Wikipedia:Files for deletion/2013 May 23



File:ST-TNG Captain&

 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  09:08, 9 July 2013 (UTC)
 * File:ST-TNG Captain& ([ delete] | talk | [ history] | links | [ logs]) – uploaded by Cburnett ( [ notify] | contribs | uploads | upload log).

Invalid FUR: Non-free content is used only if its presence would significantly increase readers' understanding of the topic, and its omission would be detrimental to that understanding. This image is not critical for understanding, but is used in a decorative fashion. Since this file does not greatly enhance understanding, nor will its omission greatly decrease understanding, it must be deleted. —Justin ( koavf ) ❤T☮C☺M☯ 00:26, 23 May 2013 (UTC)
 * Keep All It's covered by fair use law.[//www.intellectbooks.co.uk/MediaManager/File/Film%20Stills.pdf] The image is not decorative it helps to identify the episode, illustrate key plot points, and provides visual reference to the episodes thematic elements, and style. After all this is a visual medium and a picture is worth a thousands words as they say. I believe that the Star Trek episode pages could use more illustrations across the board. I also don't believe that one user should arbitrarily mass submit images for deletion. The use of images to illustrate a TV episode is very common site wide and generally held as acceptable and legal. --Mccordscvs (talk) 10:07, 2 June 2013 (UTC)
 * Keep You understand the episode more seeing the image from it. Mass duplicate nominations got mass duplicate responses.   D r e a m Focus  01:20, 23 May 2013 (UTC)
 * Keep. I respect your good faith in submitting this batch of deletion nominations, but IMO the issue needs to be reviewed by the community before any of the images in question are deleted.  This comment applies as well to the deletions you proposed yesterday (2013 May 22), and I will be placing a similar note there.  —  Rich wales (no relation to Jimbo) 04:54, 23 May 2013 (UTC)
 * Keep per Richwales (see File:STMatterofHonor.jpg. As stated by others below, these images are illustrative of the episodes and increase understanding, so their use seems appropriate. Such images are so widely used in episode articles that the wider community seems to support their use, so wider community discussion as proposed by Richwales seems necessary. -- Aussie Legend  ( ✉ ) 16:00, 23 May 2013 (UTC)
 * Delete: Clear failure of WP:NFCC. None of the keep arguments indicate what significant increase in understanding this image generates or what detrimental effects would occur from its omission.&mdash;Kww(talk) 00:50, 24 May 2013 (UTC)
 * Keep The image seems quite good at illustrating the topic of shore leave; the main characters and their close interaction; the unusual appearance of a Ferengi; the distinctive appearance of Picard; &c. Prior knowledge of such things cannot be assumed as the reader may have zero knowledge of Star Trek and its features (I have a friend like that - he's never seen a James Bond movie, for example).  As the article stands by itself, it is appropriate to illustrate such prominent features which appear in the episode and so WP:NFCC is satisfied.  The only issue is whether there's a better image.  If you Google for images of "Captain's Holiday", Google readily provides a good selection of still images.  This demonstrates that such images are considered fair use by an information provider such as Google or Wikipedia.  Warden (talk) 18:58, 27 May 2013 (UTC)
 * Delete - does not significantly add to understanding of episode, and omission would not be detrimental to understanding of episode. -- SarekOfVulcan (talk) 04:10, 28 May 2013 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section.

File:ENTcanamar.jpg

 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  09:08, 9 July 2013 (UTC)
 * File:ENTcanamar.jpg ([ delete] | talk | [ history] | links | [ logs]) – uploaded by (aeropagitica) ( [ notify] | contribs | uploads | upload log).

Invalid FUR: Non-free content is used only if its presence would significantly increase readers' understanding of the topic, and its omission would be detrimental to that understanding. This image is not critical for understanding, but is used in a decorative fashion. Since this file does not greatly enhance understanding, nor will its omission greatly decrease understanding, it must be deleted. —Justin ( koavf ) ❤T☮C☺M☯ 00:26, 23 May 2013 (UTC)
 * Keep All It's covered by fair use law.[//www.intellectbooks.co.uk/MediaManager/File/Film%20Stills.pdf] The image is not decorative it helps to identify the episode, illustrate key plot points, and provides visual reference to the episodes thematic elements, and style. After all this is a visual medium and a picture is worth a thousands words as they say. I believe that the Star Trek episode pages could use more illustrations across the board. I also don't believe that one user should arbitrarily mass submit images for deletion. The use of images to illustrate a TV episode is very common site wide and generally held as acceptable and legal. --Mccordscvs (talk) 10:07, 2 June 2013 (UTC)
 * Keep all and stop mass nominating things. You understand the episode more seeing the image from it.   D r e a m Focus  01:29, 23 May 2013 (UTC)
 * Keep per Richwales (see File:STMatterofHonor.jpg. As stated by others below, these images are illustrative of the episodes and increase understanding, so their use seems appropriate. Such images are so widely used in episode articles that the wider community seems to support their use, so wider community discussion as proposed by Richwales seems necessary. -- Aussie Legend  ( ✉ ) 16:00, 23 May 2013 (UTC)
 * Delete: Clear failure of WP:NFCC. None of the keep arguments indicate what significant increase in understanding this image generates or what detrimental effects would occur from its omission.&mdash;Kww(talk) 00:50, 24 May 2013 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section.

File:ST ByAnyOtherName.jpg

 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  09:08, 9 July 2013 (UTC)
 * File:ST ByAnyOtherName.jpg ([ delete] | talk | [ history] | links | [ logs]) – uploaded by Cyberia23 ( [ notify] | contribs | uploads | upload log).

Invalid FUR: Non-free content is used only if its presence would significantly increase readers' understanding of the topic, and its omission would be detrimental to that understanding. This image is not critical for understanding, but is used in a decorative fashion. Since this file does not greatly enhance understanding, nor will its omission greatly decrease understanding, it must be deleted. —Justin ( koavf ) ❤T☮C☺M☯ 00:26, 23 May 2013 (UTC)
 * Keep All It's covered by fair use law.[//www.intellectbooks.co.uk/MediaManager/File/Film%20Stills.pdf] The image is not decorative it helps to identify the episode, illustrate key plot points, and provides visual reference to the episodes thematic elements, and style. After all this is a visual medium and a picture is worth a thousands words as they say. I believe that the Star Trek episode pages could use more illustrations across the board. I also don't believe that one user should arbitrarily mass submit images for deletion. The use of images to illustrate a TV episode is very common site wide and generally held as acceptable and legal. --Mccordscvs (talk) 10:07, 2 June 2013 (UTC)
 * Keep all and stop mass nominating things. You understand the episode more seeing the image from it.   D r e a m Focus  01:29, 23 May 2013 (UTC)
 * Keep per Richwales (see File:STMatterofHonor.jpg. As stated by others below, these images are illustrative of the episodes and increase understanding, so their use seems appropriate. Such images are so widely used in episode articles that the wider community seems to support their use, so wider community discussion as proposed by Richwales seems necessary. -- Aussie Legend  ( ✉ ) 16:00, 23 May 2013 (UTC)
 * Delete: Clear failure of WP:NFCC. None of the keep arguments indicate what significant increase in understanding this image generates or what detrimental effects would occur from its omission.&mdash;Kww(talk) 00:51, 24 May 2013 (UTC)
 * Delete - does not significantly add to understanding of episode, and omission would not be detrimental to understanding of episode. -- SarekOfVulcan (talk) 04:11, 28 May 2013 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section.

File:ST-TNG Bloodlines.jpg

 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  00:02, 19 July 2013 (UTC)
 * File:ST-TNG Bloodlines.jpg ([ delete] | talk | [ history] | links | [ logs]) – uploaded by Cburnett ( [ notify] | contribs | uploads | upload log).

Invalid FUR: Non-free content is used only if its presence would significantly increase readers' understanding of the topic, and its omission would be detrimental to that understanding. This image is not critical for understanding, but is used in a decorative fashion. Since this file does not greatly enhance understanding, nor will its omission greatly decrease understanding, it must be deleted. —Justin ( koavf ) ❤T☮C☺M☯ 00:26, 23 May 2013 (UTC)
 * Keep All It's covered by fair use law.[//www.intellectbooks.co.uk/MediaManager/File/Film%20Stills.pdf] The image is not decorative it helps to identify the episode, illustrate key plot points, and provides visual reference to the episodes thematic elements, and style. After all this is a visual medium and a picture is worth a thousands words as they say. I believe that the Star Trek episode pages could use more illustrations across the board. I also don't believe that one user should arbitrarily mass submit images for deletion. The use of images to illustrate a TV episode is very common site wide and generally held as acceptable and legal. --Mccordscvs (talk) 10:07, 2 June 2013 (UTC)
 * Keep all and stop mass nominating things. You understand the episode more seeing the image from it.   D r e a m Focus  01:29, 23 May 2013 (UTC)
 * Keep per Richwales (see File:STMatterofHonor.jpg. As stated by others below, these images are illustrative of the episodes and increase understanding, so their use seems appropriate. Such images are so widely used in episode articles that the wider community seems to support their use, so wider community discussion as proposed by Richwales seems necessary. -- Aussie Legend  ( ✉ ) 16:00, 23 May 2013 (UTC)
 * Delete: Clear failure of WP:NFCC. None of the keep arguments indicate what significant increase in understanding this image generates or what detrimental effects would occur from its omission.&mdash;Kww(talk) 00:51, 24 May 2013 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section.

File:ST-TNG Birthright Part 2.jpg

 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  00:02, 19 July 2013 (UTC)
 * File:ST-TNG Birthright Part 2.jpg ([ delete] | talk | [ history] | links | [ logs]) – uploaded by Cburnett ( [ notify] | contribs | uploads | upload log).

Invalid FUR: Non-free content is used only if its presence would significantly increase readers' understanding of the topic, and its omission would be detrimental to that understanding. This image is not critical for understanding, but is used in a decorative fashion. Since this file does not greatly enhance understanding, nor will its omission greatly decrease understanding, it must be deleted. —Justin ( koavf ) ❤T☮C☺M☯ 00:28, 23 May 2013 (UTC)
 * Keep All It's covered by fair use law.[//www.intellectbooks.co.uk/MediaManager/File/Film%20Stills.pdf] The image is not decorative it helps to identify the episode, illustrate key plot points, and provides visual reference to the episodes thematic elements, and style. After all this is a visual medium and a picture is worth a thousands words as they say. I believe that the Star Trek episode pages could use more illustrations across the board. I also don't believe that one user should arbitrarily mass submit images for deletion. The use of images to illustrate a TV episode is very common site wide and generally held as acceptable and legal. --Mccordscvs (talk) 12:50, 2 June 2013 (UTC)
 * Keep all and stop mass nominating things. You understand the episode more seeing the image from it.   D r e a m Focus  01:29, 23 May 2013 (UTC)
 * Keep per Richwales (see File:STMatterofHonor.jpg. As stated by others below, these images are illustrative of the episodes and increase understanding, so their use seems appropriate. Such images are so widely used in episode articles that the wider community seems to support their use, so wider community discussion as proposed by Richwales seems necessary. -- Aussie Legend  ( ✉ ) 16:00, 23 May 2013 (UTC)
 * Delete: Clear failure of WP:NFCC. None of the keep arguments indicate what significant increase in understanding this image generates or what detrimental effects would occur from its omission.&mdash;Kww(talk) 00:52, 24 May 2013 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section.

File:STBoobyTrap.jpg

 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  00:02, 19 July 2013 (UTC)
 * File:STBoobyTrap.jpg ([ delete] | talk | [ history] | links | [ logs]) – uploaded by Cyberia23 ( [ notify] | contribs | uploads | upload log).

Invalid FUR: Non-free content is used only if its presence would significantly increase readers' understanding of the topic, and its omission would be detrimental to that understanding. This image is not critical for understanding, but is used in a decorative fashion. Since this file does not greatly enhance understanding, nor will its omission greatly decrease understanding, it must be deleted. —Justin ( koavf ) ❤T☮C☺M☯ 00:28, 23 May 2013 (UTC)
 * Keep All It's covered by fair use law.[//www.intellectbooks.co.uk/MediaManager/File/Film%20Stills.pdf] The image is not decorative it helps to identify the episode, illustrate key plot points, and provides visual reference to the episodes thematic elements, and style. After all this is a visual medium and a picture is worth a thousands words as they say. I believe that the Star Trek episode pages could use more illustrations across the board. I also don't believe that one user should arbitrarily mass submit images for deletion. The use of images to illustrate a TV episode is very common site wide and generally held as acceptable and legal. --Mccordscvs (talk) 12:50, 2 June 2013 (UTC)
 * Keep all and stop mass nominating things. You understand the episode more seeing the image from it.   D r e a m Focus  01:29, 23 May 2013 (UTC)
 * Keep per Richwales (see File:STMatterofHonor.jpg. As stated by others below, these images are illustrative of the episodes and increase understanding, so their use seems appropriate. Such images are so widely used in episode articles that the wider community seems to support their use, so wider community discussion as proposed by Richwales seems necessary. -- Aussie Legend  ( ✉ ) 16:00, 23 May 2013 (UTC)
 * Delete: Clear failure of WP:NFCC. None of the keep arguments indicate what significant increase in understanding this image generates or what detrimental effects would occur from its omission.&mdash;Kww(talk) 00:53, 24 May 2013 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Borderland (ENT episode).jpg

 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the discussion was: No Consensus. Discounting the keep !votes that don't address this image in particular, Miyagawa has a reasonable argument, which outside of the mass nomination context, would have gotten more discussion. I don't think consensus is strong enough to delete on this one, but I think a renomination is in order to better consider the WP:NFCC factors as they apply to this particular image. Monty 845  00:23, 4 August 2013 (UTC)
 * File:Borderland (ENT episode).jpg ([ delete] | talk | [ history] | links | [ logs]) – uploaded by とある白い猫 ( [ notify] | contribs | uploads | upload log).

Invalid FUR: Non-free content is used only if its presence would significantly increase readers' understanding of the topic, and its omission would be detrimental to that understanding. This image is not critical for understanding, but is used in a decorative fashion. Since this file does not greatly enhance understanding, nor will its omission greatly decrease understanding, it must be deleted. —Justin ( koavf ) ❤T☮C☺M☯ 00:28, 23 May 2013 (UTC)
 * Keep All It's covered by fair use law.[//www.intellectbooks.co.uk/MediaManager/File/Film%20Stills.pdf] The image is not decorative it helps to identify the episode, illustrate key plot points, and provides visual reference to the episodes thematic elements, and style. After all this is a visual medium and a picture is worth a thousands words as they say. I believe that the Star Trek episode pages could use more illustrations across the board. I also don't believe that one user should arbitrarily mass submit images for deletion. The use of images to illustrate a TV episode is very common site wide and generally held as acceptable and legal. --Mccordscvs (talk) 12:50, 2 June 2013 (UTC)
 * Keep all and stop mass nominating things. You understand the episode more seeing the image from it.   D r e a m Focus  01:29, 23 May 2013 (UTC)
 * Keep per Richwales (see File:STMatterofHonor.jpg. As stated by others below, these images are illustrative of the episodes and increase understanding, so their use seems appropriate. Such images are so widely used in episode articles that the wider community seems to support their use, so wider community discussion as proposed by Richwales seems necessary. -- Aussie Legend  ( ✉ ) 16:00, 23 May 2013 (UTC)
 * Keep Unfortunately in your mass nomination you didn't stop to read each fair use description. This image is used to help understand the makeup and costuming in this episode which is discussed in the article itself. Miyagawa (talk) 18:09, 23 May 2013 (UTC)
 * Delete: Clear failure of WP:NFCC. None of the keep arguments indicate what significant increase in understanding this image generates or what detrimental effects would occur from its omission. Miyagawa at least makes a stab at it, but the word "skimpy" certainly suffices as a description of the outfit: a picture of "skimpy" is gratuitous.&mdash;Kww(talk) 00:55, 24 May 2013 (UTC)
 * Delete: The image presumably depicts something in the plot -- perhaps "Soong attempts to escape, but Archer recaptures him"? But the image does not significantly aid in understanding that section. Nothing in the "Reception" section is depicted in the image. In the "Production" section, the actress "described the costume as slightly skimpier than she was used to", which is depicted in the image, but only in a cursory way. – Quadell (talk) 12:24, 23 July 2013 (UTC)
 * Note to Keep voters: If you feel a screenshot passes WP:NFCC, it will not help to complain about mass nominations or defend the legality of the image use, since these are not relevant. Instead, if you could identify which specific sections of prose in the body of the article are depicted by the screenshot, it will help make the closing admin's job much easier. – Quadell (talk) 12:24, 23 July 2013 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Bound (ENT episode).jpg

 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  00:02, 19 July 2013 (UTC)
 * File:Bound (ENT episode).jpg ([ delete] | talk | [ history] | links | [ logs]) – uploaded by とある白い猫 ( [ notify] | contribs | uploads | upload log).

Invalid FUR: Non-free content is used only if its presence would significantly increase readers' understanding of the topic, and its omission would be detrimental to that understanding. This image is not critical for understanding, but is used in a decorative fashion. Since this file does not greatly enhance understanding, nor will its omission greatly decrease understanding, it must be deleted. —Justin ( koavf ) ❤T☮C☺M☯ 00:28, 23 May 2013 (UTC)
 * Keep All It's covered by fair use law.[//www.intellectbooks.co.uk/MediaManager/File/Film%20Stills.pdf] The image is not decorative it helps to identify the episode, illustrate key plot points, and provides visual reference to the episodes thematic elements, and style. After all this is a visual medium and a picture is worth a thousands words as they say. I believe that the Star Trek episode pages could use more illustrations across the board. I also don't believe that one user should arbitrarily mass submit images for deletion. The use of images to illustrate a TV episode is very common site wide and generally held as acceptable and legal. --Mccordscvs (talk) 12:50, 2 June 2013 (UTC)
 * Keep all and stop mass nominating things. You understand the episode more seeing the image from it.   D r e a m Focus  01:29, 23 May 2013 (UTC)
 * Keep per Richwales (see File:STMatterofHonor.jpg. As stated by others below, these images are illustrative of the episodes and increase understanding, so their use seems appropriate. Such images are so widely used in episode articles that the wider community seems to support their use, so wider community discussion as proposed by Richwales seems necessary. -- Aussie Legend  ( ✉ ) 16:00, 23 May 2013 (UTC)
 * Delete: Clear failure of WP:NFCC. None of the keep arguments indicate what significant increase in understanding this image generates or what detrimental effects would occur from its omission.&mdash;Kww(talk) 00:56, 24 May 2013 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Bounty (ENT episode).jpg

 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  00:02, 19 July 2013 (UTC)
 * File:Bounty (ENT episode).jpg ([ delete] | talk | [ history] | links | [ logs]) – uploaded by とある白い猫 ( [ notify] | contribs | uploads | upload log).

Invalid FUR: Non-free content is used only if its presence would significantly increase readers' understanding of the topic, and its omission would be detrimental to that understanding. This image is not critical for understanding, but is used in a decorative fashion. Since this file does not greatly enhance understanding, nor will its omission greatly decrease understanding, it must be deleted. —Justin ( koavf ) ❤T☮C☺M☯ 00:29, 23 May 2013 (UTC)
 * Keep All It's covered by fair use law.[//www.intellectbooks.co.uk/MediaManager/File/Film%20Stills.pdf] The image is not decorative it helps to identify the episode, illustrate key plot points, and provides visual reference to the episodes thematic elements, and style. After all this is a visual medium and a picture is worth a thousands words as they say. I believe that the Star Trek episode pages could use more illustrations across the board. I also don't believe that one user should arbitrarily mass submit images for deletion. The use of images to illustrate a TV episode is very common site wide and generally held as acceptable and legal. --Mccordscvs (talk) 12:50, 2 June 2013 (UTC)
 * Keep all and stop mass nominating things. You understand the episode more seeing the image from it.   D r e a m Focus  01:29, 23 May 2013 (UTC)
 * Keep per Richwales (see File:STMatterofHonor.jpg. As stated by others below, these images are illustrative of the episodes and increase understanding, so their use seems appropriate. Such images are so widely used in episode articles that the wider community seems to support their use, so wider community discussion as proposed by Richwales seems necessary. -- Aussie Legend  ( ✉ ) 16:00, 23 May 2013 (UTC)
 * Delete: Clear failure of WP:NFCC. None of the keep arguments indicate what significant increase in understanding this image generates or what detrimental effects would occur from its omission.&mdash;Kww(talk) 00:56, 24 May 2013 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section.

File:STBreadCircus.jpg

 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  00:02, 19 July 2013 (UTC)
 * File:STBreadCircus.jpg ([ delete] | talk | [ history] | links | [ logs]) – uploaded by Cyberia23 ( [ notify] | contribs | uploads | upload log).

Invalid FUR: Non-free content is used only if its presence would significantly increase readers' understanding of the topic, and its omission would be detrimental to that understanding. This image is not critical for understanding, but is used in a decorative fashion. Since this file does not greatly enhance understanding, nor will its omission greatly decrease understanding, it must be deleted. —Justin ( koavf ) ❤T☮C☺M☯ 00:29, 23 May 2013 (UTC)
 * Keep All It's covered by fair use law.[//www.intellectbooks.co.uk/MediaManager/File/Film%20Stills.pdf] The image is not decorative it helps to identify the episode, illustrate key plot points, and provides visual reference to the episodes thematic elements, and style. After all this is a visual medium and a picture is worth a thousands words as they say. I believe that the Star Trek episode pages could use more illustrations across the board. I also don't believe that one user should arbitrarily mass submit images for deletion. The use of images to illustrate a TV episode is very common site wide and generally held as acceptable and legal. --Mccordscvs (talk) 12:50, 2 June 2013 (UTC)
 * Keep all and stop mass nominating things. You understand the episode more seeing the image from it.   D r e a m Focus  01:29, 23 May 2013 (UTC)
 * Keep per Richwales (see File:STMatterofHonor.jpg. As stated by others below, these images are illustrative of the episodes and increase understanding, so their use seems appropriate. Such images are so widely used in episode articles that the wider community seems to support their use, so wider community discussion as proposed by Richwales seems necessary. -- Aussie Legend  ( ✉ ) 16:00, 23 May 2013 (UTC)
 * Delete: Clear failure of WP:NFCC. None of the keep arguments indicate what significant increase in understanding this image generates or what detrimental effects would occur from its omission.&mdash;Kww(talk) 00:57, 24 May 2013 (UTC)
 * Keep: omission would be detrimental to understanding of episode. -- SarekOfVulcan (talk) 04:15, 28 May 2013 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section.

File:ST-TNG Brothers Season4.jpg

 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the discussion was: Delete – Quadell (talk) 19:01, 25 July 2013 (UTC)
 * File:ST-TNG Brothers Season4.jpg ([ delete] | talk | [ history] | links | [ logs]) – uploaded by Leoboudv ( [ notify] | contribs | uploads | upload log).

Invalid FUR: Non-free content is used only if its presence would significantly increase readers' understanding of the topic, and its omission would be detrimental to that understanding. This image is not critical for understanding, but is used in a decorative fashion. Since this file does not greatly enhance understanding, nor will its omission greatly decrease understanding, it must be deleted. —Justin ( koavf ) ❤T☮C☺M☯ 00:29, 23 May 2013 (UTC)
 * Keep All It's covered by fair use law.[//www.intellectbooks.co.uk/MediaManager/File/Film%20Stills.pdf] The image is not decorative it helps to identify the episode, illustrate key plot points, and provides visual reference to the episodes thematic elements, and style. After all this is a visual medium and a picture is worth a thousands words as they say. I believe that the Star Trek episode pages could use more illustrations across the board. I also don't believe that one user should arbitrarily mass submit images for deletion. The use of images to illustrate a TV episode is very common site wide and generally held as acceptable and legal. --Mccordscvs (talk) 12:50, 2 June 2013 (UTC)
 * Keep all and stop mass nominating things. You understand the episode more seeing the image from it.   D r e a m Focus  01:29, 23 May 2013 (UTC)
 * Keep What's with this mass nominations? --Leoboudv (talk) 01:48, 23 May 2013 (UTC)
 * Keep per Richwales (see File:STMatterofHonor.jpg. As stated by others below, these images are illustrative of the episodes and increase understanding, so their use seems appropriate. Such images are so widely used in episode articles that the wider community seems to support their use, so wider community discussion as proposed by Richwales seems necessary. -- Aussie Legend  ( ✉ ) 16:00, 23 May 2013 (UTC)
 * Delete: Clear failure of WP:NFCC. None of the keep arguments indicate what significant increase in understanding this image generates or what detrimental effects would occur from its omission.&mdash;Kww(talk) 01:00, 24 May 2013 (UTC)
 * Keep - striking enough image that its removal would be detrimental to episode understanding. -- SarekOfVulcan (talk) 04:16, 28 May 2013 (UTC)
 * Delete, the content of the image is not discussed outside the caption. – Quadell (talk) 12:26, 23 July 2013 (UTC)
 * Note to Keep voters: If you feel a screenshot passes WP:NFCC, it will not help to complain about mass nominations or defend the legality of the image use, since these are not relevant. Instead, if you could identify which specific sections of prose in the body of the article are depicted by the screenshot, it will help make the closing admin's job much easier. – Quadell (talk) 12:26, 23 July 2013 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Carpenter Street.jpg

 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  00:02, 19 July 2013 (UTC)
 * File:Carpenter Street.jpg ([ delete] | talk | [ history] | links | [ logs]) – uploaded by とある白い猫 ( [ notify] | contribs | uploads | upload log).

Invalid FUR: Non-free content is used only if its presence would significantly increase readers' understanding of the topic, and its omission would be detrimental to that understanding. This image is not critical for understanding, but is used in a decorative fashion. Since this file does not greatly enhance understanding, nor will its omission greatly decrease understanding, it must be deleted. —Justin ( koavf ) ❤T☮C☺M☯ 00:40, 23 May 2013 (UTC)
 * Keep All It's covered by fair use law.[//www.intellectbooks.co.uk/MediaManager/File/Film%20Stills.pdf] The image is not decorative it helps to identify the episode, illustrate key plot points, and provides visual reference to the episodes thematic elements, and style. After all this is a visual medium and a picture is worth a thousands words as they say. I believe that the Star Trek episode pages could use more illustrations across the board. I also don't believe that one user should arbitrarily mass submit images for deletion. The use of images to illustrate a TV episode is very common site wide and generally held as acceptable and legal. --Mccordscvs (talk) 12:50, 2 June 2013 (UTC)
 * Keep all and stop mass nominating things. You understand the episode more seeing the image from it.   D r e a m Focus  01:29, 23 May 2013 (UTC)
 * Keep per Richwales (see File:STMatterofHonor.jpg. As stated by others below, these images are illustrative of the episodes and increase understanding, so their use seems appropriate. Such images are so widely used in episode articles that the wider community seems to support their use, so wider community discussion as proposed by Richwales seems necessary. -- Aussie Legend  ( ✉ ) 16:00, 23 May 2013 (UTC)
 * Delete: Clear failure of WP:NFCC. None of the keep arguments indicate what significant increase in understanding this image generates or what detrimental effects would occur from its omission.&mdash;Kww(talk) 01:01, 24 May 2013 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section.

File:STCatspaw.jpg

 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  00:02, 19 July 2013 (UTC)
 * File:STCatspaw.jpg ([ delete] | talk | [ history] | links | [ logs]) – uploaded by Cyberia23 ( [ notify] | contribs | uploads | upload log).

Invalid FUR: Non-free content is used only if its presence would significantly increase readers' understanding of the topic, and its omission would be detrimental to that understanding. This image is not critical for understanding, but is used in a decorative fashion. Since this file does not greatly enhance understanding, nor will its omission greatly decrease understanding, it must be deleted. —Justin ( koavf ) ❤T☮C☺M☯ 00:41, 23 May 2013 (UTC)
 * Keep All It's covered by fair use law.[//www.intellectbooks.co.uk/MediaManager/File/Film%20Stills.pdf] The image is not decorative it helps to identify the episode, illustrate key plot points, and provides visual reference to the episodes thematic elements, and style. After all this is a visual medium and a picture is worth a thousands words as they say. I believe that the Star Trek episode pages could use more illustrations across the board. I also don't believe that one user should arbitrarily mass submit images for deletion. The use of images to illustrate a TV episode is very common site wide and generally held as acceptable and legal. --Mccordscvs (talk) 12:50, 2 June 2013 (UTC)
 * Keep all and stop mass nominating things. You understand the episode more seeing the image from it.   D r e a m Focus  01:29, 23 May 2013 (UTC)
 * Keep per Richwales (see File:STMatterofHonor.jpg. As stated by others below, these images are illustrative of the episodes and increase understanding, so their use seems appropriate. Such images are so widely used in episode articles that the wider community seems to support their use, so wider community discussion as proposed by Richwales seems necessary. -- Aussie Legend  ( ✉ ) 16:00, 23 May 2013 (UTC)
 * Delete: Clear failure of WP:NFCC. None of the keep arguments indicate what significant increase in understanding this image generates or what detrimental effects would occur from its omission.&mdash;Kww(talk) 01:02, 24 May 2013 (UTC)
 * Delete - does not significantly add to understanding of episode, and omission would not be detrimental to understanding of episode. "Woman dangles small Enterprise model from chain" conveys pretty much the same thing. -- SarekOfVulcan (talk) 04:18, 28 May 2013 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section.

File:ST-TNG Cause and Effect.jpg

 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  00:02, 19 July 2013 (UTC)
 * File:ST-TNG Cause and Effect.jpg ([ delete] | talk | [ history] | links | [ logs]) – uploaded by Artene50 ( [ notify] | contribs | uploads | upload log).

Invalid FUR: Non-free content is used only if its presence would significantly increase readers' understanding of the topic, and its omission would be detrimental to that understanding. This image is not critical for understanding, but is used in a decorative fashion. Since this file does not greatly enhance understanding, nor will its omission greatly decrease understanding, it must be deleted. —Justin ( koavf ) ❤T☮C☺M☯ 00:41, 23 May 2013 (UTC)
 * Keep All It's covered by fair use law.[//www.intellectbooks.co.uk/MediaManager/File/Film%20Stills.pdf] The image is not decorative it helps to identify the episode, illustrate key plot points, and provides visual reference to the episodes thematic elements, and style. After all this is a visual medium and a picture is worth a thousands words as they say. I believe that the Star Trek episode pages could use more illustrations across the board. I also don't believe that one user should arbitrarily mass submit images for deletion. The use of images to illustrate a TV episode is very common site wide and generally held as acceptable and legal. --Mccordscvs (talk) 12:50, 2 June 2013 (UTC)
 * Keep all and stop mass nominating things. You understand the episode more seeing the image from it.   D r e a m Focus  01:29, 23 May 2013 (UTC)
 * Retain the image. One understands the episodes more from the image. And stop these mass DR nominations please. --Artene50 (talk) 02:16, 23 May 2013 (UTC)
 * Keep per Richwales (see File:STMatterofHonor.jpg. As stated by others below, these images are illustrative of the episodes and increase understanding, so their use seems appropriate. Such images are so widely used in episode articles that the wider community seems to support their use, so wider community discussion as proposed by Richwales seems necessary. -- Aussie Legend  ( ✉ ) 16:00, 23 May 2013 (UTC)
 * Delete: Clear failure of WP:NFCC. None of the keep arguments indicate what significant increase in understanding this image generates or what detrimental effects would occur from its omission.&mdash;Kww(talk) 01:01, 24 May 2013 (UTC)
 * Delete - does not significantly add to understanding of episode, and omission would not be detrimental to understanding of episode. -- SarekOfVulcan (talk) 04:19, 28 May 2013 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section.

File:ST-TNG Chain of Command Part 1.jpg
<div class="boilerplate metadata vfd xfd-closed" style="background-color:#f3f9ff; margin:1em 0 0 0; padding:0 10px 0 10px; border:1px solid #aaa;">
 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  00:02, 19 July 2013 (UTC)
 * File:ST-TNG Chain of Command Part 1.jpg ([ delete] | talk | [ history] | links | [ logs]) – uploaded by Cburnett ( [ notify] | contribs | uploads | upload log).

Invalid FUR: Non-free content is used only if its presence would significantly increase readers' understanding of the topic, and its omission would be detrimental to that understanding. This image is not critical for understanding, but is used in a decorative fashion. Since this file does not greatly enhance understanding, nor will its omission greatly decrease understanding, it must be deleted. —Justin ( koavf ) ❤T☮C☺M☯ 00:41, 23 May 2013 (UTC)
 * Keep All It's covered by fair use law.[//www.intellectbooks.co.uk/MediaManager/File/Film%20Stills.pdf] The image is not decorative it helps to identify the episode, illustrate key plot points, and provides visual reference to the episodes thematic elements, and style. After all this is a visual medium and a picture is worth a thousands words as they say. I believe that the Star Trek episode pages could use more illustrations across the board. I also don't believe that one user should arbitrarily mass submit images for deletion. The use of images to illustrate a TV episode is very common site wide and generally held as acceptable and legal. --Mccordscvs (talk) 12:50, 2 June 2013 (UTC)
 * Keep all and stop mass nominating things. You understand the episode more seeing the image from it.   D r e a m Focus  01:29, 23 May 2013 (UTC)
 * Keep per Richwales (see File:STMatterofHonor.jpg. As stated by others below, these images are illustrative of the episodes and increase understanding, so their use seems appropriate. Such images are so widely used in episode articles that the wider community seems to support their use, so wider community discussion as proposed by Richwales seems necessary. -- Aussie Legend  ( ✉ ) 16:00, 23 May 2013 (UTC)
 * Delete: Clear failure of WP:NFCC. None of the keep arguments indicate what significant increase in understanding this image generates or what detrimental effects would occur from its omission.&mdash;Kww(talk) 01:02, 24 May 2013 (UTC)
 * Delete - does not significantly add to understanding of episode, and omission would not be detrimental to understanding of episode. -- SarekOfVulcan (talk) 04:19, 28 May 2013 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section.

File:STCharlieX.jpg
<div class="boilerplate metadata vfd xfd-closed" style="background-color:#f3f9ff; margin:1em 0 0 0; padding:0 10px 0 10px; border:1px solid #aaa;">
 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  00:02, 19 July 2013 (UTC)
 * File:STCharlieX.jpg ([ delete] | talk | [ history] | links | [ logs]) – uploaded by Cyberia23 ( [ notify] | contribs | uploads | upload log).

Invalid FUR: Non-free content is used only if its presence would significantly increase readers' understanding of the topic, and its omission would be detrimental to that understanding. This image is not critical for understanding, but is used in a decorative fashion. Since this file does not greatly enhance understanding, nor will its omission greatly decrease understanding, it must be deleted. —Justin ( koavf ) ❤T☮C☺M☯ 00:41, 23 May 2013 (UTC)
 * Keep All It's covered by fair use law.[//www.intellectbooks.co.uk/MediaManager/File/Film%20Stills.pdf] The image is not decorative it helps to identify the episode, illustrate key plot points, and provides visual reference to the episodes thematic elements, and style. After all this is a visual medium and a picture is worth a thousands words as they say. I believe that the Star Trek episode pages could use more illustrations across the board. I also don't believe that one user should arbitrarily mass submit images for deletion. The use of images to illustrate a TV episode is very common site wide and generally held as acceptable and legal. --Mccordscvs (talk) 12:50, 2 June 2013 (UTC)
 * Keep all and stop mass nominating things. You understand the episode more seeing the image from it.   D r e a m Focus  01:29, 23 May 2013 (UTC)
 * Keep per Richwales (see File:STMatterofHonor.jpg. As stated by others below, these images are illustrative of the episodes and increase understanding, so their use seems appropriate. Such images are so widely used in episode articles that the wider community seems to support their use, so wider community discussion as proposed by Richwales seems necessary. -- Aussie Legend  ( ✉ ) 16:00, 23 May 2013 (UTC)
 * Delete: Clear failure of WP:NFCC. None of the keep arguments indicate what significant increase in understanding this image generates or what detrimental effects would occur from its omission.&mdash;Kww(talk) 01:02, 24 May 2013 (UTC)
 * Delete - does not significantly add to understanding of episode, and omission would not be detrimental to understanding of episode. "Young man with light falling across eyes" would convey the information as well.-- SarekOfVulcan (talk) 04:21, 28 May 2013 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section.

File:ST-TNG Clues.jpg
<div class="boilerplate metadata vfd xfd-closed" style="background-color:#f3f9ff; margin:1em 0 0 0; padding:0 10px 0 10px; border:1px solid #aaa;">
 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  00:02, 19 July 2013 (UTC)
 * File:ST-TNG Clues.jpg ([ delete] | talk | [ history] | links | [ logs]) – uploaded by Cburnett ( [ notify] | contribs | uploads | upload log).

Invalid FUR: Non-free content is used only if its presence would significantly increase readers' understanding of the topic, and its omission would be detrimental to that understanding. This image is not critical for understanding, but is used in a decorative fashion. Since this file does not greatly enhance understanding, nor will its omission greatly decrease understanding, it must be deleted. —Justin ( koavf ) ❤T☮C☺M☯ 00:42, 23 May 2013 (UTC)
 * Keep All It's covered by fair use law.[//www.intellectbooks.co.uk/MediaManager/File/Film%20Stills.pdf] The image is not decorative it helps to identify the episode, illustrate key plot points, and provides visual reference to the episodes thematic elements, and style. After all this is a visual medium and a picture is worth a thousands words as they say. I believe that the Star Trek episode pages could use more illustrations across the board. I also don't believe that one user should arbitrarily mass submit images for deletion. The use of images to illustrate a TV episode is very common site wide and generally held as acceptable and legal. --Mccordscvs (talk) 12:50, 2 June 2013 (UTC)
 * Keep all and stop mass nominating things. You understand the episode more seeing the image from it.   D r e a m Focus  01:29, 23 May 2013 (UTC)
 * Keep per Richwales (see File:STMatterofHonor.jpg. As stated by others below, these images are illustrative of the episodes and increase understanding, so their use seems appropriate. Such images are so widely used in episode articles that the wider community seems to support their use, so wider community discussion as proposed by Richwales seems necessary. -- Aussie Legend  ( ✉ ) 16:00, 23 May 2013 (UTC)
 * Delete: Clear failure of WP:NFCC. None of the keep arguments indicate what significant increase in understanding this image generates or what detrimental effects would occur from its omission.&mdash;Kww(talk) 01:03, 24 May 2013 (UTC)
 * Delete - does not significantly add to understanding of episode, and omission would not be detrimental to understanding of episode. Impossible to tell that Picard is looking at the unexpected growth of the samples at the resolution/timestamp chosen.-- SarekOfVulcan (talk) 04:22, 28 May 2013 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section.

File:ST-TNG Code of Honor.jpg
<div class="boilerplate metadata vfd xfd-closed" style="background-color:#f3f9ff; margin:1em 0 0 0; padding:0 10px 0 10px; border:1px solid #aaa;">
 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  01:40, 4 August 2013 (UTC)
 * File:ST-TNG Code of Honor.jpg ([ delete] | talk | [ history] | links | [ logs]) – uploaded by Sage Veritas ( [ notify] | contribs | uploads | upload log).

Invalid FUR: Non-free content is used only if its presence would significantly increase readers' understanding of the topic, and its omission would be detrimental to that understanding. This image is not critical for understanding, but is used in a decorative fashion. Since this file does not greatly enhance understanding, nor will its omission greatly decrease understanding, it must be deleted. —Justin ( koavf ) ❤T☮C☺M☯ 00:42, 23 May 2013 (UTC)
 * Keep All It's covered by fair use law.[//www.intellectbooks.co.uk/MediaManager/File/Film%20Stills.pdf] The image is not decorative it helps to identify the episode, illustrate key plot points, and provides visual reference to the episodes thematic elements, and style. After all this is a visual medium and a picture is worth a thousands words as they say. I believe that the Star Trek episode pages could use more illustrations across the board. I also don't believe that one user should arbitrarily mass submit images for deletion. The use of images to illustrate a TV episode is very common site wide and generally held as acceptable and legal. --Mccordscvs (talk) 12:50, 2 June 2013 (UTC)
 * Keep all and stop mass nominating things. You understand the episode more seeing the image from it.   D r e a m Focus  01:29, 23 May 2013 (UTC)
 * Keep per Richwales (see File:STMatterofHonor.jpg. As stated by others below, these images are illustrative of the episodes and increase understanding, so their use seems appropriate. Such images are so widely used in episode articles that the wider community seems to support their use, so wider community discussion as proposed by Richwales seems necessary. -- Aussie Legend  ( ✉ ) 16:00, 23 May 2013 (UTC)
 * Keep The image helps the reader understand the topics and themes discussed in the text. Miyagawa (talk) 18:20, 23 May 2013 (UTC)
 * Delete: Clear failure of WP:NFCC. None of the keep arguments indicate what significant increase in understanding this image generates or what detrimental effects would occur from its omission. Miyagawa's comment borders on the the absurd: what about an image of a woman dressed in gold tinfoil makes the reader understand the themes of this episode.&mdash;Kww(talk) 01:06, 24 May 2013 (UTC)
 * Keep - omission would detract from understanding of episode. "Two women fight with spiky gloves" doesn't quite get the point across. -- SarekOfVulcan (talk) 04:24, 28 May 2013 (UTC)
 * Neither does a picture of them. The image doesn't create any level of understanding and is completely undiscussed.&mdash;Kww(talk) 05:30, 28 May 2013 (UTC)


 * Undecided. The article extensively discusses that the cast were African-Americans, and that the theme was "1940s Africa", and this material is discussed throughout. The only question is, does this particular screenshot depict this aspect of production and criticism? I honestly can't tell. – Quadell (talk) 12:30, 23 July 2013 (UTC)
 * But there isn't any prose in the article that explicitly mentions any particular aspect, scene, costume, or anything as to what constitutes the allusions to "1940s Africa". If there were an image needed to illustrate what they were doing, which scenes are their homages and which scenes are straight-up science-fiction invention?  —   fourthords  <small style="font-size:85%;">&#124; =Λ= <small style="font-size:85%;">&#124;  12:39, 23 July 2013 (UTC)
 * Note to Keep voters: If you feel a screenshot passes WP:NFCC, it will not help to complain about mass nominations or defend the legality of the image use, since these are not relevant. Instead, if you could identify which specific sections of prose in the body of the article are depicted by the screenshot, it will help make the closing admin's job much easier. – Quadell (talk) 12:30, 23 July 2013 (UTC)
 * Delete as not being necessary to understand any particular prose in the article (WP:NFCC), nor is anything with replacing it with "Tasha Yar spars with a black lady in an aluminum foil outfit, both wielding spiked gauntlets." (WP:NFCC) —   fourthords  <small style="font-size:85%;">&#124; =Λ= <small style="font-size:85%;">&#124;  12:39, 23 July 2013 (UTC)
 * Delete (changed from undecided). I'm sure that a different screenshot could pass or non-free content policy, but I just don't see this one doing so. It the months that this has been in limbo, the article has not been improved to better justify this image. – Quadell (talk) 18:08, 2 August 2013 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Cogenitor (ENT episode).jpg
<div class="boilerplate metadata vfd xfd-closed" style="background-color:#f3f9ff; margin:1em 0 0 0; padding:0 10px 0 10px; border:1px solid #aaa;">
 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  01:02, 19 July 2013 (UTC)
 * File:Cogenitor (ENT episode).jpg ([ delete] | talk | [ history] | links | [ logs]) – uploaded by とある白い猫 ( [ notify] | contribs | uploads | upload log).

Invalid FUR: Non-free content is used only if its presence would significantly increase readers' understanding of the topic, and its omission would be detrimental to that understanding. This image is not critical for understanding, but is used in a decorative fashion. Since this file does not greatly enhance understanding, nor will its omission greatly decrease understanding, it must be deleted. —Justin ( koavf ) ❤T☮C☺M☯ 00:42, 23 May 2013 (UTC)
 * Keep All It's covered by fair use law.[//www.intellectbooks.co.uk/MediaManager/File/Film%20Stills.pdf] The image is not decorative it helps to identify the episode, illustrate key plot points, and provides visual reference to the episodes thematic elements, and style. After all this is a visual medium and a picture is worth a thousands words as they say. I believe that the Star Trek episode pages could use more illustrations across the board. I also don't believe that one user should arbitrarily mass submit images for deletion. The use of images to illustrate a TV episode is very common site wide and generally held as acceptable and legal. --Mccordscvs (talk) 12:50, 2 June 2013 (UTC)
 * Keep all and stop mass nominating things. You understand the episode more seeing the image from it.   D r e a m Focus  01:29, 23 May 2013 (UTC)
 * Keep per Richwales (see File:STMatterofHonor.jpg. As stated by others below, these images are illustrative of the episodes and increase understanding, so their use seems appropriate. Such images are so widely used in episode articles that the wider community seems to support their use, so wider community discussion as proposed by Richwales seems necessary. -- Aussie Legend  ( ✉ ) 16:00, 23 May 2013 (UTC)
 * Delete: Clear failure of WP:NFCC. None of the keep arguments indicate what significant increase in understanding this image generates or what detrimental effects would occur from its omission.&mdash;Kww(talk) 01:06, 24 May 2013 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Cold Station 12 (ENT episode).jpg
<div class="boilerplate metadata vfd xfd-closed" style="background-color:#f3f9ff; margin:1em 0 0 0; padding:0 10px 0 10px; border:1px solid #aaa;">
 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  01:02, 19 July 2013 (UTC)
 * File:Cold Station 12 (ENT episode).jpg ([ delete] | talk | [ history] | links | [ logs]) – uploaded by とある白い猫 ( [ notify] | contribs | uploads | upload log).

Invalid FUR: Non-free content is used only if its presence would significantly increase readers' understanding of the topic, and its omission would be detrimental to that understanding. This image is not critical for understanding, but is used in a decorative fashion. Since this file does not greatly enhance understanding, nor will its omission greatly decrease understanding, it must be deleted. —Justin ( koavf ) ❤T☮C☺M☯ 00:42, 23 May 2013 (UTC)
 * Keep All It's covered by fair use law.[//www.intellectbooks.co.uk/MediaManager/File/Film%20Stills.pdf] The image is not decorative it helps to identify the episode, illustrate key plot points, and provides visual reference to the episodes thematic elements, and style. After all this is a visual medium and a picture is worth a thousands words as they say. I believe that the Star Trek episode pages could use more illustrations across the board. I also don't believe that one user should arbitrarily mass submit images for deletion. The use of images to illustrate a TV episode is very common site wide and generally held as acceptable and legal. --Mccordscvs (talk) 12:50, 2 June 2013 (UTC)
 * Keep all and stop mass nominating things. You understand the episode more seeing the image from it.   D r e a m Focus  01:29, 23 May 2013 (UTC)
 * Keep per Richwales (see File:STMatterofHonor.jpg. As stated by others below, these images are illustrative of the episodes and increase understanding, so their use seems appropriate. Such images are so widely used in episode articles that the wider community seems to support their use, so wider community discussion as proposed by Richwales seems necessary. -- Aussie Legend  ( ✉ ) 16:00, 23 May 2013 (UTC)
 * Delete: Clear failure of WP:NFCC. None of the keep arguments indicate what significant increase in understanding this image generates or what detrimental effects would occur from its omission.&mdash;Kww(talk) 01:07, 24 May 2013 (UTC)
 * Delete: Just a shot of Brent Spiner pointing. We already have those from the same period for free use (well, he's not pointing, but we can all picture him pointing!). Miyagawa (talk) 17:37, 28 May 2013 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section.

File:STContagion.jpg
<div class="boilerplate metadata vfd xfd-closed" style="background-color:#f3f9ff; margin:1em 0 0 0; padding:0 10px 0 10px; border:1px solid #aaa;">
 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  01:02, 19 July 2013 (UTC)
 * File:STContagion.jpg ([ delete] | talk | [ history] | links | [ logs]) – uploaded by Cyberia23 ( [ notify] | contribs | uploads | upload log).

Invalid FUR: Non-free content is used only if its presence would significantly increase readers' understanding of the topic, and its omission would be detrimental to that understanding. This image is not critical for understanding, but is used in a decorative fashion. Since this file does not greatly enhance understanding, nor will its omission greatly decrease understanding, it must be deleted. —Justin ( koavf ) ❤T☮C☺M☯ 00:43, 23 May 2013 (UTC)
 * Keep All It's covered by fair use law.[//www.intellectbooks.co.uk/MediaManager/File/Film%20Stills.pdf] The image is not decorative it helps to identify the episode, illustrate key plot points, and provides visual reference to the episodes thematic elements, and style. After all this is a visual medium and a picture is worth a thousands words as they say. I believe that the Star Trek episode pages could use more illustrations across the board. I also don't believe that one user should arbitrarily mass submit images for deletion. The use of images to illustrate a TV episode is very common site wide and generally held as acceptable and legal. --Mccordscvs (talk) 12:50, 2 June 2013 (UTC)
 * Keep all and stop mass nominating things. You understand the episode more seeing the image from it.   D r e a m Focus  01:29, 23 May 2013 (UTC)
 * Keep per Richwales (see File:STMatterofHonor.jpg. As stated by others below, these images are illustrative of the episodes and increase understanding, so their use seems appropriate. Such images are so widely used in episode articles that the wider community seems to support their use, so wider community discussion as proposed by Richwales seems necessary. -- Aussie Legend  ( ✉ ) 16:00, 23 May 2013 (UTC)
 * Delete: Clear failure of WP:NFCC. None of the keep arguments indicate what significant increase in understanding this image generates or what detrimental effects would occur from its omission.&mdash;Kww(talk) 01:07, 24 May 2013 (UTC)
 * Delete - does not significantly add to understanding of episode, and omission would not be detrimental to understanding of episode. "Romulan warbird hangs menacingly in front of the Enterprise" would convey pretty much the same information. OTOH, a similar shot from "The Neutral Zone" might pass, as it was our first view of the new ships. -- SarekOfVulcan (talk) 04:27, 28 May 2013 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section.

File:ST-TNG Conundrum.jpg
<div class="boilerplate metadata vfd xfd-closed" style="background-color:#f3f9ff; margin:1em 0 0 0; padding:0 10px 0 10px; border:1px solid #aaa;">
 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  01:02, 19 July 2013 (UTC)
 * File:ST-TNG Conundrum.jpg ([ delete] | talk | [ history] | links | [ logs]) – uploaded by RoyBoy ( [ notify] | contribs | uploads | upload log).

Invalid FUR: Non-free content is used only if its presence would significantly increase readers' understanding of the topic, and its omission would be detrimental to that understanding. This image is not critical for understanding, but is used in a decorative fashion. Since this file does not greatly enhance understanding, nor will its omission greatly decrease understanding, it must be deleted. —Justin ( koavf ) ❤T☮C☺M☯ 00:44, 23 May 2013 (UTC)
 * Keep All It's covered by fair use law.[//www.intellectbooks.co.uk/MediaManager/File/Film%20Stills.pdf] The image is not decorative it helps to identify the episode, illustrate key plot points, and provides visual reference to the episodes thematic elements, and style. After all this is a visual medium and a picture is worth a thousands words as they say. I believe that the Star Trek episode pages could use more illustrations across the board. I also don't believe that one user should arbitrarily mass submit images for deletion. The use of images to illustrate a TV episode is very common site wide and generally held as acceptable and legal. --Mccordscvs (talk) 12:50, 2 June 2013 (UTC)
 * Keep all and stop mass nominating things. You understand the episode more seeing the image from it.   D r e a m Focus  01:29, 23 May 2013 (UTC)
 * Keep per Richwales (see File:STMatterofHonor.jpg. As stated by others below, these images are illustrative of the episodes and increase understanding, so their use seems appropriate. Such images are so widely used in episode articles that the wider community seems to support their use, so wider community discussion as proposed by Richwales seems necessary. -- Aussie Legend  ( ✉ ) 16:00, 23 May 2013 (UTC)
 * Delete: Clear failure of WP:NFCC. None of the keep arguments indicate what significant increase in understanding this image generates or what detrimental effects would occur from its omission.&mdash;Kww(talk) 01:07, 24 May 2013 (UTC)
 * Keep: It makes the episode(s) far easier to identify for someone who has seen it, but cannot remember the name. These images are selected to be unique to the episode and illustrate a relevant aspect of the story -- in this case, a new character. It is television, a visual medium, and one frame to ID the episode isn't unreasonable. If the copyright holder disagrees, then Wikipedia will comply. - RoyBoy 15:38, 25 May 2013 (UTC)
 * Delete - does not significantly add to understanding of episode, and omission would not be detrimental to understanding of episode. -- SarekOfVulcan (talk) 04:28, 28 May 2013 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section.

File:RemmicksParasite.jpg
<div class="boilerplate metadata vfd xfd-closed" style="background-color:#f3f9ff; margin:1em 0 0 0; padding:0 10px 0 10px; border:1px solid #aaa;">
 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the discussion was: Keep – Quadell (talk) 13:29, 23 July 2013 (UTC)
 * File:RemmicksParasite.jpg ([ delete] | talk | [ history] | links | [ logs]) – uploaded by Sage Veritas ( [ notify] | contribs | uploads | upload log).

Invalid FUR: Non-free content is used only if its presence would significantly increase readers' understanding of the topic, and its omission would be detrimental to that understanding. This image is not critical for understanding, but is used in a decorative fashion. Since this file does not greatly enhance understanding, nor will its omission greatly decrease understanding, it must be deleted. The controversy over this scene is mentioned but the meaning can be conveyed in text. —Justin ( koavf ) ❤T☮C☺M☯ 00:44, 23 May 2013 (UTC)
 * Keep All It's covered by fair use law.[//www.intellectbooks.co.uk/MediaManager/File/Film%20Stills.pdf] The image is not decorative it helps to identify the episode, illustrate key plot points, and provides visual reference to the episodes thematic elements, and style. After all this is a visual medium and a picture is worth a thousands words as they say. I believe that the Star Trek episode pages could use more illustrations across the board. I also don't believe that one user should arbitrarily mass submit images for deletion. The use of images to illustrate a TV episode is very common site wide and generally held as acceptable and legal. --Mccordscvs (talk) 12:50, 2 June 2013 (UTC)
 * Keep all and stop mass nominating things. You understand the episode more seeing the image from it.   D r e a m Focus  01:29, 23 May 2013 (UTC)
 * Keep This alien entity is controlling the Admirals at Starfleet Central and is the basis of the episode. --Leoboudv (talk) 01:46, 23 May 2013 (UTC)
 * Keep per Richwales (see File:STMatterofHonor.jpg. As stated by others below, these images are illustrative of the episodes and increase understanding, so their use seems appropriate. Such images are so widely used in episode articles that the wider community seems to support their use, so wider community discussion as proposed by Richwales seems necessary. -- Aussie Legend  ( ✉ ) 16:00, 23 May 2013 (UTC)
 * Keep The design of the parasite is discussed in the text of the article itself. Miyagawa (talk) 18:22, 23 May 2013 (UTC)
 * Keep This one actually is useful to explain why the episode faced censorship issues.&mdash;Kww(talk) 01:09, 24 May 2013 (UTC)
 * Keep per Miyagawa's and Kww's arguments. -- SarekOfVulcan (talk) 04:29, 28 May 2013 (UTC)
 * Keep, the content of the screenshot is clearly discussed in the "Plot", "Production", and "Reception" sections. – Quadell (talk) 12:37, 23 July 2013 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section.

File:ST-TNG Cost of Living.jpg
<div class="boilerplate metadata vfd xfd-closed" style="background-color:#f3f9ff; margin:1em 0 0 0; padding:0 10px 0 10px; border:1px solid #aaa;">
 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  01:02, 19 July 2013 (UTC)
 * File:ST-TNG Cost of Living.jpg ([ delete] | talk | [ history] | links | [ logs]) – uploaded by Cburnett ( [ notify] | contribs | uploads | upload log).

Invalid FUR: Non-free content is used only if its presence would significantly increase readers' understanding of the topic, and its omission would be detrimental to that understanding. This image is not critical for understanding, but is used in a decorative fashion. Since this file does not greatly enhance understanding, nor will its omission greatly decrease understanding, it must be deleted. —Justin ( koavf ) ❤T☮C☺M☯ 00:44, 23 May 2013 (UTC)
 * Keep All It's covered by fair use law.[//www.intellectbooks.co.uk/MediaManager/File/Film%20Stills.pdf] The image is not decorative it helps to identify the episode, illustrate key plot points, and provides visual reference to the episodes thematic elements, and style. After all this is a visual medium and a picture is worth a thousands words as they say. I believe that the Star Trek episode pages could use more illustrations across the board. I also don't believe that one user should arbitrarily mass submit images for deletion. The use of images to illustrate a TV episode is very common site wide and generally held as acceptable and legal. --Mccordscvs (talk) 12:50, 2 June 2013 (UTC)
 * Keep all and stop mass nominating things. You understand the episode more seeing the image from it.   D r e a m Focus  01:29, 23 May 2013 (UTC)
 * Keep per Richwales (see File:STMatterofHonor.jpg. As stated by others below, these images are illustrative of the episodes and increase understanding, so their use seems appropriate. Such images are so widely used in episode articles that the wider community seems to support their use, so wider community discussion as proposed by Richwales seems necessary. -- Aussie Legend  ( ✉ ) 16:00, 23 May 2013 (UTC)
 * Delete: Clear failure of WP:NFCC. None of the keep arguments indicate what significant increase in understanding this image generates or what detrimental effects would occur from its omission.&mdash;Kww(talk) 01:09, 24 May 2013 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Countdown (ENT episode).jpg
<div class="boilerplate metadata vfd xfd-closed" style="background-color:#f3f9ff; margin:1em 0 0 0; padding:0 10px 0 10px; border:1px solid #aaa;">
 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  01:02, 19 July 2013 (UTC)
 * File:Countdown (ENT episode).jpg ([ delete] | talk | [ history] | links | [ logs]) – uploaded by とある白い猫 ( [ notify] | contribs | uploads | upload log).

Invalid FUR: Non-free content is used only if its presence would significantly increase readers' understanding of the topic, and its omission would be detrimental to that understanding. This image is not critical for understanding, but is used in a decorative fashion. Since this file does not greatly enhance understanding, nor will its omission greatly decrease understanding, it must be deleted. —Justin ( koavf ) ❤T☮C☺M☯ 00:44, 23 May 2013 (UTC)
 * Keep All It's covered by fair use law.[//www.intellectbooks.co.uk/MediaManager/File/Film%20Stills.pdf] The image is not decorative it helps to identify the episode, illustrate key plot points, and provides visual reference to the episodes thematic elements, and style. After all this is a visual medium and a picture is worth a thousands words as they say. I believe that the Star Trek episode pages could use more illustrations across the board. I also don't believe that one user should arbitrarily mass submit images for deletion. The use of images to illustrate a TV episode is very common site wide and generally held as acceptable and legal. --Mccordscvs (talk) 12:50, 2 June 2013 (UTC)
 * Keep all and stop mass nominating things. You understand the episode more seeing the image from it.   D r e a m Focus  01:29, 23 May 2013 (UTC)
 * Keep per Richwales (see File:STMatterofHonor.jpg. As stated by others below, these images are illustrative of the episodes and increase understanding, so their use seems appropriate. Such images are so widely used in episode articles that the wider community seems to support their use, so wider community discussion as proposed by Richwales seems necessary. -- Aussie Legend  ( ✉ ) 16:00, 23 May 2013 (UTC)
 * Delete: Clear failure of WP:NFCC. None of the keep arguments indicate what significant increase in understanding this image generates or what detrimental effects would occur from its omission.&mdash;Kww(talk) 01:10, 24 May 2013 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section.

File:STCourtMartial.jpg
<div class="boilerplate metadata vfd xfd-closed" style="background-color:#f3f9ff; margin:1em 0 0 0; padding:0 10px 0 10px; border:1px solid #aaa;">
 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  01:02, 19 July 2013 (UTC)
 * File:STCourtMartial.jpg ([ delete] | talk | [ history] | links | [ logs]) – uploaded by Cyberia23 ( [ notify] | contribs | uploads | upload log).

Invalid FUR: Non-free content is used only if its presence would significantly increase readers' understanding of the topic, and its omission would be detrimental to that understanding. This image is not critical for understanding, but is used in a decorative fashion. Since this file does not greatly enhance understanding, nor will its omission greatly decrease understanding, it must be deleted. —Justin ( koavf ) ❤T☮C☺M☯ 00:44, 23 May 2013 (UTC)
 * Keep All It's covered by fair use law.[//www.intellectbooks.co.uk/MediaManager/File/Film%20Stills.pdf] The image is not decorative it helps to identify the episode, illustrate key plot points, and provides visual reference to the episodes thematic elements, and style. After all this is a visual medium and a picture is worth a thousands words as they say. I believe that the Star Trek episode pages could use more illustrations across the board. I also don't believe that one user should arbitrarily mass submit images for deletion. The use of images to illustrate a TV episode is very common site wide and generally held as acceptable and legal. --Mccordscvs (talk) 12:50, 2 June 2013 (UTC)
 * Keep all and stop mass nominating things. You understand the episode more seeing the image from it.   D r e a m Focus  01:29, 23 May 2013 (UTC)
 * Keep per Richwales (see File:STMatterofHonor.jpg. As stated by others below, these images are illustrative of the episodes and increase understanding, so their use seems appropriate. Such images are so widely used in episode articles that the wider community seems to support their use, so wider community discussion as proposed by Richwales seems necessary. -- Aussie Legend  ( ✉ ) 16:00, 23 May 2013 (UTC)
 * Delete: Clear failure of WP:NFCC. None of the keep arguments indicate what significant increase in understanding this image generates or what detrimental effects would occur from its omission.&mdash;Kww(talk) 01:10, 24 May 2013 (UTC)
 * Keep - arrangement is distinctive enough that removal might adversely affect understanding. -- SarekOfVulcan (talk) 04:32, 28 May 2013 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section.

File:STDaggerMind.jpg
<div class="boilerplate metadata vfd xfd-closed" style="background-color:#f3f9ff; margin:1em 0 0 0; padding:0 10px 0 10px; border:1px solid #aaa;">
 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  01:02, 19 July 2013 (UTC)
 * File:STDaggerMind.jpg ([ delete] | talk | [ history] | links | [ logs]) – uploaded by Cyberia23 ( [ notify] | contribs | uploads | upload log).

Invalid FUR: Non-free content is used only if its presence would significantly increase readers' understanding of the topic, and its omission would be detrimental to that understanding. This image is not critical for understanding, but is used in a decorative fashion. Since this file does not greatly enhance understanding, nor will its omission greatly decrease understanding, it must be deleted. —Justin ( koavf ) ❤T☮C☺M☯ 00:45, 23 May 2013 (UTC)
 * Keep All It's covered by fair use law.[//www.intellectbooks.co.uk/MediaManager/File/Film%20Stills.pdf] The image is not decorative it helps to identify the episode, illustrate key plot points, and provides visual reference to the episodes thematic elements, and style. After all this is a visual medium and a picture is worth a thousands words as they say. I believe that the Star Trek episode pages could use more illustrations across the board. I also don't believe that one user should arbitrarily mass submit images for deletion. The use of images to illustrate a TV episode is very common site wide and generally held as acceptable and legal. --Mccordscvs (talk) 12:50, 2 June 2013 (UTC)
 * Keep all and stop mass nominating things. You understand the episode more seeing the image from it.   D r e a m Focus  01:29, 23 May 2013 (UTC)
 * Keep per Richwales (see File:STMatterofHonor.jpg. As stated by others below, these images are illustrative of the episodes and increase understanding, so their use seems appropriate. Such images are so widely used in episode articles that the wider community seems to support their use, so wider community discussion as proposed by Richwales seems necessary. -- Aussie Legend  ( ✉ ) 16:00, 23 May 2013 (UTC)
 * Delete: Clear failure of WP:NFCC. None of the keep arguments indicate what significant increase in understanding this image generates or what detrimental effects would occur from its omission.&mdash;Kww(talk) 01:11, 24 May 2013 (UTC)
 * Delete - does not significantly add to understanding of episode, and omission would not be detrimental to understanding of episode. "Kirk writhes in pain on a chair" conveys pretty much the same information. -- SarekOfVulcan (talk) 04:33, 28 May 2013 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Damage (ENT episode).jpg
<div class="boilerplate metadata vfd xfd-closed" style="background-color:#f3f9ff; margin:1em 0 0 0; padding:0 10px 0 10px; border:1px solid #aaa;">
 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  01:02, 19 July 2013 (UTC)
 * File:Damage (ENT episode).jpg ([ delete] | talk | [ history] | links | [ logs]) – uploaded by とある白い猫 ( [ notify] | contribs | uploads | upload log).

Invalid FUR: Non-free content is used only if its presence would significantly increase readers' understanding of the topic, and its omission would be detrimental to that understanding. This image is not critical for understanding, but is used in a decorative fashion. Since this file does not greatly enhance understanding, nor will its omission greatly decrease understanding, it must be deleted. —Justin ( koavf ) ❤T☮C☺M☯ 00:45, 23 May 2013 (UTC)
 * Keep All It's covered by fair use law.[//www.intellectbooks.co.uk/MediaManager/File/Film%20Stills.pdf] The image is not decorative it helps to identify the episode, illustrate key plot points, and provides visual reference to the episodes thematic elements, and style. After all this is a visual medium and a picture is worth a thousands words as they say. I believe that the Star Trek episode pages could use more illustrations across the board. I also don't believe that one user should arbitrarily mass submit images for deletion. The use of images to illustrate a TV episode is very common site wide and generally held as acceptable and legal. --Mccordscvs (talk) 12:50, 2 June 2013 (UTC)
 * Keep all and stop mass nominating things. You understand the episode more seeing the image from it.   D r e a m Focus  01:29, 23 May 2013 (UTC)
 * Keep per Richwales (see File:STMatterofHonor.jpg. As stated by others below, these images are illustrative of the episodes and increase understanding, so their use seems appropriate. Such images are so widely used in episode articles that the wider community seems to support their use, so wider community discussion as proposed by Richwales seems necessary. -- Aussie Legend  ( ✉ ) 16:00, 23 May 2013 (UTC)
 * Delete: Clear failure of WP:NFCC. None of the keep arguments indicate what significant increase in understanding this image generates or what detrimental effects would occur from its omission.&mdash;Kww(talk) 01:11, 24 May 2013 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section.

File:ST-TNG Dark Page.jpg
<div class="boilerplate metadata vfd xfd-closed" style="background-color:#f3f9ff; margin:1em 0 0 0; padding:0 10px 0 10px; border:1px solid #aaa;">
 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  01:02, 19 July 2013 (UTC)
 * File:ST-TNG Dark Page.jpg ([ delete] | talk | [ history] | links | [ logs]) – uploaded by Cburnett ( [ notify] | contribs | uploads | upload log).

Invalid FUR: Non-free content is used only if its presence would significantly increase readers' understanding of the topic, and its omission would be detrimental to that understanding. This image is not critical for understanding, but is used in a decorative fashion. Since this file does not greatly enhance understanding, nor will its omission greatly decrease understanding, it must be deleted. —Justin ( koavf ) ❤T☮C☺M☯ 00:45, 23 May 2013 (UTC)
 * Keep All It's covered by fair use law.[//www.intellectbooks.co.uk/MediaManager/File/Film%20Stills.pdf] The image is not decorative it helps to identify the episode, illustrate key plot points, and provides visual reference to the episodes thematic elements, and style. After all this is a visual medium and a picture is worth a thousands words as they say. I believe that the Star Trek episode pages could use more illustrations across the board. I also don't believe that one user should arbitrarily mass submit images for deletion. The use of images to illustrate a TV episode is very common site wide and generally held as acceptable and legal. --Mccordscvs (talk) 12:50, 2 June 2013 (UTC)
 * Keep all and stop mass nominating things. You understand the episode more seeing the image from it.   D r e a m Focus  01:29, 23 May 2013 (UTC)
 * Keep per Richwales (see File:STMatterofHonor.jpg. As stated by others below, these images are illustrative of the episodes and increase understanding, so their use seems appropriate. Such images are so widely used in episode articles that the wider community seems to support their use, so wider community discussion as proposed by Richwales seems necessary. -- Aussie Legend  ( ✉ ) 16:00, 23 May 2013 (UTC)
 * Delete: Clear failure of WP:NFCC. None of the keep arguments indicate what significant increase in understanding this image generates or what detrimental effects would occur from its omission.&mdash;Kww(talk) 01:12, 24 May 2013 (UTC)
 * Delete - does not significantly add to understanding of episode, and omission would not be detrimental to understanding of episode. "Troi sits up alarmed in sickbay next to her mother" conveys pretty much the same information.-- SarekOfVulcan (talk) 04:34, 28 May 2013 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section.

File:ST-TNG Data&
<div class="boilerplate metadata vfd xfd-closed" style="background-color:#f3f9ff; margin:1em 0 0 0; padding:0 10px 0 10px; border:1px solid #aaa;">
 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  01:02, 19 July 2013 (UTC)
 * File:ST-TNG Data& ([ delete] | talk | [ history] | links | [ logs]) – uploaded by Cburnett ( [ notify] | contribs | uploads | upload log).

Invalid FUR: Non-free content is used only if its presence would significantly increase readers' understanding of the topic, and its omission would be detrimental to that understanding. This image is not critical for understanding, but is used in a decorative fashion. Since this file does not greatly enhance understanding, nor will its omission greatly decrease understanding, it must be deleted. —Justin ( koavf ) ❤T☮C☺M☯ 00:50, 23 May 2013 (UTC)
 * Keep All It's covered by fair use law.[//www.intellectbooks.co.uk/MediaManager/File/Film%20Stills.pdf] The image is not decorative it helps to identify the episode, illustrate key plot points, and provides visual reference to the episodes thematic elements, and style. After all this is a visual medium and a picture is worth a thousands words as they say. I believe that the Star Trek episode pages could use more illustrations across the board. I also don't believe that one user should arbitrarily mass submit images for deletion. The use of images to illustrate a TV episode is very common site wide and generally held as acceptable and legal. --Mccordscvs (talk) 12:50, 2 June 2013 (UTC)
 * Keep all and stop mass nominating things. You understand the episode more seeing the image from it.   D r e a m Focus  01:29, 23 May 2013 (UTC)
 * Keep per Richwales (see File:STMatterofHonor.jpg. As stated by others below, these images are illustrative of the episodes and increase understanding, so their use seems appropriate. Such images are so widely used in episode articles that the wider community seems to support their use, so wider community discussion as proposed by Richwales seems necessary. -- Aussie Legend  ( ✉ ) 16:00, 23 May 2013 (UTC)
 * Delete: Clear failure of WP:NFCC. None of the keep arguments indicate what significant increase in understanding this image generates or what detrimental effects would occur from its omission.&mdash;Kww(talk) 01:12, 24 May 2013 (UTC)
 * Delete - does not significantly add to understanding of episode, and omission would not be detrimental to understanding of episode. "Data and Crusher tap-dance side by side" gets the point across.-- SarekOfVulcan (talk) 04:35, 28 May 2013 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section.

File:ENTdawn.jpg
<div class="boilerplate metadata vfd xfd-closed" style="background-color:#f3f9ff; margin:1em 0 0 0; padding:0 10px 0 10px; border:1px solid #aaa;">
 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  01:02, 19 July 2013 (UTC)
 * File:ENTdawn.jpg ([ delete] | talk | [ history] | links | [ logs]) – uploaded by (aeropagitica) ( [ notify] | contribs | uploads | upload log).

Invalid FUR: Non-free content is used only if its presence would significantly increase readers' understanding of the topic, and its omission would be detrimental to that understanding. This image is not critical for understanding, but is used in a decorative fashion. Since this file does not greatly enhance understanding, nor will its omission greatly decrease understanding, it must be deleted. —Justin ( koavf ) ❤T☮C☺M☯ 00:50, 23 May 2013 (UTC)
 * Keep All It's covered by fair use law.[//www.intellectbooks.co.uk/MediaManager/File/Film%20Stills.pdf] The image is not decorative it helps to identify the episode, illustrate key plot points, and provides visual reference to the episodes thematic elements, and style. After all this is a visual medium and a picture is worth a thousands words as they say. I believe that the Star Trek episode pages could use more illustrations across the board. I also don't believe that one user should arbitrarily mass submit images for deletion. The use of images to illustrate a TV episode is very common site wide and generally held as acceptable and legal. --Mccordscvs (talk) 12:50, 2 June 2013 (UTC)
 * Keep all and stop mass nominating things. You understand the episode more seeing the image from it.   D r e a m Focus  01:29, 23 May 2013 (UTC)
 * Keep per Richwales (see File:STMatterofHonor.jpg. As stated by others below, these images are illustrative of the episodes and increase understanding, so their use seems appropriate. Such images are so widely used in episode articles that the wider community seems to support their use, so wider community discussion as proposed by Richwales seems necessary. -- Aussie Legend  ( ✉ ) 16:00, 23 May 2013 (UTC)
 * Delete: Clear failure of WP:NFCC. None of the keep arguments indicate what significant increase in understanding this image generates or what detrimental effects would occur from its omission.&mdash;Kww(talk) 01:13, 24 May 2013 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section.

File:STDayofDove.jpg
<div class="boilerplate metadata vfd xfd-closed" style="background-color:#f3f9ff; margin:1em 0 0 0; padding:0 10px 0 10px; border:1px solid #aaa;">
 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  01:02, 19 July 2013 (UTC)
 * File:STDayofDove.jpg ([ delete] | talk | [ history] | links | [ logs]) – uploaded by Cyberia23 ( [ notify] | contribs | uploads | upload log).

Invalid FUR: Non-free content is used only if its presence would significantly increase readers' understanding of the topic, and its omission would be detrimental to that understanding. This image is not critical for understanding, but is used in a decorative fashion. Since this file does not greatly enhance understanding, nor will its omission greatly decrease understanding, it must be deleted. —Justin ( koavf ) ❤T☮C☺M☯ 00:50, 23 May 2013 (UTC)
 * Keep All It's covered by fair use law.[//www.intellectbooks.co.uk/MediaManager/File/Film%20Stills.pdf] The image is not decorative it helps to identify the episode, illustrate key plot points, and provides visual reference to the episodes thematic elements, and style. After all this is a visual medium and a picture is worth a thousands words as they say. I believe that the Star Trek episode pages could use more illustrations across the board. I also don't believe that one user should arbitrarily mass submit images for deletion. The use of images to illustrate a TV episode is very common site wide and generally held as acceptable and legal. --Mccordscvs (talk) 12:50, 2 June 2013 (UTC)
 * Keep all and stop mass nominating things. You understand the episode more seeing the image from it.   D r e a m Focus  01:29, 23 May 2013 (UTC)
 * Keep per Richwales (see File:STMatterofHonor.jpg. As stated by others below, these images are illustrative of the episodes and increase understanding, so their use seems appropriate. Such images are so widely used in episode articles that the wider community seems to support their use, so wider community discussion as proposed by Richwales seems necessary. -- Aussie Legend  ( ✉ ) 16:00, 23 May 2013 (UTC)
 * Delete: Clear failure of WP:NFCC. None of the keep arguments indicate what significant increase in understanding this image generates or what detrimental effects would occur from its omission.&mdash;Kww(talk) 01:13, 24 May 2013 (UTC)
 * Keep This episode presents the Klingons slightly differently from earlier ones, so having the picture is useful in this case. Besides, doesn't Worf use that exact sash in early episodes of TNG? -- SarekOfVulcan (talk) 04:38, 28 May 2013 (UTC)
 * That isn't mentioned in the article, so the image isn't supporting critical discussion. Even if it was, how would a change in Klingon appearance be important to understanding this episode? Your "keep" argument does nothing to undermine the deletion nomination.&mdash;Kww(talk) 04:42, 28 May 2013 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Enterprise - S2E04 - Dead Stop.jpg
<div class="boilerplate metadata vfd xfd-closed" style="background-color:#f3f9ff; margin:1em 0 0 0; padding:0 10px 0 10px; border:1px solid #aaa;">
 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  01:02, 19 July 2013 (UTC)
 * File:Enterprise - S2E04 - Dead Stop.jpg ([ delete] | talk | [ history] | links | [ logs]) – uploaded by Snorbaard ( [ notify] | contribs | uploads | upload log).

Invalid FUR: Non-free content is used only if its presence would significantly increase readers' understanding of the topic, and its omission would be detrimental to that understanding. This image is not critical for understanding, but is used in a decorative fashion. Since this file does not greatly enhance understanding, nor will its omission greatly decrease understanding, it must be deleted. —Justin ( koavf ) ❤T☮C☺M☯ 00:50, 23 May 2013 (UTC)
 * Keep All It's covered by fair use law.[//www.intellectbooks.co.uk/MediaManager/File/Film%20Stills.pdf] The image is not decorative it helps to identify the episode, illustrate key plot points, and provides visual reference to the episodes thematic elements, and style. After all this is a visual medium and a picture is worth a thousands words as they say. I believe that the Star Trek episode pages could use more illustrations across the board. I also don't believe that one user should arbitrarily mass submit images for deletion. The use of images to illustrate a TV episode is very common site wide and generally held as acceptable and legal. --Mccordscvs (talk) 12:50, 2 June 2013 (UTC)
 * Keep all and stop mass nominating things. You understand the episode more seeing the image from it.   D r e a m Focus  01:29, 23 May 2013 (UTC)
 * Keep per Richwales (see File:STMatterofHonor.jpg. As stated by others below, these images are illustrative of the episodes and increase understanding, so their use seems appropriate. Such images are so widely used in episode articles that the wider community seems to support their use, so wider community discussion as proposed by Richwales seems necessary. -- Aussie Legend  ( ✉ ) 16:00, 23 May 2013 (UTC)
 * Delete: Clear failure of WP:NFCC. None of the keep arguments indicate what significant increase in understanding this image generates or what detrimental effects would occur from its omission.&mdash;Kww(talk) 01:14, 24 May 2013 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section.

File:STDejaQ.jpg
<div class="boilerplate metadata vfd xfd-closed" style="background-color:#f3f9ff; margin:1em 0 0 0; padding:0 10px 0 10px; border:1px solid #aaa;">
 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  01:02, 19 July 2013 (UTC)
 * File:STDejaQ.jpg ([ delete] | talk | [ history] | links | [ logs]) – uploaded by Cyberia23 ( [ notify] | contribs | uploads | upload log).

Invalid FUR: Non-free content is used only if its presence would significantly increase readers' understanding of the topic, and its omission would be detrimental to that understanding. This image is not critical for understanding, but is used in a decorative fashion. Since this file does not greatly enhance understanding, nor will its omission greatly decrease understanding, it must be deleted. —Justin ( koavf ) ❤T☮C☺M☯ 00:51, 23 May 2013 (UTC)
 * Keep All It's covered by fair use law.[//www.intellectbooks.co.uk/MediaManager/File/Film%20Stills.pdf] The image is not decorative it helps to identify the episode, illustrate key plot points, and provides visual reference to the episodes thematic elements, and style. After all this is a visual medium and a picture is worth a thousands words as they say. I believe that the Star Trek episode pages could use more illustrations across the board. I also don't believe that one user should arbitrarily mass submit images for deletion. The use of images to illustrate a TV episode is very common site wide and generally held as acceptable and legal. --Mccordscvs (talk) 12:50, 2 June 2013 (UTC)
 * Keep all and stop mass nominating things. You understand the episode more seeing the image from it.   D r e a m Focus  01:29, 23 May 2013 (UTC)
 * Keep per Richwales (see File:STMatterofHonor.jpg. As stated by others below, these images are illustrative of the episodes and increase understanding, so their use seems appropriate. Such images are so widely used in episode articles that the wider community seems to support their use, so wider community discussion as proposed by Richwales seems necessary. -- Aussie Legend  ( ✉ ) 16:00, 23 May 2013 (UTC)
 * Delete: Clear failure of WP:NFCC. None of the keep arguments indicate what significant increase in understanding this image generates or what detrimental effects would occur from its omission.&mdash;Kww(talk) 01:15, 24 May 2013 (UTC)
 * Delete - does not significantly add to understanding of episode, and omission would not be detrimental to understanding of episode. "Data talks to depressed-looking Q" conveys pretty much the same information. -- SarekOfVulcan (talk) 04:40, 28 May 2013 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Divergence (ENT episode).jpg
<div class="boilerplate metadata vfd xfd-closed" style="background-color:#f3f9ff; margin:1em 0 0 0; padding:0 10px 0 10px; border:1px solid #aaa;">
 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  09:07, 19 July 2013 (UTC)
 * File:Divergence (ENT episode).jpg ([ delete] | talk | [ history] | links | [ logs]) – uploaded by とある白い猫 ( [ notify] | contribs | uploads | upload log).

Invalid FUR: Non-free content is used only if its presence would significantly increase readers' understanding of the topic, and its omission would be detrimental to that understanding. This image is not critical for understanding, but is used in a decorative fashion. Since this file does not greatly enhance understanding, nor will its omission greatly decrease understanding, it must be deleted. —Justin ( koavf ) ❤T☮C☺M☯ 00:51, 23 May 2013 (UTC)
 * Keep All It's covered by fair use law.[//www.intellectbooks.co.uk/MediaManager/File/Film%20Stills.pdf] The image is not decorative it helps to identify the episode, illustrate key plot points, and provides visual reference to the episodes thematic elements, and style. After all this is a visual medium and a picture is worth a thousands words as they say. I believe that the Star Trek episode pages could use more illustrations across the board. I also don't believe that one user should arbitrarily mass submit images for deletion. The use of images to illustrate a TV episode is very common site wide and generally held as acceptable and legal. --Mccordscvs (talk) 12:50, 2 June 2013 (UTC)
 * Keep all and stop mass nominating things. You understand the episode more seeing the image from it.   D r e a m Focus  01:29, 23 May 2013 (UTC)
 * Keep per Richwales (see File:STMatterofHonor.jpg. As stated by others below, these images are illustrative of the episodes and increase understanding, so their use seems appropriate. Such images are so widely used in episode articles that the wider community seems to support their use, so wider community discussion as proposed by Richwales seems necessary. -- Aussie Legend  ( ✉ ) 16:00, 23 May 2013 (UTC)
 * Delete: Clear failure of WP:NFCC. None of the keep arguments indicate what significant increase in understanding this image generates or what detrimental effects would occur from its omission.&mdash;Kww(talk) 01:15, 24 May 2013 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Doctor&
<div class="boilerplate metadata vfd xfd-closed" style="background-color:#f3f9ff; margin:1em 0 0 0; padding:0 10px 0 10px; border:1px solid #aaa;">
 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  09:07, 19 July 2013 (UTC)
 * File:Doctor& ([ delete] | talk | [ history] | links | [ logs]) – uploaded by とある白い猫 ( [ notify] | contribs | uploads | upload log).

Invalid FUR: Non-free content is used only if its presence would significantly increase readers' understanding of the topic, and its omission would be detrimental to that understanding. This image is not critical for understanding, but is used in a decorative fashion. Since this file does not greatly enhance understanding, nor will its omission greatly decrease understanding, it must be deleted. —Justin ( koavf ) ❤T☮C☺M☯ 00:51, 23 May 2013 (UTC)
 * Keep All It's covered by fair use law.[//www.intellectbooks.co.uk/MediaManager/File/Film%20Stills.pdf] The image is not decorative it helps to identify the episode, illustrate key plot points, and provides visual reference to the episodes thematic elements, and style. After all this is a visual medium and a picture is worth a thousands words as they say. I believe that the Star Trek episode pages could use more illustrations across the board. I also don't believe that one user should arbitrarily mass submit images for deletion. The use of images to illustrate a TV episode is very common site wide and generally held as acceptable and legal. --Mccordscvs (talk) 12:50, 2 June 2013 (UTC)
 * Keep all and stop mass nominating things. You understand the episode more seeing the image from it.   D r e a m Focus  01:29, 23 May 2013 (UTC)
 * Keep per Richwales (see File:STMatterofHonor.jpg. As stated by others below, these images are illustrative of the episodes and increase understanding, so their use seems appropriate. Such images are so widely used in episode articles that the wider community seems to support their use, so wider community discussion as proposed by Richwales seems necessary. -- Aussie Legend  ( ✉ ) 16:00, 23 May 2013 (UTC)
 * Delete Actually this one is pretty rubbish, it's just a shot of two of the main cast, one of them looking disorientated. If I was expanding the article, I'd delete the image anyway as I can't imagine what could be included in the text that this image would help the reader understand better. Miyagawa (talk) 18:24, 23 May 2013 (UTC)
 * Delete: Clear failure of WP:NFCC. None of the keep arguments indicate what significant increase in understanding this image generates or what detrimental effects would occur from its omission.&mdash;Kww(talk) 01:16, 24 May 2013 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section.

File:STElaan.jpg
<div class="boilerplate metadata vfd xfd-closed" style="background-color:#f3f9ff; margin:1em 0 0 0; padding:0 10px 0 10px; border:1px solid #aaa;">
 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  09:07, 19 July 2013 (UTC)
 * File:STElaan.jpg ([ delete] | talk | [ history] | links | [ logs]) – uploaded by Cyberia23 ( [ notify] | contribs | uploads | upload log).

Invalid FUR: Non-free content is used only if its presence would significantly increase readers' understanding of the topic, and its omission would be detrimental to that understanding. This image is not critical for understanding, but is used in a decorative fashion. Since this file does not greatly enhance understanding, nor will its omission greatly decrease understanding, it must be deleted. —Justin ( koavf ) ❤T☮C☺M☯ 00:52, 23 May 2013 (UTC)
 * Keep All It's covered by fair use law.[//www.intellectbooks.co.uk/MediaManager/File/Film%20Stills.pdf] The image is not decorative it helps to identify the episode, illustrate key plot points, and provides visual reference to the episodes thematic elements, and style. After all this is a visual medium and a picture is worth a thousands words as they say. I believe that the Star Trek episode pages could use more illustrations across the board. I also don't believe that one user should arbitrarily mass submit images for deletion. The use of images to illustrate a TV episode is very common site wide and generally held as acceptable and legal. --Mccordscvs (talk) 12:50, 2 June 2013 (UTC)
 * Keep all and stop mass nominating things. You understand the episode more seeing the image from it.   D r e a m Focus  01:29, 23 May 2013 (UTC)
 * Keep per Richwales (see File:STMatterofHonor.jpg. As stated by others below, these images are illustrative of the episodes and increase understanding, so their use seems appropriate. Such images are so widely used in episode articles that the wider community seems to support their use, so wider community discussion as proposed by Richwales seems necessary. -- Aussie Legend  ( ✉ ) 16:00, 23 May 2013 (UTC)
 * Delete: Clear failure of WP:NFCC. None of the keep arguments indicate what significant increase in understanding this image generates or what detrimental effects would occur from its omission.&mdash;Kww(talk) 01:17, 24 May 2013 (UTC)
 * Delete - does not significantly add to understanding of episode, and omission would not be detrimental to understanding of episode. -- SarekOfVulcan (talk) 04:41, 28 May 2013 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section.

File:ST TNG Devil&
<div class="boilerplate metadata vfd xfd-closed" style="background-color:#f3f9ff; margin:1em 0 0 0; padding:0 10px 0 10px; border:1px solid #aaa;">
 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  09:07, 19 July 2013 (UTC)
 * File:ST TNG Devil& ([ delete] | talk | [ history] | links | [ logs]) – uploaded by とある白い猫 ( [ notify] | contribs | uploads | upload log).

Invalid FUR: Non-free content is used only if its presence would significantly increase readers' understanding of the topic, and its omission would be detrimental to that understanding. This image is not critical for understanding, but is used in a decorative fashion. Since this file does not greatly enhance understanding, nor will its omission greatly decrease understanding, it must be deleted. —Justin ( koavf ) ❤T☮C☺M☯ 00:52, 23 May 2013 (UTC)
 * Keep All It's covered by fair use law.[//www.intellectbooks.co.uk/MediaManager/File/Film%20Stills.pdf] The image is not decorative it helps to identify the episode, illustrate key plot points, and provides visual reference to the episodes thematic elements, and style. After all this is a visual medium and a picture is worth a thousands words as they say. I believe that the Star Trek episode pages could use more illustrations across the board. I also don't believe that one user should arbitrarily mass submit images for deletion. The use of images to illustrate a TV episode is very common site wide and generally held as acceptable and legal. --Mccordscvs (talk) 12:50, 2 June 2013 (UTC)
 * Keep all and stop mass nominating things. You understand the episode more seeing the image from it.   D r e a m Focus  01:29, 23 May 2013 (UTC)
 * Keep per Richwales (see File:STMatterofHonor.jpg. As stated by others below, these images are illustrative of the episodes and increase understanding, so their use seems appropriate. Such images are so widely used in episode articles that the wider community seems to support their use, so wider community discussion as proposed by Richwales seems necessary. -- Aussie Legend  ( ✉ ) 16:00, 23 May 2013 (UTC)
 * Keep The makeup is described in the text of the article, and so this image helps the reader understand what that is referring to. Miyagawa (talk) 18:25, 23 May 2013 (UTC)
 * Delete: Clear failure of WP:NFCC. None of the keep arguments indicate what significant increase in understanding this image generates or what detrimental effects would occur from its omission. The makeup description isn't critical to understanding the episode, and that's what WP:NFCC is about.&mdash;Kww(talk) 01:19, 24 May 2013 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section.

File:ST-TNG Elementary, Dear Data.jpg
<div class="boilerplate metadata vfd xfd-closed" style="background-color:#f3f9ff; margin:1em 0 0 0; padding:0 10px 0 10px; border:1px solid #aaa;">
 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  09:07, 19 July 2013 (UTC)
 * File:ST-TNG Elementary, Dear Data.jpg ([ delete] | talk | [ history] | links | [ logs]) – uploaded by Cburnett ( [ notify] | contribs | uploads | upload log).

Invalid FUR: Non-free content is used only if its presence would significantly increase readers' understanding of the topic, and its omission would be detrimental to that understanding. This image is not critical for understanding, but is used in a decorative fashion. Since this file does not greatly enhance understanding, nor will its omission greatly decrease understanding, it must be deleted. —Justin ( koavf ) ❤T☮C☺M☯ 00:52, 23 May 2013 (UTC)
 * Keep All It's covered by fair use law.[//www.intellectbooks.co.uk/MediaManager/File/Film%20Stills.pdf] The image is not decorative it helps to identify the episode, illustrate key plot points, and provides visual reference to the episodes thematic elements, and style. After all this is a visual medium and a picture is worth a thousands words as they say. I believe that the Star Trek episode pages could use more illustrations across the board. I also don't believe that one user should arbitrarily mass submit images for deletion. The use of images to illustrate a TV episode is very common site wide and generally held as acceptable and legal. --Mccordscvs (talk) 12:50, 2 June 2013 (UTC)
 * Keep all and stop mass nominating things. You understand the episode more seeing the image from it.   D r e a m Focus  01:29, 23 May 2013 (UTC)
 * Keep per Richwales (see File:STMatterofHonor.jpg. As stated by others below, these images are illustrative of the episodes and increase understanding, so their use seems appropriate. Such images are so widely used in episode articles that the wider community seems to support their use, so wider community discussion as proposed by Richwales seems necessary. -- Aussie Legend  ( ✉ ) 16:00, 23 May 2013 (UTC)
 * Delete: Clear failure of WP:NFCC. None of the keep arguments indicate what significant increase in understanding this image generates or what detrimental effects would occur from its omission. "'Ooh, they tried to fake the streets of London as a cheesy plot device" can be expressed in text.&mdash;Kww(talk) 01:20, 24 May 2013 (UTC)
 * Delete - does not significantly add to understanding of episode, and omission would not be detrimental to understanding of episode. "Moriarty gives instructions to the Arch, with 19th-century London in the background" gets the point across. (That said, it's a fairly striking image, so the delete is weaker than some of my others tonight.)-- SarekOfVulcan (talk) 04:43, 28 May 2013 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section.

File:ST-TNG Emergence.jpg
<div class="boilerplate metadata vfd xfd-closed" style="background-color:#f3f9ff; margin:1em 0 0 0; padding:0 10px 0 10px; border:1px solid #aaa;">
 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  09:07, 20 July 2013 (UTC)
 * File:ST-TNG Emergence.jpg ([ delete] | talk | [ history] | links | [ logs]) – uploaded by Cburnett ( [ notify] | contribs | uploads | upload log).

Invalid FUR: Non-free content is used only if its presence would significantly increase readers' understanding of the topic, and its omission would be detrimental to that understanding. This image is not critical for understanding, but is used in a decorative fashion. Since this file does not greatly enhance understanding, nor will its omission greatly decrease understanding, it must be deleted. —Justin ( koavf ) ❤T☮C☺M☯ 00:52, 23 May 2013 (UTC)
 * Keep All It's covered by fair use law.[//www.intellectbooks.co.uk/MediaManager/File/Film%20Stills.pdf] The image is not decorative it helps to identify the episode, illustrate key plot points, and provides visual reference to the episodes thematic elements, and style. After all this is a visual medium and a picture is worth a thousands words as they say. I believe that the Star Trek episode pages could use more illustrations across the board. I also don't believe that one user should arbitrarily mass submit images for deletion. The use of images to illustrate a TV episode is very common site wide and generally held as acceptable and legal. --Mccordscvs (talk) 12:50, 2 June 2013 (UTC)
 * Keep all and stop mass nominating things. You understand the episode more seeing the image from it.   D r e a m Focus  01:29, 23 May 2013 (UTC)
 * Keep per Richwales (see File:STMatterofHonor.jpg. As stated by others below, these images are illustrative of the episodes and increase understanding, so their use seems appropriate. Such images are so widely used in episode articles that the wider community seems to support their use, so wider community discussion as proposed by Richwales seems necessary. -- Aussie Legend  ( ✉ ) 16:00, 23 May 2013 (UTC)
 * Delete: Clear failure of WP:NFCC. None of the keep arguments indicate what significant increase in understanding this image generates or what detrimental effects would occur from its omission.&mdash;Kww(talk) 01:21, 24 May 2013 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section.

File:ST-TNG Encounter at Farpoint.jpg
<div class="boilerplate metadata vfd xfd-closed" style="background-color:#f3f9ff; margin:1em 0 0 0; padding:0 10px 0 10px; border:1px solid #aaa;">
 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  17:09, 23 July 2013 (UTC)
 * File:ST-TNG Encounter at Farpoint.jpg ([ delete] | talk | [ history] | links | [ logs]) – uploaded by Sage Veritas ( [ notify] | contribs | uploads | upload log).

Invalid FUR: Non-free content is used only if its presence would significantly increase readers' understanding of the topic, and its omission would be detrimental to that understanding. This image is not critical for understanding, but is used in a decorative fashion. Since this file does not greatly enhance understanding, nor will its omission greatly decrease understanding, it must be deleted. —Justin ( koavf ) ❤T☮C☺M☯ 00:53, 23 May 2013 (UTC)
 * Keep All It's covered by fair use law.[//www.intellectbooks.co.uk/MediaManager/File/Film%20Stills.pdf] The image is not decorative it helps to identify the episode, illustrate key plot points, and provides visual reference to the episodes thematic elements, and style. After all this is a visual medium and a picture is worth a thousands words as they say. I believe that the Star Trek episode pages could use more illustrations across the board. I also don't believe that one user should arbitrarily mass submit images for deletion. The use of images to illustrate a TV episode is very common site wide and generally held as acceptable and legal. --Mccordscvs (talk) 12:50, 2 June 2013 (UTC)
 * Keep all and stop mass nominating things. You understand the episode more seeing the image from it.   D r e a m Focus  01:29, 23 May 2013 (UTC)
 * Keep per Richwales (see File:STMatterofHonor.jpg. As stated by others below, these images are illustrative of the episodes and increase understanding, so their use seems appropriate. Such images are so widely used in episode articles that the wider community seems to support their use, so wider community discussion as proposed by Richwales seems necessary. -- Aussie Legend  ( ✉ ) 16:00, 23 May 2013 (UTC)
 * Keep An image including the design of the aliens would be required in order to help the reader understand what is included in the article text. Miyagawa (talk) 18:26, 23 May 2013 (UTC)
 * Delete: Clear failure of WP:NFCC. None of the keep arguments indicate what significant increase in understanding this image generates or what detrimental effects would occur from its omission.&mdash;Kww(talk) 01:22, 24 May 2013 (UTC)
 * Keep - "giant glowing space jellyfish" is far enough outside most people's experience that removing the image would be detrimental to understanding the episode. -- SarekOfVulcan (talk) 04:45, 28 May 2013 (UTC)
 * Delete: The content of the screenshot is described in a single sentence in the "Plot" section, but is not really discussed elsewhere. (Discussing "new models of the Enterprise" in "Filming" really doesn't count.) There are many ways the content could be discussed in "reception" or "conception" or "home media", but it is not. – Quadell (talk) 12:44, 23 July 2013 (UTC)
 * Note to Keep voters: If you feel a screenshot passes WP:NFCC, it will not help to complain about mass nominations or defend the legality of the image use, since these are not relevant. Instead, if you could identify which specific sections of prose in the body of the article are depicted by the screenshot, it will help make the closing admin's job much easier. – Quadell (talk) 12:44, 23 July 2013 (UTC)
 * Delete: If the image were vitally important to understanding the plot (WP:NFCC)&mdash;the only place the subject is discussed&mdash;it would be alongside that text for such facilitation. Furthermore, how many aliens does Star Trek feature; do we need photos of very single one to understand stories where their appearance isn't instrumental to the plot?  Right now, I feel it's purpose is instead to decorate an infobox where nothing needs its illustrative properties.  —   fourthords  <small style="font-size:85%;">&#124; =Λ= <small style="font-size:85%;">&#124;  12:50, 23 July 2013 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section.

File:ST-TNG Ensign Ro.jpg
<div class="boilerplate metadata vfd xfd-closed" style="background-color:#f3f9ff; margin:1em 0 0 0; padding:0 10px 0 10px; border:1px solid #aaa;">
 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  09:07, 20 July 2013 (UTC)
 * File:ST-TNG Ensign Ro.jpg ([ delete] | talk | [ history] | links | [ logs]) – uploaded by Cburnett ( [ notify] | contribs | uploads | upload log).

Invalid FUR: Non-free content is used only if its presence would significantly increase readers' understanding of the topic, and its omission would be detrimental to that understanding. This image is not critical for understanding, but is used in a decorative fashion. Since this file does not greatly enhance understanding, nor will its omission greatly decrease understanding, it must be deleted. —Justin ( koavf ) ❤T☮C☺M☯ 00:53, 23 May 2013 (UTC)
 * Keep All It's covered by fair use law.[//www.intellectbooks.co.uk/MediaManager/File/Film%20Stills.pdf] The image is not decorative it helps to identify the episode, illustrate key plot points, and provides visual reference to the episodes thematic elements, and style. After all this is a visual medium and a picture is worth a thousands words as they say. I believe that the Star Trek episode pages could use more illustrations across the board. I also don't believe that one user should arbitrarily mass submit images for deletion. The use of images to illustrate a TV episode is very common site wide and generally held as acceptable and legal. --Mccordscvs (talk) 12:50, 2 June 2013 (UTC)
 * Keep all and stop mass nominating things. You understand the episode more seeing the image from it.   D r e a m Focus  01:29, 23 May 2013 (UTC)
 * Keep per Richwales (see File:STMatterofHonor.jpg. As stated by others below, these images are illustrative of the episodes and increase understanding, so their use seems appropriate. Such images are so widely used in episode articles that the wider community seems to support their use, so wider community discussion as proposed by Richwales seems necessary. -- Aussie Legend  ( ✉ ) 16:00, 23 May 2013 (UTC)
 * Delete Unlikely to add anything to the article. Although this episode is the first appearance of the Bajorans, potentially a more important image would be a shot of Michelle Forbes' face in order to show the makeup which could potentially be described in an expanded article. Miyagawa (talk) 18:27, 23 May 2013 (UTC)
 * Delete: Clear failure of WP:NFCC. None of the keep arguments indicate what significant increase in understanding this image generates or what detrimental effects would occur from its omission.&mdash;Kww(talk) 01:23, 24 May 2013 (UTC)
 * Delete - does not significantly add to understanding of episode, and omission would not be detrimental to understanding of episode. -- SarekOfVulcan (talk) 04:46, 28 May 2013 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section.

File:STErrandofMercy.jpg
<div class="boilerplate metadata vfd xfd-closed" style="background-color:#f3f9ff; margin:1em 0 0 0; padding:0 10px 0 10px; border:1px solid #aaa;">
 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  09:07, 20 July 2013 (UTC)
 * File:STErrandofMercy.jpg ([ delete] | talk | [ history] | links | [ logs]) – uploaded by Cyberia23 ( [ notify] | contribs | uploads | upload log).

Invalid FUR: Non-free content is used only if its presence would significantly increase readers' understanding of the topic, and its omission would be detrimental to that understanding. This image is not critical for understanding, but is used in a decorative fashion. Since this file does not greatly enhance understanding, nor will its omission greatly decrease understanding, it must be deleted. —Justin ( koavf ) ❤T☮C☺M☯ 00:53, 23 May 2013 (UTC)
 * Keep All It's covered by fair use law.[//www.intellectbooks.co.uk/MediaManager/File/Film%20Stills.pdf] The image is not decorative it helps to identify the episode, illustrate key plot points, and provides visual reference to the episodes thematic elements, and style. After all this is a visual medium and a picture is worth a thousands words as they say. I believe that the Star Trek episode pages could use more illustrations across the board. I also don't believe that one user should arbitrarily mass submit images for deletion. The use of images to illustrate a TV episode is very common site wide and generally held as acceptable and legal. --Mccordscvs (talk) 12:50, 2 June 2013 (UTC)
 * Keep all and stop mass nominating things. You understand the episode more seeing the image from it.   D r e a m Focus  01:29, 23 May 2013 (UTC)
 * Keep per Richwales (see File:STMatterofHonor.jpg. As stated by others below, these images are illustrative of the episodes and increase understanding, so their use seems appropriate. Such images are so widely used in episode articles that the wider community seems to support their use, so wider community discussion as proposed by Richwales seems necessary. -- Aussie Legend  ( ✉ ) 16:00, 23 May 2013 (UTC)
 * Delete: Clear failure of WP:NFCC. None of the keep arguments indicate what significant increase in understanding this image generates or what detrimental effects would occur from its omission.&mdash;Kww(talk) 01:23, 24 May 2013 (UTC)
 * Delete - does not significantly add to understanding of episode, and omission would not be detrimental to understanding of episode. Screenshot of the g'day't glowbugs would come closer to pass NFCC8, otoh.-- SarekOfVulcan (talk) 05:00, 28 May 2013 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section.

File:ST-TNG Family.jpg
<div class="boilerplate metadata vfd xfd-closed" style="background-color:#f3f9ff; margin:1em 0 0 0; padding:0 10px 0 10px; border:1px solid #aaa;">
 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  09:07, 20 July 2013 (UTC)
 * File:ST-TNG Family.jpg ([ delete] | talk | [ history] | links | [ logs]) – uploaded by Cburnett ( [ notify] | contribs | uploads | upload log).

Invalid FUR: Non-free content is used only if its presence would significantly increase readers' understanding of the topic, and its omission would be detrimental to that understanding. This image is not critical for understanding, but is used in a decorative fashion. Since this file does not greatly enhance understanding, nor will its omission greatly decrease understanding, it must be deleted. —Justin ( koavf ) ❤T☮C☺M☯ 00:57, 23 May 2013 (UTC)
 * Keep All It's covered by fair use law.[//www.intellectbooks.co.uk/MediaManager/File/Film%20Stills.pdf] The image is not decorative it helps to identify the episode, illustrate key plot points, and provides visual reference to the episodes thematic elements, and style. After all this is a visual medium and a picture is worth a thousands words as they say. I believe that the Star Trek episode pages could use more illustrations across the board. I also don't believe that one user should arbitrarily mass submit images for deletion. The use of images to illustrate a TV episode is very common site wide and generally held as acceptable and legal. --Mccordscvs (talk) 12:50, 2 June 2013 (UTC)
 * Keep all and stop mass nominating things. You understand the episode more seeing the image from it.   D r e a m Focus  01:29, 23 May 2013 (UTC)
 * Keep per Richwales (see File:STMatterofHonor.jpg. As stated by others below, these images are illustrative of the episodes and increase understanding, so their use seems appropriate. Such images are so widely used in episode articles that the wider community seems to support their use, so wider community discussion as proposed by Richwales seems necessary. -- Aussie Legend  ( ✉ ) 16:00, 23 May 2013 (UTC)
 * Delete Unlikely to add anything to the article other than illustration. I can't see how it aids the understanding of the reader more than text alone would. Miyagawa (talk) 18:29, 23 May 2013 (UTC)
 * Delete: Clear failure of WP:NFCC. None of the keep arguments indicate what significant increase in understanding this image generates or what detrimental effects would occur from its omission.&mdash;Kww(talk) 01:23, 24 May 2013 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section.

File:ST-TNG Ethics.jpg
<div class="boilerplate metadata vfd xfd-closed" style="background-color:#f3f9ff; margin:1em 0 0 0; padding:0 10px 0 10px; border:1px solid #aaa;">
 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  09:07, 20 July 2013 (UTC)
 * File:ST-TNG Ethics.jpg ([ delete] | talk | [ history] | links | [ logs]) – uploaded by Cburnett ( [ notify] | contribs | uploads | upload log).

Invalid FUR: Non-free content is used only if its presence would significantly increase readers' understanding of the topic, and its omission would be detrimental to that understanding. This image is not critical for understanding, but is used in a decorative fashion. Since this file does not greatly enhance understanding, nor will its omission greatly decrease understanding, it must be deleted. —Justin ( koavf ) ❤T☮C☺M☯ 00:57, 23 May 2013 (UTC)
 * Keep All It's covered by fair use law.[//www.intellectbooks.co.uk/MediaManager/File/Film%20Stills.pdf] The image is not decorative it helps to identify the episode, illustrate key plot points, and provides visual reference to the episodes thematic elements, and style. After all this is a visual medium and a picture is worth a thousands words as they say. I believe that the Star Trek episode pages could use more illustrations across the board. I also don't believe that one user should arbitrarily mass submit images for deletion. The use of images to illustrate a TV episode is very common site wide and generally held as acceptable and legal. --Mccordscvs (talk) 12:50, 2 June 2013 (UTC)
 * Keep all and stop mass nominating things. You understand the episode more seeing the image from it.   D r e a m Focus  01:29, 23 May 2013 (UTC)
 * Keep per Richwales (see File:STMatterofHonor.jpg. As stated by others below, these images are illustrative of the episodes and increase understanding, so their use seems appropriate. Such images are so widely used in episode articles that the wider community seems to support their use, so wider community discussion as proposed by Richwales seems necessary. -- Aussie Legend  ( ✉ ) 16:00, 23 May 2013 (UTC)
 * Delete A more important image would be a shot of the Klingon spine prop, for which there is coverage of its creation for this episode in the Star Trek Makeup book by Michael Westmore. Miyagawa (talk) 18:30, 23 May 2013 (UTC)
 * Delete: Clear failure of WP:NFCC. None of the keep arguments indicate what significant increase in understanding this image generates or what detrimental effects would occur from its omission.&mdash;Kww(talk) 01:24, 24 May 2013 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section.

File:ST-TNG Evolution.jpg
<div class="boilerplate metadata vfd xfd-closed" style="background-color:#f3f9ff; margin:1em 0 0 0; padding:0 10px 0 10px; border:1px solid #aaa;">
 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  09:07, 20 July 2013 (UTC)
 * File:ST-TNG Evolution.jpg ([ delete] | talk | [ history] | links | [ logs]) – uploaded by Cburnett ( [ notify] | contribs | uploads | upload log).

Invalid FUR: Non-free content is used only if its presence would significantly increase readers' understanding of the topic, and its omission would be detrimental to that understanding. This image is not critical for understanding, but is used in a decorative fashion. Since this file does not greatly enhance understanding, nor will its omission greatly decrease understanding, it must be deleted. —Justin ( koavf ) ❤T☮C☺M☯ 00:57, 23 May 2013 (UTC)
 * Keep All It's covered by fair use law.[//www.intellectbooks.co.uk/MediaManager/File/Film%20Stills.pdf] The image is not decorative it helps to identify the episode, illustrate key plot points, and provides visual reference to the episodes thematic elements, and style. After all this is a visual medium and a picture is worth a thousands words as they say. I believe that the Star Trek episode pages could use more illustrations across the board. I also don't believe that one user should arbitrarily mass submit images for deletion. The use of images to illustrate a TV episode is very common site wide and generally held as acceptable and legal. --Mccordscvs (talk) 12:50, 2 June 2013 (UTC)
 * Keep all and stop mass nominating things. You understand the episode more seeing the image from it.   D r e a m Focus  01:29, 23 May 2013 (UTC)
 * Keep per Richwales (see File:STMatterofHonor.jpg. As stated by others below, these images are illustrative of the episodes and increase understanding, so their use seems appropriate. Such images are so widely used in episode articles that the wider community seems to support their use, so wider community discussion as proposed by Richwales seems necessary. -- Aussie Legend  ( ✉ ) 16:00, 23 May 2013 (UTC)
 * Delete "The Enterprise flies past a glowing red ball" would be enough. Clear failure of WP:NFCC. None of the keep arguments indicate what significant increase in understanding this image generates or what detrimental effects would occur from its omission.&mdash;Kww(talk) 21:05, 24 May 2013 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section.

File:ST-TNG Eye of the Beholder.jpg
<div class="boilerplate metadata vfd xfd-closed" style="background-color:#f3f9ff; margin:1em 0 0 0; padding:0 10px 0 10px; border:1px solid #aaa;">
 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  09:07, 20 July 2013 (UTC)
 * File:ST-TNG Eye of the Beholder.jpg ([ delete] | talk | [ history] | links | [ logs]) – uploaded by Cburnett ( [ notify] | contribs | uploads | upload log).

Invalid FUR: Non-free content is used only if its presence would significantly increase readers' understanding of the topic, and its omission would be detrimental to that understanding. This image is not critical for understanding, but is used in a decorative fashion. Since this file does not greatly enhance understanding, nor will its omission greatly decrease understanding, it must be deleted. —Justin ( koavf ) ❤T☮C☺M☯ 00:57, 23 May 2013 (UTC)
 * Keep All It's covered by fair use law.[//www.intellectbooks.co.uk/MediaManager/File/Film%20Stills.pdf] The image is not decorative it helps to identify the episode, illustrate key plot points, and provides visual reference to the episodes thematic elements, and style. After all this is a visual medium and a picture is worth a thousands words as they say. I believe that the Star Trek episode pages could use more illustrations across the board. I also don't believe that one user should arbitrarily mass submit images for deletion. The use of images to illustrate a TV episode is very common site wide and generally held as acceptable and legal. --Mccordscvs (talk) 12:50, 2 June 2013 (UTC)
 * Keep all and stop mass nominating things. You understand the episode more seeing the image from it.   D r e a m Focus  01:29, 23 May 2013 (UTC)
 * Keep per Richwales (see File:STMatterofHonor.jpg. As stated by others below, these images are illustrative of the episodes and increase understanding, so their use seems appropriate. Such images are so widely used in episode articles that the wider community seems to support their use, so wider community discussion as proposed by Richwales seems necessary. -- Aussie Legend  ( ✉ ) 16:00, 23 May 2013 (UTC)
 * Delete "Man leaps into column of glitter" is an adequate replacement. Clear failure of WP:NFCC. None of the keep arguments indicate what significant increase in understanding this image generates or what detrimental effects would occur from its omission. There's no article here, either: it's an abuse of fair-use material to include it because no Wikipedia editor had the intiative to actually write anything about the topic.&mdash;Kww(talk) 21:07, 24 May 2013 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section.

File:ST-VOY 6 11.jpg
<div class="boilerplate metadata vfd xfd-closed" style="background-color:#f3f9ff; margin:1em 0 0 0; padding:0 10px 0 10px; border:1px solid #aaa;">
 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  09:07, 20 July 2013 (UTC)
 * File:ST-VOY 6 11.jpg ([ delete] | talk | [ history] | links | [ logs]) – uploaded by Thealok ( [ notify] | contribs | uploads | upload log).

Invalid FUR: Non-free content is used only if its presence would significantly increase readers' understanding of the topic, and its omission would be detrimental to that understanding. This image is not critical for understanding, but is used in a decorative fashion. Since this file does not greatly enhance understanding, nor will its omission greatly decrease understanding, it must be deleted. —Justin ( koavf ) ❤T☮C☺M☯ 00:57, 23 May 2013 (UTC)
 * Keep All It's covered by fair use law.[//www.intellectbooks.co.uk/MediaManager/File/Film%20Stills.pdf] The image is not decorative it helps to identify the episode, illustrate key plot points, and provides visual reference to the episodes thematic elements, and style. After all this is a visual medium and a picture is worth a thousands words as they say. I believe that the Star Trek episode pages could use more illustrations across the board. I also don't believe that one user should arbitrarily mass submit images for deletion. The use of images to illustrate a TV episode is very common site wide and generally held as acceptable and legal. --Mccordscvs (talk) 12:50, 2 June 2013 (UTC)
 * Keep all and stop mass nominating things. You understand the episode more seeing the image from it.   D r e a m Focus  01:29, 23 May 2013 (UTC)
 * Keep per Richwales (see File:STMatterofHonor.jpg. As stated by others below, these images are illustrative of the episodes and increase understanding, so their use seems appropriate. Such images are so widely used in episode articles that the wider community seems to support their use, so wider community discussion as proposed by Richwales seems necessary. -- Aussie Legend  ( ✉ ) 16:00, 23 May 2013 (UTC)
 * Delete "Two men in hats discuss something offscreen, and we aren't going to tell you what it is". Clear failure of WP:NFCC. None of the keep arguments indicate what significant increase in understanding this image generates or what detrimental effects would occur from its omission.&mdash;Kww(talk) 21:10, 24 May 2013 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section.

File:ST-TNG First Contact.jpg
<div class="boilerplate metadata vfd xfd-closed" style="background-color:#f3f9ff; margin:1em 0 0 0; padding:0 10px 0 10px; border:1px solid #aaa;">
 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  09:07, 20 July 2013 (UTC)
 * File:ST-TNG First Contact.jpg ([ delete] | talk | [ history] | links | [ logs]) – uploaded by Cburnett ( [ notify] | contribs | uploads | upload log).

Invalid FUR: Non-free content is used only if its presence would significantly increase readers' understanding of the topic, and its omission would be detrimental to that understanding. This image is not critical for understanding, but is used in a decorative fashion. Since this file does not greatly enhance understanding, nor will its omission greatly decrease understanding, it must be deleted. —Justin ( koavf ) ❤T☮C☺M☯ 00:58, 23 May 2013 (UTC)
 * Keep All It's covered by fair use law.[//www.intellectbooks.co.uk/MediaManager/File/Film%20Stills.pdf] The image is not decorative it helps to identify the episode, illustrate key plot points, and provides visual reference to the episodes thematic elements, and style. After all this is a visual medium and a picture is worth a thousands words as they say. I believe that the Star Trek episode pages could use more illustrations across the board. I also don't believe that one user should arbitrarily mass submit images for deletion. The use of images to illustrate a TV episode is very common site wide and generally held as acceptable and legal. --Mccordscvs (talk) 12:50, 2 June 2013 (UTC)
 * Keep all and stop mass nominating things. You understand the episode more seeing the image from it.   D r e a m Focus  01:29, 23 May 2013 (UTC)
 * Keep per Richwales (see File:STMatterofHonor.jpg. As stated by others below, these images are illustrative of the episodes and increase understanding, so their use seems appropriate. Such images are so widely used in episode articles that the wider community seems to support their use, so wider community discussion as proposed by Richwales seems necessary. -- Aussie Legend  ( ✉ ) 16:00, 23 May 2013 (UTC)
 * Delete: "Riker got beaten badly" would suffice. Clear failure of WP:NFCC. None of the keep arguments indicate what significant increase in understanding this image generates or what detrimental effects would occur from its omission.&mdash;Kww(talk) 21:12, 24 May 2013 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section.

File:ST-TNG Firstborn.jpg
<div class="boilerplate metadata vfd xfd-closed" style="background-color:#f3f9ff; margin:1em 0 0 0; padding:0 10px 0 10px; border:1px solid #aaa;">
 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  09:07, 20 July 2013 (UTC)
 * File:ST-TNG Firstborn.jpg ([ delete] | talk | [ history] | links | [ logs]) – uploaded by Cburnett ( [ notify] | contribs | uploads | upload log).

Invalid FUR: Non-free content is used only if its presence would significantly increase readers' understanding of the topic, and its omission would be detrimental to that understanding. This image is not critical for understanding, but is used in a decorative fashion. Since this file does not greatly enhance understanding, nor will its omission greatly decrease understanding, it must be deleted. —Justin ( koavf ) ❤T☮C☺M☯ 00:58, 23 May 2013 (UTC)
 * Keep All It's covered by fair use law.[//www.intellectbooks.co.uk/MediaManager/File/Film%20Stills.pdf] The image is not decorative it helps to identify the episode, illustrate key plot points, and provides visual reference to the episodes thematic elements, and style. After all this is a visual medium and a picture is worth a thousands words as they say. I believe that the Star Trek episode pages could use more illustrations across the board. I also don't believe that one user should arbitrarily mass submit images for deletion. The use of images to illustrate a TV episode is very common site wide and generally held as acceptable and legal. --Mccordscvs (talk) 12:50, 2 June 2013 (UTC)
 * Keep all and stop mass nominating things. You understand the episode more seeing the image from it.   D r e a m Focus  01:29, 23 May 2013 (UTC)
 * Keep per Richwales (see File:STMatterofHonor.jpg. As stated by others below, these images are illustrative of the episodes and increase understanding, so their use seems appropriate. Such images are so widely used in episode articles that the wider community seems to support their use, so wider community discussion as proposed by Richwales seems necessary. -- Aussie Legend  ( ✉ ) 16:00, 23 May 2013 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section.

File:STForTheWorld.jpg
<div class="boilerplate metadata vfd xfd-closed" style="background-color:#f3f9ff; margin:1em 0 0 0; padding:0 10px 0 10px; border:1px solid #aaa;">
 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  09:07, 20 July 2013 (UTC)
 * File:STForTheWorld.jpg ([ delete] | talk | [ history] | links | [ logs]) – uploaded by Cyberia23 ( [ notify] | contribs | uploads | upload log).

Invalid FUR: Non-free content is used only if its presence would significantly increase readers' understanding of the topic, and its omission would be detrimental to that understanding. This image is not critical for understanding, but is used in a decorative fashion. Since this file does not greatly enhance understanding, nor will its omission greatly decrease understanding, it must be deleted. —Justin ( koavf ) ❤T☮C☺M☯ 00:58, 23 May 2013 (UTC)
 * Keep All It's covered by fair use law.[//www.intellectbooks.co.uk/MediaManager/File/Film%20Stills.pdf] The image is not decorative it helps to identify the episode, illustrate key plot points, and provides visual reference to the episodes thematic elements, and style. After all this is a visual medium and a picture is worth a thousands words as they say. I believe that the Star Trek episode pages could use more illustrations across the board. I also don't believe that one user should arbitrarily mass submit images for deletion. The use of images to illustrate a TV episode is very common site wide and generally held as acceptable and legal. --Mccordscvs (talk) 12:50, 2 June 2013 (UTC)
 * Keep all and stop mass nominating things. You understand the episode more seeing the image from it.   D r e a m Focus  01:29, 23 May 2013 (UTC)
 * Keep per Richwales (see File:STMatterofHonor.jpg. As stated by others below, these images are illustrative of the episodes and increase understanding, so their use seems appropriate. Such images are so widely used in episode articles that the wider community seems to support their use, so wider community discussion as proposed by Richwales seems necessary. -- Aussie Legend  ( ✉ ) 16:00, 23 May 2013 (UTC)
 * Delete: "Lady in green tinfoil dress points at something apparently behind the viewer. And the sky is orange, so you think you are on a different planet, too." Clear failure of WP:NFCC. None of the keep arguments indicate what significant increase in understanding this image generates or what detrimental effects would occur from its omission.&mdash;Kww(talk) 21:14, 24 May 2013 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section.

File:ST-TNG Force of Nature.jpg
<div class="boilerplate metadata vfd xfd-closed" style="background-color:#f3f9ff; margin:1em 0 0 0; padding:0 10px 0 10px; border:1px solid #aaa;">
 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  09:07, 20 July 2013 (UTC)
 * File:ST-TNG Force of Nature.jpg ([ delete] | talk | [ history] | links | [ logs]) – uploaded by Cburnett ( [ notify] | contribs | uploads | upload log).

Invalid FUR: Non-free content is used only if its presence would significantly increase readers' understanding of the topic, and its omission would be detrimental to that understanding. This image is not critical for understanding, but is used in a decorative fashion. Since this file does not greatly enhance understanding, nor will its omission greatly decrease understanding, it must be deleted. —Justin ( koavf ) ❤T☮C☺M☯ 00:58, 23 May 2013 (UTC)
 * Keep All It's covered by fair use law.[//www.intellectbooks.co.uk/MediaManager/File/Film%20Stills.pdf] The image is not decorative it helps to identify the episode, illustrate key plot points, and provides visual reference to the episodes thematic elements, and style. After all this is a visual medium and a picture is worth a thousands words as they say. I believe that the Star Trek episode pages could use more illustrations across the board. I also don't believe that one user should arbitrarily mass submit images for deletion. The use of images to illustrate a TV episode is very common site wide and generally held as acceptable and legal. --Mccordscvs (talk) 12:50, 2 June 2013 (UTC)
 * Keep all and stop mass nominating things. You understand the episode more seeing the image from it.   D r e a m Focus  01:29, 23 May 2013 (UTC)
 * Keep per Richwales (see File:STMatterofHonor.jpg. As stated by others below, these images are illustrative of the episodes and increase understanding, so their use seems appropriate. Such images are so widely used in episode articles that the wider community seems to support their use, so wider community discussion as proposed by Richwales seems necessary. -- Aussie Legend  ( ✉ ) 16:00, 23 May 2013 (UTC)
 * Delete. "Another picture of the Enterprise, flying towards yet another nebula. We colored it purple this week, so you can tell it's not the green one we used last week". Clear failure of WP:NFCC. None of the keep arguments indicate what significant increase in understanding this image generates or what detrimental effects would occur from its omission.&mdash;Kww(talk) 21:16, 24 May 2013 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section.

File:ST-TNG Frame of Mind.jpg
<div class="boilerplate metadata vfd xfd-closed" style="background-color:#f3f9ff; margin:1em 0 0 0; padding:0 10px 0 10px; border:1px solid #aaa;">
 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  09:07, 20 July 2013 (UTC)
 * File:ST-TNG Frame of Mind.jpg ([ delete] | talk | [ history] | links | [ logs]) – uploaded by Cburnett ( [ notify] | contribs | uploads | upload log).

Invalid FUR: Non-free content is used only if its presence would significantly increase readers' understanding of the topic, and its omission would be detrimental to that understanding. This image is not critical for understanding, but is used in a decorative fashion. Since this file does not greatly enhance understanding, nor will its omission greatly decrease understanding, it must be deleted. —Justin ( koavf ) ❤T☮C☺M☯ 01:00, 23 May 2013 (UTC)
 * Keep All It's covered by fair use law.[//www.intellectbooks.co.uk/MediaManager/File/Film%20Stills.pdf] The image is not decorative it helps to identify the episode, illustrate key plot points, and provides visual reference to the episodes thematic elements, and style. After all this is a visual medium and a picture is worth a thousands words as they say. I believe that the Star Trek episode pages could use more illustrations across the board. I also don't believe that one user should arbitrarily mass submit images for deletion. The use of images to illustrate a TV episode is very common site wide and generally held as acceptable and legal. --Mccordscvs (talk) 12:50, 2 June 2013 (UTC)
 * Keep all and stop mass nominating things. You understand the episode more seeing the image from it.   D r e a m Focus  01:29, 23 May 2013 (UTC)
 * Keep per Richwales (see File:STMatterofHonor.jpg. As stated by others below, these images are illustrative of the episodes and increase understanding, so their use seems appropriate. Such images are so widely used in episode articles that the wider community seems to support their use, so wider community discussion as proposed by Richwales seems necessary. -- Aussie Legend  ( ✉ ) 16:00, 23 May 2013 (UTC)
 * Delete "Riker leans on doorframe, looking upset." *Delete: Clear failure of WP:NFCC. None of the keep arguments indicate what significant increase in understanding this image generates or what detrimental effects would occur from its omission.&mdash;Kww(talk) 21:22, 24 May 2013 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section.

File:STFridaysChild.jpg
<div class="boilerplate metadata vfd xfd-closed" style="background-color:#f3f9ff; margin:1em 0 0 0; padding:0 10px 0 10px; border:1px solid #aaa;">
 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  09:07, 20 July 2013 (UTC)
 * File:STFridaysChild.jpg ([ delete] | talk | [ history] | links | [ logs]) – uploaded by (aeropagitica) ( [ notify] | contribs | uploads | upload log).

Invalid FUR: Non-free content is used only if its presence would significantly increase readers' understanding of the topic, and its omission would be detrimental to that understanding. This image is not critical for understanding, but is used in a decorative fashion. Since this file does not greatly enhance understanding, nor will its omission greatly decrease understanding, it must be deleted. —Justin ( koavf ) ❤T☮C☺M☯ 01:00, 23 May 2013 (UTC)
 * Keep All It's covered by fair use law.[//www.intellectbooks.co.uk/MediaManager/File/Film%20Stills.pdf] The image is not decorative it helps to identify the episode, illustrate key plot points, and provides visual reference to the episodes thematic elements, and style. After all this is a visual medium and a picture is worth a thousands words as they say. I believe that the Star Trek episode pages could use more illustrations across the board. I also don't believe that one user should arbitrarily mass submit images for deletion. The use of images to illustrate a TV episode is very common site wide and generally held as acceptable and legal. --Mccordscvs (talk) 12:50, 2 June 2013 (UTC)
 * Keep all and stop mass nominating things. You understand the episode more seeing the image from it.   D r e a m Focus  01:29, 23 May 2013 (UTC)
 * Keep per Richwales (see File:STMatterofHonor.jpg. As stated by others below, these images are illustrative of the episodes and increase understanding, so their use seems appropriate. Such images are so widely used in episode articles that the wider community seems to support their use, so wider community discussion as proposed by Richwales seems necessary. -- Aussie Legend  ( ✉ ) 16:00, 23 May 2013 (UTC)
 * Delete: "Men in outfits reminiscent of Shriner's costumes look at something, but no one knows precisely why or at what." Clear failure of WP:NFCC. None of the keep arguments indicate what significant increase in understanding this image generates or what detrimental effects would occur from its omission.&mdash;Kww(talk) 21:28, 24 May 2013 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section.

File:ST-TNG Future Imperfect.jpg
<div class="boilerplate metadata vfd xfd-closed" style="background-color:#f3f9ff; margin:1em 0 0 0; padding:0 10px 0 10px; border:1px solid #aaa;">
 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  09:07, 20 July 2013 (UTC)
 * File:ST-TNG Future Imperfect.jpg ([ delete] | talk | [ history] | links | [ logs]) – uploaded by Cburnett ( [ notify] | contribs | uploads | upload log).

Invalid FUR: Non-free content is used only if its presence would significantly increase readers' understanding of the topic, and its omission would be detrimental to that understanding. This image is not critical for understanding, but is used in a decorative fashion. Since this file does not greatly enhance understanding, nor will its omission greatly decrease understanding, it must be deleted. —Justin ( koavf ) ❤T☮C☺M☯ 01:00, 23 May 2013 (UTC)
 * Keep All It's covered by fair use law.[//www.intellectbooks.co.uk/MediaManager/File/Film%20Stills.pdf] The image is not decorative it helps to identify the episode, illustrate key plot points, and provides visual reference to the episodes thematic elements, and style. After all this is a visual medium and a picture is worth a thousands words as they say. I believe that the Star Trek episode pages could use more illustrations across the board. I also don't believe that one user should arbitrarily mass submit images for deletion. The use of images to illustrate a TV episode is very common site wide and generally held as acceptable and legal. --Mccordscvs (talk) 12:50, 2 June 2013 (UTC)
 * Keep all and stop mass nominating things. You understand the episode more seeing the image from it.   D r e a m Focus  01:29, 23 May 2013 (UTC)
 * Keep per Richwales (see File:STMatterofHonor.jpg. As stated by others below, these images are illustrative of the episodes and increase understanding, so their use seems appropriate. Such images are so widely used in episode articles that the wider community seems to support their use, so wider community discussion as proposed by Richwales seems necessary. -- Aussie Legend  ( ✉ ) 16:00, 23 May 2013 (UTC)
 * Delete: "Riker furrows his brow as he looks over a youth's shoulder. Once again, we won't discuss what he may be looking at." Clear failure of WP:NFCC. None of the keep arguments indicate what significant increase in understanding this image generates or what detrimental effects would occur from its omission.&mdash;Kww(talk) 21:31, 24 May 2013 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section.

File:ST-TNG Galaxy&
<div class="boilerplate metadata vfd xfd-closed" style="background-color:#f3f9ff; margin:1em 0 0 0; padding:0 10px 0 10px; border:1px solid #aaa;">
 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  09:07, 20 July 2013 (UTC)
 * File:ST-TNG Galaxy& ([ delete] | talk | [ history] | links | [ logs]) – uploaded by Cburnett ( [ notify] | contribs | uploads | upload log).

Invalid FUR: Non-free content is used only if its presence would significantly increase readers' understanding of the topic, and its omission would be detrimental to that understanding. This image is not critical for understanding, but is used in a decorative fashion. Since this file does not greatly enhance understanding, nor will its omission greatly decrease understanding, it must be deleted. —Justin ( koavf ) ❤T☮C☺M☯ 01:00, 23 May 2013 (UTC)
 * Keep All It's covered by fair use law.[//www.intellectbooks.co.uk/MediaManager/File/Film%20Stills.pdf] The image is not decorative it helps to identify the episode, illustrate key plot points, and provides visual reference to the episodes thematic elements, and style. After all this is a visual medium and a picture is worth a thousands words as they say. I believe that the Star Trek episode pages could use more illustrations across the board. I also don't believe that one user should arbitrarily mass submit images for deletion. The use of images to illustrate a TV episode is very common site wide and generally held as acceptable and legal. --Mccordscvs (talk) 12:50, 2 June 2013 (UTC)
 * Keep all and stop mass nominating things. You understand the episode more seeing the image from it.   D r e a m Focus  01:29, 23 May 2013 (UTC)
 * Keep per Richwales (see File:STMatterofHonor.jpg. As stated by others below, these images are illustrative of the episodes and increase understanding, so their use seems appropriate. Such images are so widely used in episode articles that the wider community seems to support their use, so wider community discussion as proposed by Richwales seems necessary. -- Aussie Legend  ( ✉ ) 16:00, 23 May 2013 (UTC)
 * Delete: Yet another image included because no editor involved in the creation of this page had any intention of creating an article, but thought that writing a plot summary and including a screenshot would be pretty. Clear failure of WP:NFCC. None of the keep arguments indicate what significant increase in understanding this image generates or what detrimental effects would occur from its omission.&mdash;Kww(talk) 21:34, 24 May 2013 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section.

File:ST-TNG Gambit Part 1.jpg
<div class="boilerplate metadata vfd xfd-closed" style="background-color:#f3f9ff; margin:1em 0 0 0; padding:0 10px 0 10px; border:1px solid #aaa;">
 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  08:08, 21 July 2013 (UTC)
 * File:ST-TNG Gambit Part 1.jpg ([ delete] | talk | [ history] | links | [ logs]) – uploaded by Cburnett ( [ notify] | contribs | uploads | upload log).

Invalid FUR: Non-free content is used only if its presence would significantly increase readers' understanding of the topic, and its omission would be detrimental to that understanding. This image is not critical for understanding, but is used in a decorative fashion. Since this file does not greatly enhance understanding, nor will its omission greatly decrease understanding, it must be deleted. —Justin ( koavf ) ❤T☮C☺M☯ 01:00, 23 May 2013 (UTC)
 * Keep All It's covered by fair use law.[//www.intellectbooks.co.uk/MediaManager/File/Film%20Stills.pdf] The image is not decorative it helps to identify the episode, illustrate key plot points, and provides visual reference to the episodes thematic elements, and style. After all this is a visual medium and a picture is worth a thousands words as they say. I believe that the Star Trek episode pages could use more illustrations across the board. I also don't believe that one user should arbitrarily mass submit images for deletion. The use of images to illustrate a TV episode is very common site wide and generally held as acceptable and legal.--Mccordscvs (talk) 12:50, 2 June 2013 (UTC)
 * Keep all and stop mass nominating things. You understand the episode more seeing the image from it.   D r e a m Focus  01:29, 23 May 2013 (UTC)
 * Keep per Richwales (see File:STMatterofHonor.jpg. As stated by others below, these images are illustrative of the episodes and increase understanding, so their use seems appropriate. Such images are so widely used in episode articles that the wider community seems to support their use, so wider community discussion as proposed by Richwales seems necessary. -- Aussie Legend  ( ✉ ) 16:00, 23 May 2013 (UTC)
 * Delete: "Two men and a Vulcan look at something offscreen. As seems to be a tradition inside the Wikiproject, we consider the thing they are looking at to be a secret, and will not disclose it." Clear failure of WP:NFCC. None of the keep arguments indicate what significant increase in understanding this image generates or what detrimental effects would occur from its omission.&mdash;Kww(talk) 21:36, 24 May 2013 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section.

File:ST-TNG Genesis.jpg
<div class="boilerplate metadata vfd xfd-closed" style="background-color:#f3f9ff; margin:1em 0 0 0; padding:0 10px 0 10px; border:1px solid #aaa;">
 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  08:08, 21 July 2013 (UTC)
 * File:ST-TNG Genesis.jpg ([ delete] | talk | [ history] | links | [ logs]) – uploaded by Cburnett ( [ notify] | contribs | uploads | upload log).

Invalid FUR: Non-free content is used only if its presence would significantly increase readers' understanding of the topic, and its omission would be detrimental to that understanding. This image is not critical for understanding, but is used in a decorative fashion. Since this file does not greatly enhance understanding, nor will its omission greatly decrease understanding, it must be deleted. —Justin ( koavf ) ❤T☮C☺M☯ 01:01, 23 May 2013 (UTC)
 * Keep all and stop mass nominating things. You understand the episode more seeing the image from it.   D r e a m Focus  01:29, 23 May 2013 (UTC)
 * Keep per Richwales (see File:STMatterofHonor.jpg. As stated by others below, these images are illustrative of the episodes and increase understanding, so their use seems appropriate. Such images are so widely used in episode articles that the wider community seems to support their use, so wider community discussion as proposed by Richwales seems necessary. -- Aussie Legend  ( ✉ ) 16:00, 23 May 2013 (UTC)
 * Delete: "More gruel, please." Context and intent of this image is completely unclear. Clear failure of WP:NFCC. None of the keep arguments indicate what significant increase in understanding this image generates or what detrimental effects would occur from its omission.&mdash;Kww(talk) 21:38, 24 May 2013 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Hatchery (ENT episode).jpg
<div class="boilerplate metadata vfd xfd-closed" style="background-color:#f3f9ff; margin:1em 0 0 0; padding:0 10px 0 10px; border:1px solid #aaa;">
 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  08:08, 21 July 2013 (UTC)
 * File:Hatchery (ENT episode).jpg ([ delete] | talk | [ history] | links | [ logs]) – uploaded by とある白い猫 ( [ notify] | contribs | uploads | upload log).

Invalid FUR: Non-free content is used only if its presence would significantly increase readers' understanding of the topic, and its omission would be detrimental to that understanding. This image is not critical for understanding, but is used in a decorative fashion. Since this file does not greatly enhance understanding, nor will its omission greatly decrease understanding, it must be deleted. —Justin ( koavf ) ❤T☮C☺M☯ 01:06, 23 May 2013 (UTC)
 * Keep all and stop mass nominating things. You understand the episode more seeing the image from it.   D r e a m Focus  01:29, 23 May 2013 (UTC)
 * Keep per Richwales (see File:STMatterofHonor.jpg. As stated by others below, these images are illustrative of the episodes and increase understanding, so their use seems appropriate. Such images are so widely used in episode articles that the wider community seems to support their use, so wider community discussion as proposed by Richwales seems necessary. -- Aussie Legend  ( ✉ ) 16:00, 23 May 2013 (UTC)
 * Delete: "Vulcan woman with prominent breast implants overlooks small geodesic dome." Clear failure of WP:NFCC. None of the keep arguments indicate what significant increase in understanding this image generates or what detrimental effects would occur from its omission.&mdash;Kww(talk) 21:39, 24 May 2013 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section.

File:ST-TNG Heart of Glory.jpg
<div class="boilerplate metadata vfd xfd-closed" style="background-color:#f3f9ff; margin:1em 0 0 0; padding:0 10px 0 10px; border:1px solid #aaa;">
 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the discussion was: Keep
 * File:ST-TNG Heart of Glory.jpg ([ delete] | talk | [ history] | links | [ logs]) – uploaded by Leoboudv ( [ notify] | contribs | uploads | upload log).

Invalid FUR: Non-free content is used only if its presence would significantly increase readers' understanding of the topic, and its omission would be detrimental to that understanding. This image is not critical for understanding, but is used in a decorative fashion. Since this file does not greatly enhance understanding, nor will its omission greatly decrease understanding, it must be deleted. The purported rationale is that this camera angle hadn't been used before but I can't imagine how this justifies this media. —Justin ( koavf ) ❤T☮C☺M☯ 01:06, 23 May 2013 (UTC)
 * Keep all and stop mass nominating things. You understand the episode more seeing the image from it.   D r e a m Focus  01:29, 23 May 2013 (UTC)
 * Keep per Richwales (see File:STMatterofHonor.jpg. As stated by others below, these images are illustrative of the episodes and increase understanding, so their use seems appropriate. Such images are so widely used in episode articles that the wider community seems to support their use, so wider community discussion as proposed by Richwales seems necessary. -- Aussie Legend  ( ✉ ) 16:00, 23 May 2013 (UTC)
 * Keep When I expanded this article I considered deleting this image, but decided in the end to keep it as it demonstrated the unusual camera angles used in this episode and which were described in the text. Miyagawa (talk) 18:31, 23 May 2013 (UTC)
 * Delete: A look at the warp core from a ramp instead of the ground doesn't justify an image. Clear failure of WP:NFCC. None of the keep arguments indicate what significant increase in understanding this image generates or what detrimental effects would occur from its omission.&mdash;Kww(talk) 21:42, 24 May 2013 (UTC)
 * Keep, the content of the screenshot is discussed in both the "plot" and "production" sections. – Quadell (talk) 12:46, 23 July 2013 (UTC)
 * Keep as appropriate illustrative of the referenced prose now accompanying the image. —  fourthords  <small style="font-size:85%;">&#124; =Λ= <small style="font-size:85%;">&#124;  13:03, 23 July 2013 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section.

File:ST-TNG Hide and Q.jpg
<div class="boilerplate metadata vfd xfd-closed" style="background-color:#f3f9ff; margin:1em 0 0 0; padding:0 10px 0 10px; border:1px solid #aaa;">
 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the discussion was: Delete, the content of the screenshot is not discussed outside of the "plot" section. It is barely discussed there, and not in a way that can't be conveyed by text. – Quadell (talk) 12:51, 23 July 2013 (UTC)
 * File:ST-TNG Hide and Q.jpg ([ delete] | talk | [ history] | links | [ logs]) – uploaded by Sage Veritas ( [ notify] | contribs | uploads | upload log).

Invalid FUR: Non-free content is used only if its presence would significantly increase readers' understanding of the topic, and its omission would be detrimental to that understanding. This image is not critical for understanding, but is used in a decorative fashion. Since this file does not greatly enhance understanding, nor will its omission greatly decrease understanding, it must be deleted. —Justin ( koavf ) ❤T☮C☺M☯ 01:07, 23 May 2013 (UTC)
 * Keep all and stop mass nominating things. You understand the episode more seeing the image from it.   D r e a m Focus  01:29, 23 May 2013 (UTC)
 * Keep per Richwales (see File:STMatterofHonor.jpg. As stated by others below, these images are illustrative of the episodes and increase understanding, so their use seems appropriate. Such images are so widely used in episode articles that the wider community seems to support their use, so wider community discussion as proposed by Richwales seems necessary. -- Aussie Legend  ( ✉ ) 16:00, 23 May 2013 (UTC)
 * Keep The costuming is described in the text of the article itself, and the image is included to aid the readers understanding of that section. Miyagawa (talk) 18:32, 23 May 2013 (UTC)
 * Delete: Don't need a copyrighted image of a TV show to describe a French military uniform. Clear failure of WP:NFCC. None of the keep arguments indicate what significant increase in understanding this image generates or what detrimental effects would occur from its omission.&mdash;Kww(talk) 21:44, 24 May 2013 (UTC)
 * Delete. We know what Napoleonic uniforms look like. The fact that he's wearing one, and – more importantly – the significance of that fact, can easily be covered through text. Fut.Perf. ☼ 07:00, 21 July 2013 (UTC)
 * Note to Keep voters: If you feel a screenshot passes WP:NFCC, it will not help to complain about mass nominations or defend the legality of the image use, since these are not relevant. Instead, if you could identify which specific sections of prose in the body of the article are depicted by the screenshot, it will help make the closing admin's job much easier. – Quadell (talk) 12:51, 23 July 2013 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section.

File:ST-TNG Hollow Pursuits.jpg
<div class="boilerplate metadata vfd xfd-closed" style="background-color:#f3f9ff; margin:1em 0 0 0; padding:0 10px 0 10px; border:1px solid #aaa;">
 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  08:08, 21 July 2013 (UTC)
 * File:ST-TNG Hollow Pursuits.jpg ([ delete] | talk | [ history] | links | [ logs]) – uploaded by Cburnett ( [ notify] | contribs | uploads | upload log).

Invalid FUR: Non-free content is used only if its presence would significantly increase readers' understanding of the topic, and its omission would be detrimental to that understanding. This image is not critical for understanding, but is used in a decorative fashion. Since this file does not greatly enhance understanding, nor will its omission greatly decrease understanding, it must be deleted. —Justin ( koavf ) ❤T☮C☺M☯ 01:07, 23 May 2013 (UTC)
 * Keep all and stop mass nominating things. You understand the episode more seeing the image from it.   D r e a m Focus  01:29, 23 May 2013 (UTC)
 * Keep per Richwales (see File:STMatterofHonor.jpg. As stated by others below, these images are illustrative of the episodes and increase understanding, so their use seems appropriate. Such images are so widely used in episode articles that the wider community seems to support their use, so wider community discussion as proposed by Richwales seems necessary. -- Aussie Legend  ( ✉ ) 16:00, 23 May 2013 (UTC)
 * Delete: "Star Trek actors perform cheesy imitation of the Four Musketeers." Clear failure of WP:NFCC. None of the keep arguments indicate what significant increase in understanding this image generates or what detrimental effects would occur from its omission.&mdash;Kww(talk) 21:46, 24 May 2013 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Home (ENT episode).jpg
<div class="boilerplate metadata vfd xfd-closed" style="background-color:#f3f9ff; margin:1em 0 0 0; padding:0 10px 0 10px; border:1px solid #aaa;">
 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  08:08, 21 July 2013 (UTC)
 * File:Home (ENT episode).jpg ([ delete] | talk | [ history] | links | [ logs]) – uploaded by とある白い猫 ( [ notify] | contribs | uploads | upload log).

Invalid FUR: Non-free content is used only if its presence would significantly increase readers' understanding of the topic, and its omission would be detrimental to that understanding. This image is not critical for understanding, but is used in a decorative fashion. Since this file does not greatly enhance understanding, nor will its omission greatly decrease understanding, it must be deleted. —Justin ( koavf ) ❤T☮C☺M☯ 01:07, 23 May 2013 (UTC)
 * Keep all and stop mass nominating things. You understand the episode more seeing the image from it.   D r e a m Focus  01:29, 23 May 2013 (UTC)
 * Keep per Richwales (see File:STMatterofHonor.jpg. As stated by others below, these images are illustrative of the episodes and increase understanding, so their use seems appropriate. Such images are so widely used in episode articles that the wider community seems to support their use, so wider community discussion as proposed by Richwales seems necessary. -- Aussie Legend  ( ✉ ) 16:00, 23 May 2013 (UTC)
 * Delete: "Scott Bakula gazes at woman in orange sweater at dinner table." Clear failure of WP:NFCC. None of the keep arguments indicate what significant increase in understanding this image generates or what detrimental effects would occur from its omission.&mdash;Kww(talk) 21:49, 24 May 2013 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section.

File:ST-TNG Homeward.jpg
<div class="boilerplate metadata vfd xfd-closed" style="background-color:#f3f9ff; margin:1em 0 0 0; padding:0 10px 0 10px; border:1px solid #aaa;">
 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  08:08, 21 July 2013 (UTC)
 * File:ST-TNG Homeward.jpg ([ delete] | talk | [ history] | links | [ logs]) – uploaded by Cburnett ( [ notify] | contribs | uploads | upload log).

Invalid FUR: Non-free content is used only if its presence would significantly increase readers' understanding of the topic, and its omission would be detrimental to that understanding. This image is not critical for understanding, but is used in a decorative fashion. Since this file does not greatly enhance understanding, nor will its omission greatly decrease understanding, it must be deleted. —Justin ( koavf ) ❤T☮C☺M☯ 01:08, 23 May 2013 (UTC)
 * Keep all and stop mass nominating things. You understand the episode more seeing the image from it.   D r e a m Focus  01:29, 23 May 2013 (UTC)
 * Keep per Richwales (see File:STMatterofHonor.jpg. As stated by others below, these images are illustrative of the episodes and increase understanding, so their use seems appropriate. Such images are so widely used in episode articles that the wider community seems to support their use, so wider community discussion as proposed by Richwales seems necessary. -- Aussie Legend  ( ✉ ) 16:00, 23 May 2013 (UTC)
 * Delete: Another case of an image with no article to include it in. Clear failure of WP:NFCC. None of the keep arguments indicate what significant increase in understanding this image generates or what detrimental effects would occur from its omission.&mdash;Kww(talk) 21:51, 24 May 2013 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Bilby and O&
<div class="boilerplate metadata vfd xfd-closed" style="background-color:#f3f9ff; margin:1em 0 0 0; padding:0 10px 0 10px; border:1px solid #aaa;">
 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  08:08, 21 July 2013 (UTC)
 * File:Bilby and O& ([ delete] | talk | [ history] | links | [ logs]) – uploaded by EDGE ( [ notify] | contribs | uploads | upload log).

Invalid FUR: Non-free content is used only if its presence would significantly increase readers' understanding of the topic, and its omission would be detrimental to that understanding. This image is not critical for understanding, but is used in a decorative fashion. Since this file does not greatly enhance understanding, nor will its omission greatly decrease understanding, it must be deleted. —Justin ( koavf ) ❤T☮C☺M☯ 01:08, 23 May 2013 (UTC)
 * Keep all and stop mass nominating things. You understand the episode more seeing the image from it.   D r e a m Focus  01:29, 23 May 2013 (UTC)
 * Keep per Richwales (see File:STMatterofHonor.jpg. As stated by others below, these images are illustrative of the episodes and increase understanding, so their use seems appropriate. Such images are so widely used in episode articles that the wider community seems to support their use, so wider community discussion as proposed by Richwales seems necessary. -- Aussie Legend  ( ✉ ) 16:00, 23 May 2013 (UTC)
 * Delete: Another case of an image with no article to include it in. Clear failure of WP:NFCC. None of the keep arguments indicate what significant increase in understanding this image generates or what detrimental effects would occur from its omission.&mdash;Kww(talk) 00:19, 26 May 2013 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section.

File:HowsharperTAS.jpg
<div class="boilerplate metadata vfd xfd-closed" style="background-color:#f3f9ff; margin:1em 0 0 0; padding:0 10px 0 10px; border:1px solid #aaa;">
 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  09:09, 21 July 2013 (UTC)
 * File:HowsharperTAS.jpg ([ delete] | talk | [ history] | links | [ logs]) – uploaded by Leoboudv ( [ notify] | contribs | uploads | upload log).

Invalid FUR: Non-free content is used only if its presence would significantly increase readers' understanding of the topic, and its omission would be detrimental to that understanding. This image is not critical for understanding, but is used in a decorative fashion. Since this file does not greatly enhance understanding, nor will its omission greatly decrease understanding, it must be deleted. —Justin ( koavf ) ❤T☮C☺M☯ 01:09, 23 May 2013 (UTC)
 * Keep all and stop mass nominating things. You understand the episode more seeing the image from it.   D r e a m Focus  01:29, 23 May 2013 (UTC)
 * Keep per Richwales (see File:STMatterofHonor.jpg. As stated by others below, these images are illustrative of the episodes and increase understanding, so their use seems appropriate. Such images are so widely used in episode articles that the wider community seems to support their use, so wider community discussion as proposed by Richwales seems necessary. -- Aussie Legend  ( ✉ ) 16:00, 23 May 2013 (UTC)
 * Delete: Standard bridge scene with monster on viewscreeen, conveys nothing. Also, another case of an image with no article to include it in. Clear failure of WP:NFCC. None of the keep arguments indicate what significant increase in understanding this image generates or what detrimental effects would occur from its omission.
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section.

File:TNG 5-23 I, Borg.jpg
<div class="boilerplate metadata vfd xfd-closed" style="background-color:#f3f9ff; margin:1em 0 0 0; padding:0 10px 0 10px; border:1px solid #aaa;">
 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  09:09, 21 July 2013 (UTC)
 * File:TNG 5-23 I, Borg.jpg ([ delete] | talk | [ history] | links | [ logs]) – uploaded by Artene50 ( [ notify] | contribs | uploads | upload log).

Invalid FUR: Non-free content is used only if its presence would significantly increase readers' understanding of the topic, and its omission would be detrimental to that understanding. This image is not critical for understanding, but is used in a decorative fashion. Since this file does not greatly enhance understanding, nor will its omission greatly decrease understanding, it must be deleted. —Justin ( koavf ) ❤T☮C☺M☯ 01:09, 23 May 2013 (UTC)
 * Keep all and stop mass nominating things. You understand the episode more seeing the image from it.   D r e a m Focus  01:29, 23 May 2013 (UTC)
 * Comment I have no objections to the deletion of this single image as the uploader. But only this image. --Artene50 (talk) 02:19, 23 May 2013 (UTC)
 * Keep per Richwales (see File:STMatterofHonor.jpg. As stated by others below, these images are illustrative of the episodes and increase understanding, so their use seems appropriate. Such images are so widely used in episode articles that the wider community seems to support their use, so wider community discussion as proposed by Richwales seems necessary. -- Aussie Legend  ( ✉ ) 16:00, 23 May 2013 (UTC)
 * Delete: Another case of an image with no article to include it in. Since there's no discussion of anything in the article, it's impossble to point at any discussion that this image increases the reader's understanding of. Clear failure of WP:NFCC. None of the keep arguments indicate what significant increase in understanding this image generates or what detrimental effects would occur from its omission.&mdash;Kww(talk) 00:25, 26 May 2013 (UTC)
 * Delete: The only consideration I can think for this episode is that there would be unique discussion of the makeup (which has potential as the TNG makeup guide does discuss Hugh's makeup at some length in the Borg chapter. But it'd need a closer shot of the actor in costume to suffice. Miyagawa (talk) 17:41, 28 May 2013 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section.

File:STIMudd.jpg
<div class="boilerplate metadata vfd xfd-closed" style="background-color:#f3f9ff; margin:1em 0 0 0; padding:0 10px 0 10px; border:1px solid #aaa;">
 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the discussion was: Keep as valid in Harry Mudd only. – Quadell (talk) 13:02, 23 July 2013 (UTC)
 * File:STIMudd.jpg ([ delete] | talk | [ history] | links | [ logs]) – uploaded by (aeropagitica) ( [ notify] | contribs | uploads | upload log).

Invalid FUR: Non-free content is used only if its presence would significantly increase readers' understanding of the topic, and its omission would be detrimental to that understanding. This image is not critical for understanding, but is used in a decorative fashion. Since this file does not greatly enhance understanding, nor will its omission greatly decrease understanding, it must be deleted. —Justin ( koavf ) ❤T☮C☺M☯ 01:10, 23 May 2013 (UTC)
 * Keep all and stop mass nominating things. You understand the episode more seeing the image from it.   D r e a m Focus  01:29, 23 May 2013 (UTC)
 * Keep per Richwales (see File:STMatterofHonor.jpg. As stated by others below, these images are illustrative of the episodes and increase understanding, so their use seems appropriate. Such images are so widely used in episode articles that the wider community seems to support their use, so wider community discussion as proposed by Richwales seems necessary. -- Aussie Legend  ( ✉ ) 16:00, 23 May 2013 (UTC)
 * Note that this image is used in multiple articles - Keep in Harry Mudd as this is the only image used to illustrate a fictional character, delete from the episode article. --B (talk) 15:40, 24 May 2013 (UTC)
 * Delete: Another case of an image with no article to include it in. Since there's no discussion of anything in the article, it's impossble to point at any discussion that this image increases the reader's understanding of. Clear failure of WP:NFCC. None of the keep arguments indicate what significant increase in understanding this image generates or what detrimental effects would occur from its omission. As for the character article, it uses no third-party sources, and should also be deleted on that basis: it's simply a WP:PLOT violation dressed up as an article about a character.&mdash;Kww(talk) 00:29, 26 May 2013 (UTC)
 * Keep per B, used to identify character in his own article. -- SarekOfVulcan (talk) 05:05, 28 May 2013 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section.

File:ST-TNG Identity Crisis.jpg
<div class="boilerplate metadata vfd xfd-closed" style="background-color:#f3f9ff; margin:1em 0 0 0; padding:0 10px 0 10px; border:1px solid #aaa;">
 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  09:06, 22 July 2013 (UTC)
 * File:ST-TNG Identity Crisis.jpg ([ delete] | talk | [ history] | links | [ logs]) – uploaded by Cburnett ( [ notify] | contribs | uploads | upload log).

Invalid FUR: Non-free content is used only if its presence would significantly increase readers' understanding of the topic, and its omission would be detrimental to that understanding. This image is not critical for understanding, but is used in a decorative fashion. Since this file does not greatly enhance understanding, nor will its omission greatly decrease understanding, it must be deleted. —Justin ( koavf ) ❤T☮C☺M☯ 01:10, 23 May 2013 (UTC)
 * Keep all and stop mass nominating things. You understand the episode more seeing the image from it.   D r e a m Focus  01:29, 23 May 2013 (UTC)
 * Keep per Richwales (see File:STMatterofHonor.jpg. As stated by others below, these images are illustrative of the episodes and increase understanding, so their use seems appropriate. Such images are so widely used in episode articles that the wider community seems to support their use, so wider community discussion as proposed by Richwales seems necessary. -- Aussie Legend  ( ✉ ) 16:00, 23 May 2013 (UTC)
 * Delete: Is everyone certain that we can't save time by just deleting all of these WP:NOT violations acting as homes to the abuses of our fair-use criteria? Another case of an image with no article to include it in. Since there's no discussion of anything in the article, it's impossible to point at any discussion that this image increases the reader's understanding of. Hard to image what we could discuss about "Geordi walks away from three off-screen light sources", anyway. Clear failure of WP:NFCC. None of the keep arguments indicate what significant increase in understanding this image generates or what detrimental effects would occur from its omission.&mdash;Kww(talk) 00:32, 26 May 2013 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Impulse (ENT episode).jpg
<div class="boilerplate metadata vfd xfd-closed" style="background-color:#f3f9ff; margin:1em 0 0 0; padding:0 10px 0 10px; border:1px solid #aaa;">
 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  09:06, 22 July 2013 (UTC)
 * File:Impulse (ENT episode).jpg ([ delete] | talk | [ history] | links | [ logs]) – uploaded by とある白い猫 ( [ notify] | contribs | uploads | upload log).

Invalid FUR: Non-free content is used only if its presence would significantly increase readers' understanding of the topic, and its omission would be detrimental to that understanding. This image is not critical for understanding, but is used in a decorative fashion. Since this file does not greatly enhance understanding, nor will its omission greatly decrease understanding, it must be deleted. —Justin ( koavf ) ❤T☮C☺M☯ 01:10, 23 May 2013 (UTC)
 * Keep all and stop mass nominating things. You understand the episode more seeing the image from it.   D r e a m Focus  01:29, 23 May 2013 (UTC)
 * Keep per Richwales (see File:STMatterofHonor.jpg. As stated by others below, these images are illustrative of the episodes and increase understanding, so their use seems appropriate. Such images are so widely used in episode articles that the wider community seems to support their use, so wider community discussion as proposed by Richwales seems necessary. -- Aussie Legend  ( ✉ ) 16:00, 23 May 2013 (UTC)
 * Delete: This episode actually has an article: still fails WP:NOT, but least somebody cared enough to pretend that writing an article was the goal. Still, this image is a clear failure of WP:NFCC. "Man walks towards unseen destination with gun pointing at ground" doesn't explain anything of importance about an episode exploring drug addiction. None of the keep arguments indicate what significant increase in understanding this image generates or what detrimental effects would occur from its omission.&mdash;Kww(talk) 00:32, 26 May 2013 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section.

File:In a Mirror, Darkly (ENT episode) Part I.jpg
<div class="boilerplate metadata vfd xfd-closed" style="background-color:#f3f9ff; margin:1em 0 0 0; padding:0 10px 0 10px; border:1px solid #aaa;">
 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted as G7 by AnomieBOT ⚡  01:00, 1 July 2013 (UTC)
 * File:In a Mirror, Darkly (ENT episode) Part I.jpg ([ delete] | talk | [ history] | links | [ logs]) – uploaded by とある白い猫 ( [ notify] | contribs | uploads | upload log).

Invalid FUR: Non-free content is used only if its presence would significantly increase readers' understanding of the topic, and its omission would be detrimental to that understanding. This image is not critical for understanding, but is used in a decorative fashion. Since this file does not greatly enhance understanding, nor will its omission greatly decrease understanding, it must be deleted. Free media are included later in the article to display this anyway. —Justin ( koavf ) ❤T☮C☺M☯ 01:13, 23 May 2013 (UTC)
 * Keep per Richwales (see File:STMatterofHonor.jpg. As stated by others below, these images are illustrative of the episodes and increase understanding, so their use seems appropriate. Such images are so widely used in episode articles that the wider community seems to support their use, so wider community discussion as proposed by Richwales seems necessary. -- Aussie Legend  ( ✉ ) 16:00, 23 May 2013 (UTC)
 * Keep Is used to show the costuming in this episode, which was distinctive as compared to the rest of this series. Miyagawa (talk) 18:34, 23 May 2013 (UTC)
 * Delete: Congratulations to Miyagawa, who took the time to actually write an article about the episode. Still, this one is a clear failure of WP:NFCC. The free image File:WonderCon 2012 - original series Star Trek uniforms.jpg illustrates the costuming far better than this picture. None of the keep arguments indicate what significant increase in understanding this image generates or what detrimental effects would occur from its omission.&mdash;Kww(talk) 00:42, 26 May 2013 (UTC)
 * I've requested the speedy deletion of this image as the original uploader as I agree with your point. It has also been removed from the article. Miyagawa (talk) 18:25, 30 June 2013 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section.

File:DS9 In the Pale Moonlight.png
<div class="boilerplate metadata vfd xfd-closed" style="background-color:#f3f9ff; margin:1em 0 0 0; padding:0 10px 0 10px; border:1px solid #aaa;">
 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  09:06, 22 July 2013 (UTC)
 * File:DS9 In the Pale Moonlight.png ([ delete] | talk | [ history] | links | [ logs]) – uploaded by Hazydan ( [ notify] | contribs | uploads | upload log).

Invalid FUR: Non-free content is used only if its presence would significantly increase readers' understanding of the topic, and its omission would be detrimental to that understanding. This image is not critical for understanding, but is used in a decorative fashion. Since this file does not greatly enhance understanding, nor will its omission greatly decrease understanding, it must be deleted. —Justin ( koavf ) ❤T☮C☺M☯ 01:14, 23 May 2013 (UTC)
 * Keep all and stop mass nominating things. You understand the episode more seeing the image from it.   D r e a m Focus  01:29, 23 May 2013 (UTC)
 * Keep per Richwales (see File:STMatterofHonor.jpg. As stated by others below, these images are illustrative of the episodes and increase understanding, so their use seems appropriate. Such images are so widely used in episode articles that the wider community seems to support their use, so wider community discussion as proposed by Richwales seems necessary. -- Aussie Legend  ( ✉ ) 16:00, 23 May 2013 (UTC)
 * Delete: Fraudulent FUR: "man sits on couch in dark room, staring at camera" does not "demonstrate the uncommon narrative structure of the episode". None of the keep arguments indicate what significant increase in understanding this image generates or what detrimental effects would occur from its omission.&mdash;Kww(talk) 00:42, 26 May 2013 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section.

File:ST-TNG Inheritance.jpg
<div class="boilerplate metadata vfd xfd-closed" style="background-color:#f3f9ff; margin:1em 0 0 0; padding:0 10px 0 10px; border:1px solid #aaa;">
 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  12:10, 21 July 2013 (UTC)
 * File:ST-TNG Inheritance.jpg ([ delete] | talk | [ history] | links | [ logs]) – uploaded by Cburnett ( [ notify] | contribs | uploads | upload log).

Invalid FUR: Non-free content is used only if its presence would significantly increase readers' understanding of the topic, and its omission would be detrimental to that understanding. This image is not critical for understanding, but is used in a decorative fashion. Since this file does not greatly enhance understanding, nor will its omission greatly decrease understanding, it must be deleted. —Justin ( koavf ) ❤T☮C☺M☯ 01:15, 23 May 2013 (UTC)
 * Keep all and stop mass nominating things. You understand the episode more seeing the image from it.   D r e a m Focus  01:29, 23 May 2013 (UTC)
 * Keep per Richwales (see File:STMatterofHonor.jpg. As stated by others below, these images are illustrative of the episodes and increase understanding, so their use seems appropriate. Such images are so widely used in episode articles that the wider community seems to support their use, so wider community discussion as proposed by Richwales seems necessary. -- Aussie Legend  ( ✉ ) 16:00, 23 May 2013 (UTC)
 * Delete: Is everyone certain that we can't save time by just deleting all of these WP:NOT violations acting as homes to the abuses of our fair-use criteria? Another case of an image with no article to include it in. Since there's no discussion of anything in the article, it's impossible to point at any discussion that this image increases the reader's understanding of. Hard to image what we could discuss about yet another image of yet another guest star staring dramatically at something off screen. Why can't these people ever look at something that's actually in our field of view. Clear failure of WP:NFCC. None of the keep arguments indicate what significant increase in understanding this image generates or what detrimental effects would occur from its omission.&mdash;Kww(talk) 05:27, 26 May 2013 (UTC)
 * Delete - does not significantly add to understanding of episode, and omission would not be detrimental to understanding of episode. -- SarekOfVulcan (talk) 05:06, 28 May 2013 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section.

File:ST-TNG Interface.jpg
<div class="boilerplate metadata vfd xfd-closed" style="background-color:#f3f9ff; margin:1em 0 0 0; padding:0 10px 0 10px; border:1px solid #aaa;">
 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  09:06, 22 July 2013 (UTC)
 * File:ST-TNG Interface.jpg ([ delete] | talk | [ history] | links | [ logs]) – uploaded by Cburnett ( [ notify] | contribs | uploads | upload log).

Invalid FUR: Non-free content is used only if its presence would significantly increase readers' understanding of the topic, and its omission would be detrimental to that understanding. This image is not critical for understanding, but is used in a decorative fashion. Since this file does not greatly enhance understanding, nor will its omission greatly decrease understanding, it must be deleted. —Justin ( koavf ) ❤T☮C☺M☯ 01:17, 23 May 2013 (UTC)
 * Keep all and stop mass nominating things. You understand the episode more seeing the image from it.   D r e a m Focus  01:29, 23 May 2013 (UTC)
 * Keep per Richwales (see File:STMatterofHonor.jpg. As stated by others below, these images are illustrative of the episodes and increase understanding, so their use seems appropriate. Such images are so widely used in episode articles that the wider community seems to support their use, so wider community discussion as proposed by Richwales seems necessary. -- Aussie Legend  ( ✉ ) 16:00, 23 May 2013 (UTC)
 * Delete: Is everyone certain that we can't save time by just deleting all of these WP:NOT violations acting as homes to the abuses of our fair-use criteria? Another case of an image with no article to include it in. Since there's no discussion of anything in the article, it's impossible to point at any discussion that this image increases the reader's understanding of. I will give this one props though: we can actually kind of sort of determine that Geordi is gazing at blurry cubes. Clear failure of WP:NFCC. None of the keep arguments indicate what significant increase in understanding this image generates or what detrimental effects would occur from its omission.&mdash;Kww(talk) 05:29, 26 May 2013 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Spock and Dr Jones.jpg
<div class="boilerplate metadata vfd xfd-closed" style="background-color:#f3f9ff; margin:1em 0 0 0; padding:0 10px 0 10px; border:1px solid #aaa;">
 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  09:06, 22 July 2013 (UTC)
 * File:Spock and Dr Jones.jpg ([ delete] | talk | [ history] | links | [ logs]) – uploaded by WikiuserNI ( [ notify] | contribs | uploads | upload log).

Invalid FUR: Non-free content is used only if its presence would significantly increase readers' understanding of the topic, and its omission would be detrimental to that understanding. This image is not critical for understanding, but is used in a decorative fashion. Since this file does not greatly enhance understanding, nor will its omission greatly decrease understanding, it must be deleted. —Justin ( koavf ) ❤T☮C☺M☯ 01:17, 23 May 2013 (UTC)
 * Keep all and stop mass nominating things. You understand the episode more seeing the image from it.   D r e a m Focus  01:29, 23 May 2013 (UTC)
 * Keep per Richwales (see File:STMatterofHonor.jpg. As stated by others below, these images are illustrative of the episodes and increase understanding, so their use seems appropriate. Such images are so widely used in episode articles that the wider community seems to support their use, so wider community discussion as proposed by Richwales seems necessary. -- Aussie Legend  ( ✉ ) 16:00, 23 May 2013 (UTC)
 * Delete: "Spock and a guest star carry a box towards an undetermined location. We don't know what the box is, nor is the destination clear" would replace the image, but it's not at all clear why we would bother. Clear failure of WP:NFCC. None of the keep arguments indicate what significant increase in understanding this image generates or what detrimental effects would occur from its omission.&mdash;Kww(talk) 05:32, 26 May 2013 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section.

File:ST-TNG Journey&
<div class="boilerplate metadata vfd xfd-closed" style="background-color:#f3f9ff; margin:1em 0 0 0; padding:0 10px 0 10px; border:1px solid #aaa;">
 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  12:10, 21 July 2013 (UTC)
 * File:ST-TNG Journey& ([ delete] | talk | [ history] | links | [ logs]) – uploaded by Cburnett ( [ notify] | contribs | uploads | upload log).

Invalid FUR: Non-free content is used only if its presence would significantly increase readers' understanding of the topic, and its omission would be detrimental to that understanding. This image is not critical for understanding, but is used in a decorative fashion. Since this file does not greatly enhance understanding, nor will its omission greatly decrease understanding, it must be deleted. —Justin ( koavf ) ❤T☮C☺M☯ 01:21, 23 May 2013 (UTC)
 * Keep all and stop mass nominating things. You understand the episode more seeing the image from it.   D r e a m Focus  01:29, 23 May 2013 (UTC)
 * Keep per Richwales (see File:STMatterofHonor.jpg. As stated by others below, these images are illustrative of the episodes and increase understanding, so their use seems appropriate. Such images are so widely used in episode articles that the wider community seems to support their use, so wider community discussion as proposed by Richwales seems necessary. -- Aussie Legend  ( ✉ ) 16:00, 23 May 2013 (UTC)
 * Delete: Plot summary includes "and a fight breaks out", which adequately replaces this picture. Clear failure of WP:NFCC. None of the keep arguments indicate what significant increase in understanding this image generates or what detrimental effects would occur from its omission.&mdash;Kww(talk) 05:35, 26 May 2013 (UTC)
 * Delete Actually, I believe this illustrates Wesley stopping time _after_ a fight breaks out, but there's no way to tell from this image that that's what we're seeing. Fails nfcc8. -- SarekOfVulcan (talk) 05:08, 28 May 2013 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section.

File:ST-TNG Lessons.jpg
<div class="boilerplate metadata vfd xfd-closed" style="background-color:#f3f9ff; margin:1em 0 0 0; padding:0 10px 0 10px; border:1px solid #aaa;">
 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the discussion was: Keep – Quadell (talk) 13:06, 23 July 2013 (UTC)
 * File:ST-TNG Lessons.jpg ([ delete] | talk | [ history] | links | [ logs]) – uploaded by Cburnett ( [ notify] | contribs | uploads | upload log).

Invalid FUR: Non-free content is used only if its presence would significantly increase readers' understanding of the topic, and its omission would be detrimental to that understanding. This image is not critical for understanding, but is used in a decorative fashion. Since this file does not greatly enhance understanding, nor will its omission greatly decrease understanding, it must be deleted. —Justin ( koavf ) ❤T☮C☺M☯ 01:22, 23 May 2013 (UTC)
 * Keep all and stop mass nominating things. You understand the episode more seeing the image from it.   D r e a m Focus  01:29, 23 May 2013 (UTC)
 * Keep per Richwales (see File:STMatterofHonor.jpg. As stated by others below, these images are illustrative of the episodes and increase understanding, so their use seems appropriate. Such images are so widely used in episode articles that the wider community seems to support their use, so wider community discussion as proposed by Richwales seems necessary. -- Aussie Legend  ( ✉ ) 16:00, 23 May 2013 (UTC)
 * Keep This episode included some unusual camera angles in order to hide musicians playing instruments just off camera. This image demonstrates one of those such shots. Miyagawa (talk) 18:35, 23 May 2013 (UTC)
 * Keep per Miyagawa, but move out of the infobox. This image is used transformatively and appropriately to discuss a unique production aspect of the episode. --B (talk) 15:37, 24 May 2013 (UTC)
 * Delete: The old dodge of taking pictures of a body double that can play instruments interleaved with shots of the actors pretending to play the same instruments doesn't require an illustration to explain it. Clear failure of WP:NFCC. None of the keep arguments indicate what significant increase in understanding this image generates or what detrimental effects would occur from its omission.&mdash;Kww(talk) 05:38, 26 May 2013 (UTC)
 * Keep, would require significantly more text to explain. -- SarekOfVulcan (talk) 05:10, 28 May 2013 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Star Trek TOS - Journey to Babel - Captain Kirk with Vulcan ambassador Sarek and Tellarite ambassador Gav.jpg
<div class="boilerplate metadata vfd xfd-closed" style="background-color:#f3f9ff; margin:1em 0 0 0; padding:0 10px 0 10px; border:1px solid #aaa;">
 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the discussion was: keep. Fut.Perf. ☼ 12:49, 29 July 2013 (UTC)
 * File:Star Trek TOS - Journey to Babel - Captain Kirk with Vulcan ambassador Sarek and Tellarite ambassador Gav.jpg ([ delete] | talk | [ history] | links | [ logs]) – uploaded by Zzapamiga ( [ notify] | contribs | uploads | upload log).

Invalid FUR: Non-free content is used only if its presence would significantly increase readers' understanding of the topic, and its omission would be detrimental to that understanding. This image is not critical for understanding, but is used in a decorative fashion. Since this file does not greatly enhance understanding, nor will its omission greatly decrease understanding, it must be deleted. —Justin ( koavf ) ❤T☮C☺M☯ 01:22, 23 May 2013 (UTC)
 * Keep all and stop mass nominating things. You understand the episode more seeing the image from it.   D r e a m Focus  01:29, 23 May 2013 (UTC)
 * Keep per Richwales (see File:STMatterofHonor.jpg. As stated by others below, these images are illustrative of the episodes and increase understanding, so their use seems appropriate. Such images are so widely used in episode articles that the wider community seems to support their use, so wider community discussion as proposed by Richwales seems necessary. -- Aussie Legend  ( ✉ ) 16:00, 23 May 2013 (UTC)
 * Delete:Just an illustration, with nothing that actually causes a significant increase in understanding. Clear WP:NFCC violation.&mdash;Kww(talk) 15:51, 26 May 2013 (UTC)
 * Keep - with the multiple alien races present (which have minor, if any other appearances in TOS), this picture does add significantly to the understanding of the episode, and "pig-faced alien" is too generic to get the point across properly. -- SarekOfVulcan (talk) 05:12, 28 May 2013 (UTC)
 * Delete: The content of this screenshot is not mentioned outside of "plot" section, and it is not clear which plot point is actually depicted. I have no doubt that additional material could justify this image's use (discussion of costumes, production, commentary on the look of alien races by critics), but such material is not present. – Quadell (talk) 13:11, 23 July 2013 (UTC)
 * Note to Keep voters: If you feel a screenshot passes WP:NFCC, it will not help to complain about mass nominations or defend the legality of the image use, since these are not relevant. Instead, if you could identify which specific sections of prose in the body of the article are depicted by the screenshot, it will help make the closing admin's job much easier. – Quadell (talk) 13:11, 23 July 2013 (UTC)
 * Keep. I have added text to the Journey to Babel article describing the physical appearances of the Andorian and Tellarite alien species, which were introduced in this episode and are illustrated in this image.  —  Rich wales (no relation to Jimbo) 01:07, 28 July 2013 (UTC)
 * Response You've added an unsourced section that just says how they look without discussing why and how they were designed that way. And the image is still used improperly in the infobox. This is exactly the same problem as before. —Justin ( koavf ) ❤T☮C☺M☯ 06:09, 28 July 2013 (UTC)
 * I've added some sources to the new "Alien species" section, and I've also removed the image from the infobox and repositioned it next to the new section. —  Rich wales (no relation to Jimbo) 00:56, 29 July 2013 (UTC)
 * Keep (changed vote from above). As currently used in the article, I now believe this image passes NFCC#8. On a more personal note, I'm glad to see new, sourced, free content added to the article, and I consider that the best possible outcome of a FFD discussion on a screenshot. – Quadell (talk) 11:49, 29 July 2013 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Kir&
<div class="boilerplate metadata vfd xfd-closed" style="background-color:#f3f9ff; margin:1em 0 0 0; padding:0 10px 0 10px; border:1px solid #aaa;">
 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  09:06, 22 July 2013 (UTC)
 * File:Kir& ([ delete] | talk | [ history] | links | [ logs]) – uploaded by とある白い猫 ( [ notify] | contribs | uploads | upload log).

Invalid FUR: Non-free content is used only if its presence would significantly increase readers' understanding of the topic, and its omission would be detrimental to that understanding. This image is not critical for understanding, but is used in a decorative fashion. Since this file does not greatly enhance understanding, nor will its omission greatly decrease understanding, it must be deleted. —Justin ( koavf ) ❤T☮C☺M☯ 01:23, 23 May 2013 (UTC)
 * Keep per Richwales (see File:STMatterofHonor.jpg. As stated by others below, these images are illustrative of the episodes and increase understanding, so their use seems appropriate. Such images are so widely used in episode articles that the wider community seems to support their use, so wider community discussion as proposed by Richwales seems necessary. -- Aussie Legend  ( ✉ ) 16:00, 23 May 2013 (UTC)
 * Delete: "Vulcan woman with tawny hair" would suffice. Clear failure of WP:NFCC. None of the keep arguments indicate what significant increase in understanding this image generates or what detrimental effects would occur from its omission.&mdash;Kww(talk) 05:41, 26 May 2013 (UTC)
 * Delete: It is included for decorative use only. Miyagawa (talk) 17:46, 28 May 2013 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section.

File:ST-TNG Legacy.jpg
<div class="boilerplate metadata vfd xfd-closed" style="background-color:#f3f9ff; margin:1em 0 0 0; padding:0 10px 0 10px; border:1px solid #aaa;">
 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  09:06, 22 July 2013 (UTC)
 * File:ST-TNG Legacy.jpg ([ delete] | talk | [ history] | links | [ logs]) – uploaded by Cburnett ( [ notify] | contribs | uploads | upload log).

Invalid FUR: Non-free content is used only if its presence would significantly increase readers' understanding of the topic, and its omission would be detrimental to that understanding. This image is not critical for understanding, but is used in a decorative fashion. Since this file does not greatly enhance understanding, nor will its omission greatly decrease understanding, it must be deleted. —Justin ( koavf ) ❤T☮C☺M☯ 01:23, 23 May 2013 (UTC)
 * Keep per Richwales (see File:STMatterofHonor.jpg. As stated by others below, these images are illustrative of the episodes and increase understanding, so their use seems appropriate. Such images are so widely used in episode articles that the wider community seems to support their use, so wider community discussion as proposed by Richwales seems necessary. -- Aussie Legend  ( ✉ ) 16:00, 23 May 2013 (UTC)
 * Delete: Is everyone certain that we can't save time by just deleting all of these WP:NOT violations acting as homes to the abuses of our fair-use criteria? Another case of an image with no article to include it in. A single trivia note tacked onto a plot summary does not make an article. Since there's no discussion of anything in the article, it's impossible to point at any discussion that this image increases the reader's understanding of. Hard to imagine what we could discuss about "pretty girl and Data stare at something off screen again", anyway. Clear failure of WP:NFCC. None of the keep arguments indicate what significant increase in understanding this image generates or what detrimental effects would occur from its omission.&mdash;Kww(talk) 05:44, 26 May 2013 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section.

File:STLastBattle.jpg
<div class="boilerplate metadata vfd xfd-closed" style="background-color:#f3f9ff; margin:1em 0 0 0; padding:0 10px 0 10px; border:1px solid #aaa;">
 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  09:06, 22 July 2013 (UTC)
 * File:STLastBattle.jpg ([ delete] | talk | [ history] | links | [ logs]) – uploaded by Cyberia23 ( [ notify] | contribs | uploads | upload log).

Invalid FUR: Non-free content is used only if its presence would significantly increase readers' understanding of the topic, and its omission would be detrimental to that understanding. This image is not critical for understanding, but is used in a decorative fashion. Since this file does not greatly enhance understanding, nor will its omission greatly decrease understanding, it must be deleted. —Justin ( koavf ) ❤T☮C☺M☯ 01:23, 23 May 2013 (UTC)
 * Keep per Richwales (see File:STMatterofHonor.jpg. As stated by others below, these images are illustrative of the episodes and increase understanding, so their use seems appropriate. Such images are so widely used in episode articles that the wider community seems to support their use, so wider community discussion as proposed by Richwales seems necessary. -- Aussie Legend  ( ✉ ) 16:00, 23 May 2013 (UTC)
 * Delete: "Frank Gorshin with the left half of his face painted white and the right half of his face painted black, once again looking at something off screen" would suffice. Clear failure of WP:NFCC. None of the keep arguments indicate what significant increase in understanding this image generates or what detrimental effects would occur from its omission.&mdash;Kww(talk) 05:47, 26 May 2013 (UTC)
 * Weak keep -- not convinced Kww's phrase above gets the point across sufficiently. -- SarekOfVulcan (talk) 05:13, 28 May 2013 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section.

File:ST-TNG Liasons.jpg
<div class="boilerplate metadata vfd xfd-closed" style="background-color:#f3f9ff; margin:1em 0 0 0; padding:0 10px 0 10px; border:1px solid #aaa;">
 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  09:06, 22 July 2013 (UTC)
 * File:ST-TNG Liasons.jpg ([ delete] | talk | [ history] | links | [ logs]) – uploaded by Cburnett ( [ notify] | contribs | uploads | upload log).

Invalid FUR: Non-free content is used only if its presence would significantly increase readers' understanding of the topic, and its omission would be detrimental to that understanding. This image is not critical for understanding, but is used in a decorative fashion. Since this file does not greatly enhance understanding, nor will its omission greatly decrease understanding, it must be deleted. —Justin ( koavf ) ❤T☮C☺M☯ 01:23, 23 May 2013 (UTC)
 * Keep per Richwales (see File:STMatterofHonor.jpg. As stated by others below, these images are illustrative of the episodes and increase understanding, so their use seems appropriate. Such images are so widely used in episode articles that the wider community seems to support their use, so wider community discussion as proposed by Richwales seems necessary. -- Aussie Legend  ( ✉ ) 16:00, 23 May 2013 (UTC)
 * Delete: Is everyone certain that we can't save time by just deleting all of these WP:NOT violations acting as homes to the abuses of our fair-use criteria? Another case of an image with no article to include it in. Since there's no discussion of anything in the article, it's impossible to point at any discussion that this image increases the reader's understanding of. "Picard and an attractive woman gaze into each other's eyes" would suffice. Clear failure of WP:NFCC. None of the keep arguments indicate what significant increase in understanding this image generates or what detrimental effects would occur from its omission.&mdash;Kww(talk) 05:49, 26 May 2013 (UTC)
 * Delete - does not significantly add to understanding of episode, and omission would not be detrimental to understanding of episode. -- SarekOfVulcan (talk) 05:14, 28 May 2013 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Little Green Men Star Trek Deep Space Nine.jpg
<div class="boilerplate metadata vfd xfd-closed" style="background-color:#f3f9ff; margin:1em 0 0 0; padding:0 10px 0 10px; border:1px solid #aaa;">
 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  09:06, 22 July 2013 (UTC)
 * File:Little Green Men Star Trek Deep Space Nine.jpg ([ delete] | talk | [ history] | links | [ logs]) – uploaded by Bwmoll3 ( [ notify] | contribs | uploads | upload log).

Invalid FUR: Non-free content is used only if its presence would significantly increase readers' understanding of the topic, and its omission would be detrimental to that understanding. This image is not critical for understanding, but is used in a decorative fashion. Since this file does not greatly enhance understanding, nor will its omission greatly decrease understanding, it must be deleted. —Justin ( koavf ) ❤T☮C☺M☯ 01:23, 23 May 2013 (UTC)
 * Keep per Richwales (see File:STMatterofHonor.jpg. As stated by others below, these images are illustrative of the episodes and increase understanding, so their use seems appropriate. Such images are so widely used in episode articles that the wider community seems to support their use, so wider community discussion as proposed by Richwales seems necessary. -- Aussie Legend  ( ✉ ) 16:00, 23 May 2013 (UTC)
 * Delete: Is everyone certain that we can't save time by just deleting all of these WP:NOT violations acting as homes to the abuses of our fair-use criteria? Another case of an image with no article to include it in. Since there's no discussion of anything in the article, it's impossible to point at any discussion that this image increases the reader's understanding of. There's no good-faith argument that this illustrates anything of importance. Clear failure of WP:NFCC. None of the keep arguments indicate what significant increase in understanding this image generates or what detrimental effects would occur from its omission.&mdash;Kww(talk) 05:51, 26 May 2013 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section.

File:ST-TNG Loud as a Whisper.jpg
<div class="boilerplate metadata vfd xfd-closed" style="background-color:#f3f9ff; margin:1em 0 0 0; padding:0 10px 0 10px; border:1px solid #aaa;">
 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  09:06, 22 July 2013 (UTC)
 * File:ST-TNG Loud as a Whisper.jpg ([ delete] | talk | [ history] | links | [ logs]) – uploaded by Cburnett ( [ notify] | contribs | uploads | upload log).

Invalid FUR: Non-free content is used only if its presence would significantly increase readers' understanding of the topic, and its omission would be detrimental to that understanding. This image is not critical for understanding, but is used in a decorative fashion. Since this file does not greatly enhance understanding, nor will its omission greatly decrease understanding, it must be deleted. —Justin ( koavf ) ❤T☮C☺M☯ 01:24, 23 May 2013 (UTC)
 * Keep per Richwales (see File:STMatterofHonor.jpg. As stated by others below, these images are illustrative of the episodes and increase understanding, so their use seems appropriate. Such images are so widely used in episode articles that the wider community seems to support their use, so wider community discussion as proposed by Richwales seems necessary. -- Aussie Legend  ( ✉ ) 16:00, 23 May 2013 (UTC)
 * Delete: Now we have four people looking dramatically off-camera. No meat to the article, no discussion of image, nothing at all to justify its inclusion. This is truly getting pathetic. WP:NFCC failure.&mdash;Kww(talk) 05:55, 26 May 2013 (UTC)
 * Delete - does not significantly add to understanding of episode, and omission would not be detrimental to understanding of episode. -- SarekOfVulcan (talk) 05:16, 28 May 2013 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section.

File:ST-TNG Lower Decks.jpg
<div class="boilerplate metadata vfd xfd-closed" style="background-color:#f3f9ff; margin:1em 0 0 0; padding:0 10px 0 10px; border:1px solid #aaa;">
 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  09:06, 22 July 2013 (UTC)
 * File:ST-TNG Lower Decks.jpg ([ delete] | talk | [ history] | links | [ logs]) – uploaded by RoyBoy ( [ notify] | contribs | uploads | upload log).

Invalid FUR: Non-free content is used only if its presence would significantly increase readers' understanding of the topic, and its omission would be detrimental to that understanding. This image is not critical for understanding, but is used in a decorative fashion. Since this file does not greatly enhance understanding, nor will its omission greatly decrease understanding, it must be deleted. —Justin ( koavf ) ❤T☮C☺M☯ 01:24, 23 May 2013 (UTC)
 * Keep per Richwales (see File:STMatterofHonor.jpg. As stated by others below, these images are illustrative of the episodes and increase understanding, so their use seems appropriate. Such images are so widely used in episode articles that the wider community seems to support their use, so wider community discussion as proposed by Richwales seems necessary. -- Aussie Legend  ( ✉ ) 16:00, 23 May 2013 (UTC)
 * Delete: Is everyone certain that we can't save time by just deleting all of these WP:NOT violations acting as homes to the abuses of our fair-use criteria? Another case of an image with no article to include it in. Since there's no discussion of anything in the article, it's impossible to point at any discussion that this image increases the reader's understanding of. There's nothing about the appearance of this particular game the characters are playing that is relevant to the episode. Clear failure of WP:NFCC. None of the keep arguments indicate what significant increase in understanding this image generates or what detrimental effects would occur from its omission.&mdash;Kww(talk) 15:54, 26 May 2013 (UTC)
 * Delete - does not significantly add to understanding of episode, and omission would not be detrimental to understanding of episode. -- SarekOfVulcan (talk) 05:15, 28 May 2013 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section.

File:ST-TNG Man of the People.jpg
<div class="boilerplate metadata vfd xfd-closed" style="background-color:#f3f9ff; margin:1em 0 0 0; padding:0 10px 0 10px; border:1px solid #aaa;">
 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  09:06, 22 July 2013 (UTC)
 * File:ST-TNG Man of the People.jpg ([ delete] | talk | [ history] | links | [ logs]) – uploaded by Cburnett ( [ notify] | contribs | uploads | upload log).

Invalid FUR: Non-free content is used only if its presence would significantly increase readers' understanding of the topic, and its omission would be detrimental to that understanding. This image is not critical for understanding, but is used in a decorative fashion. Since this file does not greatly enhance understanding, nor will its omission greatly decrease understanding, it must be deleted. —Justin ( koavf ) ❤T☮C☺M☯ 01:24, 23 May 2013 (UTC)
 * Keep per Richwales (see File:STMatterofHonor.jpg. As stated by others below, these images are illustrative of the episodes and increase understanding, so their use seems appropriate. Such images are so widely used in episode articles that the wider community seems to support their use, so wider community discussion as proposed by Richwales seems necessary. -- Aussie Legend  ( ✉ ) 16:00, 23 May 2013 (UTC)
 * Delete: Is everyone certain that we can't save time by just deleting all of these WP:NOT violations acting as homes to the abuses of our fair-use criteria? Another case of an image with no article to include it in. Since there's no discussion of anything in the article, it's impossible to point at any discussion that this image increases the reader's understanding of. Clear failure of WP:NFCC. None of the keep arguments indicate what significant increase in understanding this image generates or what detrimental effects would occur from its omission.&mdash;Kww(talk) 15:56, 26 May 2013 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section.

File:ST-TNG Masks.jpg
<div class="boilerplate metadata vfd xfd-closed" style="background-color:#f3f9ff; margin:1em 0 0 0; padding:0 10px 0 10px; border:1px solid #aaa;">
 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  09:06, 22 July 2013 (UTC)
 * File:ST-TNG Masks.jpg ([ delete] | talk | [ history] | links | [ logs]) – uploaded by Cburnett ( [ notify] | contribs | uploads | upload log).

Invalid FUR: Non-free content is used only if its presence would significantly increase readers' understanding of the topic, and its omission would be detrimental to that understanding. This image is not critical for understanding, but is used in a decorative fashion. Since this file does not greatly enhance understanding, nor will its omission greatly decrease understanding, it must be deleted. —Justin ( koavf ) ❤T☮C☺M☯ 01:25, 23 May 2013 (UTC)
 * Keep per Richwales (see File:STMatterofHonor.jpg. As stated by others below, these images are illustrative of the episodes and increase understanding, so their use seems appropriate. Such images are so widely used in episode articles that the wider community seems to support their use, so wider community discussion as proposed by Richwales seems necessary. -- Aussie Legend  ( ✉ ) 16:00, 23 May 2013 (UTC)
 * Delete: Is everyone certain that we can't save time by just deleting all of these WP:NOT violations acting as homes to the abuses of our fair-use criteria? Another case of an image with no article to include it in. Since there's no discussion of anything in the article, it's impossible to point at any discussion that this image increases the reader's understanding of. The exact appearance of the temple of symbols is unnecessary to have understanding of the plot. Clear failure of WP:NFCC. None of the keep arguments indicate what significant increase in understanding this image generates or what detrimental effects would occur from its omission.&mdash;Kww(talk) 15:59, 26 May 2013 (UTC)
 * Delete - does not significantly add to understanding of episode, and omission would not be detrimental to understanding of episode. "Data sits at the top of a flight of stairs wearing a mask" conveys most of the same information. -- SarekOfVulcan (talk) 05:17, 28 May 2013 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section.

File:ENTmarauders.jpg
<div class="boilerplate metadata vfd xfd-closed" style="background-color:#f3f9ff; margin:1em 0 0 0; padding:0 10px 0 10px; border:1px solid #aaa;">
 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  08:05, 23 July 2013 (UTC)
 * File:ENTmarauders.jpg ([ delete] | talk | [ history] | links | [ logs]) – uploaded by (aeropagitica) ( [ notify] | contribs | uploads | upload log).

Invalid FUR: Non-free content is used only if its presence would significantly increase readers' understanding of the topic, and its omission would be detrimental to that understanding. This image is not critical for understanding, but is used in a decorative fashion. Since this file does not greatly enhance understanding, nor will its omission greatly decrease understanding, it must be deleted. —Justin ( koavf ) ❤T☮C☺M☯ 01:25, 23 May 2013 (UTC)
 * Keep per Richwales (see File:STMatterofHonor.jpg. As stated by others below, these images are illustrative of the episodes and increase understanding, so their use seems appropriate. Such images are so widely used in episode articles that the wider community seems to support their use, so wider community discussion as proposed by Richwales seems necessary. -- Aussie Legend  ( ✉ ) 16:00, 23 May 2013 (UTC)
 * Delete: Is everyone certain that we can't save time by just deleting all of these WP:NOT violations acting as homes to the abuses of our fair-use criteria? Another case of an image with no article to include it in. Since there's no discussion of anything in the article, it's impossible to point at any discussion that this image increases the reader's understanding of. This time, instead of looking dramatically at something off-screen, they are looking dramatically at something off-screen and pointing guns at it too. Clear failure of WP:NFCC. None of the keep arguments indicate what significant increase in understanding this image generates or what detrimental effects would occur from its omission.&mdash;Kww(talk) 16:03, 26 May 2013 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section.

File:STManhunt.jpg
<div class="boilerplate metadata vfd xfd-closed" style="background-color:#f3f9ff; margin:1em 0 0 0; padding:0 10px 0 10px; border:1px solid #aaa;">
 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  08:05, 23 July 2013 (UTC)
 * File:STManhunt.jpg ([ delete] | talk | [ history] | links | [ logs]) – uploaded by Cyberia23 ( [ notify] | contribs | uploads | upload log).

Invalid FUR: Non-free content is used only if its presence would significantly increase readers' understanding of the topic, and its omission would be detrimental to that understanding. This image is not critical for understanding, but is used in a decorative fashion. Since this file does not greatly enhance understanding, nor will its omission greatly decrease understanding, it must be deleted. —Justin ( koavf ) ❤T☮C☺M☯ 01:25, 23 May 2013 (UTC)
 * Keep per Richwales (see File:STMatterofHonor.jpg. As stated by others below, these images are illustrative of the episodes and increase understanding, so their use seems appropriate. Such images are so widely used in episode articles that the wider community seems to support their use, so wider community discussion as proposed by Richwales seems necessary. -- Aussie Legend  ( ✉ ) 16:00, 23 May 2013 (UTC)
 * Delete: Is everyone certain that we can't save time by just deleting all of these WP:NOT violations acting as homes to the abuses of our fair-use criteria? Another case of an image with no article to include it in. Since there's no discussion of anything in the article, it's impossible to point at any discussion that this image increases the reader's understanding of. This is one of the worst of the set: Jean-Luc Picard in an image from a holodeck simulation that is unrelated to the main plot: by itself, this image serves only to bewilder and confuse the reader. Clear failure of WP:NFCC. None of the keep arguments indicate what significant increase in understanding this image generates or what detrimental effects would occur from its omission.
 * Delete - does not significantly add to understanding of episode, and omission would not be detrimental to understanding of episode. -- SarekOfVulcan (talk) 05:18, 28 May 2013 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section.

File:ST-TNG Manage a Troi.jpg
<div class="boilerplate metadata vfd xfd-closed" style="background-color:#f3f9ff; margin:1em 0 0 0; padding:0 10px 0 10px; border:1px solid #aaa;">
 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  08:05, 23 July 2013 (UTC)
 * File:ST-TNG Manage a Troi.jpg ([ delete] | talk | [ history] | links | [ logs]) – uploaded by Cburnett ( [ notify] | contribs | uploads | upload log).

Invalid FUR: Non-free content is used only if its presence would significantly increase readers' understanding of the topic, and its omission would be detrimental to that understanding. This image is not critical for understanding, but is used in a decorative fashion. Since this file does not greatly enhance understanding, nor will its omission greatly decrease understanding, it must be deleted. —Justin ( koavf ) ❤T☮C☺M☯ 01:25, 23 May 2013 (UTC)
 * Keep per Richwales (see File:STMatterofHonor.jpg. As stated by others below, these images are illustrative of the episodes and increase understanding, so their use seems appropriate. Such images are so widely used in episode articles that the wider community seems to support their use, so wider community discussion as proposed by Richwales seems necessary. -- Aussie Legend  ( ✉ ) 16:00, 23 May 2013 (UTC)
 * Delete: Is everyone certain that we can't save time by just deleting all of these WP:NOT violations acting as homes to the abuses of our fair-use criteria? Another case of an image with no article to include it in. Since there's no discussion of anything in the article, it's impossible to point at any discussion that this image increases the reader's understanding of. Not even the small trivial list appended to the plot description mentions anything about this image. Clear failure of WP:NFCC. None of the keep arguments indicate what significant increase in understanding this image generates or what detrimental effects would occur from its omission.&mdash;Kww(talk) 16:09, 26 May 2013 (UTC)
 * Delete - does not significantly add to understanding of episode, and omission would not be detrimental to understanding of episode."Riker, Troi, and Troi in silk clothes in a jail cell" covers it nicely. -- SarekOfVulcan (talk) 05:19, 28 May 2013 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section.

File:STMetamorphjpg.jpg
<div class="boilerplate metadata vfd xfd-closed" style="background-color:#f3f9ff; margin:1em 0 0 0; padding:0 10px 0 10px; border:1px solid #aaa;">
 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the discussion was: kept for one article only. Fut.Perf. ☼ 06:19, 23 July 2013 (UTC)
 * File:STMetamorphjpg.jpg ([ delete] | talk | [ history] | links | [ logs]) – uploaded by Cyberia23 ( [ notify] | contribs | uploads | upload log).

Invalid FUR: Non-free content is used only if its presence would significantly increase readers' understanding of the topic, and its omission would be detrimental to that understanding. This image is not critical for understanding, but is used in a decorative fashion. Since this file does not greatly enhance understanding, nor will its omission greatly decrease understanding, it must be deleted. —Justin ( koavf ) ❤T☮C☺M☯ 01:26, 23 May 2013 (UTC)
 * Keep per Richwales (see File:STMatterofHonor.jpg. As stated by others below, these images are illustrative of the episodes and increase understanding, so their use seems appropriate. Such images are so widely used in episode articles that the wider community seems to support their use, so wider community discussion as proposed by Richwales seems necessary. -- Aussie Legend  ( ✉ ) 16:00, 23 May 2013 (UTC)
 * Delete: Is everyone certain that we can't save time by just deleting all of these WP:NOT violations acting as homes to the abuses of our fair-use criteria? Another case of an image with no article to include it in. Since there's no discussion of anything in the article, it's impossible to point at any discussion that this image increases the reader's understanding of. There's no good-faith argument that this illustrates anything of importance. Clear failure of WP:NFCC. None of the keep arguments indicate what significant increase in understanding this image generates or what detrimental effects would occur from its omission.&mdash;Kww(talk) 16:11, 26 May 2013 (UTC)
 * Keep, used to demonstrate character appearance in Zefram Cochrane. -- SarekOfVulcan (talk) 05:21, 28 May 2013 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section.

File:STMiri.jpg
<div class="boilerplate metadata vfd xfd-closed" style="background-color:#f3f9ff; margin:1em 0 0 0; padding:0 10px 0 10px; border:1px solid #aaa;">
 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  08:05, 23 July 2013 (UTC)
 * File:STMiri.jpg ([ delete] | talk | [ history] | links | [ logs]) – uploaded by Cyberia23 ( [ notify] | contribs | uploads | upload log).

Invalid FUR: Non-free content is used only if its presence would significantly increase readers' understanding of the topic, and its omission would be detrimental to that understanding. This image is not critical for understanding, but is used in a decorative fashion. Since this file does not greatly enhance understanding, nor will its omission greatly decrease understanding, it must be deleted. —Justin ( koavf ) ❤T☮C☺M☯ 01:26, 23 May 2013 (UTC)
 * Keep per Richwales (see File:STMatterofHonor.jpg. As stated by others below, these images are illustrative of the episodes and increase understanding, so their use seems appropriate. Such images are so widely used in episode articles that the wider community seems to support their use, so wider community discussion as proposed by Richwales seems necessary. -- Aussie Legend  ( ✉ ) 16:00, 23 May 2013 (UTC)
 * Delete: Is everyone certain that we can't save time by just deleting all of these WP:NOT violations acting as homes to the abuses of our fair-use criteria? Another case of an image with no article to include it in. Since there's no discussion of anything in the article, it's impossible to point at any discussion that this image increases the reader's understanding of. There's no good-faith argument that this picture of a girl with a dirty face, once more staring off-screen, illustrates anything of importance. Clear failure of WP:NFCC. None of the keep arguments indicate what significant increase in understanding this image generates or what detrimental effects would occur from its omission.&mdash;Kww(talk) 16:14, 26 May 2013 (UTC)
 * Weak delete -- could be used to identify the character, but although she's the title character, I don't think she has the notability for her own article. Otherwise, fails nfcc8. -- SarekOfVulcan (talk) 05:25, 28 May 2013 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section.

File:STMirrorMirror.jpg
<div class="boilerplate metadata vfd xfd-closed" style="background-color:#f3f9ff; margin:1em 0 0 0; padding:0 10px 0 10px; border:1px solid #aaa;">
 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  08:05, 23 July 2013 (UTC)
 * File:STMirrorMirror.jpg ([ delete] | talk | [ history] | links | [ logs]) – uploaded by Cyberia23 ( [ notify] | contribs | uploads | upload log).

Invalid FUR: Non-free content is used only if its presence would significantly increase readers' understanding of the topic, and its omission would be detrimental to that understanding. This image is not critical for understanding, but is used in a decorative fashion. Since this file does not greatly enhance understanding, nor will its omission greatly decrease understanding, it must be deleted. —Justin ( koavf ) ❤T☮C☺M☯ 01:26, 23 May 2013 (UTC)
 * Keep per Richwales (see File:STMatterofHonor.jpg. As stated by others below, these images are illustrative of the episodes and increase understanding, so their use seems appropriate. Such images are so widely used in episode articles that the wider community seems to support their use, so wider community discussion as proposed by Richwales seems necessary. -- Aussie Legend  ( ✉ ) 16:00, 23 May 2013 (UTC)
 * Delete: Yet another WP:NOT violation serving as a home for WP:NFCC abuse. "Spock wears a goatee and Kirk ripped his shirt sleeves off" would suffice as a replacement for this image. Clear WP:NFCC violation.&mdash;Kww(talk) 22:22, 26 May 2013 (UTC)
 * Delete this one as failing nfcc8, but there are other shots from that episode that could be argued to pass. -- SarekOfVulcan (talk) 05:26, 28 May 2013 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Muddpassion.jpg
<div class="boilerplate metadata vfd xfd-closed" style="background-color:#f3f9ff; margin:1em 0 0 0; padding:0 10px 0 10px; border:1px solid #aaa;">
 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  08:05, 23 July 2013 (UTC)
 * File:Muddpassion.jpg ([ delete] | talk | [ history] | links | [ logs]) – uploaded by Mokwella ( [ notify] | contribs | uploads | upload log).

Invalid FUR: Non-free content is used only if its presence would significantly increase readers' understanding of the topic, and its omission would be detrimental to that understanding. This image is not critical for understanding, but is used in a decorative fashion. Since this file does not greatly enhance understanding, nor will its omission greatly decrease understanding, it must be deleted. —Justin ( koavf ) ❤T☮C☺M☯ 01:27, 23 May 2013 (UTC)
 * Keep per Richwales (see File:STMatterofHonor.jpg. As stated by others below, these images are illustrative of the episodes and increase understanding, so their use seems appropriate. Such images are so widely used in episode articles that the wider community seems to support their use, so wider community discussion as proposed by Richwales seems necessary. -- Aussie Legend  ( ✉ ) 16:00, 23 May 2013 (UTC)
 * Delete:Maybe it's time for an unambiguous statement in WP:NFCC: "if the image is a headshot of a character looking at something offscreen, there's no way that you can claim that it increases the reader's understanding." Clear WP:NFCC violation.&mdash;Kww(talk) 22:26, 26 May 2013 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section.

File:ST-TNG Night Terrors.jpg
<div class="boilerplate metadata vfd xfd-closed" style="background-color:#f3f9ff; margin:1em 0 0 0; padding:0 10px 0 10px; border:1px solid #aaa;">
 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  08:05, 23 July 2013 (UTC)
 * File:ST-TNG Night Terrors.jpg ([ delete] | talk | [ history] | links | [ logs]) – uploaded by Cburnett ( [ notify] | contribs | uploads | upload log).

Invalid FUR: Non-free content is used only if its presence would significantly increase readers' understanding of the topic, and its omission would be detrimental to that understanding. This image is not critical for understanding, but is used in a decorative fashion. Since this file does not greatly enhance understanding, nor will its omission greatly decrease understanding, it must be deleted. —Justin ( koavf ) ❤T☮C☺M☯ 01:28, 23 May 2013 (UTC)
 * Keep per Richwales (see File:STMatterofHonor.jpg. As stated by others below, these images are illustrative of the episodes and increase understanding, so their use seems appropriate. Such images are so widely used in episode articles that the wider community seems to support their use, so wider community discussion as proposed by Richwales seems necessary. -- Aussie Legend  ( ✉ ) 16:00, 23 May 2013 (UTC)
 * Delete: A picture of green fog and dim lights with an unexplained suited man hovering in front. This picture is doubly abused, being included both in the abysmally bad Night Terrors (Star Trek: The Next Generation), an article with hundreds of edits over the span of eight years where, once again, not a single editor displayed any comprehension of what an encyclopedia article is about. It also gets abused in Binary stars in fiction, an article that likes to use pictures to substitute for explanation. Clear WP:NFCC violation in both cases.&mdash;Kww(talk) 22:34, 26 May 2013 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section.

File:ST-TNG New Ground.jpg
<div class="boilerplate metadata vfd xfd-closed" style="background-color:#f3f9ff; margin:1em 0 0 0; padding:0 10px 0 10px; border:1px solid #aaa;">
 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  08:05, 23 July 2013 (UTC)
 * File:ST-TNG New Ground.jpg ([ delete] | talk | [ history] | links | [ logs]) – uploaded by Cburnett ( [ notify] | contribs | uploads | upload log).

Invalid FUR: Non-free content is used only if its presence would significantly increase readers' understanding of the topic, and its omission would be detrimental to that understanding. This image is not critical for understanding, but is used in a decorative fashion. Since this file does not greatly enhance understanding, nor will its omission greatly decrease understanding, it must be deleted. —Justin ( koavf ) ❤T☮C☺M☯ 01:28, 23 May 2013 (UTC)
 * Keep per Richwales (see File:STMatterofHonor.jpg. As stated by others below, these images are illustrative of the episodes and increase understanding, so their use seems appropriate. Such images are so widely used in episode articles that the wider community seems to support their use, so wider community discussion as proposed by Richwales seems necessary. -- Aussie Legend  ( ✉ ) 16:00, 23 May 2013 (UTC)
 * Delete Big Klingon looks at something offscreen while little Klingon stares at him. Again, that "off-screen" clarification for WP:NFCC feels like it could come in handy. Image explains nothing, Article contains nothing. Clear WP:NFCC violation.&mdash;Kww(talk) 22:54, 26 May 2013 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section.

File:KS,MT,SD in Mudd&
<div class="boilerplate metadata vfd xfd-closed" style="background-color:#f3f9ff; margin:1em 0 0 0; padding:0 10px 0 10px; border:1px solid #aaa;">
 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  08:05, 23 July 2013 (UTC)
 * File:KS,MT,SD in Mudd& ([ delete] | talk | [ history] | links | [ logs]) – uploaded by Tovojolo ( [ notify] | contribs | uploads | upload log).

Invalid FUR: Non-free content is used only if its presence would significantly increase readers' understanding of the topic, and its omission would be detrimental to that understanding. This image is not critical for understanding, but is used in a decorative fashion. Since this file does not greatly enhance understanding, nor will its omission greatly decrease understanding, it must be deleted. —Justin ( koavf ) ❤T☮C☺M☯ 01:29, 23 May 2013 (UTC)
 * Keep per Richwales (see File:STMatterofHonor.jpg. As stated by others below, these images are illustrative of the episodes and increase understanding, so their use seems appropriate. Such images are so widely used in episode articles that the wider community seems to support their use, so wider community discussion as proposed by Richwales seems necessary. -- Aussie Legend  ( ✉ ) 16:00, 23 May 2013 (UTC)
 * Delete:This time the subjects are staring at the viewer, but the image conveys nothing but "three pretty women stare at the viewer". Clear WP:NFCC violation.&mdash;Kww(talk) 22:56, 26 May 2013 (UTC)
 * Keep The episode is entitled "Mudd's Women" and the entire plot of that episode concerns them so having an image of them aids a reader's comprehension of the article. --Tovojolo (talk) 09:13, 13 July 2013 (UTC)
 * Response But how? What exactly do you understand from this non-free media that can't be adequately explained with prose? —Justin ( koavf ) ❤T☮C☺M☯ 18:41, 13 July 2013 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Crossover (ST-DS9).jpg
<div class="boilerplate metadata vfd xfd-closed" style="background-color:#f3f9ff; margin:1em 0 0 0; padding:0 10px 0 10px; border:1px solid #aaa;">
 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  08:05, 23 July 2013 (UTC)
 * File:Crossover (ST-DS9).jpg ([ delete] | talk | [ history] | links | [ logs]) – uploaded by Rockfang ( [ notify] | contribs | uploads | upload log).

Invalid FUR: Non-free content is used only if its presence would significantly increase readers' understanding of the topic, and its omission would be detrimental to that understanding. This image is not critical for understanding, but is used in a decorative fashion. Since this file does not greatly enhance understanding, nor will its omission greatly decrease understanding, it must be deleted. —Justin ( koavf ) ❤T☮C☺M☯ 01:29, 23 May 2013 (UTC)
 * Keep per Richwales (see File:STMatterofHonor.jpg. As stated by others below, these images are illustrative of the episodes and increase understanding, so their use seems appropriate. Such images are so widely used in episode articles that the wider community seems to support their use, so wider community discussion as proposed by Richwales seems necessary. -- Aussie Legend  ( ✉ ) 16:00, 23 May 2013 (UTC)
 * Delete Another WP:NFCC violation housed in a WP:NOT violation. Boiler-plate FUR, boiler-plate infobox all trying to masquerade as an encyclopedia article.&mdash;Kww(talk) 22:58, 26 May 2013 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Philip Anglim as Bareil.jpg
<div class="boilerplate metadata vfd xfd-closed" style="background-color:#f3f9ff; margin:1em 0 0 0; padding:0 10px 0 10px; border:1px solid #aaa;">
 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  08:05, 23 July 2013 (UTC)
 * File:Philip Anglim as Bareil.jpg ([ delete] | talk | [ history] | links | [ logs]) – uploaded by Rockfang ( [ notify] | contribs | uploads | upload log).

Invalid FUR: Non-free content is used only if its presence would significantly increase readers' understanding of the topic, and its omission would be detrimental to that understanding. This image is not critical for understanding, but is used in a decorative fashion. Since this file does not greatly enhance understanding, nor will its omission greatly decrease understanding, it must be deleted. —Justin ( koavf ) ❤T☮C☺M☯ 01:29, 23 May 2013 (UTC)
 * Keep per Richwales (see File:STMatterofHonor.jpg. As stated by others below, these images are illustrative of the episodes and increase understanding, so their use seems appropriate. Such images are so widely used in episode articles that the wider community seems to support their use, so wider community discussion as proposed by Richwales seems necessary. -- Aussie Legend  ( ✉ ) 16:00, 23 May 2013 (UTC)
 * Delete Another WP:NFCC violation housed in a WP:NOT violation. This really should be a CSD category.&mdash;Kww(talk) 23:10, 26 May 2013 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Star Trek - Obsession (screenshot of dead redshirt).jpg
<div class="boilerplate metadata vfd xfd-closed" style="background-color:#f3f9ff; margin:1em 0 0 0; padding:0 10px 0 10px; border:1px solid #aaa;">
 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the discussion was: Delete. Fails NFCC#8. Deleted by
 * File:Star Trek - Obsession (screenshot of dead redshirt).jpg ([ delete] | talk | [ history] | links | [ logs]) – uploaded by Cyberia23 ( [ notify] | contribs | uploads | upload log).

Invalid FUR: Non-free content is used only if its presence would significantly increase readers' understanding of the topic, and its omission would be detrimental to that understanding. This image is not critical for understanding, but is used in a decorative fashion. Since this file does not greatly enhance understanding, nor will its omission greatly decrease understanding, it must be deleted. —Justin ( koavf ) ❤T☮C☺M☯ 01:37, 23 May 2013 (UTC)
 * Keep per Richwales (see File:STMatterofHonor.jpg. As stated by others below, these images are illustrative of the episodes and increase understanding, so their use seems appropriate. Such images are so widely used in episode articles that the wider community seems to support their use, so wider community discussion as proposed by Richwales seems necessary. -- Aussie Legend  ( ✉ ) 16:00, 23 May 2013 (UTC)
 * Note that this one is used in two articles. Keep in Redshirt (character). --B (talk) 15:30, 24 May 2013 (UTC)
 * Delete: For the use in Obsession (Star Trek: The Original Series), it's just another case of a WP:NFCC violation housed in a WP:NOT violation. For Redshirt (character), B confuses "illustration" with "increasing understanding". It's true that this illustrates a Star Trek character in a red shirt, which is the source of the term. There's nothing that makes the text explanation in Redshirt (character) difficult to understand in the absence of the picture.&mdash;Kww(talk) 23:14, 26 May 2013 (UTC)
 * Keep per use in Redshirt. -- SarekOfVulcan (talk) 05:28, 28 May 2013 (UTC)
 * Delete, obvious case in the episode article, and illustrating function in the "redshirt" article is completely trivial. We don't need to see this image in order to understand that people who die will typically lie on the ground afterwards, and nothing in the article hinges on the exact design of the uniform or the face of this specific actor. Fut.Perf. ☼ 06:33, 23 July 2013 (UTC)
 * Delete, this clearly fails NFCC#8 in Obsession (Star Trek: The Original Series), and I would say it just barely fails NFCC#8 in Redshirt (character) as well. It's great decoration and improves the article, but I can't honestly claim it enhances my understanding of a Redshirt character in ways text alone would not. – Quadell (talk) 13:15, 23 July 2013 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Oneofour.jpg
<div class="boilerplate metadata vfd xfd-closed" style="background-color:#f3f9ff; margin:1em 0 0 0; padding:0 10px 0 10px; border:1px solid #aaa;">
 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  08:05, 23 July 2013 (UTC)
 * File:Oneofour.jpg ([ delete] | talk | [ history] | links | [ logs]) – uploaded by Mokwella ( [ notify] | contribs | uploads | upload log).

Invalid FUR: Non-free content is used only if its presence would significantly increase readers' understanding of the topic, and its omission would be detrimental to that understanding. This image is not critical for understanding, but is used in a decorative fashion. Since this file does not greatly enhance understanding, nor will its omission greatly decrease understanding, it must be deleted. —Justin ( koavf ) ❤T☮C☺M☯ 01:37, 23 May 2013 (UTC)
 * Keep per Richwales (see File:STMatterofHonor.jpg. As stated by others below, these images are illustrative of the episodes and increase understanding, so their use seems appropriate. Such images are so widely used in episode articles that the wider community seems to support their use, so wider community discussion as proposed by Richwales seems necessary. -- Aussie Legend  ( ✉ ) 16:00, 23 May 2013 (UTC)
 * Delete If one changes the text "encounters a giant cloud that consumes planets that lie in its path" to "encounters a giant red cloud that consumes planets that lie in its path" in One of Our Planets Is Missing, this image becomes superfluous. Clear WP:NFCC violation.&mdash;Kww(talk) 23:18, 26 May 2013 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section.

File:STOpAnnihlate.jpg
<div class="boilerplate metadata vfd xfd-closed" style="background-color:#f3f9ff; margin:1em 0 0 0; padding:0 10px 0 10px; border:1px solid #aaa;">
 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  01:40, 4 August 2013 (UTC)
 * File:STOpAnnihlate.jpg ([ delete] | talk | [ history] | links | [ logs]) – uploaded by Cyberia23 ( [ notify] | contribs | uploads | upload log).

Invalid FUR: Non-free content is used only if its presence would significantly increase readers' understanding of the topic, and its omission would be detrimental to that understanding. This image is not critical for understanding, but is used in a decorative fashion. Since this file does not greatly enhance understanding, nor will its omission greatly decrease understanding, it must be deleted. —Justin ( koavf ) ❤T☮C☺M☯ 01:38, 23 May 2013 (UTC)
 * Keep per Richwales (see File:STMatterofHonor.jpg. As stated by others below, these images are illustrative of the episodes and increase understanding, so their use seems appropriate. Such images are so widely used in episode articles that the wider community seems to support their use, so wider community discussion as proposed by Richwales seems necessary. -- Aussie Legend  ( ✉ ) 16:00, 23 May 2013 (UTC)
 * Delete Just another WP:NFCC violation housed in a WP:NOT violation.&mdash;Kww(talk) 23:21, 26 May 2013 (UTC)
 * Keep. It's borderline, but the scene is clearly mentioned in the plot section ("Kirk beams down to join the landing party and search for the creatures responsible. Inside a building, they find pancake-sized single-celled organisms that are highly resistant to phaser fire."), and the image depicts the look of the creatures, mentioned in the production section ("The neural parasites were made by covering individual novelty vomits with a clear, inflatable bladder.") I'd say that's enough to pass NFCC#8. – Quadell (talk) 13:21, 23 July 2013 (UTC)
 * Delete. The claim that the creatures were made with "novelty vomit" (LOL, learn a new English word every day) is unsourced. So the only thing we can work with is the description in the plot summary: "pancake-sized single-celled organisms". Now, that's a fine description and helps to imagine the scene just fine. I don't need the image to understand the plot, and there's nothing else beyond that. Fut.Perf. ☼ 19:29, 23 July 2013 (UTC)
 * Delete (changed from Keep). In the months since this image was nominated, the article has had unsourced statements regarding this image removed, and no sourced statements have taken its place. There is currently no clear discussion of this image in the article, and no one seems to want to add any. – Quadell (talk) 18:12, 2 August 2013 (UTC)
 * Delete. Much as I would like to see a screen shot from this episode in the article — and despite my lingering general misgivings about how narrowly NFCC#8 is being interpreted here — I will concede that this particular image is not a terribly good representation of the episode.  An image of Spock going down alone to the planet's surface to retrieve one of the "flying fried egg" parasites, despite being in excruciating pain from having one of the things attached to his back, would probably be a better choice to illustrate this article.  —  Rich wales (no relation to Jimbo) 18:50, 2 August 2013 (UTC)
 * As long as there is no analytical discussion of pretty much anything in the article, there is no need to illustrate anything. That other scene is no more in need of visual illustration than this one. Like so many others, this page now consists entirely of plot renarration (I refuse to call it "plot summary", because it isn't even that.) First develop the page into an actual, legitimate article, which it isn't now; then, if and when the need arises to have something illustrated, illustrate it. Fut.Perf. ☼ 07:12, 3 August 2013 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Bashir2.jpg
<div class="boilerplate metadata vfd xfd-closed" style="background-color:#f3f9ff; margin:1em 0 0 0; padding:0 10px 0 10px; border:1px solid #aaa;">
 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the discussion was: Delete- – Quadell (talk) 13:23, 23 July 2013 (UTC)
 * File:Bashir2.jpg ([ delete] | talk | [ history] | links | [ logs]) – uploaded by FLJuJitsu ( [ notify] | contribs | uploads | upload log).

Invalid FUR: Non-free content is used only if its presence would significantly increase readers' understanding of the topic, and its omission would be detrimental to that understanding. This image is not critical for understanding, but is used in a decorative fashion. Since this file does not greatly enhance understanding, nor will its omission greatly decrease understanding, it must be deleted. —Justin ( koavf ) ❤T☮C☺M☯ 01:38, 23 May 2013 (UTC)
 * Keep per Richwales (see File:STMatterofHonor.jpg. As stated by others below, these images are illustrative of the episodes and increase understanding, so their use seems appropriate. Such images are so widely used in episode articles that the wider community seems to support their use, so wider community discussion as proposed by Richwales seems necessary. -- Aussie Legend  ( ✉ ) 16:00, 23 May 2013 (UTC)
 * Delete This image isn't very helpful for an understanding of this episode. --Leoboudv (talk) 05:11, 24 May 2013 (UTC)
 * Keep, this one aids identification for those who remember it, and appreciation even for those who don't, by showing the Bond imagery. – Fayenatic  L ondon 18:58, 24 May 2013 (UTC)
 * Delete: the fact that Fayenatic london doesn't understand the Our Man Flint reference in Our Man Bashir shows how little the image does to explain things. Could be made useful via a juxtaposition with similar imagery from Our Man Flint, but, until someone does so, this image fails WP:NFCC.&mdash;Kww(talk) 23:28, 26 May 2013 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Defiant-normalphaser-paradiselost.jpg
<div class="boilerplate metadata vfd xfd-closed" style="background-color:#f3f9ff; margin:1em 0 0 0; padding:0 10px 0 10px; border:1px solid #aaa;">
 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the discussion was: Delete – Quadell (talk) 13:24, 23 July 2013 (UTC)
 * File:Defiant-normalphaser-paradiselost.jpg ([ delete] | talk | [ history] | links | [ logs]) – uploaded by FLJuJitsu ( [ notify] | contribs | uploads | upload log).

Invalid FUR: Non-free content is used only if its presence would significantly increase readers' understanding of the topic, and its omission would be detrimental to that understanding. This image is not critical for understanding, but is used in a decorative fashion. Since this file does not greatly enhance understanding, nor will its omission greatly decrease understanding, it must be deleted. —Justin ( koavf ) ❤T☮C☺M☯ 01:38, 23 May 2013 (UTC)
 * Keep per Richwales (see File:STMatterofHonor.jpg. As stated by others below, these images are illustrative of the episodes and increase understanding, so their use seems appropriate. Such images are so widely used in episode articles that the wider community seems to support their use, so wider community discussion as proposed by Richwales seems necessary. -- Aussie Legend  ( ✉ ) 16:00, 23 May 2013 (UTC)
 * Delete A lot of plot, a few trivia points, and the most obvious "cultural reference" in the history of Wikipedia do not an article make. Again, as there's no real article to place an image in, there's no justification for a fair-use image at all.&mdash;Kww(talk) 23:32, 26 May 2013 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section.

File:ST-TNG Parallels.jpg
<div class="boilerplate metadata vfd xfd-closed" style="background-color:#f3f9ff; margin:1em 0 0 0; padding:0 10px 0 10px; border:1px solid #aaa;">
 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the discussion was: Delete – Quadell (talk) 13:26, 23 July 2013 (UTC)
 * File:ST-TNG Parallels.jpg ([ delete] | talk | [ history] | links | [ logs]) – uploaded by Cburnett ( [ notify] | contribs | uploads | upload log).

Invalid FUR: Non-free content is used only if its presence would significantly increase readers' understanding of the topic, and its omission would be detrimental to that understanding. This image is not critical for understanding, but is used in a decorative fashion. Since this file does not greatly enhance understanding, nor will its omission greatly decrease understanding, it must be deleted. —Justin ( koavf ) ❤T☮C☺M☯ 01:39, 23 May 2013 (UTC)
 * Keep per Richwales (see File:STMatterofHonor.jpg. As stated by others below, these images are illustrative of the episodes and increase understanding, so their use seems appropriate. Such images are so widely used in episode articles that the wider community seems to support their use, so wider community discussion as proposed by Richwales seems necessary. -- Aussie Legend  ( ✉ ) 16:00, 23 May 2013 (UTC)
 * Keep This image shows the hundreds of USS Enterprises from 'parallel' and different universes all in one image and Commander Worf must find the correct Enterprise ship that he belongs on. The image significantly increased my understanding of this episode and Worf's situation in locating his ship in his time-line. --Leoboudv (talk) 05:16, 24 May 2013 (UTC)
 * Keep, this one aids identification for those who remember it, and appreciation even for those who don't. – Fayenatic  L ondon 18:55, 24 May 2013 (UTC)
 * Delete Pretty image, but does nothing really to increase the reader's understanding of what is, once again, a violation of WP:NOT. Clear WP:NFCC violation.&mdash;Kww(talk) 23:37, 26 May 2013 (UTC)
 * Delete as wholly unnecessary IAW WP:NFCC & WP:NFCC. There's nothing in particular about this image that saying "hundreds of Enterprises appear, with a shuttlecraft leaving the foreground."  What referenced prose in the article is not understandable without this copyrighted photo?  —   fourthords  <small style="font-size:85%;">&#124; =Λ= <small style="font-size:85%;">&#124;  17:31, 17 July 2013 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Past Tense DS9.jpg
<div class="boilerplate metadata vfd xfd-closed" style="background-color:#f3f9ff; margin:1em 0 0 0; padding:0 10px 0 10px; border:1px solid #aaa;">
 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the discussion was: Delete – Quadell (talk) 13:54, 23 July 2013 (UTC)
 * File:Past Tense DS9.jpg ([ delete] | talk | [ history] | links | [ logs]) – uploaded by Rockfang ( [ notify] | contribs | uploads | upload log).

Invalid FUR: Non-free content is used only if its presence would significantly increase readers' understanding of the topic, and its omission would be detrimental to that understanding. This image is not critical for understanding, but is used in a decorative fashion. Since this file does not greatly enhance understanding, nor will its omission greatly decrease understanding, it must be deleted. —Justin ( koavf ) ❤T☮C☺M☯ 01:39, 23 May 2013 (UTC)
 * Keep per Richwales (see File:STMatterofHonor.jpg. As stated by others below, these images are illustrative of the episodes and increase understanding, so their use seems appropriate. Such images are so widely used in episode articles that the wider community seems to support their use, so wider community discussion as proposed by Richwales seems necessary. -- Aussie Legend  ( ✉ ) 16:00, 23 May 2013 (UTC)
 * Keep, this one aids identification for those who remember it, and appreciation even for those who don't. – Fayenatic  L ondon 18:55, 24 May 2013 (UTC)
 * Delete Once again, the host article is a WP:NOT violation, completely and absolutely devoid of any content suitable for an article. Since there is a complete absence of commentary, the image isn't the subject of commentary nor does it help the reader to understand the non-existent commentary. Blatant WP:NFCC violation.&mdash;Kww(talk) 04:02, 27 May 2013 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section.

File:STPatternForce.jpg
<div class="boilerplate metadata vfd xfd-closed" style="background-color:#f3f9ff; margin:1em 0 0 0; padding:0 10px 0 10px; border:1px solid #aaa;">
 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the discussion was: Keep, NFCC#8 (the main basis of objection) is met as the costumes are discussed as having significant effect on broadcast history.
 * File:STPatternForce.jpg ([ delete] | talk | [ history] | links | [ logs]) – uploaded by Cyberia23 ( [ notify] | contribs | uploads | upload log).

Invalid FUR: Non-free content is used only if its presence would significantly increase readers' understanding of the topic, and its omission would be detrimental to that understanding. This image is not critical for understanding, but is used in a decorative fashion. Since this file does not greatly enhance understanding, nor will its omission greatly decrease understanding, it must be deleted. —Justin ( koavf ) ❤T☮C☺M☯ 01:40, 23 May 2013 (UTC)
 * Keep per Richwales (see File:STMatterofHonor.jpg. As stated by others below, these images are illustrative of the episodes and increase understanding, so their use seems appropriate. Such images are so widely used in episode articles that the wider community seems to support their use, so wider community discussion as proposed by Richwales seems necessary. -- Aussie Legend  ( ✉ ) 16:00, 23 May 2013 (UTC)
 * Easily replaced by "Star Trek crew continues its fascination with things off-screen, wearing Nazi uniforms to give this theme a little variety." Blatant WP:NFCC failure, as there is no detrimental effect on a reader's understanding caused by the removal of this image.&mdash;Kww(talk) 05:01, 27 May 2013 (UTC)
 * Keep, the content of the screenshot is discussed in the "plot" section, but more importantly, their costumes are mentioned in the "notes" section as being one of the reason that the episode was not aired in Germany. Saying in text that the uniforms looked somewhat Nazi-ish will leave the reader wondering how exactly the uniforms looked, given the severity of the reaction. In my opinion, NFCC#8 is met because of that. – Quadell (talk) 13:52, 23 July 2013 (UTC)
 * Delete. I disagree with Quadell here: everybody knows what nazi uniforms look like, and even if you don't, it's really of no importance: what matters is not that readers can visualize the precise colours and cut of the uniforms but that they understand what social significance they have. This is something that text can explain; an image can't. This point of policy bears repeating: the crucial thing is not that the content of an image must be discussed in the text; the crucial thing is that it must be discussed in a way that would be significantly less easy to adequately understand without the visual support of the image. Fut.Perf. ☼ 19:12, 23 July 2013 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section.

File:STPeakPerform.jpg
<div class="boilerplate metadata vfd xfd-closed" style="background-color:#f3f9ff; margin:1em 0 0 0; padding:0 10px 0 10px; border:1px solid #aaa;">
 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  20:11, 23 July 2013 (UTC)
 * File:STPeakPerform.jpg ([ delete] | talk | [ history] | links | [ logs]) – uploaded by Cyberia23 ( [ notify] | contribs | uploads | upload log).

Invalid FUR: Non-free content is used only if its presence would significantly increase readers' understanding of the topic, and its omission would be detrimental to that understanding. This image is not critical for understanding, but is used in a decorative fashion. Since this file does not greatly enhance understanding, nor will its omission greatly decrease understanding, it must be deleted. —Justin ( koavf ) ❤T☮C☺M☯ 01:40, 23 May 2013 (UTC)
 * Keep per Richwales (see File:STMatterofHonor.jpg. As stated by others below, these images are illustrative of the episodes and increase understanding, so their use seems appropriate. Such images are so widely used in episode articles that the wider community seems to support their use, so wider community discussion as proposed by Richwales seems necessary. -- Aussie Legend  ( ✉ ) 16:00, 23 May 2013 (UTC)
 * Delete, the content of this screenshot is not mentioned outside of the "plot" section, where it is not clear which plot point (fist game or last?) is depicted. – Quadell (talk) 13:43, 23 July 2013 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section.

File:STPenPals.jpg
<div class="boilerplate metadata vfd xfd-closed" style="background-color:#f3f9ff; margin:1em 0 0 0; padding:0 10px 0 10px; border:1px solid #aaa;">
 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the discussion was: Delete – Quadell (talk) 13:40, 23 July 2013 (UTC)
 * File:STPenPals.jpg ([ delete] | talk | [ history] | links | [ logs]) – uploaded by Cyberia23 ( [ notify] | contribs | uploads | upload log).

Invalid FUR: Non-free content is used only if its presence would significantly increase readers' understanding of the topic, and its omission would be detrimental to that understanding. This image is not critical for understanding, but is used in a decorative fashion. Since this file does not greatly enhance understanding, nor will its omission greatly decrease understanding, it must be deleted. —Justin ( koavf ) ❤T☮C☺M☯ 01:40, 23 May 2013 (UTC)
 * Keep per Richwales (see File:STMatterofHonor.jpg. As stated by others below, these images are illustrative of the episodes and increase understanding, so their use seems appropriate. Such images are so widely used in episode articles that the wider community seems to support their use, so wider community discussion as proposed by Richwales seems necessary. -- Aussie Legend  ( ✉ ) 16:00, 23 May 2013 (UTC)
 * Delete: Another character facing off-screen. Unless there's something about the specific makeup design for this particular alien that is critical to understanding the plot, there's no way this routine head shot could significantly understand a reader's understanding of the episode. Blatant WP:NFCC failure.&mdash;Kww(talk) 05:06, 27 May 2013 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section.

File:ST-TNG Phantasms.jpg
<div class="boilerplate metadata vfd xfd-closed" style="background-color:#f3f9ff; margin:1em 0 0 0; padding:0 10px 0 10px; border:1px solid #aaa;">
 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the discussion was: Delete – Quadell (talk) 13:39, 23 July 2013 (UTC)
 * File:ST-TNG Phantasms.jpg ([ delete] | talk | [ history] | links | [ logs]) – uploaded by Cburnett ( [ notify] | contribs | uploads | upload log).

Invalid FUR: Non-free content is used only if its presence would significantly increase readers' understanding of the topic, and its omission would be detrimental to that understanding. This image is not critical for understanding, but is used in a decorative fashion. Since this file does not greatly enhance understanding, nor will its omission greatly decrease understanding, it must be deleted. —Justin ( koavf ) ❤T☮C☺M☯ 01:41, 23 May 2013 (UTC)
 * Keep per Richwales (see File:STMatterofHonor.jpg. As stated by others below, these images are illustrative of the episodes and increase understanding, so their use seems appropriate. Such images are so widely used in episode articles that the wider community seems to support their use, so wider community discussion as proposed by Richwales seems necessary. -- Aussie Legend  ( ✉ ) 16:00, 23 May 2013 (UTC)
 * Delete Image is easily described, and not particularly key to understanding anything in the host article, another WP:NOT violation. At least this time, Data talks to the off-screen character on a telephone instead of simply staring at it. Clear WP:NFCC failure.&mdash;Kww(talk) 05:10, 27 May 2013 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section.

File:STPlatoStep.jpg
<div class="boilerplate metadata vfd xfd-closed" style="background-color:#f3f9ff; margin:1em 0 0 0; padding:0 10px 0 10px; border:1px solid #aaa;">
 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the discussion was: Delete – Quadell (talk) 13:37, 23 July 2013 (UTC)
 * File:STPlatoStep.jpg ([ delete] | talk | [ history] | links | [ logs]) – uploaded by Cyberia23 ( [ notify] | contribs | uploads | upload log).

Invalid FUR: Non-free content is used only if its presence would significantly increase readers' understanding of the topic, and its omission would be detrimental to that understanding. This image is not critical for understanding, but is used in a decorative fashion. Since this file does not greatly enhance understanding, nor will its omission greatly decrease understanding, it must be deleted. —Justin ( koavf ) ❤T☮C☺M☯ 01:41, 23 May 2013 (UTC)
 * Keep per Richwales (see File:STMatterofHonor.jpg. As stated by others below, these images are illustrative of the episodes and increase understanding, so their use seems appropriate. Such images are so widely used in episode articles that the wider community seems to support their use, so wider community discussion as proposed by Richwales seems necessary. -- Aussie Legend  ( ✉ ) 16:00, 23 May 2013 (UTC)
 * Delete: Four actors in imitation Greek togas staring off-screen are still four actors staring off-screen. Nothing about this shot is important to understanding the plot, so it's a blatant WP:NFCC failure. Even the ludicrously bad "identification" argument that people try to use fails in this case, because it's the kissing scene that is the key identifier for this episode.&mdash;Kww(talk) 05:24, 27 May 2013 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section.

File:ENTprecious cargo.jpg
<div class="boilerplate metadata vfd xfd-closed" style="background-color:#f3f9ff; margin:1em 0 0 0; padding:0 10px 0 10px; border:1px solid #aaa;">
 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the discussion was: Delete – Quadell (talk) 13:34, 23 July 2013 (UTC)
 * File:ENTprecious cargo.jpg ([ delete] | talk | [ history] | links | [ logs]) – uploaded by (aeropagitica) ( [ notify] | contribs | uploads | upload log).

Invalid FUR: Non-free content is used only if its presence would significantly increase readers' understanding of the topic, and its omission would be detrimental to that understanding. This image is not critical for understanding, but is used in a decorative fashion. Since this file does not greatly enhance understanding, nor will its omission greatly decrease understanding, it must be deleted. —Justin ( koavf ) ❤T☮C☺M☯ 01:41, 23 May 2013 (UTC)
 * Keep per Richwales (see File:STMatterofHonor.jpg. As stated by others below, these images are illustrative of the episodes and increase understanding, so their use seems appropriate. Such images are so widely used in episode articles that the wider community seems to support their use, so wider community discussion as proposed by Richwales seems necessary. -- Aussie Legend  ( ✉ ) 16:00, 23 May 2013 (UTC)
 * Delete Characters staring off-screen again. No rational argument could be made that the removal of this image would damage the reader's understanding, and the FUR is a fraud: there is no critical commentary in the article, as it is once again a blatant violation of WP:NOT.&mdash;Kww(talk) 05:27, 27 May 2013 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section.

File:ST-TNG Preemptive Strike.jpg
<div class="boilerplate metadata vfd xfd-closed" style="background-color:#f3f9ff; margin:1em 0 0 0; padding:0 10px 0 10px; border:1px solid #aaa;">
 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the discussion was: Delete – Quadell (talk) 13:33, 23 July 2013 (UTC)
 * File:ST-TNG Preemptive Strike.jpg ([ delete] | talk | [ history] | links | [ logs]) – uploaded by Cburnett ( [ notify] | contribs | uploads | upload log).

Invalid FUR: Non-free content is used only if its presence would significantly increase readers' understanding of the topic, and its omission would be detrimental to that understanding. This image is not critical for understanding, but is used in a decorative fashion. Since this file does not greatly enhance understanding, nor will its omission greatly decrease understanding, it must be deleted. —Justin ( koavf ) ❤T☮C☺M☯ 01:41, 23 May 2013 (UTC)
 * Keep per Richwales (see File:STMatterofHonor.jpg. As stated by others below, these images are illustrative of the episodes and increase understanding, so their use seems appropriate. Such images are so widely used in episode articles that the wider community seems to support their use, so wider community discussion as proposed by Richwales seems necessary. -- Aussie Legend  ( ✉ ) 16:00, 23 May 2013 (UTC)
 * Delete Image is of Michelle Forbes staring off-screen while an unidentified black male stares at her staring off-screen. Again, no rational claim of increased understanding can be made, so the use violates WP:NFCC. Again, the host article is blatant violation of WP:NOT.&mdash;Kww(talk) 05:31, 27 May 2013 (UTC)
 * Delete, "man talks to Ensign Ro, out of uniform, in a bar" gets the point across. -- SarekOfVulcan (talk) 00:27, 6 June 2013 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section.

File:&
<div class="boilerplate metadata vfd xfd-closed" style="background-color:#f3f9ff; margin:1em 0 0 0; padding:0 10px 0 10px; border:1px solid #aaa;">
 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  01:00, 1 June 2013 (UTC)
 * File:& ([ delete] | talk | [ history] | links | [ logs]) – uploaded by FlyersPh9 ( [ notify] | contribs | uploads | upload log).

Image is merely a collection of data that can be intergrated into the article. The rationale's only reason for including it in the article is that the uploader felt it has facts that "readers will find interesting". – Dream out loud (talk) 07:24, 23 May 2013 (UTC)
 * Delete USA Today type infographic that combines a multitude of Wikipedia sins: unencyclopedic, POV, OR, and non-inline citations that are too small to be read anyway. Andrew Lenahan -  St ar bli nd  16:14, 30 May 2013 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Interview with expert on Weak vs Strong sustainability.png
<div class="boilerplate metadata vfd xfd-closed" style="background-color:#f3f9ff; margin:1em 0 0 0; padding:0 10px 0 10px; border:1px solid #aaa;">
 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  01:00, 1 June 2013 (UTC)
 * File:Interview with expert on Weak vs Strong sustainability.png ([ delete] | talk | [ history] | links | [ logs]) – uploaded by MBA2012E2 ( [ notify] | contribs | uploads | upload log).

It's unclear why we need any non-free content to illustrate the concept of weak vs. strong sustainability, and certainly not a screenshot from a news program. (ESkog)(Talk) 12:37, 23 May 2013 (UTC)
 * Delete, does not aid understanding or appreciation. – Fayenatic  L ondon 18:52, 24 May 2013 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Beegeesroyalalberthall.jpg
<div class="boilerplate metadata vfd xfd-closed" style="background-color:#f3f9ff; margin:1em 0 0 0; padding:0 10px 0 10px; border:1px solid #aaa;">
 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  01:00, 1 June 2013 (UTC)
 * File:Beegeesroyalalberthall.jpg ([ delete] | talk | [ history] | links | [ logs]) – uploaded by Samuelpoginavera ( [ notify] | contribs | uploads | upload log).

Plenty of free images already illustrating the Bee Gees article, including one of them performing at a different venue around the same time period. Unclear why we need a non-free image here. (ESkog)(Talk) 13:10, 23 May 2013 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Anabel_Conde.jpg
<div class="boilerplate metadata vfd xfd-closed" style="background-color:#f3f9ff; margin:1em 0 0 0; padding:0 10px 0 10px; border:1px solid #aaa;">
 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the discussion was: Wrong forum. The file is on Commons. Please nominate it for deletion there if you still feel it should be deleted. AnomieBOT ⚡ 15:08, 23 May 2013 (UTC)
 * File:Anabel_Conde.jpg ([ delete] | talk | [ history] | links | [ logs]) – uploaded by User talk: ( [ notify] | contribs | uploads | upload log).
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section.

File:TalriasGNC.jpg
<div class="boilerplate metadata vfd xfd-closed" style="background-color:#f3f9ff; margin:1em 0 0 0; padding:0 10px 0 10px; border:1px solid #aaa;">
 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  01:00, 1 June 2013 (UTC)
 * File:TalriasGNC.jpg ([ delete] | talk | [ history] | links | [ logs]) – uploaded by Sannse ( [ notify] | contribs | uploads | upload log).

I have no idea what this photo was used for. I suggest we delete unless someone finds something usefull to do with this photo. MGA73 (talk) 16:45, 23 May 2013 (UTC)
 * Delete wrong license, clearly not PD, source images are under CC licenses -- 65.94.76.126 (talk) 04:44, 24 May 2013 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section.