Wikipedia:Files for deletion/2014 October 31



File:Lakers sign Kobe two year deal.jpg

 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the discussion was: Image deleted as an orphaned non-free image. Mike V  •  Talk  19:41, 9 December 2014 (UTC)
 * File:Lakers sign Kobe two year deal.jpg ([ delete] | talk | [ history] | links | [ logs]) – uploaded by Idyllchilde ( [ notify] | contribs | uploads | upload log).

Does not meet WP:NFCI. Not covered under "Images with iconic status or historical importance", and not a core image to include in a biography. Person is not deceased either. —Bagumba (talk) 05:36, 31 October 2014 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Western Los Angeles County Council Pinewood Derby CSP.png

 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the discussion was: '''No consensus for deletion, defaulting to keep. However, the image does not have a fair use rationale for the article that it's on so I've added the necessary tag. Mike V  •  Talk'''  20:10, 9 December 2014 (UTC)
 * File:Western Los Angeles County Council Pinewood Derby CSP.png ([ delete] | talk | [ history] | links | [ logs]) – uploaded by Evrik ( [ notify] | contribs | uploads | upload log).

Included as non-free content but it is not clear as to whether the usage complies with NFCC; particularly WP:NFCC and WP:NFCC - the article mentions the circumstance for which the Scouting patch was issued but it is not clear that the article has much in the way of commentary about the patch itself (as opposed the Pinewood derby event) or about the significance (if any) of the actual patch. Elegie (talk) 08:34, 31 October 2014 (UTC)
 * Keep There are no free equivalents, so that should satisfy NFCC #1. Last year, the BSA celebrated the 60th anniversary and honored the founder of the event. They did it with a patch. The patch is "not free." As for point eight, the presence of the image does significantly increase reader's understanding of the topic. It directly relates to the text that surrounds it and underscores the significance of the event. --evrik (talk) 14:45, 31 October 2014 (UTC)


 * Keep I agree that are no free equivalents that can be substituted. As with many council Scout patches, they are a unique design and copying the patch to create another version wouldn't in my understanding be free of copyright protection. Even if that were permissible,  it has never been a requirement for adding fair use Scout patches to articles as long as the patch meets the other criteria for use.


 * The article is clearly about the anniversary of the first event, which the council patch obviously illustrates. That image is definitely germane to the article and is the subject of the introduction to the article.— btphelps (talk to me) (what I've done) 15:41, 31 October 2014 (UTC)


 * Delete There is no fair use rationale for the article in which the image is used. There is additionally no sourced critical discussion about the image in that article. --Stefan2 (talk) 17:20, 21 November 2014 (UTC)
 * Comment I went back and checked. There is. --evrik (talk) 22:11, 1 December 2014 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Sebastopol-1854.jpg

 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the discussion was: Delete. Mike V  •  Talk  20:04, 9 December 2014 (UTC)
 * File:Sebastopol-1854.jpg ([ delete] | talk | [ history] | links | [ logs]) – uploaded by Zas2000 ( [ notify] | contribs | uploads | upload log).

Fails WP:NFCCP #1, a free equivalent could be created. eh bien mon prince (talk) 10:58, 31 October 2014 (UTC)
 * This map, File:Weller Siege of Sebastopol 1854-1855.jpg would be a good start. --evrik (talk) 19:56, 9 December 2014 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section.