Wikipedia:Files for deletion/2014 December 1



File:Paramount Animation logo.jpg

 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted as F5 by AnomieBOT ⚡  03:03, 12 December 2014 (UTC)
 * File:Paramount Animation logo.jpg ([ delete] | talk | [ history] | links | [ logs]) – uploaded by Nickelodeon745 ( [ notify] | contribs | uploads | upload log).

What is the source for this alleged Paramount Animation logo? Google Images search results in nothing with this style. Same with TinEye.com. Perhaps it's legit, but the users who keep adding it to articles, like Kresblain and Nickelodeon745 have not explained the origin of the logo in article space. Only here does Kresbain explain the origin of the image, but a dropbox link does not qualify as WP:RS as far as I know. Cyphoidbomb (talk) 03:52, 1 December 2014 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Love Actually.jpg

 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by A file with this name on Commons is now visible. AnomieBOT ⚡ 18:13, 13 December 2014 (UTC)
 * File:Love Actually.jpg ([ delete] | talk | [ history] | links | [ logs]) – uploaded by Noboyo ( [ notify] | contribs | uploads | upload log).

This album cover is used in Love Actually article. It fails to meet WP:NFCC (minimal use) and #8 (contextual significance). It is repetitive to the film poster, and it is merely decorative. Of course, one disagrees. George Ho (talk) 06:35, 1 December 2014 (UTC)
 * Delete Fails WP:NFCC per MOS:FILM. Also fails WP:NFCC as it is almost identical to the poster in the infobox. --Stefan2 (talk) 15:19, 1 December 2014 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Ministryofmagic.png

 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  18:13, 13 December 2014 (UTC)
 * File:Ministryofmagic.png ([ delete] | talk | [ history] | links | [ logs]) – uploaded by Kakurady ( [ notify] | contribs | uploads | upload log).

Unused. Based on an unlicensed file. MGA73 (talk) 08:28, 1 December 2014 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Taylor Swift - Shake It Off sample.ogg

 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  18:13, 13 December 2014 (UTC)
 * File:Taylor Swift - Shake It Off sample.ogg ([ delete] | talk | [ history] | links | [ logs]) – uploaded by HĐ ( [ notify] | contribs | uploads | upload log).

The sample does not conform to WP:NFCC and does not justify how it aids a reader in understanding the article better. To be precise it fails NFCC#8 and its deletion would not be any detrimental to the readers. — Indian: BIO  [ ChitChat  ] 14:41, 1 December 2014 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Ed Sheeran Thinking Out Loud.jpg

 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  18:13, 13 December 2014 (UTC)
 * File:Ed Sheeran Thinking Out Loud.jpg ([ delete] | talk | [ history] | links | [ logs]) – uploaded by Djunbalanced ( [ notify] | contribs | uploads | upload log).

Fails WP:NFCC and WP:NFCC: seems to be a non-notable extra cover. Stefan2 (talk) 15:17, 1 December 2014 (UTC)
 * As the uploader I'd agree, now that the main one is out and clearly the one intended for release. -- DJUnBalanced 21:57, 10 December 2014 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Don&

 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  17:11, 14 December 2014 (UTC)
 * File:Don& ([ delete] | talk | [ history] | links | [ logs]) – uploaded by Rm w a vu ( [ notify] | contribs | uploads | upload log).

Crowded House is an Australian band. The image is of an American international release of "Don't Dream It's Over". I've already added the Australian cover art of the single to reflect the band's nationality. I don't see why American international cover art is needed unless it's for display to differentiate from the Australian cover art. The reasoning is inadequate to help the image meet WP:NFCC standards. Also, the article should mention prose information of both images, but I don't think the sources discuss the cover arts. George Ho (talk) 16:55, 1 December 2014 (UTC)
 * Keep The alternate cover passes WP:NFCC and WP:NFCC as stated on Template:Infobox album, "An alternate cover that is significantly different from the original and is widely distributed and/or replaces the original has generally been held to pass this criterion.", which could be logically used for singles. The current consensus for alternate images on album/single articles are that the alternate cover has to be significantly different from the original, widely distributed and/or replacing the original would pass the criteria for identification or an alternate image that is the subject of sourced critical commentary about the image would also be acceptable. This cover is significantly different from File:Crowded house don't dream it's over australian single.jpg, was widely distributed in the United States, the song charted better in the United States than it did in Australia making it to number two on the Billboard Hot 100 and the alternate cover was the infobox image for seven years before the Australian single cover was added to the article. Aspects (talk) 22:38, 7 December 2014 (UTC)
 * I must let you know that the cover art is of international editions, like the US one. --George Ho (talk) 16:22, 8 December 2014 (UTC)
 * Wait a minute... The image is purely decorative, and the cover art itself is not well discussed by sources. I don't see how this discussion is different from Files for deletion/2013 September 6. --George Ho (talk) 16:35, 8 December 2014 (UTC)


 * Delete I have to agree with George, the image fails WP:NFCC. It is a purely decorative image and does not add anything to the reader's understanding of the article. — Indian: BIO  [ ChitChat  ] 06:21, 9 December 2014 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Pardess.jpg

 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  18:13, 13 December 2014 (UTC)
 * File:Pardess.jpg ([ delete] | talk | [ history] | links | [ logs]) – uploaded by RohanProductions ( [ notify] | contribs | uploads | upload log).

Fails WP:NFCC, see MOS:FILM. Stefan2 (talk) 17:23, 1 December 2014 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section.

File:White flag icon.jpg

 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  18:13, 13 December 2014 (UTC)
 * File:White flag icon.jpg ([ delete] | talk | [ history] | links | [ logs]) – uploaded by Kirill Lokshin ( [ notify] | contribs | uploads | upload log).

Better quality, SVG version of this file exists on commons at. Arthunter (talk) 22:08, 1 December 2014 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section.