Wikipedia:Files for deletion/2014 June 23



File:Pocketpaint2003se.JPG

 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  04:03, 1 July 2014 (UTC)
 * File:Pocketpaint2003se.JPG ([ delete] | talk | [ history] | links | [ logs]) – uploaded by Spunker88 ( [ notify] | contribs | uploads | upload log).

This non-free image goes against WP:NFCC because its article already has File:Ppaint s.jpg which does not show Wikipedia logo too. Codename Lisa (talk) 02:14, 23 June 2014 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Pro-Desktop 2000i Splash Screen.png

 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  04:03, 1 July 2014 (UTC)
 * File:Pro-Desktop 2000i Splash Screen.png ([ delete] | talk | [ history] | links | [ logs]) – uploaded by Conseils ( [ notify] | contribs | uploads | upload log).

Non-free image used decoratively against WP:NFCC. Codename Lisa (talk) 02:16, 23 June 2014 (UTC)


 * Hi, I believe that the images with respect to the article i.e. the splash screens are covered under


 * 8. Contextual significance. Non-free content is used only if its presence would significantly increase readers' understanding of the article topic, and its omission would be detrimental to that understanding.


 * That is, the users will remember the graphic and recognise the versions more readily from the graphic. Significantly enhancing the value of the information presented. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Conseils (talk • contribs) 22:55, 26 June 2014‎
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section.

File:This is a logo for Pro DESKTOP 2001.png

 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  04:03, 1 July 2014 (UTC)
 * File:This is a logo for Pro DESKTOP 2001.png ([ delete] | talk | [ history] | links | [ logs]) – uploaded by Conseils ( [ notify] | contribs | uploads | upload log).

Non-free image used decoratively against WP:NFCC. Codename Lisa (talk) 02:16, 23 June 2014 (UTC)


 * Hi, I believe that the images with respect to the article i.e. the splash screens are covered under


 * 8. Contextual significance. Non-free content is used only if its presence would significantly increase readers' understanding of the article topic, and its omission would be detrimental to that understanding.


 * That is, the users will remember the graphic and recognise the versions more readily from the graphic. Significantly enhancing the value of the information presented. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Conseils (talk • contribs) 22:40, 26 June 2014‎
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section.

File:ProD Splash Screen.jpg

 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  04:03, 1 July 2014 (UTC)
 * File:ProD Splash Screen.jpg ([ delete] | talk | [ history] | links | [ logs]) – uploaded by Curlybap ( [ notify] | contribs | uploads | upload log).

Non-free image used decoratively against WP:NFCC. Codename Lisa (talk) 02:16, 23 June 2014 (UTC)


 * Hi, I believe that the images with respect to the article i.e. the splash screens are covered under


 * 8. Contextual significance. Non-free content is used only if its presence would significantly increase readers' understanding of the article topic, and its omission would be detrimental to that understanding.


 * That is, the users will remember the graphic and recognise the versions more readily from the graphic. Significantly enhancing the value of the information presented. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Conseils (talk • contribs) 22:40, 26 June 2014‎
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Asphalt series.jpg

 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  04:03, 1 July 2014 (UTC)
 * File:Asphalt series.jpg ([ delete] | talk | [ history] | links | [ logs]) – uploaded by Alex Neman ( [ notify] | contribs | uploads | upload log).

Per WP:NFCC, WP:NFCC, WP:NFCC and WP:NFG. Stefan2 (talk) 14:18, 23 June 2014 (UTC)
 * Delete These decorative images are useless to the reader without the words describing them. Hence, it is a case that words alone would suffice. Best regards, Codename Lisa (talk) 23:17, 26 June 2014 (UTC)
 * Delete per WP:NFCC, no critical commentary about the image. Armbrust The Homunculus 07:05, 29 June 2014 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Craig McLachlan and Check 1-2 The Video.jpg

 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  04:03, 1 July 2014 (UTC)
 * File:Craig McLachlan and Check 1-2 The Video.jpg ([ delete] | talk | [ history] | links | [ logs]) – uploaded by Tobyjamesaus ( [ notify] | contribs | uploads | upload log).

Per WP:NFCC: essentially the reverse of MOS:FILM. Stefan2 (talk) 14:44, 23 June 2014 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Bush Sr on Zapata oil rig c1963.jpg

 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  04:03, 1 July 2014 (UTC)
 * File:Bush Sr on Zapata oil rig c1963.jpg ([ delete] | talk | [ history] | links | [ logs]) – uploaded by Dale145 ( [ notify] | contribs | uploads | upload log).

This is licensed as if it were a US government photo, but it has no source provided and the text suggest that it does not in fact come from a government website. Also, given the lack of documentation I have to think that the identification of the subject is suppositional rather than provided by someone on the scene who knew for certain. It looks like Bush, but my brother looks like Harrison Ford. Mangoe (talk) 16:12, 23 June 2014 (UTC)
 * Delete PD-USGov license is being claimed on the basis that the image "is believed" to be part of a private corporation's annual report that was included in an unnamed SEC filing? And the claim that it is a photo of George H. W. Bush utterly fails WP:V. - LuckyLouie (talk) 19:27, 24 June 2014 (UTC)
 * It's possible that it's an obscure photo of Bush speaking at the christening of the Scorpion rig but there's no evidence of any government publication that would indicate use of a PD-USGov image license (or connection to any conspiracy, for that matter). - LuckyLouie (talk) 13:37, 26 June 2014 (UTC)


 * Delete Obvious BLP violation to make this claim. Dougweller (talk) 13:23, 26 June 2014 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section.

File:RFlogo.gif

 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted as F5 by AnomieBOT ⚡  17:09, 28 June 2014 (UTC)
 * File:RFlogo.gif ([ delete] | talk | [ history] | links | [ logs]) – uploaded by Adamberman ( [ notify] | contribs | uploads | upload log).

Obsolete, Orphan, replaced by RF logo180x180px.jpg Adamberman13 (talk) 17:14, 23 June 2014 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section.

File:2019-after-the-fall-of-new-york.jpg

 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the discussion was: Keep. Between this discussion and the use on the article page, there currently seems preference for the original poster.  TLSuda  (talk) 02:56, 1 July 2014 (UTC)
 * File:2019-after-the-fall-of-new-york.jpg ([ delete] | talk | [ history] | links | [ logs]) – uploaded by Andrzejbanas ( [ notify] | contribs | uploads | upload log).

We don't need an Italian language poster for an article when there is an English language DVD cover that does the job. Fails WP:NFCC.  Green Giant  ( talk )  17:16, 23 June 2014 (UTC)
 * Keep a poster is more historically appropriate and covers the film's original presentation and title. It shouldn't be replaced by a DVD cover. Armbrust The Homunculus 06:59, 29 June 2014 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Harry Greb.jpg

 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  04:03, 1 July 2014 (UTC)
 * File:Harry Greb.jpg ([ delete] | talk | [ history] | links | [ logs]) – uploaded by MaxPayne888 ( [ notify] | contribs | uploads | upload log).

Textbook violation of WP:NFCC, see reasoning in db-f7. For some reason, User:Nyttend decided to delete the deletion tag. Stefan2 (talk) 19:45, 23 June 2014 (UTC)
 * Keep unless Stefan provides some sort of evidence for this assertion. Nothing in the image description or in the image itself says that this is the case, and the source doesn't either.  Take a hint and don't abuse the admin who declines an unexplained speedy deletion.  Nyttend (talk) 21:05, 23 June 2014 (UTC)
 * In what way do you think that the image description should be amended to say that there isn't any sourced critical discussion about this Corbis image in the article?
 * Also, what do you mean about abusing an " admin who declines an unexplained speedy deletion", and what does it have to do with this file? Could you explain where and on which page to find the unexplained speedy deletion nomination? If you refer to a speedy deletion nomination, you must also specify which page and which nomination you are talking about so that other people know what you mean. I also do not see what that statement has to do with this file, since the tag clearly provides a reason for speedy deletion: db-f7 tells that it should be deleted as an image agency image without sourced critical discussion, and the "reason" parameter tells that the EXIF tells that it is an image agency image (in this case from Corbis). --Stefan2 (talk) 13:47, 25 June 2014 (UTC)
 * Keep I believe that the juxtaposition of this image within an article containing sourced biographical information sufficiently meets the "transformative" requirements of harnessing a press agency photograph. In addition, I find it highly unlikely that this low resolution image will replace the original market role of the original, in fact (after proper sourcing), it may actually increase the profitability of said image. Feel free to ignore my comments as they are the biased view of the original uploader! (MaxPayne888 (talk) 23:54, 23 June 2014 (UTC))
 * Delete I agree with the posters below that this particular file does in fact violate WP:NFCC due to the (not nearly as striking!) free image available within the article. However, I am curious as to why a file like File:Dempsey,Jack (1927)a.JPG remains untouched when there are literally hundreds of public-domain images of the subject? MaxPayne888 (talk) 07:50, 29 June 2014 (UTC)
 * delete Aw, come on, guys: there's already another picture of him in the article which is (allegedly) PD! There's no way this doesn't violate WP:NFCC. Mangoe (talk) 20:37, 24 June 2014 (UTC)
 * Delete File violates WP:NFCC as there is already a non-free file about this boxer (File:Harry Greb posing.jpg). Armbrust The Homunculus 06:56, 29 June 2014 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section.