Wikipedia:Files for deletion/2014 August 27



File:Sp-ausnet logo.png

 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  03:02, 4 September 2014 (UTC)
 * File:Sp-ausnet logo.png ([ delete] | talk | [ history] | links | [ logs]) – uploaded by Miracle Pen ( [ notify] | contribs | uploads | upload log).

Fails WP:NFCC: former logo. Stefan2 (talk) 12:29, 27 August 2014 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Valor Monument.jpg

 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  03:02, 4 September 2014 (UTC)
 * File:Valor Monument.jpg ([ delete] | talk | [ history] | links | [ logs]) – uploaded by Wapacman ( [ notify] | contribs | uploads | upload log).

Derivative work of non-free sculpture (for seeing that the sculpture meets TOO, note the collection of five different shapes, the map, and the text). RJaguar3 &#124; u &#124; t 15:21, 27 August 2014 (UTC)
 * View - Reasoning ... -- Wapacman (talk) 21:11, 27 August 2014 (UTC)the photo was taken by myself, if person claiming this is not my own work can show another photograph with exactly the same composition of people seating behind the monument, then his claim is true. Otherwise, this was my picture and should not be deleted.
 * There is no evidence that you are the sculptor. Unless you are the sculptor, you can't upload images of the sculpture. See for example Korean War Veterans Memorial. --Stefan2 (talk) 21:54, 27 August 2014 (UTC)
 * You have to be the sculptor to include a picture of a destination in historic Filipinotown? The photo is promoting the district as a destination, not the sculpture itself. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Wapacman (talk • contribs) 08:51, 28 August 2014 (UTC)
 * The sculptor holds the copyright to the sculpture. You can't upload pictures of it without permission from the sculptor. --Stefan2 (talk) 14:08, 28 August 2014 (UTC)
 * Example:

This is just the mural itself. Photo does not show any context to where the image was located. The Valor Monument photograph is promoting the district, not the art itself. I own the photo. There are no exact replica of this photograph. So if there's a picture of the Rizal monument, I have to be the sculptor to post that picture? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Wapacman (talk • contribs) 08:58, 28 August 2014 (UTC)
 * See c:Commons:Deletion requests/File:Philip Vera Cruz and Larry Itliong.jpg. --Stefan2 (talk) 14:08, 28 August 2014 (UTC)
 * To upload a picture of a non-free sculpture (in the United States) on Wikipedia as a free image, you would need to obtain the appropriate permissions from the copyright holder (usually the creator of the sculpture, but check because the copyright may have been assigned to someone else). RJaguar3 &#124; u &#124; t 00:00, 29 August 2014 (UTC)

@Stefan2, I did the mural I posted in the right, the mural in Filipinotown, yet that has been in Wikipedia for many years, yet no one has asked my permission. Can I sue Wikipedia then, because I did not grant permission, yet my mural was published for many years? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Wapacman (talk • contribs) 06:35, 29 August 2014 (UTC)
 * No. Wikipedia is probably exempt from liability per 17 U.S.C. § 512. However, if you indeed did create the mural, you may be able to sue the uploader or anyone who has added the image to an article. If you can't identify those people, then it is your problem. If you indeed did create the mural, and wish the image to remain on Wikipedia, then please follow the procedure at WP:CONSENT. --Stefan2 (talk) 15:02, 29 August 2014 (UTC)


 * Delete per my reasoning at Administrators' noticeboard/IncidentArchive851, specifically where I note that Wapacman has uploaded copyvios using image manipulation tactics to prevent automated or semi-automated discovery of those copyvios, and then gone on to claim they were his own images. Per the precautionary principle articulated at Commons, we should consider all of Wapacman's uploads tainted from a copyright perspective and subject to deletion. —/M endaliv /2¢/Δ's/ 20:01, 1 September 2014 (UTC)
 * So you are suggesting that the statement "I took the photo" probably is wrong, right? --Stefan2 (talk) 23:02, 1 September 2014 (UTC)
 * I'm suggesting that in light of this uploader's past behavior we just can't be sure. It's all well and good to AGF, but looking at the old ANI thread, there's clearly something wrong here. —/M endaliv /2¢/Δ's/ 02:15, 2 September 2014 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Friends of Science In Medicine Logo.jpg

 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  03:02, 4 September 2014 (UTC)
 * File:Friends of Science In Medicine Logo.jpg ([ delete] | talk | [ history] | links | [ logs]) – uploaded by DJFryzy ( [ notify] | contribs | uploads | upload log).

Obsolete, replaced by Friends_of_Science_in_Medicine_logo_transparent.png Dynamicimanyd (talk) 16:45, 27 August 2014 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Invernesswinter.jpg

 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  03:02, 4 September 2014 (UTC)
 * File:Invernesswinter.jpg ([ delete] | talk | [ history] | links | [ logs]) – uploaded by JohnJohnJohnJohn ( [ notify] | contribs | uploads | upload log).

Appears to be taken from http://www.visitscotland.com/see-do/events/winter-festivals/inverness with no evidence of permission. Eeekster (talk) 19:18, 27 August 2014 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section.

File:30 Great Piano Classics Album Cover.jpg

 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  03:02, 4 September 2014 (UTC)
 * File:30 Great Piano Classics Album Cover.jpg ([ delete] | talk | [ history] | links | [ logs]) – uploaded by SurreyJohn ( [ notify] | contribs | uploads | upload log).

Redundant extra cover. See WP:NFCC and WP:NFCC. Also contains unsuitable private information (GPS coordinates in the EXIF). Stefan2 (talk) 21:53, 27 August 2014 (UTC)

Reply: This album cover is for the Piano music LP which is an album in its own right (but also forms part of the 150 great classics release). The other Dacrop LP cover is used for the other 4 LPs. The guideline states that "Multiple items of non-free content are not used if one item can convey equivalent significant information." It does NOT say you can't use two covers. Here one cover does not, as the fifth album is a Piano compilation. Also, it is listed on Amazon and ebay, and other review websites as a separate album. I have replaced the photo with one with no GPS metadata.
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section.