Wikipedia:Files for deletion/2014 August 14



File:Clippy wikipedia parody.jpg

 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  03:02, 22 August 2014 (UTC)
 * File:Clippy wikipedia parody.jpg ([ delete] | talk | [ history] | links | [ logs]) – uploaded by Herostratus ( [ notify] | contribs | uploads | upload log).

Fails WP:NFCC and WP:NFCC: we don't need to see a parody to understand that Clippit parodies exist, there is already a picture of Clippit in the Office Assistant article, and a parody could reasonably be made that has freely-licensed text that could either be used as text or made into a non-free derivative work. RJaguar3 &#124; u &#124; t 01:42, 14 August 2014 (UTC)
 * Yeah if the point being made was just "parodies exist" then text would do. But the point being made is "observe, the parodies look like this". For "looks like this" type exposition images are useful. Not clear your point re "could be made into a non-free derivative work" since that's what I did. It's legally OK as fair use parody I assume. Obviously a free version isn't available and won't be for many decades or probably this century I guess so it's fair use or nothing here.


 * Your point that it's fair use that's exceeds our remit... dunno, it's debatable I guess. "Presence would significantly increase readers' understanding of the article topic"... the section its used in titled "Criticism and parodies" and I guess an example might be considered useful. "Minimal usage"... dunno, it's used once and in that article, don't see how it could be more minimal without disappearing... can't really make it too much smaller or fuzz up the resolution much more without the text becoming illegible for people without pretty good vision. Maybe though. Not really up to date on how these policies are applied on the ground though. Herostratus (talk) 03:00, 14 August 2014 (UTC)
 * It didn't seem clear to me from looking at the file description page that you freely licensed the text you wrote. If the text is freely-licensed, then it serves as an acceptable substitute for the derivative-work image, and it could be displayed in the margin where the image is currently located.  RJaguar3 &#124; u &#124; t 12:52, 14 August 2014 (UTC)
 * Oh, OK. The problem is, there isn't really a good way to indicate (in our system) "Here is a work, some of which is taken from copyrighted material (but for which I am claiming fair use) and some of which is my own work (which I donate under a free license)". The actual file is my original work (made in PC Paint), but it's not really transformative original artistic work (in the sense that, say, Andy Warhol's painting of Campbell's Soup cans was, which I assume gave Warhol copyright of the painting and prevented the Campbell's Soup Company from contesting that). I suppose I could claimed that and maybe that'd fly or maybe not, I don't know, and since I don't know I didn't claim it as entirely my own work. I assume that copyright for a work devolves to the most restrictive status. Anyway, there's no easy way to express this in the license. Herostratus (talk) 15:32, 17 August 2014 (UTC)


 * Delete The violation of WP:NFCC here is serious. This policy makes it a point that copyright-protected non-free intellectual properties of others must never be used (even under fair use) to make a point that can be made with words alone or with freely licensed material. Best regards, Codename Lisa (talk) 20:03, 14 August 2014 (UTC)
 * Delete - Beyond the points made, I dislike the idea of encouraging/frustrating/etc. vandalism. I can't say (much less prove) that the vandalism to the article was provoked by that Clippy supporting vandalism, but I'd find it much more tasteful if the image was just about regular or good faith editing. I also don't understand the dating site thing... how is that relevant or funny? This may not be a strong enough standalone reason to delete it, but it certainly doesn't help its case. mol uɐɯ  14:51, 17 August 2014 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Mount Saint Vincent Logo.jpg

 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  03:02, 22 August 2014 (UTC)
 * File:Mount Saint Vincent Logo.jpg ([ delete] | talk | [ history] | links | [ logs]) – uploaded by Nynj450 ( [ notify] | contribs | uploads | upload log).

a new image of better quality will be uploaded Nynj450 (talk) 02:40, 14 August 2014 (UTC)

Please Delete! — Preceding unsigned comment added by Nynj450 (talk • contribs) 02:58, 15 August 2014 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Westminster Pollution History.jpg

 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  03:02, 22 August 2014 (UTC)
 * File:Westminster Pollution History.jpg ([ delete] | talk | [ history] | links | [ logs]) – uploaded by GrindtXX ( [ notify] | contribs | uploads | upload log).

Fails WP:NFCC and WP:NFCC. The statement in the NFUR that "All modern grey literature is likely to be in copyright" is probably false; at the very least, an editor-made mockup of gray literature could be created, or an author of gray literature could be contacted to freely license their work. RJaguar3 &#124; u &#124; t 04:55, 14 August 2014 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section.

Files listed for deletion

 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the discussion was: Malformed nomination For instructions on how to nominate files for deletion, see Files for deletion/heading. --Stefan2 (talk) 13:52, 14 August 2014 (UTC)

Some of your images or media files have been listed for deletion. Please see Files for deletion/2014 August 14 if you are interested in preserving them. Thank you. Rules of Nature (talk) 13:13, 14 August 2014 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Sri Ram Ashram Shyampur.jpg

 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the discussion was: Withdrawn.  TLSuda  (talk) 01:44, 22 August 2014 (UTC)
 * File:Sri Ram Ashram Shyampur.jpg ([ delete] | talk | [ history] | links | [ logs]) – uploaded by Pradeepwb ( [ notify] | contribs | uploads | upload log).

Photo of minors, and it's removal would not adversely affect the article in which it appears. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 13:35, 14 August 2014 (UTC)
 * Do minors enjoy some protection adults do not when it comes to being photographed? CombatWombat42 (talk) 18:39, 14 August 2014 (UTC)
 * Yes. Minors may not appear on pornographic pictures. This is not relevant here, though. I am not aware of any other protections for photos of minors. --Stefan2 (talk) 18:55, 14 August 2014 (UTC)
 * I'm sorry I didn't state the blatantly obvious. I was trying to figure out why User:Sfan00 IMG even mentioned that they were minors. CombatWombat42 (talk) 21:36, 14 August 2014 (UTC)


 * I was referring it here because I think Wikipedia needs to be more pro-active about not using pictures of kids unless it really needs to.

I appreciate there is no formal guideline on this at present, but my understanding was that were an image of minors/children could be removed from an article, without affecting the article content, or where the image wasn't directly mentioned in the article, the image should be removed. If the image has OTRS confirming model releases it would be a different issue. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 23:21, 14 August 2014 (UTC)
 * I have never heard of such a policy, or of any problems caused by not having such a policy. Where did you get this "understanding" you speak of? CombatWombat42 (talk) 23:40, 14 August 2014 (UTC)
 * It wasn't formal policy as such, but a previous admin advised (can't recall who.), If there is no policy reason for this to be deleted, then

Withdrawn. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 09:52, 15 August 2014 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Ghalib-Farsi-Kalam-Iran.jpg

 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  03:02, 22 August 2014 (UTC)
 * File:Ghalib-Farsi-Kalam-Iran.jpg ([ delete] | talk | [ history] | links | [ logs]) – uploaded by Nannadeem ( [ notify] | contribs | uploads | upload log).

Fails WP:NFCC. Stefan2 (talk) 13:50, 14 August 2014 (UTC)


 * If file can be kept (no deletion), then anyone may kindly help by giving it necessary tags/temp. My intention to have it in the article(s) is to illustrate pictorial  high profile evidence. However, it is a copyright concern itself (my uploading bears a general permission and email which I have already forwarded, is a prove of implied action).  Now admin may decide per EN:WP norms & policy.  Thanks Nannadeem (talk) 15:03, 14 August 2014 (UTC)


 * Delete. Unfortunately, nominator is right. This is not a free image, hence it cannot be helped. Best regards, Codename Lisa (talk) 02:24, 15 August 2014 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Wehwalt the centurion.jpg

 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the discussion was: Withdrawn.  TLSuda  (talk) 01:46, 22 August 2014 (UTC)
 * File:Wehwalt the centurion.jpg ([ delete] | talk | [ history] | links | [ logs]) – uploaded by Brianboulton ( [ notify] | contribs | uploads | upload log).

Unused, personal file? Sfan00 IMG (talk) 14:46, 14 August 2014 (UTC)
 * Obviously it's a personal file if it has the user name of a prominent Wikipedian in it. This image file is linked (not transcluded) onto Wehwalt's talk page. Keep. — Crisco 1492 (talk) 15:08, 14 August 2014 (UTC)
 * Pretty obvious keep. Ed [talk] [majestic titan] 19:42, 14 August 2014 (UTC)
 * What purpose is achieved by deleting it? This looks likes the jobsworth mentality at work. Keep, of course. Brianboulton (talk) 20:36, 14 August 2014 (UTC)


 *  Withdrawn - Userspace file. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 23:22, 14 August 2014 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Maris racal playing different instruments.jpg

 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  03:02, 22 August 2014 (UTC)
 * File:Maris racal playing different instruments.jpg ([ delete] | talk | [ history] | links | [ logs]) – uploaded by ImTaeYoon ( [ notify] | contribs | uploads | upload log).

Unused, personal? Sfan00 IMG (talk) 14:52, 14 August 2014 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Cvhedc5.jpg

 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  03:02, 22 August 2014 (UTC)
 * File:Cvhedc5.jpg ([ delete] | talk | [ history] | links | [ logs]) – uploaded by Mario94606 ( [ notify] | contribs | uploads | upload log).

Per the footnote to WP:NFCI §1: something like htis should only be used in the article about the book, but not in the article about the writer. Stefan2 (talk) 15:54, 14 August 2014 (UTC)
 * Delete The comic book cover is being used to illustrate a section in the writer's bibliography against WP:NFCC. Aspects (talk) 20:45, 16 August 2014 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Tuan Burhanudeen Jayah.jpg

 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  03:02, 22 August 2014 (UTC)
 * File:Tuan Burhanudeen Jayah.jpg ([ delete] | talk | [ history] | links | [ logs]) – uploaded by Abhayaputta ( [ notify] | contribs | uploads | upload log).

Unclear source. A newspaper is mentioned, although not a complete URL. Many newspaper photos violate WP:NFCC. Stefan2 (talk) 20:13, 14 August 2014 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Lahore-Lions.jpg

 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  03:02, 22 August 2014 (UTC)
 * File:Lahore-Lions.jpg ([ delete] | talk | [ history] | links | [ logs]) – uploaded by Wiki id2 ( [ notify] | contribs | uploads | upload log).

Per WP:NFCC: former logo without critical discussion. Stefan2 (talk) 21:28, 14 August 2014 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Rawalpindi Rams.gif

 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  03:02, 22 August 2014 (UTC)
 * File:Rawalpindi Rams.gif ([ delete] | talk | [ history] | links | [ logs]) – uploaded by Wiki id2 ( [ notify] | contribs | uploads | upload log).

Fails WP:NFCC: former logo without critical discussion. Stefan2 (talk) 21:31, 14 August 2014 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Rawalpindi-Rams.jpg

 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  03:02, 22 August 2014 (UTC)
 * File:Rawalpindi-Rams.jpg ([ delete] | talk | [ history] | links | [ logs]) – uploaded by Rajaghalib ( [ notify] | contribs | uploads | upload log).

Fails WP:NFCC: former logo without critical discussion. Stefan2 (talk) 21:31, 14 August 2014 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section.