Wikipedia:Files for deletion/2013 September 21



File:Commonwealth Games Federation Logo.svg

 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the discussion was: Keep —David Eppstein (talk) 21:04, 7 December 2013 (UTC)

Commons regards this logo as being too simple. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 15:49, 21 September 2013 (UTC)
 * Comment er, what's the rationale for deletion? Is it now commons? -- 70.24.249.39 (talk) 23:03, 21 September 2013 (UTC)
 * The logo itself doesn't look copyrightable, but the SVG adaptation of it might be copyrighted per Adobe Systems, Inc. v. Southern Software, Inc. In that case, the image violates WP:NFCC as someone else could make a freely licensed SVG adaptation. Nominated for deletion on Commons per Commons:COM:TOO: this is more complex than File:EDGE magazine (logo).svg which a British court decided was copyrighted. --Stefan2 (talk) 17:45, 22 September 2013 (UTC)
 * Keep no rationale given for deletion. This file uses fair-use rationales, and the commons version is up for deletion -- 70.24.249.39 (talk) 07:58, 23 September 2013 (UTC)
 * Keep Per non-free media information and use rationale, the image which is a logo used to identify the organization of the Commonwealth Games Federation. The significance of the logo is to help the reader identify the organization, assure the readers that they have reached the right article containing critical commentary about the organization, and illustrate the organization's intended branding message in a way that words alone could not convey. The fair-use rationale can be found at Template:Non-free logo, which is suppose to be added on any logo that has sole purpose of providing an identity to a brand.  It is also covered at WP:NFC, WP:LOGO, and Fair use.  As long as the correct rationale tags have been used, then there is no copyright violation.   Wesley   Mᴥuse  15:12, 30 September 2013 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section.

File:ABCKids.svg

 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the discussion was: Keep —David Eppstein (talk) 21:08, 7 December 2013 (UTC)

This logo may not meet TOO. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 16:30, 21 September 2013 (UTC)
 * Comment why does that matter? It's always used FURs and has a PD-ineligible license. -- 70.24.249.39 (talk) 23:05, 21 September 2013 (UTC)
 * Keep invalid reasoning for deletion, this does not use a free-license. -- 70.24.249.39 (talk) 23:05, 21 September 2013 (UTC)
 * Nominated for deletion on Commons per Commons:COM:TOO. --Stefan2 (talk) 18:16, 22 September 2013 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section.

File:607 img 17.jpg

 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  19:12, 13 October 2013 (UTC)

Fails WP:NFCC - image isn't discussed in a critical manner.  Taylor Trescott  - my talk + my edits 23:36, 21 September 2013 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section.