in a decorative fashion. Since this file does not greatly enhance understanding, nor will its omission greatly decrease understanding, it must be deleted. Cf. with several similar nominations here, here, and here (for instance). The burden of proof is on the uploader and keep !voters to show how this particular piece of media is meaningful for understanding the episode and how critical and sourced commentary is given in the article to provide context. —Justin ( koavf ) ❤T☮C☺M☯ 06:35, 31 July 2013 (UTC)
 * Keep, the image of Space Ghost at his talk show host desk is the bulk of what Space Ghost Coast to Coast was about (and really most of the content); if anything, the promotional image in the article's infobox should instead be deleted instead as far less informative to a reader, as it doesn't actually depict the show itself or its setting, but rather an illustration of some of the characters completely out of context and in a different visual style. postdlf (talk) 02:48, 1 August 2013 (UTC)
 * Delete, the content of the screenshot is not mentioned in sourced text in either article. – Quadell (talk) 17:38, 8 August 2013 (UTC)
 * Delete, as used in the current version the image is purely decorative and deleting it would have no impact on the article's quality.--eh bien mon prince (talk) 21:58, 1 October 2013 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section.

File:STReturnTomorrow.jpg
<div class="boilerplate metadata vfd xfd-closed" style="background-color:#f3f9ff; margin:1em 0 0 0; padding:0 10px 0 10px; border:1px solid #aaa;">
 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted as G7 by – Quadell (talk) 17:40, 8 August 2013 (UTC)
 * File:STReturnTomorrow.jpg ([ delete] | talk | [ history] | links | [ logs]) – uploaded by Cyberia23 ( [ notify] | contribs | uploads | upload log).

Invalid FUR: Non-free content is used only if its presence would significantly increase readers' understanding of the topic, and its omission would be detrimental to that understanding. This image is not critical for understanding, but is used in a decorative fashion. Since this file does not greatly enhance understanding, nor will its omission greatly decrease understanding, it must be deleted. Cf. with several similar nominations here, here, and here (for instance). The burden of proof is on the uploader and keep !voters to show how this particular piece of media is meaningful for understanding the episode and how critical and sourced commentary is given in the article to provide context. —Justin ( koavf ) ❤T☮C☺M☯ 09:01, 31 July 2013 (UTC)
 * DELETE or REPLACE under a different user. I want all the Star Trek images that I uploaded off Wikipedia so that I'm no longer attached to the image. Cyberia23 (talk) 22:19, 7 August 2013 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section.

File:ST-TNG Reunion.jpg
<div class="boilerplate metadata vfd xfd-closed" style="background-color:#f3f9ff; margin:1em 0 0 0; padding:0 10px 0 10px; border:1px solid #aaa;">
 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the discussion was: Delete – Quadell (talk) 17:44, 8 August 2013 (UTC)
 * File:ST-TNG Reunion.jpg ([ delete] | talk | [ history] | links | [ logs]) – uploaded by Cburnett ( [ notify] | contribs | uploads | upload log).

Invalid FUR: Non-free content is used only if its presence would significantly increase readers' understanding of the topic, and its omission would be detrimental to that understanding. This image is not critical for understanding, but is used in a decorative fashion. Since this file does not greatly enhance understanding, nor will its omission greatly decrease understanding, it must be deleted. Cf. with several similar nominations here, here, and here (for instance). The burden of proof is on the uploader and keep !voters to show how this particular piece of media is meaningful for understanding the episode and how critical and sourced commentary is given in the article to provide context. —Justin ( koavf ) ❤T☮C☺M☯ 09:01, 31 July 2013 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section.

File:ST-TNG Rightful Heir.jpg
<div class="boilerplate metadata vfd xfd-closed" style="background-color:#f3f9ff; margin:1em 0 0 0; padding:0 10px 0 10px; border:1px solid #aaa;">
 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the discussion was: Delete – Quadell (talk) 17:44, 8 August 2013 (UTC)
 * File:ST-TNG Rightful Heir.jpg ([ delete] | talk | [ history] | links | [ logs]) – uploaded by Cburnett ( [ notify] | contribs | uploads | upload log).

Invalid FUR: Non-free content is used only if its presence would significantly increase readers' understanding of the topic, and its omission would be detrimental to that understanding. This image is not critical for understanding, but is used in a decorative fashion. Since this file does not greatly enhance understanding, nor will its omission greatly decrease understanding, it must be deleted. Cf. with several similar nominations here, here, and here (for instance). The burden of proof is on the uploader and keep !voters to show how this particular piece of media is meaningful for understanding the episode and how critical and sourced commentary is given in the article to provide context. —Justin ( koavf ) ❤T☮C☺M☯ 09:01, 31 July 2013 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section.

File:USS Majestic hit.jpg
<div class="boilerplate metadata vfd xfd-closed" style="background-color:#f3f9ff; margin:1em 0 0 0; padding:0 10px 0 10px; border:1px solid #aaa;">
 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the discussion was: Delete – Quadell (talk) 17:44, 8 August 2013 (UTC)
 * File:USS Majestic hit.jpg ([ delete] | talk | [ history] | links | [ logs]) – uploaded by Rob.derosa ( [ notify] | contribs | uploads | upload log).

Invalid FUR: Non-free content is used only if its presence would significantly increase readers' understanding of the topic, and its omission would be detrimental to that understanding. This image is not critical for understanding, but is used in a decorative fashion. Since this file does not greatly enhance understanding, nor will its omission greatly decrease understanding, it must be deleted. Cf. with several similar nominations here, here, and here (for instance). The burden of proof is on the uploader and keep !voters to show how this particular piece of media is meaningful for understanding the episode and how critical and sourced commentary is given in the article to provide context. —Justin ( koavf ) ❤T☮C☺M☯ 09:02, 31 July 2013 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section.

File:ST-TNG Sarek.jpg
<div class="boilerplate metadata vfd xfd-closed" style="background-color:#f3f9ff; margin:1em 0 0 0; padding:0 10px 0 10px; border:1px solid #aaa;">
 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the discussion was: Delete – Quadell (talk) 17:44, 8 August 2013 (UTC)
 * File:ST-TNG Sarek.jpg ([ delete] | talk | [ history] | links | [ logs]) – uploaded by Cburnett ( [ notify] | contribs | uploads | upload log).

Invalid FUR: Non-free content is used only if its presence would significantly increase readers' understanding of the topic, and its omission would be detrimental to that understanding. This image is not critical for understanding, but is used in a decorative fashion. Since this file does not greatly enhance understanding, nor will its omission greatly decrease understanding, it must be deleted. Cf. with several similar nominations here, here, and here (for instance). The burden of proof is on the uploader and keep !voters to show how this particular piece of media is meaningful for understanding the episode and how critical and sourced commentary is given in the article to provide context. —Justin ( koavf ) ❤T☮C☺M☯ 09:02, 31 July 2013 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section.

File:ST-TNG Schisms.jpg
<div class="boilerplate metadata vfd xfd-closed" style="background-color:#f3f9ff; margin:1em 0 0 0; padding:0 10px 0 10px; border:1px solid #aaa;">
 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the discussion was: Delete – Quadell (talk) 17:44, 8 August 2013 (UTC)
 * File:ST-TNG Schisms.jpg ([ delete] | talk | [ history] | links | [ logs]) – uploaded by Cburnett ( [ notify] | contribs | uploads | upload log).

Invalid FUR: Non-free content is used only if its presence would significantly increase readers' understanding of the topic, and its omission would be detrimental to that understanding. This image is not critical for understanding, but is used in a decorative fashion. Since this file does not greatly enhance understanding, nor will its omission greatly decrease understanding, it must be deleted. Cf. with several similar nominations here, here, and here (for instance). The burden of proof is on the uploader and keep !voters to show how this particular piece of media is meaningful for understanding the episode and how critical and sourced commentary is given in the article to provide context. —Justin ( koavf ) ❤T☮C☺M☯ 09:02, 31 July 2013 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Rurigan.jpg
<div class="boilerplate metadata vfd xfd-closed" style="background-color:#f3f9ff; margin:1em 0 0 0; padding:0 10px 0 10px; border:1px solid #aaa;">
 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the discussion was: Delete – Quadell (talk) 17:44, 8 August 2013 (UTC)
 * File:Rurigan.jpg ([ delete] | talk | [ history] | links | [ logs]) – uploaded by Rockfang ( [ notify] | contribs | uploads | upload log).

Invalid FUR: Non-free content is used only if its presence would significantly increase readers' understanding of the topic, and its omission would be detrimental to that understanding. This image is not critical for understanding, but is used in a decorative fashion. Since this file does not greatly enhance understanding, nor will its omission greatly decrease understanding, it must be deleted. Cf. with several similar nominations here, here, and here (for instance). The burden of proof is on the uploader and keep !voters to show how this particular piece of media is meaningful for understanding the episode and how critical and sourced commentary is given in the article to provide context. —Justin ( koavf ) ❤T☮C☺M☯ 09:08, 31 July 2013 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Enterprise - S2E01 - Shockwave, Part 2.jpg
<div class="boilerplate metadata vfd xfd-closed" style="background-color:#f3f9ff; margin:1em 0 0 0; padding:0 10px 0 10px; border:1px solid #aaa;">
 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the discussion was: Delete – Quadell (talk) 17:45, 8 August 2013 (UTC)
 * File:Enterprise - S2E01 - Shockwave, Part 2.jpg ([ delete] | talk | [ history] | links | [ logs]) – uploaded by Snorbaard ( [ notify] | contribs | uploads | upload log).

Invalid FUR: Non-free content is used only if its presence would significantly increase readers' understanding of the topic, and its omission would be detrimental to that understanding. This image is not critical for understanding, but is used in a decorative fashion. Since this file does not greatly enhance understanding, nor will its omission greatly decrease understanding, it must be deleted. Cf. with several similar nominations here, here, and here (for instance). The burden of proof is on the uploader and keep !voters to show how this particular piece of media is meaningful for understanding the episode and how critical and sourced commentary is given in the article to provide context. —Justin ( koavf ) ❤T☮C☺M☯ 09:08, 31 July 2013 (UTC)
 * Delete Appears to be illustrative, and does not relate to anything specific in the plot or article. Miyagawa (talk) 22:47, 31 July 2013 (UTC)
 * Delete as the nominator's reason's are correct. --Artene50 (talk) 22:06, 3 August 2013 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section.

File:ST-TNG Ship in a Bottle.jpg
<div class="boilerplate metadata vfd xfd-closed" style="background-color:#f3f9ff; margin:1em 0 0 0; padding:0 10px 0 10px; border:1px solid #aaa;">
 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the discussion was: Delete – Quadell (talk) 17:46, 8 August 2013 (UTC)
 * File:ST-TNG Ship in a Bottle.jpg ([ delete] | talk | [ history] | links | [ logs]) – uploaded by Cburnett ( [ notify] | contribs | uploads | upload log).

Invalid FUR: Non-free content is used only if its presence would significantly increase readers' understanding of the topic, and its omission would be detrimental to that understanding. This image is not critical for understanding, but is used in a decorative fashion. Since this file does not greatly enhance understanding, nor will its omission greatly decrease understanding, it must be deleted. Cf. with several similar nominations here, here, and here (for instance). The burden of proof is on the uploader and keep !voters to show how this particular piece of media is meaningful for understanding the episode and how critical and sourced commentary is given in the article to provide context. —Justin ( koavf ) ❤T☮C☺M☯ 09:08, 31 July 2013 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section.

File:STShoreLeave.jpg
<div class="boilerplate metadata vfd xfd-closed" style="background-color:#f3f9ff; margin:1em 0 0 0; padding:0 10px 0 10px; border:1px solid #aaa;">
 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted as G7 by – Quadell (talk) 17:31, 8 August 2013 (UTC)
 * File:STShoreLeave.jpg ([ delete] | talk | [ history] | links | [ logs]) – uploaded by Cyberia23 ( [ notify] | contribs | uploads | upload log).

Invalid FUR: Non-free content is used only if its presence would significantly increase readers' understanding of the topic, and its omission would be detrimental to that understanding. This image is not critical for understanding, but is used in a decorative fashion. Since this file does not greatly enhance understanding, nor will its omission greatly decrease understanding, it must be deleted. Cf. with several similar nominations here, here, and here (for instance). The burden of proof is on the uploader and keep !voters to show how this particular piece of media is meaningful for understanding the episode and how critical and sourced commentary is given in the article to provide context. —Justin ( koavf ) ❤T☮C☺M☯ 09:09, 31 July 2013 (UTC)
 * DELETE or REPLACE under a different user. I want all the Star Trek images that I uploaded off Wikipedia so that I'm no longer attached to the image. Cyberia23 (talk) 22:19, 7 August 2013 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section.

File:ST-TNG Silicon Avatar.jpg
<div class="boilerplate vfd xfd-closed" style="background-color:#f3f9ff; margin:1em 0 0 0; padding:0 10px 0 10px; border:1px solid #aaa;">
 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the discussion was: Keep. Another borderline case and I sympathise with those who find it hard to write a description but somebody should give it a go to provide a greater contextual significance to this image.
 * File:ST-TNG Silicon Avatar.jpg ([ delete] | talk | [ history] | links | [ logs]) – uploaded by Cburnett ( [ notify] | contribs | uploads | upload log).

Invalid FUR: Non-free content is used only if its presence would significantly increase readers' understanding of the topic, and its omission would be detrimental to that understanding. This image is not critical for understanding, but is used in a decorative fashion. Since this file does not greatly enhance understanding, nor will its omission greatly decrease understanding, it must be deleted. Cf. with several similar nominations here, here, and here (for instance). The burden of proof is on the uploader and keep !voters to show how this particular piece of media is meaningful for understanding the episode and how critical and sourced commentary is given in the article to provide context. —Justin ( koavf ) ❤T☮C☺M☯ 09:09, 31 July 2013 (UTC)
 * Keep The Crystalline Entity is pretty hard to describe in text. It comes off sounding like a solid crystal to someone who isn't already familiar with the episode in question, which isn't accurate. Therefore I would say to keep on that basis. Miyagawa (talk) 22:49, 31 July 2013 (UTC)
 * Keep per Miyagawa; omitting a visual depiction of the Crystalline Entity, a unique entity in the Star Trek franchise (if not all of TV sci-fi), would be a detriment to a reader's understanding of an article about an episode focused on that entity. postdlf (talk) 03:24, 1 August 2013 (UTC)
 * Keep I could not describe the Crystalline Entity in textual prose. We need an image of this unique entity for this episode. --Artene50 (talk) 22:04, 3 August 2013 (UTC)
 * Delete, the content of the screenshot is not mentioned in sourced statements in the article body. If the image is important, then this has to be shown in the text. (If that's added, then the image should be kept.) – Quadell (talk) 17:29, 8 August 2013 (UTC)
 * Keep - Screencaps of television episodes are ipso facto relevant to articles about the episodes. One gains a better understanding of the episode simply by looking at the image. To state anything else is a form of extreme reductionism attacking fair use itself. Magog the Ogre (t • c) 16:29, 18 August 2013 (UTC)
 * Keep I added a clearer context for the screencap although I admit there are visually better images of this entity. --Leoboudv (talk) 06:03, 21 August 2013 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Similitude (ENT episode).jpg
<div class="boilerplate metadata vfd xfd-closed" style="background-color:#f3f9ff; margin:1em 0 0 0; padding:0 10px 0 10px; border:1px solid #aaa;">
 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the discussion was: Delete – Quadell (talk) 17:28, 8 August 2013 (UTC)
 * File:Similitude (ENT episode).jpg ([ delete] | talk | [ history] | links | [ logs]) – uploaded by とある白い猫 ( [ notify] | contribs | uploads | upload log).

Invalid FUR: Non-free content is used only if its presence would significantly increase readers' understanding of the topic, and its omission would be detrimental to that understanding. This image is not critical for understanding, but is used in a decorative fashion. Since this file does not greatly enhance understanding, nor will its omission greatly decrease understanding, it must be deleted. Cf. with several similar nominations here, here, and here (for instance). The burden of proof is on the uploader and keep !voters to show how this particular piece of media is meaningful for understanding the episode and how critical and sourced commentary is given in the article to provide context. —Justin ( koavf ) ❤T☮C☺M☯ 09:10, 31 July 2013 (UTC)
 * Delete It isn't even an intrinsic part of the episode really. Miyagawa (talk) 22:50, 31 July 2013 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Enterprise - S2E09 - Singularity.jpg
<div class="boilerplate metadata vfd xfd-closed" style="background-color:#f3f9ff; margin:1em 0 0 0; padding:0 10px 0 10px; border:1px solid #aaa;">
 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the discussion was: Delete – Quadell (talk) 17:28, 8 August 2013 (UTC)
 * File:Enterprise - S2E09 - Singularity.jpg ([ delete] | talk | [ history] | links | [ logs]) – uploaded by Snorbaard ( [ notify] | contribs | uploads | upload log).

Invalid FUR: Non-free content is used only if its presence would significantly increase readers' understanding of the topic, and its omission would be detrimental to that understanding. This image is not critical for understanding, but is used in a decorative fashion. Since this file does not greatly enhance understanding, nor will its omission greatly decrease understanding, it must be deleted. Cf. with several similar nominations here, here, and here (for instance). The burden of proof is on the uploader and keep !voters to show how this particular piece of media is meaningful for understanding the episode and how critical and sourced commentary is given in the article to provide context. —Justin ( koavf ) ❤T☮C☺M☯ 09:10, 31 July 2013 (UTC)
 * Delete Appears to be just a shot of a cast member in costume - we actually have a free use image of that particular actor... and in costume too. So delete. Miyagawa (talk) 22:50, 31 July 2013 (UTC)
 * Delete per Miyagawa; generic screenshot of the characters not illustrating anything significant to the specific episode/article. postdlf (talk) 03:25, 1 August 2013 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section.

File:ST-TNG Sins of the Father.jpg
<div class="boilerplate metadata vfd xfd-closed" style="background-color:#f3f9ff; margin:1em 0 0 0; padding:0 10px 0 10px; border:1px solid #aaa;">
 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the discussion was: Delete – Quadell (talk) 17:28, 8 August 2013 (UTC)
 * File:ST-TNG Sins of the Father.jpg ([ delete] | talk | [ history] | links | [ logs]) – uploaded by Artene50 ( [ notify] | contribs | uploads | upload log).

Invalid FUR: Non-free content is used only if its presence would significantly increase readers' understanding of the topic, and its omission would be detrimental to that understanding. This image is not critical for understanding, but is used in a decorative fashion. Since this file does not greatly enhance understanding, nor will its omission greatly decrease understanding, it must be deleted. Cf. with several similar nominations here, here, and here (for instance). The burden of proof is on the uploader and keep !voters to show how this particular piece of media is meaningful for understanding the episode and how critical and sourced commentary is given in the article to provide context. —Justin ( koavf ) ❤T☮C☺M☯ 09:10, 31 July 2013 (UTC)
 * Delete This was uploaded by me in good faith but the image was a bit unclear. Delete if you wish. --Artene50 (talk) 21:58, 3 August 2013 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section.

File:ST-TNG Skin of Evil.jpg
<div class="boilerplate metadata vfd xfd-closed" style="background-color:#f3f9ff; margin:1em 0 0 0; padding:0 10px 0 10px; border:1px solid #aaa;">
 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the discussion was: Keep – Quadell (talk) 17:25, 8 August 2013 (UTC)
 * File:ST-TNG Skin of Evil.jpg ([ delete] | talk | [ history] | links | [ logs]) – uploaded by Eladkse ( [ notify] | contribs | uploads | upload log).

Recreation of deleted content. Also, invalid FUR. —Justin ( koavf ) ❤T☮C☺M☯ 09:11, 31 July 2013 (UTC)
 * Keep: This is a different image to the one deleted per this discussion. The old image, that was deleted for failing NFCC#8, was a rather generic image of Yar. In it's stead, I proposed an number of images of the tar-like creature, on the basis that it would give the reader an understanding of what the creature looks like - and would help illustrate this section of the article. While I received little feedback on this, I decided to upload this particular shot because of the inclusion of Riker - showing the relative size of the creature to the human characters (per the given FUR: Depicts Riker confronting Armus - a creature formed from an animated pool of a tar-like substance. Provides illustration to the section of the article discussing the special effects used for the creature). Eladkse (talk) 11:53, 31 July 2013 (UTC)


 * Keep per Eladkse. Additionally, it would be difficult to describe the creature in text. What is a person covered in black tar. Just how much tar? Also, based on the description of how they did the effect in the article it really gives the reader a sense of what the poor stunt guy had to go through. Miyagawa (talk) 22:52, 31 July 2013 (UTC)
 * Keep per Eladkse and Miyagawa; of great significance to the article and clearly not replaceable by a text description. postdlf (talk) 03:26, 1 August 2013 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section.

File:STSpaceSeed.jpg
<div class="boilerplate metadata vfd xfd-closed" style="background-color:#f3f9ff; margin:1em 0 0 0; padding:0 10px 0 10px; border:1px solid #aaa;">
 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted as G7 by – Quadell (talk) 15:14, 8 August 2013 (UTC)
 * File:STSpaceSeed.jpg ([ delete] | talk | [ history] | links | [ logs]) – uploaded by Cyberia23 ( [ notify] | contribs | uploads | upload log).

Invalid FUR: Non-free content is used only if its presence would significantly increase readers' understanding of the topic, and its omission would be detrimental to that understanding. This image is not critical for understanding, but is used in a decorative fashion. Since this file does not greatly enhance understanding, nor will its omission greatly decrease understanding, it must be deleted. Cf. with several similar nominations here, here, and here (for instance). The burden of proof is on the uploader and keep !voters to show how this particular piece of media is meaningful for understanding the episode and how critical and sourced commentary is given in the article to provide context. —Justin ( koavf ) ❤T☮C☺M☯ 09:13, 31 July 2013 (UTC)
 * Keep, the Khan character is one of the most significant in the Star Trek franchise, but this depiction is unique to the Space Seed episode. Khan did not appear in any other ST episode, and the film depiction in Star Trek II looks completely different, both for plot reasons changing the costume and the actor being 15 years older. And Khan is what the episode Space Seed is about. His dominance of the female crew member, smitten with the handsome and exotic superman, is also a key plot point (see, for example, the extensive critique of it here as being a weak point of the episode; the critic also mentions Montalban's "intensity" in the role, which the screenshot also goes some length to show). postdlf (talk) 03:36, 1 August 2013 (UTC)
 * DELETE or REPLACE under a different user. I want all the Star Trek images that I uploaded off Wikipedia so that I'm no longer attached to the image. Cyberia23 (talk) 22:20, 7 August 2013 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section.

File:STSpectreGun.jpg
<div class="boilerplate metadata vfd xfd-closed" style="background-color:#f3f9ff; margin:1em 0 0 0; padding:0 10px 0 10px; border:1px solid #aaa;">
 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted as G7 by – Quadell (talk) 15:15, 8 August 2013 (UTC)
 * File:STSpectreGun.jpg ([ delete] | talk | [ history] | links | [ logs]) – uploaded by Cyberia23 ( [ notify] | contribs | uploads | upload log).

Invalid FUR: Non-free content is used only if its presence would significantly increase readers' understanding of the topic, and its omission would be detrimental to that understanding. This image is not critical for understanding, but is used in a decorative fashion. Since this file does not greatly enhance understanding, nor will its omission greatly decrease understanding, it must be deleted. Cf. with several similar nominations here, here, and here (for instance). The burden of proof is on the uploader and keep !voters to show how this particular piece of media is meaningful for understanding the episode and how critical and sourced commentary is given in the article to provide context. —Justin ( koavf ) ❤T☮C☺M☯ 09:17, 31 July 2013 (UTC)
 * Delete Literally a line up of the main cast that could be from almost any episode. Miyagawa (talk) 22:53, 31 July 2013 (UTC)
 * Delete per Miyagawa. There are plenty of great screenshots from this episode that would satisfy NFCC, for example to show the deliberately incomplete and abstract Western-genre set design. This is not one of them. postdlf (talk) 03:43, 1 August 2013 (UTC)
 * DELETE or REPLACE under a different user. I want all the Star Trek images that I uploaded off Wikipedia so that I'm no longer attached to the image. Cyberia23 (talk) 22:21, 7 August 2013 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section.

File:STSpocksBrain.jpg
<div class="boilerplate metadata vfd xfd-closed" style="background-color:#f3f9ff; margin:1em 0 0 0; padding:0 10px 0 10px; border:1px solid #aaa;">
 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted as G7 by – Quadell (talk) 15:15, 8 August 2013 (UTC)
 * File:STSpocksBrain.jpg ([ delete] | talk | [ history] | links | [ logs]) – uploaded by Cyberia23 ( [ notify] | contribs | uploads | upload log).

Invalid FUR: Non-free content is used only if its presence would significantly increase readers' understanding of the topic, and its omission would be detrimental to that understanding. This image is not critical for understanding, but is used in a decorative fashion. Since this file does not greatly enhance understanding, nor will its omission greatly decrease understanding, it must be deleted. Cf. with several similar nominations here, here, and here (for instance). The burden of proof is on the uploader and keep !voters to show how this particular piece of media is meaningful for understanding the episode and how critical and sourced commentary is given in the article to provide context. —Justin ( koavf ) ❤T☮C☺M☯ 09:18, 31 July 2013 (UTC)
 * Keep, the defining image for this episode, which significantly aids a reader's understanding by identifying the episode and showing the silly setup of brainless Spock blankly staring with little remote controls on his temples. postdlf (talk) 03:46, 1 August 2013 (UTC)
 * DELETE or REPLACE under a different user. I want all the Star Trek images that I uploaded off Wikipedia so that I'm no longer attached to the image. Cyberia23 (talk) 22:21, 7 August 2013 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section.

File:ST-TNG Starship Mine.jpg
<div class="boilerplate metadata vfd xfd-closed" style="background-color:#f3f9ff; margin:1em 0 0 0; padding:0 10px 0 10px; border:1px solid #aaa;">
 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the discussion was: Delete – Quadell (talk) 15:13, 8 August 2013 (UTC)
 * File:ST-TNG Starship Mine.jpg ([ delete] | talk | [ history] | links | [ logs]) – uploaded by Cburnett ( [ notify] | contribs | uploads | upload log).

Invalid FUR: Non-free content is used only if its presence would significantly increase readers' understanding of the topic, and its omission would be detrimental to that understanding. This image is not critical for understanding, but is used in a decorative fashion. Since this file does not greatly enhance understanding, nor will its omission greatly decrease understanding, it must be deleted. Cf. with several similar nominations here, here, and here (for instance). The burden of proof is on the uploader and keep !voters to show how this particular piece of media is meaningful for understanding the episode and how critical and sourced commentary is given in the article to provide context. —Justin ( koavf ) ❤T☮C☺M☯ 09:19, 31 July 2013 (UTC)
 * Delete Image doesn't tell anything about the show and is not notable. --Artene50 (talk) 22:01, 3 August 2013 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section.

File:ENTstigma.jpg
<div class="boilerplate metadata vfd xfd-closed" style="background-color:#f3f9ff; margin:1em 0 0 0; padding:0 10px 0 10px; border:1px solid #aaa;">
 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the discussion was: Delete – Quadell (talk) 15:12, 8 August 2013 (UTC)
 * File:ENTstigma.jpg ([ delete] | talk | [ history] | links | [ logs]) – uploaded by (aeropagitica) ( [ notify] | contribs | uploads | upload log).

Invalid FUR: Non-free content is used only if its presence would significantly increase readers' understanding of the topic, and its omission would be detrimental to that understanding. This image is not critical for understanding, but is used in a decorative fashion. Since this file does not greatly enhance understanding, nor will its omission greatly decrease understanding, it must be deleted. Cf. with several similar nominations here, here, and here (for instance). The burden of proof is on the uploader and keep !voters to show how this particular piece of media is meaningful for understanding the episode and how critical and sourced commentary is given in the article to provide context. —Justin ( koavf ) ❤T☮C☺M☯ 09:27, 31 July 2013 (UTC)
 * Delete Just a shot of two cast members in costume. Miyagawa (talk) 22:54, 31 July 2013 (UTC)
 * Delete per Miyagawa; adds nothing informative to the episode's article. postdlf (talk) 03:47, 1 August 2013 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Storm Front (Part I).jpg
<div class="boilerplate metadata vfd xfd-closed" style="background-color:#f3f9ff; margin:1em 0 0 0; padding:0 10px 0 10px; border:1px solid #aaa;">
 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the discussion was: Delete – Quadell (talk) 15:12, 8 August 2013 (UTC)
 * File:Storm Front (Part I).jpg ([ delete] | talk | [ history] | links | [ logs]) – uploaded by とある白い猫 ( [ notify] | contribs | uploads | upload log).

Invalid FUR: Non-free content is used only if its presence would significantly increase readers' understanding of the topic, and its omission would be detrimental to that understanding. This image is not critical for understanding, but is used in a decorative fashion. Since this file does not greatly enhance understanding, nor will its omission greatly decrease understanding, it must be deleted. Cf. with several similar nominations here, here, and here (for instance). The burden of proof is on the uploader and keep !voters to show how this particular piece of media is meaningful for understanding the episode and how critical and sourced commentary is given in the article to provide context. —Justin ( koavf ) ❤T☮C☺M☯ 09:28, 31 July 2013 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Storm Front (Part II).jpg
<div class="boilerplate metadata vfd xfd-closed" style="background-color:#f3f9ff; margin:1em 0 0 0; padding:0 10px 0 10px; border:1px solid #aaa;">
 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the discussion was: Delete – Quadell (talk) 15:12, 8 August 2013 (UTC)
 * File:Storm Front (Part II).jpg ([ delete] | talk | [ history] | links | [ logs]) – uploaded by とある白い猫 ( [ notify] | contribs | uploads | upload log).

Invalid FUR: Non-free content is used only if its presence would significantly increase readers' understanding of the topic, and its omission would be detrimental to that understanding. This image is not critical for understanding, but is used in a decorative fashion. Since this file does not greatly enhance understanding, nor will its omission greatly decrease understanding, it must be deleted. Cf. with several similar nominations here, here, and here (for instance). The burden of proof is on the uploader and keep !voters to show how this particular piece of media is meaningful for understanding the episode and how critical and sourced commentary is given in the article to provide context. —Justin ( koavf ) ❤T☮C☺M☯ 09:28, 31 July 2013 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Stratagem (ENT episode).jpg
<div class="boilerplate metadata vfd xfd-closed" style="background-color:#f3f9ff; margin:1em 0 0 0; padding:0 10px 0 10px; border:1px solid #aaa;">
 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the discussion was: Delete – Quadell (talk) 15:12, 8 August 2013 (UTC)
 * File:Stratagem (ENT episode).jpg ([ delete] | talk | [ history] | links | [ logs]) – uploaded by とある白い猫 ( [ notify] | contribs | uploads | upload log).

Invalid FUR: Non-free content is used only if its presence would significantly increase readers' understanding of the topic, and its omission would be detrimental to that understanding. This image is not critical for understanding, but is used in a decorative fashion. Since this file does not greatly enhance understanding, nor will its omission greatly decrease understanding, it must be deleted. Cf. with several similar nominations here, here, and here (for instance). The burden of proof is on the uploader and keep !voters to show how this particular piece of media is meaningful for understanding the episode and how critical and sourced commentary is given in the article to provide context. —Justin ( koavf ) ❤T☮C☺M☯ 09:28, 31 July 2013 (UTC)
 * Delete I think it'd be fairly easy to describe Scott Bakula wearing a bad wig. In fact, that would probably be the description. Miyagawa (talk) 22:55, 31 July 2013 (UTC)
 * Delete per Miyagawa in my favorite comment of the day. postdlf (talk) 03:47, 1 August 2013 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section.

File:ST-TNG Sub Rosa.jpg
<div class="boilerplate metadata vfd xfd-closed" style="background-color:#f3f9ff; margin:1em 0 0 0; padding:0 10px 0 10px; border:1px solid #aaa;">
 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the discussion was: Delete – Quadell (talk) 15:09, 8 August 2013 (UTC)
 * File:ST-TNG Sub Rosa.jpg ([ delete] | talk | [ history] | links | [ logs]) – uploaded by Cburnett ( [ notify] | contribs | uploads | upload log).

Invalid FUR: Non-free content is used only if its presence would significantly increase readers' understanding of the topic, and its omission would be detrimental to that understanding. This image is not critical for understanding, but is used in a decorative fashion. Since this file does not greatly enhance understanding, nor will its omission greatly decrease understanding, it must be deleted. Cf. with several similar nominations here, here, and here (for instance). The burden of proof is on the uploader and keep !voters to show how this particular piece of media is meaningful for understanding the episode and how critical and sourced commentary is given in the article to provide context. —Justin ( koavf ) ❤T☮C☺M☯ 09:29, 31 July 2013 (UTC)
 * Delete Nothing that couldn't be explained easily by text alone. Miyagawa (talk) 22:56, 31 July 2013 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section.

File:ST-TNG Suddenly Human.jpg
<div class="boilerplate metadata vfd xfd-closed" style="background-color:#f3f9ff; margin:1em 0 0 0; padding:0 10px 0 10px; border:1px solid #aaa;">
 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the discussion was: Delete – Quadell (talk) 15:09, 8 August 2013 (UTC)
 * File:ST-TNG Suddenly Human.jpg ([ delete] | talk | [ history] | links | [ logs]) – uploaded by Cburnett ( [ notify] | contribs | uploads | upload log).

Invalid FUR: Non-free content is used only if its presence would significantly increase readers' understanding of the topic, and its omission would be detrimental to that understanding. This image is not critical for understanding, but is used in a decorative fashion. Since this file does not greatly enhance understanding, nor will its omission greatly decrease understanding, it must be deleted. Cf. with several similar nominations here, here, and here (for instance). The burden of proof is on the uploader and keep !voters to show how this particular piece of media is meaningful for understanding the episode and how critical and sourced commentary is given in the article to provide context. —Justin ( koavf ) ❤T☮C☺M☯ 09:29, 31 July 2013 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section.

File:ST-TNG Suspicions.jpg
<div class="boilerplate metadata vfd xfd-closed" style="background-color:#f3f9ff; margin:1em 0 0 0; padding:0 10px 0 10px; border:1px solid #aaa;">
 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the discussion was: Delete – Quadell (talk) 15:09, 8 August 2013 (UTC)
 * File:ST-TNG Suspicions.jpg ([ delete] | talk | [ history] | links | [ logs]) – uploaded by RoyBoy ( [ notify] | contribs | uploads | upload log).

Invalid FUR: Non-free content is used only if its presence would significantly increase readers' understanding of the topic, and its omission would be detrimental to that understanding. This image is not critical for understanding, but is used in a decorative fashion. Since this file does not greatly enhance understanding, nor will its omission greatly decrease understanding, it must be deleted. Cf. with several similar nominations here, here, and here (for instance). The burden of proof is on the uploader and keep !voters to show how this particular piece of media is meaningful for understanding the episode and how critical and sourced commentary is given in the article to provide context. —Justin ( koavf ) ❤T☮C☺M☯ 09:30, 31 July 2013 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section.

File:ST-TNG Tapestry.jpg
<div class="boilerplate vfd xfd-closed" style="background-color:#f3f9ff; margin:1em 0 0 0; padding:0 10px 0 10px; border:1px solid #aaa;">
 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the discussion was: Keep but really needs more sourced commentary to fully justify inclusion.
 * File:ST-TNG Tapestry.jpg ([ delete] | talk | [ history] | links | [ logs]) – uploaded by Cburnett ( [ notify] | contribs | uploads | upload log).

Invalid FUR: Non-free content is used only if its presence would significantly increase readers' understanding of the topic, and its omission would be detrimental to that understanding. This image is not critical for understanding, but is used in a decorative fashion. Since this file does not greatly enhance understanding, nor will its omission greatly decrease understanding, it must be deleted. Cf. with several similar nominations here, here, and here (for instance). The burden of proof is on the uploader and keep !voters to show how this particular piece of media is meaningful for understanding the episode and how critical and sourced commentary is given in the article to provide context. —Justin ( koavf ) ❤T☮C☺M☯ 09:32, 31 July 2013 (UTC)
 * Borderline Keep I'm only saying this because it is the only episode where any of the TNG cast wear the movie era costumes. Plus, the costuming was deliberate to ensure that the blood splatter was visible on the red costume by pulling open the front flap. It wouldn't be impossible to describe in text but it would take half a paragraph to do it justice, especially with Picard's reaction to being stabbed. It would increase understanding of the scene more simply than text alone. Miyagawa (talk) 22:58, 31 July 2013 (UTC)
 * Keep per Miyagawa; the dramatic impact of the action of this scene, Picard's wound, and the expression on his face could not be adequately conveyed by text. postdlf (talk) 03:49, 1 August 2013 (UTC)
 * Delete, nothing in this screenshot is described by sourced commentary in the article. – Quadell (talk) 15:07, 8 August 2013 (UTC)
 * Keep - Screencaps of television episodes are ipso facto relevant to articles about the episodes. One gains a better understanding of the episode simply by looking at the image. To state anything else is a form of extreme reductionism attacking fair use itself. What's more, this is most important screenshot from the episode, and one of the most iconic of the entire ST:TNG franchise. Magog the Ogre (t • c) 16:31, 18 August 2013 (UTC)
 * Delete, there is no exception for episode screencaps in the FUR. The image is undeniably not critical for understanding the article.--eh bien mon prince (talk) 22:02, 1 October 2013 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section.

File:STThtWhchSurv.jpg
<div class="boilerplate metadata vfd xfd-closed" style="background-color:#f3f9ff; margin:1em 0 0 0; padding:0 10px 0 10px; border:1px solid #aaa;">
 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted as G7 by – Quadell (talk) 15:05, 8 August 2013 (UTC)
 * File:STThtWhchSurv.jpg ([ delete] | talk | [ history] | links | [ logs]) – uploaded by Cyberia23 ( [ notify] | contribs | uploads | upload log).

Invalid FUR: Non-free content is used only if its presence would significantly increase readers' understanding of the topic, and its omission would be detrimental to that understanding. This image is not critical for understanding, but is used in a decorative fashion. Since this file does not greatly enhance understanding, nor will its omission greatly decrease understanding, it must be deleted. Cf. with several similar nominations here, here, and here (for instance). The burden of proof is on the uploader and keep !voters to show how this particular piece of media is meaningful for understanding the episode and how critical and sourced commentary is given in the article to provide context. —Justin ( koavf ) ❤T☮C☺M☯ 09:33, 31 July 2013 (UTC)
 * Keep, the episode is about an alien computer projecting a woman killer, finally projecting three duplicates; the oddness of this scenario and how it is portrayed, and the specifics of the woman's and computer's appearances are significant to a reader's understanding of the episode, and help the reader identify the episode better than any other image from it could. postdlf (talk) 02:57, 1 August 2013 (UTC)
 * DELETE or REPLACE under a different user. I want all the Star Trek images that I uploaded off Wikipedia so that I'm no longer attached to the image. Cyberia23 (talk) 22:22, 7 August 2013 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section.

File:The Aenar (ENT episode).jpg
<div class="boilerplate metadata vfd xfd-closed" style="background-color:#f3f9ff; margin:1em 0 0 0; padding:0 10px 0 10px; border:1px solid #aaa;">
 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the discussion was: Delete – Quadell (talk) 14:56, 8 August 2013 (UTC)
 * File:The Aenar (ENT episode).jpg ([ delete] | talk | [ history] | links | [ logs]) – uploaded by とある白い猫 ( [ notify] | contribs | uploads | upload log).

Invalid FUR: Non-free content is used only if its presence would significantly increase readers' understanding of the topic, and its omission would be detrimental to that understanding. This image is not critical for understanding, but is used in a decorative fashion. Since this file does not greatly enhance understanding, nor will its omission greatly decrease understanding, it must be deleted. Cf. with several similar nominations here, here, and here (for instance). The burden of proof is on the uploader and keep !voters to show how this particular piece of media is meaningful for understanding the episode and how critical and sourced commentary is given in the article to provide context. —Justin ( koavf ) ❤T☮C☺M☯ 09:35, 31 July 2013 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section.

File:STAltFactor.jpg
<div class="boilerplate metadata vfd xfd-closed" style="background-color:#f3f9ff; margin:1em 0 0 0; padding:0 10px 0 10px; border:1px solid #aaa;">
 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted as G7 by – Quadell (talk) 14:54, 8 August 2013 (UTC)
 * File:STAltFactor.jpg ([ delete] | talk | [ history] | links | [ logs]) – uploaded by Cyberia23 ( [ notify] | contribs | uploads | upload log).

Invalid FUR: Non-free content is used only if its presence would significantly increase readers' understanding of the topic, and its omission would be detrimental to that understanding. This image is not critical for understanding, but is used in a decorative fashion. Since this file does not greatly enhance understanding, nor will its omission greatly decrease understanding, it must be deleted. Cf. with several similar nominations here, here, and here (for instance). The burden of proof is on the uploader and keep !voters to show how this particular piece of media is meaningful for understanding the episode and how critical and sourced commentary is given in the article to provide context. —Justin ( koavf ) ❤T☮C☺M☯ 09:38, 31 July 2013 (UTC)
 * DELETE or REPLACE under a different user. I want all the Star Trek images that I uploaded off Wikipedia so that I'm no longer attached to the image. Cyberia23 (talk) 22:22, 7 August 2013 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section.

File:STTheApple.jpg
<div class="boilerplate metadata vfd xfd-closed" style="background-color:#f3f9ff; margin:1em 0 0 0; padding:0 10px 0 10px; border:1px solid #aaa;">
 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted as G7 by – Quadell (talk) 14:48, 8 August 2013 (UTC)
 * File:STTheApple.jpg ([ delete] | talk | [ history] | links | [ logs]) – uploaded by Cyberia23 ( [ notify] | contribs | uploads | upload log).

Invalid FUR: Non-free content is used only if its presence would significantly increase readers' understanding of the topic, and its omission would be detrimental to that understanding. This image is not critical for understanding, but is used in a decorative fashion. Since this file does not greatly enhance understanding, nor will its omission greatly decrease understanding, it must be deleted. Cf. with several similar nominations here, here, and here (for instance). The burden of proof is on the uploader and keep !voters to show how this particular piece of media is meaningful for understanding the episode and how critical and sourced commentary is given in the article to provide context. —Justin ( koavf ) ❤T☮C☺M☯ 09:39, 31 July 2013 (UTC)
 * Keep, a reader seeing "Vaal"'s depiction within the episode significantly increases their understanding of the article's topic, as it's what the episode is about and the design is unique to this thing and episode. postdlf (talk) 21:03, 31 July 2013 (UTC)
 * DELETE or REPLACE under a different user. I want all the Star Trek images that I uploaded off Wikipedia so that I'm no longer attached to the image. Cyberia23 (talk) 22:22, 7 August 2013 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section.

File:The Augments (ENT episode).jpg
<div class="boilerplate metadata vfd xfd-closed" style="background-color:#f3f9ff; margin:1em 0 0 0; padding:0 10px 0 10px; border:1px solid #aaa;">
 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the discussion was: Delete – Quadell (talk) 14:53, 8 August 2013 (UTC)
 * File:The Augments (ENT episode).jpg ([ delete] | talk | [ history] | links | [ logs]) – uploaded by とある白い猫 ( [ notify] | contribs | uploads | upload log).

Invalid FUR: Non-free content is used only if its presence would significantly increase readers' understanding of the topic, and its omission would be detrimental to that understanding. This image is not critical for understanding, but is used in a decorative fashion. Since this file does not greatly enhance understanding, nor will its omission greatly decrease understanding, it must be deleted. Cf. with several similar nominations here, here, and here (for instance). The burden of proof is on the uploader and keep !voters to show how this particular piece of media is meaningful for understanding the episode and how critical and sourced commentary is given in the article to provide context. —Justin ( koavf ) ❤T☮C☺M☯ 09:40, 31 July 2013 (UTC)
 * Delete per NFCC#8; the only relevant information this image includes particular to this episode is Brent Spiner playing yet another character in the Soong line of ancestry, but you can barely see him so it's effectively worthless. A screenshot (or crop of one) with a closeup of Spiner as Arik Soong would be much better. postdlf (talk) 02:53, 1 August 2013 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Cube.jpg
<div class="boilerplate vfd xfd-closed" style="background-color:#f3f9ff; margin:1em 0 0 0; padding:0 10px 0 10px; border:1px solid #aaa;">
 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the discussion was: Delete Like a lot of ST images there is a lack of sourced contextual information. Without something to explain why this is a significant image, it fails NFCC#8. Deleted by
 * File:Cube.jpg ([ delete] | talk | [ history] | links | [ logs]) – uploaded by Acegikmo1 ( [ notify] | contribs | uploads | upload log).

Invalid FUR: Non-free content is used only if its presence would significantly increase readers' understanding of the topic, and its omission would be detrimental to that understanding. This image is not critical for understanding, but is used in a decorative fashion. Since this file does not greatly enhance understanding, nor will its omission greatly decrease understanding, it must be deleted. Cf. with several similar nominations here, here, and here (for instance). The burden of proof is on the uploader and keep !voters to show how this particular piece of media is meaningful for understanding the episode and how critical and sourced commentary is given in the article to provide context. —Justin ( koavf ) ❤T☮C☺M☯ 09:42, 31 July 2013 (UTC)
 * There might be a better screenshot from this episode, but given that this is used in an episode in which the Enterprise confronts a Borg ship, showing that ship is pretty significant to a reader's understanding of the article. So keep pending a better screenshot being identified. postdlf (talk) 21:01, 31 July 2013 (UTC)
 * Delete. I can't find any sourced statements in the article that describe anything in this screenshot. – Quadell (talk) 14:52, 8 August 2013 (UTC)
 * Keep - Screencaps of television episodes are ipso facto relevant to articles about the episodes. One gains a better understanding of the episode simply by looking at the image. To state anything else is a form of extreme reductionism attacking fair use itself. What's more, this is probably the most important screenshot from the episode. Magog the Ogre (t • c) 16:32, 18 August 2013 (UTC)
 * Keep, for reasons analogous to the consensus to keep File:ST-TNG The Big Goodbye.jpg in the discussion below. The image succinctly conveys the main thrust of the plot of the episodes-- a confrontation between the Enterprise and a Borg cube. I suppose you could argue that a screenshot of Locutus or something might be a bit more iconic, but it'd also be more inscrutable to somebody who's not already familiar with the episode. --Lost tiree, lost dutch :O (talk) 01:33, 21 September 2013 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section.

File:ST-TNG The Big Goodbye.jpg
<div class="boilerplate metadata vfd xfd-closed" style="background-color:#f3f9ff; margin:1em 0 0 0; padding:0 10px 0 10px; border:1px solid #aaa;">
 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the discussion was: Keep – Quadell (talk) 14:50, 8 August 2013 (UTC)
 * File:ST-TNG The Big Goodbye.jpg ([ delete] | talk | [ history] | links | [ logs]) – uploaded by Sage Veritas ( [ notify] | contribs | uploads | upload log).

Invalid FUR: Non-free content is used only if its presence would significantly increase readers' understanding of the topic, and its omission would be detrimental to that understanding. This image is not critical for understanding, but is used in a decorative fashion. Since this file does not greatly enhance understanding, nor will its omission greatly decrease understanding, it must be deleted. Cf. with several similar nominations here, here, and here (for instance). The burden of proof is on the uploader and keep !voters to show how this particular piece of media is meaningful for understanding the episode and how critical and sourced commentary is given in the article to provide context. —Justin ( koavf ) ❤T☮C☺M☯ 09:45, 31 July 2013 (UTC)
 * Keep, the image of the main cast in 1940s period garb, in a 1940s period set, with the high tech holodeck portal opened behind them (note also the starship's corridor extending in the distance through what looks like a solid building), is really a fabulous one for this episode that immediately encapsulates the plot and setting. This significantly increases readers' understanding of the topic and how the holodeck is depicted in a way that a mere text description cannot. postdlf (talk) 20:56, 31 July 2013 (UTC)
 * Keep I had removed the previous image on this article myself, but the new one is marvellous and really helps the reader to understand the concept of the holodeck and how it interacts with the rest of the ship which is intrinsic to the plot itself. Miyagawa (talk) 23:00, 31 July 2013 (UTC)
 * Keep When I see this image of the holodeck portal, I understand the plot much more compared to the previous junk image version on this image file. --Leoboudv (talk) 09:32, 4 August 2013 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section.

File:STTheCage.jpg
<div class="boilerplate metadata vfd xfd-closed" style="background-color:#f3f9ff; margin:1em 0 0 0; padding:0 10px 0 10px; border:1px solid #aaa;">
 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted as G7 by – Quadell (talk) 14:47, 8 August 2013 (UTC)
 * File:STTheCage.jpg ([ delete] | talk | [ history] | links | [ logs]) – uploaded by Cyberia23 ( [ notify] | contribs | uploads | upload log).

Invalid FUR: Non-free content is used only if its presence would significantly increase readers' understanding of the topic, and its omission would be detrimental to that understanding. This image is not critical for understanding, but is used in a decorative fashion. Since this file does not greatly enhance understanding, nor will its omission greatly decrease understanding, it must be deleted. Cf. with several similar nominations here, here, and here (for instance). The burden of proof is on the uploader and keep !voters to show how this particular piece of media is meaningful for understanding the episode and how critical and sourced commentary is given in the article to provide context. —Justin ( koavf ) ❤T☮C☺M☯ 09:50, 31 July 2013 (UTC)
 * Keep, the image depicts the episode's antagonists, who are obviously integral to the article's topic, and are a specific alien design such that seeing them significantly increases readers' understanding. postdlf (talk) 20:53, 31 July 2013 (UTC)
 * DELETE or REPLACE under a different user. I want all the Star Trek images that I uploaded off Wikipedia so that I'm no longer attached to the image. Cyberia23 (talk) 22:23, 7 August 2013 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section.

File:ENTcatwalk.jpg
<div class="boilerplate metadata vfd xfd-closed" style="background-color:#f3f9ff; margin:1em 0 0 0; padding:0 10px 0 10px; border:1px solid #aaa;">
 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the discussion was: Delete – Quadell (talk) 14:49, 8 August 2013 (UTC)
 * File:ENTcatwalk.jpg ([ delete] | talk | [ history] | links | [ logs]) – uploaded by (aeropagitica) ( [ notify] | contribs | uploads | upload log).

Invalid FUR: Non-free content is used only if its presence would significantly increase readers' understanding of the topic, and its omission would be detrimental to that understanding. This image is not critical for understanding, but is used in a decorative fashion. Since this file does not greatly enhance understanding, nor will its omission greatly decrease understanding, it must be deleted. Cf. with several similar nominations here, here, and here (for instance). The burden of proof is on the uploader and keep !voters to show how this particular piece of media is meaningful for understanding the episode and how critical and sourced commentary is given in the article to provide context. —Justin ( koavf ) ❤T☮C☺M☯ 09:50, 31 July 2013 (UTC)
 * Delete per NFCC#8; the image merely portrays two of the main cast standing next to each other rather than anything particular to this episode. There may be a screenshot for this episode that would better illustrate a key plot point or event, but this is not it. postdlf (talk) 20:50, 31 July 2013 (UTC)
 * Delete I can't see how it adds anything at all to the article. Miyagawa (talk) 23:00, 31 July 2013 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section.

File:STChangeling.jpg
<div class="boilerplate metadata vfd xfd-closed" style="background-color:#f3f9ff; margin:1em 0 0 0; padding:0 10px 0 10px; border:1px solid #aaa;">
 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted as G7 by – Quadell (talk) 14:46, 8 August 2013 (UTC)
 * File:STChangeling.jpg ([ delete] | talk | [ history] | links | [ logs]) – uploaded by Cyberia23 ( [ notify] | contribs | uploads | upload log).

Invalid FUR: Non-free content is used only if its presence would significantly increase readers' understanding of the topic, and its omission would be detrimental to that understanding. This image is not critical for understanding, but is used in a decorative fashion. Since this file does not greatly enhance understanding, nor will its omission greatly decrease understanding, it must be deleted. Cf. with several similar nominations here, here, and here (for instance). The burden of proof is on the uploader and keep !voters to show how this particular piece of media is meaningful for understanding the episode and how critical and sourced commentary is given in the article to provide context. —Justin ( koavf ) ❤T☮C☺M☯ 09:51, 31 July 2013 (UTC)
 * Keep, the image depicts what the episode is about: Kirk confronting a robotic probe. Certainly seeing the specially created prop robot that is the main subject of the episode the article is about significantly increases readers' understanding. postdlf (talk) 20:48, 31 July 2013 (UTC)
 * Strong keep The image clearly depicts what the episode is about: Nomad the changeling which threatens the safety of the USS Enterprise and its crew. Its very difficult to even give a description of this object. A square and cylindrial object with an antenna? How would this make sense--compared to a single photo? Its not even a regular shaped cylinder. --Leoboudv (talk) 09:37, 4 August 2013 (UTC)
 * DELETE or REPLACE under a different user. I want all the Star Trek images that I uploaded off Wikipedia so that I'm no longer attached to the image. Cyberia23 (talk) 22:11, 7 August 2013 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Letters to God.jpg
<div class="boilerplate metadata vfd xfd-closed" style="background-color:#f3f9ff; margin:1em 0 0 0; padding:0 10px 0 10px; border:1px solid #aaa;">
 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the discussion was: Delete – Quadell (talk) 14:44, 8 August 2013 (UTC)
 * File:Letters to God.jpg ([ delete] | talk | [ history] | links | [ logs]) – uploaded by American Eagle ( [ notify] | contribs | uploads | upload log).

Now redundant to File:Letters to God poster.jpg, the official theatrical release poster. Michaelzeng7 (talk) 15:02, 31 July 2013 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section.

File:NCC1017.jpg
<div class="boilerplate metadata vfd xfd-closed" style="background-color:#f3f9ff; margin:1em 0 0 0; padding:0 10px 0 10px; border:1px solid #aaa;">
 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the discussion was: Delete – Quadell (talk) 14:43, 8 August 2013 (UTC)
 * File:NCC1017.jpg ([ delete] | talk | [ history] | links | [ logs]) – uploaded by Paterakis ( [ notify] | contribs | uploads | upload log).

Invalid FUR. In general the remastering of this episode was discussed in the article but it was unsourced and it's still not clear that this particular still is explaining anything that text can't adequately describe were it sourced. —Justin ( koavf ) ❤T☮C☺M☯ 19:40, 31 July 2013 (UTC)
 * Delete for inadequate NFUR, which claims it's to identify the episode in The Doomsday Machine (Star Trek: The Original Series) but it is poorly chosen for that purpose (and a much better one is already in the article). The image of a wrecked Federation starship with a breached saucer hull is not one specific to this episode or even otherwise uncommon in the franchise. More important, the screenshot is not from the original and most familiar broadcast version of the episode, but instead from a decades-later remastered version (and the article does not discuss the remaster at all). The article infobox already has the best image, of the Enterprise confronting the gaping maw of an enormous planet killing machine, for identifying the episode and its main subject. postdlf (talk) 20:33, 31 July 2013 (UTC)
 * Delete per Postdlf - the infobox image is the important one here. Miyagawa (talk) 23:01, 31 July 2013 (UTC)
 * Delete This image is not needed for this episode. The first image in the article infobox is the pertinent one. --Leoboudv (talk) 08:35, 8 August 2013 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Morgan Dowell.gif
<div class="boilerplate metadata vfd xfd-closed" style="background-color:#f3f9ff; margin:1em 0 0 0; padding:0 10px 0 10px; border:1px solid #aaa;">
 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the discussion was: Delete – Quadell (talk) 14:43, 8 August 2013 (UTC)
 * File:Morgan Dowell.gif ([ delete] | talk | [ history] | links | [ logs]) – uploaded by Mjdowell ( [ notify] | contribs | uploads | upload log).

Unused personal image, article it was uploaded for was deleted as an A7. January ( talk ) 21:01, 31 July 2013 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section.