Wikipedia:Files for deletion/2013 May 2



File:DavidMartirosyan1.jpg

 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  18:11, 10 May 2013 (UTC)
 * File:DavidMartirosyan1.jpg ([ delete] | talk | [ history] | links | [ logs]) – uploaded by DavidMarty ( [ notify] | contribs | uploads | upload log).

Orphan photo of non-notable amateur filmmaker -- Тимофей ЛееСуда . 01:23, 2 May 2013 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section.

File:View of Jesse N.jpg

 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted as G3 by AnomieBOT ⚡  02:02, 3 May 2013 (UTC)
 * File:View of Jesse N.jpg ([ delete] | talk | [ history] | links | [ logs]) – uploaded by Hrincon83 ( [ notify] | contribs | uploads | upload log).

This file was uploaded solely to be used to vandalize Culture in this edit]. Deli nk (talk) 15:49, 2 May 2013 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section.

File:JR Expert.jpg

 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted as G3 by AnomieBOT ⚡  02:02, 3 May 2013 (UTC)
 * File:JR Expert.jpg ([ delete] | talk | [ history] | links | [ logs]) – uploaded by Hrincon83 ( [ notify] | contribs | uploads | upload log).

This file was uploaded solely to be used to vandalize Health insurance in this edit. Deli nk (talk) 15:50, 2 May 2013 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Moses Anderson.jpg

 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  18:11, 10 May 2013 (UTC)
 * File:Moses Anderson.jpg ([ delete] | talk | [ history] | links | [ logs]) – uploaded by Slowking4 ( [ notify] | contribs | uploads | upload log).

Photo of a prolific public figure who died in 2012 being used under a claim of fair use. There are photos of him on Flickr and you could reach out to some of those uploaders and ask if they would change their license for us. You could email the Archdiocese of Detroit and ask if they would provide a photo under an acceptable license. There are numerous avenues for obtaining a free image and it's absurd to say this isn't replaceable. B (talk) 21:29, 2 May 2013 (UTC)
 * Comment would you mind uploading one of those Flickr images, so you can claim this as redundant to a free image? -- 65.94.76.126 (talk) 05:55, 3 May 2013 (UTC)
 * I have made this point repeatedly and I'll say it one more time for good measure. Say I email one of the flickr users (which I have done before and been successful before).  We're going to call him Bob:
 * "Dear Bob, you have a great photo of Moses Anderson. I am an editor on the English Wikipedia and we would like to use your photo if you would permit us to do so.  For Wikipedia's licensing needs, the flickr license would need to be CC-BY or CC-BY-SA.  Would you be willing to change your license?  Thank you, sincerely, Mr. B."
 * "Dear Mr. B. It looks like Moses Anderson already has a nice photo.  What's wrong with the one you have?"
 * "Well, it's non-free and we would prefer a free one."
 * "Okay, you can use mine. I won't charge anything."
 * "No, I'm sorry. I'm referring to free as in speech, not free as in soda.  Please see free content.  Wikipedia only accepts images where the copyright holder explicitly permits commercial reuse and derivative works."
 * "But you're using the one you have now without that stuff."
 * "Right - we're using it under a claim of fair use. We'd prefer to not do that."
 * "Why don't you just use mine under a claim of fair use?"
 * "Well, we prefer free ones."
 * "Why should I change my license and let anyone on the planet use my photo when you're perfectly content to use one without me doing that? Get lost and never contact me again."
 * Having a "non-free" image all but eliminates our chances of getting someone to provide us with one under an acceptable license. Nobody anywhere is going to understand why they should let us use their image under a free license when we are perfectly content to use some other image without one.  Fair use is fine when there's just absolutely no chance we could ever get anything else - but if the person was a reasonably public figure in the digital camera age, then we ought to exhaust other avenues first. --B (talk) 23:02, 3 May 2013 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Institut auf dem Rosenberg, Campus Birds Eye.gif.png

 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the discussion was: Deleted under CSD#F7 (replaceable image). Deleted by
 * File:Institut auf dem Rosenberg, Campus Birds Eye.gif.png ([ delete] | talk | [ history] | links | [ logs]) – uploaded by LKK343 ( [ notify] | contribs | uploads | upload log).

Invalid reason for fair use. A free image could be obtained by photographing the campus. Fails WP:NFCC -- Тимофей ЛееСуда . 22:34, 2 May 2013 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Institut auf dem Rosenberg, Campus in Winter.png

 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the discussion was: Deleted under CSD#F7 (replaceable image). Deleted by
 * File:Institut auf dem Rosenberg, Campus in Winter.png ([ delete] | talk | [ history] | links | [ logs]) – uploaded by LKK343 ( [ notify] | contribs | uploads | upload log).

Invalid reason for fair use. A free image could be obtained by photographing the campus.Fails WP:NFCC -- Тимофей ЛееСуда . 22:35, 2 May 2013 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Institut auf dem Rosenberg, Main Building.jpg

 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the discussion was: Deleted under CSD#F7 (replaceable image). Deleted by
 * File:Institut auf dem Rosenberg, Main Building.jpg ([ delete] | talk | [ history] | links | [ logs]) – uploaded by LKK343 ( [ notify] | contribs | uploads | upload log).

Invalid reason for fair use. A free image could be obtained by photographing the campus.Fails WP:NFCC -- Тимофей ЛееСуда . 22:36, 2 May 2013 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section.