Wikipedia:Files for deletion/2013 May 3



File:Institut auf dem Rosenberg, Historic Main Building (1902).gif

 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  19:10, 11 May 2013 (UTC)
 * File:Institut auf dem Rosenberg, Historic Main Building (1902).gif ([ delete] | talk | [ history] | links | [ logs]) – uploaded by LKK343 ( [ notify] | contribs | uploads | upload log).

There is no critical discussion about what the building looked like in 1902. If the image is still protected for copyright for some reason (unpublished?), then it should be deleted per WP:NFCC. Stefan2 (talk) 13:27, 3 May 2013 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section.

File:AgnesMonica1995.jpg

 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  19:10, 11 May 2013 (UTC)
 * File:AgnesMonica1995.jpg ([ delete] | talk | [ history] | links | [ logs]) – uploaded by Alexia Nelson ( [ notify] | contribs | uploads | upload log).

Use does not significantly increase reader understanding of the statement that she was in the album. (File may qualify for speedy deletion under F7 since the album is neither under crown copyright nor is it a two-dimensional representation of a proposed building or architectural work.) —teb728 t c 22:18, 3 May 2013 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Highschoolscandal.jpg

 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  19:10, 11 May 2013 (UTC)
 * File:Highschoolscandal.jpg ([ delete] | talk | [ history] | links | [ logs]) – uploaded by Cowo8 ( [ notify] | contribs | uploads | upload log).

Doesn't appear to have any encyclopedic value. Eeekster (talk) 23:01, 3 May 2013 (UTC)
 * Delete Can G1 apply to files? --BDD (talk) 23:08, 3 May 2013 (UTC)
 * Delete The "G" speedy criteria apply to files. Additionally, it is a copyright violation. The photo of the building is stolen from File:Wolgarston High School - geograph.org.uk - 267976.jpg, and the photographer isn't credited nor is there a link to https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/2.0/deed which are violations of the CC-BY-SA 2.0 licence of the image. The photo of Pope Benedict XVI is a copyright violation of something made by the Associated Press. No idea where the helicopter and parachute come from. --Stefan2 (talk) 00:23, 6 May 2013 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section.