Wikipedia:Files for deletion/2014 September 12



File:AMX 50 Foch.jpg

 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  16:13, 26 September 2014 (UTC)
 * File:AMX 50 Foch.jpg ([ delete] | talk | [ history] | links | [ logs]) – uploaded by Redeagle32 ( [ notify] | contribs | uploads | upload log).

Redundant to File:AMX-50.jpg. See WP:NFCC. Stefan2 (talk) 16:23, 12 September 2014 (UTC)
 * Keep. As an unusual variant, it's not redundant to any of the images in Commons:Category:AMX-50 in the Musée des Blindés, and a free replacement is unlikely to exist. - Eureka Lott 01:16, 14 September 2014 (UTC)
 * That's not what WP:NFCC means. WP:NFCC, by virtue of WP:NFLISTS, tells that we do not need to see multiple pictures of tanks in this article. There are already freely licensed images of some of the tanks mentioned in this article. --Stefan2 (talk) 21:48, 15 September 2014 (UTC)
 * I think the image meets the NFCC criteria. As I noted above, this image is substantially different from any of the free images we have (or are likely to have) available. WP:NFLISTS clearly doesn't apply, since it's not being used in a list. If it was a redundant image, it would be a CAT:REFU candidate and we wouldn't need to have this discussion. - Eureka Lott 18:34, 16 September 2014 (UTC)
 * The image would only be appropriate in an article AMX 50 Foch, but no such article exists. In this article, the tank model is barely mentioned, and the image therefore violates WP:NFCC. --Stefan2 (talk) 15:57, 18 September 2014 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Hitokiri Ginji, Black Lagoon Vol.4.jpg

 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  16:13, 26 September 2014 (UTC)
 * File:Hitokiri Ginji, Black Lagoon Vol.4.jpg ([ delete] | talk | [ history] | links | [ logs]) – uploaded by Megamethamphetamine ( [ notify] | contribs | uploads | upload log).

Fails WP:NFCC. Stefan2 (talk) 17:08, 12 September 2014 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Rubenvent.jpg

 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  16:13, 26 September 2014 (UTC)
 * File:Rubenvent.jpg ([ delete] | talk | [ history] | links | [ logs]) – uploaded by Pepso2 ( [ notify] | contribs | uploads | upload log).

This is a non-free derivative work of a cartoon, the original version of which is now in the public domain. It is being used on the Rube Goldberg machine article to illustrate an example of such a machine. There is no reason to use this non-free derivative work when the original public-domain image could be used instead. Psychonaut (talk) 19:12, 12 September 2014 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section.