Wikipedia:Files for deletion/2013 September 29



File:Qld Cricket logo.png

 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  20:12, 13 October 2013 (UTC)

Unused and SVG version now at File:Queensland Cricket logo.svg  LGA talk  edits   05:33, 29 September 2013 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Before Nightfall in their video clip for Beneath The Smile.jpg

 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted as F11 by AnomieBOT ⚡  13:26, 8 October 2013 (UTC)

"It was Uploaded to their Facebook page under no liscence" is not a vaild licence  LGA talk  edits   05:49, 29 September 2013 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Ramon Valdes.jpg

 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the discussion was: Kept as fair use for one article. Diannaa (talk) 18:59, 13 October 2013 (UTC)

A picture of a person. Fails WP:NFCC.  Taylor Trescott  - my talk + my edits 12:19, 29 September 2013 (UTC)
 * Could you explain a further? The subject in the photo is deceased so there's no way to obtain a replaceable one. Erick (talk) 14:10, 29 September 2013 (UTC)
 * Sorry, I didn't know it was used in a person's article. That's the only place it should be used, because it's also being used in two other articles where it clearly fails the criteria.  Taylor Trescott  - my talk + my edits 19:19, 29 September 2013 (UTC)
 * Thank you for clarifying. I have notified the user about the inappropriate usage of non-free material. Erick (talk) 20:18, 29 September 2013 (UTC)

Could you withdraw the nomination seeing as how the issue has been resolved? Erick (talk) 20:19, 2 October 2013 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Google Asus Nexus 7 2013.jpg

 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted as F9 by AnomieBOT ⚡  20:12, 13 October 2013 (UTC)

Looks like press image - not self-created TheMostAmazingTechnik (talk) 13:52, 29 September 2013 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Downtown Calhoun Georgia 2.jpg

 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  20:12, 13 October 2013 (UTC)

LQ, OR, overwritten by original uploader several years ago, presumably as unneeded.[//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Special:Log&page=File%3A9674879Calhoun---gordon-county.jpg] Magog the Ogre (t • c) 15:50, 29 September 2013 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section.

File:BBC America.svg

 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by A file with this name on Commons is now visible. AnomieBOT ⚡ 20:12, 13 October 2013 (UTC)

Ineligible for F8 because it was restored locally, and transcludes Do not copy to commons. However, the deletion discussion on Commons ended with keep, so the justification for keeping it locally appears no longer appears to be relevant. Magog the Ogre (t • c) 16:13, 29 September 2013 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section.

File:BBC NorthEastAndCumbria.png

 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by A file with this name on Commons is now visible. AnomieBOT ⚡ 20:12, 13 October 2013 (UTC)

see my nomination immediately above. Magog the Ogre (t • c) 16:13, 29 September 2013 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section.

File:BBC Radio 1.svg

 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by A file with this name on Commons is now visible. AnomieBOT ⚡ 20:12, 13 October 2013 (UTC)

see my nomination immediately above. Magog the Ogre (t • c) 16:14, 29 September 2013 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Bagramyan&

 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  00:01, 19 January 2014 (UTC)

Violation of NFCC. This image does NOT "significantly increase readers' understanding of the topic" Ե րևանցի  talk  17:09, 29 September 2013 (UTC)


 * Keep - The copyright expired last year. HouseOfArtaxiad (talk) 19:08, 14 October 2013 (UTC)
 * Could you explain why the copyright expired last year? In USA, the copyright only expires for unpublished works between 2003 and 2018. If the copyright expired outside the United States, then that does not affect the copyright status in the United States. --Stefan2 (talk) 21:30, 14 October 2013 (UTC)
 * This photo was either taken in Russia or Ukraine and would be public domain for either country. It's 71 years old, so the copyright is expired per PD-Russia and PD-Ukraine. --HouseOfArtaxiad (talk) 14:48, 15 October 2013 (UTC)
 * Those templates describe the copyright status in Russia and Ukraine, but Wikipedia is hosted in the United States, where the copyright expires 95 years after publication. The copyright only expires after 70 years in Russia and Ukraine if the photographer either is anonymous or died during the year of photography. --Stefan2 (talk) 15:00, 15 October 2013 (UTC)
 * Both templates say they can be free in the US if the photo became public domain in Russia/Ukraine prior to 1996. For both countries, it was published before 1943 and 1951, respectively, and the creator is unknown. So it was public domain before 1996. --HouseOfArtaxiad (talk) 15:11, 15 October 2013 (UTC)
 * There is no evidence that the photographer is unknown. --Stefan2 (talk) 15:19, 15 October 2013 (UTC)
 * The source doesn't give one. --HouseOfArtaxiad (talk) 15:30, 15 October 2013 (UTC)
 * A minimum check would be to check the first publication containing the photo. The photo seems to be a scan of a book or a newspaper or something. Check the publication from which that website got the photo. --Stefan2 (talk) 15:38, 15 October 2013 (UTC)
 * Here is the book. Do you know how to open it? The picture is supposed to be on page 78. --HouseOfArtaxiad (talk) 15:43, 15 October 2013 (UTC)
 * I don't have the book and Google tells that there is no electronic copy available. That book seems to be from 2002 and is unlikely the first publication of the photo. Was the photographer credited in the first publication of the photo? --Stefan2 (talk) 22:45, 15 October 2013 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Bagramyan kurasov.jpg

 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  00:01, 19 January 2014 (UTC)

Violation of NFCC. This image does NOT "significantly increase readers' understanding of the topic" Ե րևանցի  talk  17:09, 29 September 2013 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Vasilevski bagra.jpg

 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  00:01, 19 January 2014 (UTC)

Violation of NFCC. This image does NOT "significantly increase readers' understanding of the topic" Ե րևանցի  talk  17:09, 29 September 2013 (UTC)


 * As the uploader of the above three images, I don't know what all the hoopla is about and how the editor who has nominated them for deletion has come to the conclusion that they do not "significantly increase readers' understanding of the topic". Biography articles typically include photos of an individual interacting with other people, some of whom were or went onto become important world leaders, such as Nikita Khrushchev, pictured above in the first photo. I sense an ill-faith nomination as I have, unfortunately, come into conflict with said editor on another of other articles recently and so I do not believe that it is a mere coincidence that he plucked these three images simply out of concern that a viewer may not garner much understanding from them. But I leave that judgment to be made by more experienced editors.--Marshal Bagramyan (talk) 17:44, 29 September 2013 (UTC)
 * I suggest you read WP:AGF first. And how do these images "significantly increase readers' understanding of the topic"? How does the picture of Bagaramyan and Khrushchev help the reader understand the topic? There is no reason why there should be 4 non-free images in one article. -- Ե րևանցի  talk  17:49, 29 September 2013 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section.

File:401 boys sled.gif
<div class="boilerplate vfd xfd-closed" style="background-color:#f3f9ff; margin:1em 0 0 0; padding:0 10px 0 10px; border:1px solid #aaa;">
 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  21:13, 13 October 2013 (UTC)

Image not discussed critically, but used as decoration (WP:NFCC violation)  Taylor Trescott  - my talk + my edits 19:05, 29 September 2013 (UTC)
 * delete per nom -- Ե րևանցի talk  21:40, 30 September 2013 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section.