Wikipedia:Files for deletion/2013 September 3



File:PlayStorePermissions.png

 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted as F5 by AnomieBOT ⚡  18:34, 11 October 2013 (UTC)
 * File:PlayStorePermissions.png ([ delete] | talk | [ history] | links | [ logs]) – uploaded by Smurfy ( [ notify] | contribs | uploads | upload log).

Google Play Store is non-free and not GPL, screenshot can be re-created using a similar permission display in the actual Apps menu in Settings (making it preemptively violate NFCC 1) ViperSnake151   Talk  01:38, 3 September 2013 (UTC)
 * Comment The file is unfree so it is unclear how the uploader meant to use the picture. However, if you just need to display the "App permissions" message, then you could crop that out and list it as PD-ineligible. As the file isn't in use, I'm not sure if it would be worth the trouble to save any part of it. --Stefan2 (talk) 10:35, 3 September 2013 (UTC)
 * I replaced it with File:Android App Permissions.png already. Its from the actual Android software instead of Play Store. ViperSnake151   Talk  23:38, 3 September 2013 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Notre dame coat of arms.jpg

 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  10:27, 11 October 2013 (UTC)
 * File:Notre dame coat of arms.jpg ([ delete] | talk | [ history] | links | [ logs]) – uploaded by Pmadrid ( [ notify] | contribs | uploads | upload log).

Unneeded. File:Notre dame coat of arms.png is better. Stefan2 (talk) 10:33, 3 September 2013 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Elissa - Ayshalak (alternative cover).jpg

 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  10:27, 11 October 2013 (UTC)
 * File:Elissa - Ayshalak (alternative cover).jpg ([ delete] | talk | [ history] | links | [ logs]) – uploaded by Onceturn ( [ notify] | contribs | uploads | upload log).

Redundant to File:Elissa - Ayshalak.jpg. Stefan2 (talk) 12:48, 3 September 2013 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Sabrina - SexyGirl (alternative cover).jpg

 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  10:27, 11 October 2013 (UTC)
 * File:Sabrina - SexyGirl (alternative cover).jpg ([ delete] | talk | [ history] | links | [ logs]) – uploaded by Mlenooo ( [ notify] | contribs | uploads | upload log).

Redundant to File:Sabrina Sexy Girl.jpg, see WP:NFCC. Stefan2 (talk) 12:50, 3 September 2013 (UTC)
 * Delete - One is enough. --George Ho (talk) 19:08, 7 October 2013 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section.

File:DKM Album Alternative Cover.jpg

 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  02:01, 2 October 2013 (UTC)
 * File:DKM Album Alternative Cover.jpg ([ delete] | talk | [ history] | links | [ logs]) – uploaded by Versace1608 ( [ notify] | contribs | uploads | upload log).

Redundant to File:Official Artwork for D'King's Men Album.gif, see WP:NFCC. Stefan2 (talk) 12:51, 3 September 2013 (UTC) Update The preceeding file was converted to a JPG file. This file is now redundant to File:Official_Artwork_for_D'King's_Men_Album.jpg. davidwr/ (talk)/(contribs)  16:22, 24 September 2013 (UTC)
 * Keep only one but consult someone familiar with the album and/or the uploader of the images to see which one should be kept. In any case, reduce the size of the image to just big enough to show up well in an infobox.  Recommend immediately procedurally withdrawing this nomination and creating a new multiple-file nomination with a recommendation to pick one and delete the rest.  davidwr/  (talk)/(contribs)  04:21, 4 September 2013 (UTC) Speedy keep as no longer redundant.  davidwr/  (talk)/(contribs)  15:09, 24 September 2013 (UTC) Restoring original recommendation in light of existence of redundancy still being a problem. davidwr/  (talk)/(contribs)  16:22, 24 September 2013 (UTC)

Why is this file nominated for deletion? I reduced it to comply with Wikipedia's image policy. The larger version of the file I uploaded has been deleted. Do you want me to reduce this image further? versace1608 (talk) 06:32, 14 September 2013 (UTC)
 * It was nominated as being redundant to a file that has since been deleted and re-uploaded in a different file format . There is no longer any reason to delete THIS file.  If the nominator does not withdraw the nomination, a non-involved editor should close this nomination with "keep" within a few days. davidwr/  (talk)/(contribs)  15:13, 24 September 2013 (UTC) Update: Struck and updated per Stefan2's note below.  davidwr/  (talk)/(contribs)  16:22, 24 September 2013 (UTC)
 * It seems that the deleted file was reposted as File:Official Artwork for D'King's Men Album.jpg so there is still one file too much. --Stefan2 (talk) 15:18, 24 September 2013 (UTC)


 * Comment: I asked the uploader of both files to only use one of them, mark the other for deletion, and put a note here so this discussion can be closed.  User talk:Versace1608 ([//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk%3AVersace1608&diff=574340154&oldid=573226547 diff]).  davidwr/  (talk)/(contribs)  16:31, 24 September 2013 (UTC)
 * With the uploader's blessing (see User talk:Versace1608) I removed the alternative cover from the only article it was used in and marked this image for speedy deletion. Regardless of how this closes, the image will be eligible for deletion on October 1 unless it is re-used in the interim.  I put the URL of the source of the image on the article's talk page, so no real information is lost.  davidwr/  (talk)/(contribs)  21:15, 24 September 2013 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Rage Alternative cover soundchaser.jpg

 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  18:34, 11 October 2013 (UTC)
 * File:Rage Alternative cover soundchaser.jpg ([ delete] | talk | [ history] | links | [ logs]) – uploaded by GuKeltke ( [ notify] | contribs | uploads | upload log).

Redundant to File:Rage - Soundchaser album cover.jpg, see WP:NFCC. Stefan2 (talk) 12:52, 3 September 2013 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Marduk - Plague Angel (alternative cover).jpg

 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  18:34, 11 October 2013 (UTC)
 * File:Marduk - Plague Angel (alternative cover).jpg ([ delete] | talk | [ history] | links | [ logs]) – uploaded by Lte2112 ( [ notify] | contribs | uploads | upload log).

Redundant to File:Marduk - Plague Angel.jpg, see WP:NFCC. Stefan2 (talk) 12:55, 3 September 2013 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Diamond Mine Mode Time Up.png

 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  18:34, 11 October 2013 (UTC)
 * File:Diamond Mine Mode Time Up.png ([ delete] | talk | [ history] | links | [ logs]) – uploaded by 22dragon22burn ( [ notify] | contribs | uploads | upload log).

This non-free image is used "[t]o demonstrate the gameplay of Bejeweled 3." It is a remarkably poor choice of image for illustrating gameplay, as the screen is darkened and has a big "TIME UP" text label obscuring it. Therefore, this image fails WP:NFCC. RJaguar3 &#124; u &#124; t 13:27, 3 September 2013 (UTC)
 * Delete Indeed fails NFCC#8, may also fail WP:NFCC. -- Trevj (talk) 08:47, 23 September 2013 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Vanishing Point (soundtrack).jpg

 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  18:34, 11 October 2013 (UTC)
 * File:Vanishing Point (soundtrack).jpg ([ delete] | talk | [ history] | links | [ logs]) – uploaded by Bede735 ( [ notify] | contribs | uploads | upload log).

While different from the film poster, this image is used in Vanishing Point (1971 film). The soundtrack is not the main topic, and the image is used for the "Soundtrack" section. I believe that visual identity of the soundtrack is no longer necessary. Also, to make it necessary, either image itself must be discussed, or the image must also relate directly to the film, like File:Chor lau heung 1979 vinyl cast.jpg. George Ho (talk) 17:15, 3 September 2013 (UTC)
 * As indicated in the Purpose of use field, the image is being used in the album infobox to show the primary visual image associated with the work—the album. Like other film articles with no corresponding soundtrack article, the soundtrack section often includes an infobox for the album. The album cover looks nothing like the film poster used in the film article. No reference to MOS guidance has been provided by the proposer. Bede735 (talk) 17:37, 3 September 2013 (UTC)
 * Use of soundtrack images was discussed many times, especially in WT:NFC. Also, omittance of this image wouldn't affect the article and the reader's understanding of the film soundtrack because a reader can already understand the tracklist and the soundtrack's availability without this image and/or buy the film and hear the soundtrack. --George Ho (talk) 17:51, 3 September 2013 (UTC)


 * See MOS:FILM. The image currently violates WP:NFCC as the FUR contains the wrong article title. --Stefan2 (talk) 22:36, 4 September 2013 (UTC)
 * Minor issue fixed. --George Ho (talk) 22:55, 4 September 2013 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section.

File:SherylCrowAllIWannaDoFrenchCDSingleCover.jpg

 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  18:34, 11 October 2013 (UTC)
 * File:SherylCrowAllIWannaDoFrenchCDSingleCover.jpg ([ delete] | talk | [ history] | links | [ logs]) – uploaded by Tchernomush ( [ notify] | contribs | uploads | upload log).

There is already another infobox image, File:Sheryl-Crow-All-I-Wanna-Do-37547.jpg. Although different from other, this is a French edition. As long as the American one is used, I see no need on keeping this image any longer. George Ho (talk) 17:33, 3 September 2013 (UTC)
 * Delete No sourced commentary regarding this alternative cover, appears to not be notable, hence fails WP:NFCC. -- Trevj (talk) 10:16, 24 September 2013 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Cloudy with a Chance of Meatballs Soundtrack.jpg

 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  10:27, 11 October 2013 (UTC)
 * File:Cloudy with a Chance of Meatballs Soundtrack.jpg ([ delete] | talk | [ history] | links | [ logs]) – uploaded by InfamousPrince ( [ notify] | contribs | uploads | upload log).

The original soundtrack article, where this image originally appeared, was merged into the main film article. Since the main article already contains a theatrical poster for identification, per MOS:FILM, a soundtrack cover is unnecessary for its identification. Michaelzeng7 (talk) 21:55, 3 September 2013 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section.