Wikipedia:Files for deletion/2014 December 4



File:Aquascutum ad campaign.jpg

 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  18:13, 13 December 2014 (UTC)
 * File:Aquascutum ad campaign.jpg ([ delete] | talk | [ history] | links | [ logs]) – uploaded by Wednesday 2013 ( [ notify] | contribs | uploads | upload log).

"The illustration is specifically needed to support the following point(s): The high profile people that Aquascutum uses for its campaigns." The example is (we're told) from/for 2014. Nothing in the article suggests that Aquascutum has used "high profile people" for decades. (As for this earlier use, it's illustrated with a different image.) I note from the title of the source of this file that the bloke in the photo (who I had to look up in WP) is an actor and has an OBE; so perhaps he's medium profile and this claim could be added to the article. However, even if this were so, the image would be unnecessarily large. -- Hoary (talk) 02:12, 4 December 2014 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Gunturucity.jpg

 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted as F7 by AnomieBOT ⚡  18:06, 8 December 2014 (UTC)
 * File:Gunturucity.jpg ([ delete] | talk | [ history] | links | [ logs]) – uploaded by Bvm9999 ( [ notify] | contribs | uploads | upload log).

See. Fails WP:NFCC if unfree. Stefan2 (talk) 12:09, 4 December 2014 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Weightloss pyramid.JPG

 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  18:13, 13 December 2014 (UTC)
 * File:Weightloss pyramid.JPG ([ delete] | talk | [ history] | links | [ logs]) – uploaded by Rachel asdf ( [ notify] | contribs | uploads | upload log).

SVG version of this file exists on commons at. Arthunter (talk) 16:19, 4 December 2014 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Wikitendo2.PNG

 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  18:13, 13 December 2014 (UTC)
 * File:Wikitendo2.PNG ([ delete] | talk | [ history] | links | [ logs]) – uploaded by Master Thief Garrett ( [ notify] | contribs | uploads | upload log).

SVG version of this file exists on commons at. Arthunter (talk) 16:29, 4 December 2014 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Spyrogyra.png

 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  18:13, 13 December 2014 (UTC)
 * File:Spyrogyra.png ([ delete] | talk | [ history] | links | [ logs]) – uploaded by Krishnavedala ( [ notify] | contribs | uploads | upload log).

ElectroKid (☮ • ✍) 20:29, 4 December 2014 (UTC)
 * I am the original uploader of this iage which has become orphaned and no longer useful on the wiki. The image can be deleted to help keep the Wiki clean.--ElectroKid (☮ • ✍) 20:30, 4 December 2014 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Jrrt lotr cover design.jpg

 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  17:11, 14 December 2014 (UTC)
 * File:Jrrt lotr cover design.jpg ([ delete] | talk | [ history] | links | [ logs]) – uploaded by Dbachmann ( [ notify] | contribs | uploads | upload log).

Fails WP:NFG. Stefan2 (talk) 21:44, 4 December 2014 (UTC)

Keep. Exceptions should be very well-justified and alternate forms of presentation (including with fewer images) strongly considered. Obviously, the image could be split into three separate images, each uploaded individually and given a fair use rationale. But the point is that that this is not a random collage, it is the design of three covers designed for a single work that was to be published in three volumes. So citing "NFG", which was clearly intended to prevent non-free "collages" of the type people slap on infoboxes or similar, is somewhat beside the point. If you really object on fundamental grounds, feel free to do the honours and re-upload the three cover designs individually with proper rationales before deletion. --dab (𒁳) 22:21, 4 December 2014 (UTC)
 * Splitting this into three images would be equally unacceptable as that would also be a non-free gallery. Additionally, the article The Lord of the Rings does not need any non-free covers per WP:NFC §6, as cover images already appear in the articles about the individual books. --Stefan2 (talk) 22:27, 4 December 2014 (UTC)

Keep. The three covers should be presented together, and The Lord of the Rings is the right place to display them. Tolkien designed these together for the three volumes, which he considered parts of a single book. They are in effect a single work of art, and their impact is much greater when shown together, since they are historically related. The covers illustrated at the daughter articles are not these original designs, but designs for recent editions. -- Elphion (talk) 02:59, 8 December 2014 (UTC)

Keep. The image clearly illustrates the fact that the Lord of the Rings is one book split into three volumes, and as pointed out the other images in the article are later editions and do not show the original design. GimliDotNet ( Speak to me, Stuff I've done )  05:57, 8 December 2014 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section.