Wikipedia:Files for deletion/2014 October 12



File:Cec logo.svg

 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  15:08, 28 October 2014 (UTC)
 * File:Cec logo.svg ([ delete] | talk | [ history] | links | [ logs]) – uploaded by Koman90 ( [ notify] | contribs | uploads | upload log).

Old logo, used decoratively, violates WP:NFCC and WP:NFCC. RJaguar3 &#124; u &#124; t 01:46, 12 October 2014 (UTC)
 * Keep If this were simply an old outdated corporate logo, it could be deleted without loss of informative content. However, it is used in illustrative support of an article section specifically about the redesign of this corporate logo mascot image, so it does serve an informative purpose for the reader. It is not used "decoratively" in the article, and does not violate any of the NFCC requirements. Xenophrenic (talk) 17:25, 12 October 2014 (UTC)
 * Keep 89.240.246.69 (talk) 14:04, 20 October 2014 (UTC)
 * IP 89.240.246.69 appears to be used by a disruptive user who is a probable sock of HoshiNoKaabii2000 or one of his/her compatriots. Cyphoidbomb (talk) 14:59, 21 October 2014 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Tajproductions.JPG

 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  15:08, 28 October 2014 (UTC)
 * File:Tajproductions.JPG ([ delete] | talk | [ history] | links | [ logs]) – uploaded by MegaHL90 ( [ notify] | contribs | uploads | upload log).

Orphaned logo. Kelly hi! 08:39, 12 October 2014 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Tayk, next to Oltu river, near Olur.JPG

 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  15:08, 28 October 2014 (UTC)
 * File:Tayk, next to Oltu river, near Olur.JPG ([ delete] | talk | [ history] | links | [ logs]) – uploaded by Sofie ( [ notify] | contribs | uploads | upload log).

Orphan, low resolution. Kelly hi! 10:28, 12 October 2014 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Nirmala novel cover.jpg

 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the discussion was: Revert to first edition cover.  TLSuda  (talk) 13:37, 28 October 2014 (UTC)
 * File:Nirmala novel cover.jpg ([ delete] | talk | [ history] | links | [ logs]) – uploaded by The Herald ( [ notify] | contribs | uploads | upload log).

Given the age, it seems plausible that the first edition cover would be in the public domain (see Template:PD-India). In any case, the first edition, even if non-free, would be preferred to this randomly chosen edition. J Milburn (talk) 16:23, 12 October 2014 (UTC)
 * ..So shall I revert it..?  The herald  15:29, 15 October 2014 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section.