Wikipedia:Files for deletion/2014 July 18



File:Polish man found guilty of Rassenschande &

 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted as F7 by AnomieBOT ⚡  02:03, 25 July 2014 (UTC)
 * File:Polish man found guilty of Rassenschande & ([ delete] | talk | [ history] | links | [ logs]) – uploaded by Policja ( [ notify] | contribs | uploads | upload log).

Unencyclopedic, with no reasonable proof that the photograph shows what is being claimed by the illegal repository of found objects used as the online source. Poeticbent talk 16:44, 18 July 2014 (UTC)
 * delete. Actually the photo is originally from Historisches Centrum Hagen (foto 25) and does show what it says, but I failed to find its copyright status. Staszek Lem (talk) 20:03, 18 July 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: The caption at the above address reads in German: Abbildung 25 – Öffentliche Anprangerung eines polnischen Fremdarbeiters in Eisenach wegen "Rassenschande", 15. November 1940 (Stiftung Topographie des Terrors, Berlin), however, the visible cardboard sign does not say "polnischen". The photograph could be showing a prisoner of any other ethnic group from German occupied territories amounting to the staggering 30% of the Poland's population before World War II. They included Ukrainians, Jews, Czechs etc. The caption is alleging what is not in the photograph itself. Poeticbent talk 21:37, 18 July 2014 (UTC)
 * I understood your concern even earlier. However IMO when a photo comes from a reliable source, he have reasons to believe that it was captioned correctly. If a photo caption says it is shows blue tits, we don't argue. Still, I continue to agree with you that lacking better context if is easy to contest the match of caption to image. A possible confirming context would be if the photo was part of "Polnische" collection, or a book, or etc. Staszek Lem (talk) 21:49, 18 July 2014 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Sankyo Super 8 Film Camera.jpg

 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  16:09, 26 July 2014 (UTC)
 * File:Sankyo Super 8 Film Camera.jpg ([ delete] | talk | [ history] | links | [ logs]) – uploaded by H.Brian Griffin ( [ notify] | contribs | uploads | upload log).

Either this image is missing permission for a free license, or it is replaceable fair-use. Either way it has no place here. Peripitus (Talk) 12:04, 18 July 2014 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section.

File:World-news-now.jpg

 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  16:09, 26 July 2014 (UTC)
 * File:World-news-now.jpg ([ delete] | talk | [ history] | links | [ logs]) – uploaded by Pmartinez ( [ notify] | contribs | uploads | upload log).

Old logo used without discussion in violation of WP:NFCC and WP:NFCC. RJaguar3 &#124; u &#124; t 14:49, 18 July 2014 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Infomercial Guide Description.jpg

 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  16:09, 26 July 2014 (UTC)
 * File:Infomercial Guide Description.jpg ([ delete] | talk | [ history] | links | [ logs]) – uploaded by Mrschimpf ( [ notify] | contribs | uploads | upload log).

Multiple WP:NFCC violations:
 * The large amount of legible text, essential for the image's purpose, violates WP:NFC #15
 * A mock description of an infomercial could easily be written by a Wikipedian, so this image fails WP:NFCC
 * The nontext nonfree elements (the picture-in-picture and the EPG interface) are gratuitously included in the image, in violation of WP:NFCC
 * The text next to the picture already describes how infomercial advertisers can submit program listings to EPGs, so this image fails WP:NFCC. RJaguar3 &#124; u &#124; t 14:54, 18 July 2014 (UTC)
 * Delete, uploader-endorsed You know, if you just removed images without any comment/FD noms and let the bots do the talking it's never a problem and I can address it. I uploaded this when UUI didn't exist and we had less strict NFC guidelines, and yes there's text to the side now so it's duplicative. No need to make a long NFC deletion example of a file uploaded six years ago to make a point you could've just addressed by removing the image and letting it delete through the orphaning process.  Nate  • ( chatter ) 01:27, 19 July 2014 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Kadavul paathi Mirugam paathi.jpg

 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted as F5 by AnomieBOT ⚡  01:01, 23 July 2014 (UTC)
 * File:Kadavul paathi Mirugam paathi.jpg ([ delete] | talk | [ history] | links | [ logs]) – uploaded by Kailash29792 ( [ notify] | contribs | uploads | upload log).

The poster of a different film with the same title, which failed to enter production. Kailash29792 (talk) 14:57, 18 July 2014 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Wciu-tv.png

 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  16:09, 26 July 2014 (UTC)
 * File:Wciu-tv.png ([ delete] | talk | [ history] | links | [ logs]) – uploaded by Wdjt ( [ notify] | contribs | uploads | upload log).

Old non-free logo not discussed in the article violates WP:NFCC and WP:NFCC RJaguar3 &#124; u &#124; t 15:09, 18 July 2014 (UTC)
 * Delete, uploader-endorsed Again, as above, remove it and let the orphan process play out. Was logo at time I uploaded, isn't any longer, nobody's stopping anybody from removing it under our non-free guidelines.  Nate  • ( chatter ) 03:53, 19 July 2014 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section.

File:MESA &

 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  16:09, 26 July 2014 (UTC)
 * File:MESA & ([ delete] | talk | [ history] | links | [ logs]) – uploaded by Ev160 ( [ notify] | contribs | uploads | upload log).

Fails WP:NFCC, this is the provided rationale: "Few people care to read about this subject to begin with. It is also not a controversial or sensitive image". eh bien mon prince (talk) 23:17, 18 July 2014 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section.