Wikipedia:Files for deletion/2013 September 26



File:KS Department of Commerce.jpg

 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  07:04, 4 October 2013 (UTC)

Newer file uploaded with .PNG instead of .JPEG. Corkythehornetfan (talk) 00:40, 26 September 2013 (UTC)
 * So why not just tag it as unused? There's no need for a discussion. Eeekster (talk) 01:21, 26 September 2013 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section.

File:KS Department of Agriculture.jpg

 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted as F5 by AnomieBOT ⚡  20:12, 13 October 2013 (UTC)

uploaded newer version. Corkythehornetfan (talk) 00:51, 26 September 2013 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Generation-Goldman-2-photo.jpg

 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  20:12, 13 October 2013 (UTC)

Violates WP:NFCC: there is already a CD cover. Stefan2 (talk) 13:19, 26 September 2013 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Generation-goldman-collective.jpg

 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  20:12, 13 October 2013 (UTC)

Violates WP:NFCC: there is already a CD cover. Stefan2 (talk) 13:20, 26 September 2013 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Generation-Goldman-2-album-cover.jpg

 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  20:12, 19 October 2013 (UTC)

Violates WP:NFCC: the article also contains the cover of the first volume. Stefan2 (talk) 13:21, 26 September 2013 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Salut-les-copains-October-1972.jpg

 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the discussion was: Removed the one that doesn't match the title of the article. Diannaa (talk) 18:39, 13 October 2013 (UTC)

See WP:NFCC: the article only needs one cover. The other one should be removed from the article. Stefan2 (talk) 13:24, 26 September 2013 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Odd-look-kavinsky-the-weeknd.png

 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  20:12, 13 October 2013 (UTC)

Violates WP:NFCC: alternative cover. The other one is PD-text, so this is the one which will have to go. Stefan2 (talk) 13:26, 26 September 2013 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Obsesion-lucenzo-kenza-farah.jpg

 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  20:12, 13 October 2013 (UTC)

Violates WP:NFCC: the article has plenty of other cover images. Stefan2 (talk) 13:28, 26 September 2013 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Laskovyy-May-film-poster.jpg

 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  20:12, 13 October 2013 (UTC)

Violates WP:NFCC, see the footnote to WP:NFCI §1. Stefan2 (talk) 13:35, 26 September 2013 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Dance-pause-panetoz.jpg

 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  00:02, 19 January 2014 (UTC)

Violates WP:NFCC: alternative cover. Stefan2 (talk) 13:37, 26 September 2013 (UTC)
 * Keep. This is the cover art for the English-language version of the song, rather than the original Swedish version.  The cover art is completely different, so showing one does not inform the reader about how the other was marketed.  Past discussions at WT:NFC amd at FFD have generally upheld use of alternate covers where the alternate cover is fundamentally different from the original, and has either replaced the original, or been the cover used in a significant marketing territory.  A different major language-version would appear to be a similarly significant kind of alternate release. Jheald (talk) 10:15, 28 September 2013 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Danza-kuduro-lucenzo-featuring-don-omar-dutch.jpg

 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  00:02, 19 January 2014 (UTC)

Violates WP:NFCC: alternative version. Stefan2 (talk) 13:40, 26 September 2013 (UTC)
 * Keep The fact that this made #1 in the Dutch charts, and is a different language version so a materially different cut, and has a quite unrelated cover image to the original, suggest that this is a significant alt release, satisfying our criteria as to whether or not to show how the alt release was presented and marketed. Jheald (talk) 10:23, 28 September 2013 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Danza kuduro (music video).jpg

 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  20:12, 13 October 2013 (UTC)

Violates WP:NFCC: seemingly random screenshot without critical discussion which just shows some of the characters in the film. Stefan2 (talk) 13:42, 26 September 2013 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Friday-by-glee-cast.png

 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the discussion was: Keep. Acather96 (click here to contact me) 21:40, 10 February 2014 (UTC)

Violates WP:NFCC: alternative cover. Stefan2 (talk) 13:44, 26 September 2013 (UTC)
 * Keep. Cover for a release by a completely different set of recording artists, which bears no visual relation to the original art, and which we consider a significant enough version to single out for separate discussion in the article.  That matches the usually understood criteria for alt releases or re-releases considered significant enough in their own right that we should show how they were presented and marketed. Jheald (talk) 10:31, 28 September 2013 (UTC)
 * Keep The single cover for the Glee cover version passes the points of WP:NFCC. WP:NFCC is met because the single cover is used for identification its version and the Rebecca Black single cover cannot convey equivalent significant information and/or identification of Glee's version. WP:NFCC is met because the single cover are used for identification and the image increases readers' understanding and not having them would be detrimental to the understanding of Glee's version.  The single cover passes the first example of acceptable use of fair images at WP:NFCI: "Cover art: Cover art from various items, for visual identification only in the context of critical commentary of that item (not for identification without critical commentary)."


 * The current consensus for single covers in section infoboxes to represent notable cover versions are that they pass WP:NFCC and WP:NFCI. Since WP:SONGCOVER says notable cover versions should be covered in the article about the song and not have its own article, but if it had its own article, the image would be acceptable there, so it is acceptable in the sections of the song article. The single cover is not alternate cover for the Rebecca Black cover, it is the primary cover for Glee's version and should be treated as such. Aspects (talk) 09:47, 11 December 2013 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Love-generation-with-goleo-vi.jpg

 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  00:02, 19 January 2014 (UTC)

Violates WP:NFCC: alternative cover. Stefan2 (talk) 13:46, 26 September 2013 (UTC)
 * Keep Cover art for a significant alt release. Alt cover art bears no relation to the original.  Plus, seeing the cover art helps the reader understand the meaning and relevance of "Goleo VI", and how the presentation of the re-release was tied in to the marketing and presentation of the World Cup events.  Jheald (talk) 10:38, 28 September 2013 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Eu-quero-tchu-by-Flavel-and-Neto.jpg

 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the discussion was: Keep. Acather96 (click here to contact me) 21:45, 10 February 2014 (UTC)

Violates WP:NFCC: alternative cover. Stefan2 (talk) 13:47, 26 September 2013 (UTC)
 * Keep Cover art for a release by a completely different duo of recording artists, which bears no visual relation to the original art. This was the version of the song that dominantly broke through in Europe.  Therefore makes all the criteria to qualify as appropriate cover art for a significant alt release.  Jheald (talk) 10:44, 28 September 2013 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section.

File:ISpacesLogo.jpg
<div class="boilerplate vfd xfd-closed" style="background-color:#f3f9ff; margin:1em 0 0 0; padding:0 10px 0 10px; border:1px solid #aaa;">
 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  20:12, 13 October 2013 (UTC)

Unused logo. No foreseeable use. Stefan2 (talk) 13:51, 26 September 2013 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Break-the-Border-Platinum-Edition.jpg
<div class="boilerplate vfd xfd-closed" style="background-color:#f3f9ff; margin:1em 0 0 0; padding:0 10px 0 10px; border:1px solid #aaa;">
 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  20:12, 13 October 2013 (UTC)

Violates WP:NFCC: alternative cover. Stefan2 (talk) 14:05, 26 September 2013 (UTC)
 * Delete A much less significant release than the original, with visuals predominantly re-worked from the original cover. Jheald (talk) 10:47, 28 September 2013 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section.

File:If-i-lose-myself-alesso-vs-onerepublic.jpg
<div class="boilerplate vfd xfd-closed" style="background-color:#f3f9ff; margin:1em 0 0 0; padding:0 10px 0 10px; border:1px solid #aaa;">
 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  18:12, 2 January 2014 (UTC)

Violates WP:NFCC, see File:If i lose myself cover art.jpg. Stefan2 (talk) 14:12, 26 September 2013 (UTC)
 * Borderline Different colour scheme does create quite a strikingly different fell (at least IMO), even if the underlying elements are almost all very similar. #4 in Swefen seems quite significant;  but let me leave it to others to come in with what they think about this one.  Jheald (talk) 10:54, 28 September 2013 (UTC)
 * Delete The alternate cover image is not significantly different than the main image thereby failing WP:NFCC. It is the same background image but with a blue hue to the clouds in the bottom half versus a red hue to the clouds in the bottom half. Aspects (talk) 09:52, 11 December 2013 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section.

File:SomethingWickedSaga.jpg
<div class="boilerplate vfd xfd-closed" style="background-color:#f3f9ff; margin:1em 0 0 0; padding:0 10px 0 10px; border:1px solid #aaa;">
 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  20:12, 13 October 2013 (UTC)

Unfree gallery, see WP:NFG and WP:MONTAGE. Stefan2 (talk) 14:24, 26 September 2013 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section.