Wikipedia:Files for deletion/2014 November 11



File:Audi Vice City.JPG

 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  00:00, 14 December 2014 (UTC)
 * File:Audi Vice City.JPG ([ delete] | talk | [ history] | links | [ logs]) – uploaded by Jagvar ( [ notify] | contribs | uploads | upload log).

Fails WP:NFCC: same situation as listed in WP:NFC §3 and §5. Not sure why User:Ronhjones decided to remove the {{subst:rfu}} tag. Stefan2 (talk) 16:44, 11 November 2014 (UTC)
 * Comment A game screenshot cannot be replaceable by another image. The article states An example of game modification in Grand Theft Auto: Vice City: a 2005 Audi A8L W12 car., not really something you can fully describe by text alone. Ron h jones (Talk) 20:52, 11 November 2014 (UTC)


 * Delete. We don't need this specific non-free Audi image because a) it doesn't provide any comparison to the standard output of that particular game and b) there are surely free games to substitute this example. And I don't think the image as such is helpful for understanding the article Mod (gaming). I don't know a lot of game modding either but I guess e.g. OpenTTD qualifies for this category, so if an image is required for illustrative purposes we should look for a free-to-use version. De728631 (talk) 22:38, 11 November 2014 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Kolkata Knight Riders (former logo).png

 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  17:12, 14 December 2014 (UTC)
 * File:Kolkata Knight Riders (former logo).png ([ delete] | talk | [ history] | links | [ logs]) – uploaded by Tamravidhir ( [ notify] | contribs | uploads | upload log).

Fails WP:NFCC: former logo. Stefan2 (talk) 16:56, 11 November 2014 (UTC)
 * Comment - This section of Kolkata Knight Riders explicitly describes the former logo of Kolkata Knight Riders and the information is also cited. It reads - "Initially, when Kolkata knight Riders were first introduced in 2008, the logo of the team consisted of a blazing golden Viking helmet against a black background with the name of the team Kolkata Knight Riders written in gold next to it. However, the black background was changed to purple in the third season. In 2012, a new logo, which consist of a blazing purple Corinthian helmet trimmed with gold, with Kolkata Knight Rider written within a shield has been introduced..."
 * Thus, I feel that if this file remains in the article then this visual information will make the mentioned section more comprehensible and less confusing to readers. WP:NFCC#8 says - "Non-free content is used only if its presence would significantly increase readers' understanding of the article topic, and its omission would be detrimental to that understanding.". And I feel that this image does significantly increase readers' understanding, and its omission would be detrimental to that understanding. Tamra vidhir  (talk!) 10:35, 12 November 2014 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Gondolin.jpg

 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  00:01, 13 December 2014 (UTC)
 * File:Gondolin.jpg ([ delete] | talk | [ history] | links | [ logs]) – uploaded by Mirlen ( [ notify] | contribs | uploads | upload log).

This fails WP:NFCC #8. Contextual significance is missing because the image is not needed to understand the concept of Tolkien's fictional city Gondolin, nor is the painting as such discussed anywhere in the article. De728631 (talk) 21:24, 11 November 2014 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section.

File:TBLOTR.jpg

 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  00:01, 13 December 2014 (UTC)
 * File:TBLOTR.jpg ([ delete] | talk | [ history] | links | [ logs]) – uploaded by LOTRrules ( [ notify] | contribs | uploads | upload log).

Fails WP:NFCC #8. There is no contextual significance as the painting itself is not discussed in depth, nor does it help the reader to understand the article. Merely showing a variety of portrayals as mentioned in the FUR is not covered by our fair use criteria. De728631 (talk) 21:36, 11 November 2014 (UTC) De728631 (talk) 21:36, 11 November 2014 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section.