Wikipedia:Files for deletion/2014 July 7



File:FR Khan ENR.jpg

 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted as G4 by AnomieBOT ⚡  13:07, 10 July 2014 (UTC)
 * File:FR Khan ENR.jpg ([ delete] | talk | [ history] | links | [ logs]) – uploaded by Coolieguy ( [ notify] | contribs | uploads | upload log).

non-free image, of a person that we already have a non-free image, used simply to show he was on the magazine cover. This simple fact can be adequately covered by text alone. Image fails WP:NFCC and WP:NFCC Peripitus (Talk) 10:15, 7 July 2014 (UTC)
 * Wasn't this previously listed at Files for deletion/2014 June 21? User:Peripitus, could you check whether WP:CSD would work? --Stefan2 (talk) 19:51, 7 July 2014 (UTC)
 * That it was. And was uploaded by someone who participated extensively in that discussion - Peripitus (Talk) 11:16, 10 July 2014 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section.

File:US Amateur Callsign Region Numeral Map.PNG

 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  14:08, 16 July 2014 (UTC)
 * File:US Amateur Callsign Region Numeral Map.PNG ([ delete] | talk | [ history] | links | [ logs]) – uploaded by KeithTyler ( [ notify] | contribs | uploads | upload log).

Superseded by the more complete File:US Amateur callsign regions.svg on Commons. —Scott5114↗ [EXACT CHANGE ONLY] 19:16, 7 July 2014 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Dawley Court, Middlesex in 1929.jpg

 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  20:11, 16 July 2014 (UTC)
 * File:Dawley Court, Middlesex in 1929.jpg ([ delete] | talk | [ history] | links | [ logs]) – uploaded by Rodolph ( [ notify] | contribs | uploads | upload log).

Missing evidence that this is in the public domain in both the United States and the United Kingdom.

To be in the public domain in both countries, the photograph must satisfy all of the following criteria:
 * The photographer must have become known within 70 years after the creation of the photograph.
 * The photographer must have died more than 70 years ago.
 * The photograph mustn't have been published before 2003.
 * The photograph must have been published before the 70th anniversary of the photographer's death.

To be in the public domain in only the United States, it is sufficient if the photograph satisfies all of the following criteria:
 * The photographer must be known.
 * The photographer must have died more than 70 years ago.
 * The photograph mustn't have been published before 2003.

To be in the public domain in only the United Kingdom, it is sufficient if the photograph satisfies all of the following criteria:
 * Case 1 : known photographer
 * The photographer must have died more than 70 years ago. Otherwise, it is unfree in the United Kingdom as PD-old-70 isn't satisfied yet.
 * The photograph must have been published before the 70th anniversary of the photographer's death. Otherwise, it is unfree per Article 4 of the Copyright Duration Directive.
 * Case 2 : unknown photographer
 * The photograph must have been published more than 70 years ago. Otherwise, it is either unfree for not satisfying the criteria in PD-UK-unknown, or because of Article 4 in the Copyright Duration Directive.

The uploader claims that the photographer is unknown, but hasn't provided any evidence of this. If this is copyrighted in the United States, it needs to be treated as unfree. There is currently no evidence that the file satisfies WP:NFCC. Stefan2 (talk) 19:47, 7 July 2014 (UTC)
 * I'm not sure why you moved the goal-posts. First you thought it ok as long as the resolution was reduced, to satisfy 'fair useage', but now you've come for it again citing different rules? As I said the photo was taken in 1929, unknown photographer, possibly by a family member, or someone commissioned by them.Rodolph (talk) 09:49, 8 July 2014 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section.