Wikipedia:Files for deletion/2014 August 25



File:To Sirloin with Love.jpg

 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  16:08, 3 September 2014 (UTC)
 * File:To Sirloin with Love.jpg ([ delete] | talk | [ history] | links | [ logs]) – uploaded by Grapesoda22 ( [ notify] | contribs | uploads | upload log).

Invalid WP:FUR: not used educationally but decoratively in the infobox. No critical commentary on this scene. —Justin ( koavf ) ❤T☮C☺M☯ 16:03, 25 August 2014 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section.

File:BrigadierGeneral.png

 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  16:08, 3 September 2014 (UTC)
 * File:BrigadierGeneral.png ([ delete] | talk | [ history] | links | [ logs]) – uploaded by PNG crusade bot ( [ notify] | contribs | uploads | upload log).

Not in use, superseded by SVG files like File:US-O7 insignia.svg. &mdash;innotata 17:05, 25 August 2014 (UTC)


 * Transfer to Commons because it is a PD image. 13:32, 31 August 2014 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Common face of one euro coin.jpg

 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the discussion was: Uploader assures that image is a scan, not a photograph. Scans do not have the same "sweat of the brow" approach and therefore gain no new rights. The base coin image copyright is still the same, and the file is appropriately tagged.  TLSuda  (talk) 18:26, 3 September 2014 (UTC)
 * File:Common face of one euro coin.jpg ([ delete] | talk | [ history] | links | [ logs]) – uploaded by Blue-Haired Lawyer ( [ notify] | contribs | uploads | upload log).

A file like this needs two copyright tags: a free one for the photograph and an unfree one for the coin. The photograph copyright tag is missing. Stefan2 (talk) 18:56, 25 August 2014 (UTC)
 * It's not a photograph, it's a scan. There's no copyright obtained in just scanning someone else's copyrighted work. — Blue-Haired Lawyer t 00:35, 26 August 2014 (UTC)
 * This looks like a typical photograph. All photographs of coins need permission from the photographer. You might have noticed that lots of photographs of euro coins were removed from various articles recently because the uploaders forgot to ensure that permission was available from the photographers. --Stefan2 (talk) 13:55, 26 August 2014 (UTC)
 * I think it would do this website some good to experience more pragmatism and less perfectionism about licenses. Nobody gets a copyright by scanning a copyrighted image, and fair use does not require securing permissions from the photographer.  This is the encyclopedia that anyone can edit.  Too much bureaucracy in the picture department, I have no doubt, encourages people to upload files with incorrect statements.  If the site gets to that point, it ends up no better protected by its policies, while its articles become less informative because they are stripped of free and fair-use images.  Italick (talk) 13:48, 30 August 2014 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section.