Wikipedia:Files for deletion/2014 September 2



File:ADOBE ID CS v3.PNG

 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  17:12, 11 September 2014 (UTC)
 * File:ADOBE ID CS v3.PNG ([ delete] | talk | [ history] | links | [ logs]) – uploaded by Umar1996 ( [ notify] | contribs | uploads | upload log).

Image use does not conform to WP:NFCC: contextual significance. There are lot of times in which it is useful to show an image on an older version of the program. This is not one of those times because of the absence of said contextual significance. Codename Lisa (talk) 00:21, 2 September 2014 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section.

File:This is how we do video.jpg

 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  17:12, 11 September 2014 (UTC)
 * File:This is how we do video.jpg ([ delete] | talk | [ history] | links | [ logs]) – uploaded by Gourami Watcher ( [ notify] | contribs | uploads | upload log).

Fails WP:NFCC, Katy Perry just holding a piece of melon in her hand is not exactly required to be used with an image. Mere descriptive words suffices, or a free image of Perry from commons. Does not increase the reader's understanding of the article, is not being discussed in the section where used, and thus its deletion would not be detrimental to the article. — Indian: BIO  · [ ChitChat ] 09:17, 2 September 2014 (UTC)


 * The file was originally uploaded to display that during the music video, an earlier look from her career was used. That was included in the original caption, but someone changed it.-- Gourami Watcher pride 20:16, 2 September 2014 (UTC)


 * If not this, what would be a good image to use for the music video?  Snuggums ( talk  /  edits ) 19:30, 3 September 2014 (UTC)
 * The section can easily be understood without an image. --Stefan2 (talk) 13:11, 5 September 2014 (UTC)


 * Delete Violates WP:NFCC: not critically discussed. --Stefan2 (talk) 13:11, 5 September 2014 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Corvanderhart1972.jpg

 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  17:12, 11 September 2014 (UTC)
 * File:Corvanderhart1972.jpg ([ delete] | talk | [ history] | links | [ logs]) – uploaded by SportsAddicted ( [ notify] | contribs | uploads | upload log).

Low quality. Also on Commons (see ), but with slightly different colours, so the file doesn't meet F8. Stefan2 (talk) 10:12, 2 September 2014 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section.

Rice vinegar

 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the discussion was: Delete all per WP:NFCC.  TLSuda  (talk) 12:09, 12 September 2014 (UTC)
 * File:Black rice vinegar.JPG ([ delete] | talk | [ history] | links | [ logs])
 * File:Chinkiang rice vinegar.JPG ([ delete] | talk | [ history] | links | [ logs])
 * File:Marukan seasoned rice vinegar.JPG ([ delete] | talk | [ history] | links | [ logs])

Per WP:NFCC: You don't need to see pictures of unfree vinegar packaging to understand what vinegar is. --Stefan2 (talk) 14:24, 2 September 2014 (UTC)
 * Keep I disagree as to each of the images nominated because the vinegar types are all very different from one another in flavor, color, source material (that from which each is derived) and cultural/culinary usage. The free alternative, depicting each vinegar in a container without a label, or with a generic or homemade label, would provide the reader with significantly less contextual significance as the examples depicted represent what a reader will find in the marketplace. The proposal may make sense in terms of generic white vinegar, but these vinegars vary significantly from white vinegar in appearance, flavor and culinary usage, as well as cultural context. Geoff  Who, me? 15:28, 2 September 2014 (UTC)
 * Vinegar is about the taste and the liquid, not about the packaging. Compare with the article Tea which contains pictures of liquid and leaves, but not pictures of packaging. --Stefan2 (talk) 13:12, 5 September 2014 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Akram ut tarajim 20 76.jpg

 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  17:12, 11 September 2014 (UTC)
 * File:Akram ut tarajim 20 76.jpg ([ delete] | talk | [ history] | links | [ logs]) – uploaded by Rsami ( [ notify] | contribs | uploads | upload log).

This seems to be out of scope. Stefan2 (talk) 16:45, 2 September 2014 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section.

File:File name.ext

 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the discussion was: Erroneous Nomination. When following the listing instructions (step 2), you need to replace " " with the actual name of the file. You'll also want to put the name of the uploader just after " ", and your reason for deletion just after " ". Feel free to just replace this entire section with the corrected template. If you are still having trouble, ask for help at WT:FFD or at my talk page. AnomieBOT ⚡ 17:09, 2 September 2014 (UTC)

Maybe991 (talk) 16:45, 2 September 2014 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Akram ut tarajim 26 20.jpg

 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  17:12, 11 September 2014 (UTC)
 * File:Akram ut tarajim 26 20.jpg ([ delete] | talk | [ history] | links | [ logs]) – uploaded by Rsami ( [ notify] | contribs | uploads | upload log).

This seems to be out of scope. Also incorrect copyright tag. Stefan2 (talk) 16:45, 2 September 2014 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Akram ut tarajim 93 7.jpg

 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  17:12, 11 September 2014 (UTC)
 * File:Akram ut tarajim 93 7.jpg ([ delete] | talk | [ history] | links | [ logs]) – uploaded by Rsami ( [ notify] | contribs | uploads | upload log).

This seems to be out of scope. Also incorrect copyright tag. Stefan2 (talk) 16:46, 2 September 2014 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Seal of the FAU.gif

 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  17:12, 11 September 2014 (UTC)
 * File:Seal of the FAU.gif ([ delete] | talk | [ history] | links | [ logs]) – uploaded by Tanaka-San Die ( [ notify] | contribs | uploads | upload log).

A new svg version of the file is uploaded. See Chu86happychu 17:38, 2 September 2014 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section.

File:WWE Monday Night Raw Logo, late 1994-early 1995.jpg
<div class="boilerplate ffd vfd xfd-closed" style="background-color:#f3f9ff; margin:1em 0 0 0; padding:0 10px 0 10px; border:1px solid #aaa;">
 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  17:12, 11 September 2014 (UTC)
 * File:WWE Monday Night Raw Logo, late 1994-early 1995.jpg ([ delete] | talk | [ history] | links | [ logs]) – uploaded by Kyle C Haight ( [ notify] | contribs | uploads | upload log).

Per WP:NFCC: extra logo, not discussed critically. Stefan2 (talk) 20:49, 2 September 2014 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Swain&
<div class="boilerplate ffd vfd xfd-closed" style="background-color:#f3f9ff; margin:1em 0 0 0; padding:0 10px 0 10px; border:1px solid #aaa;">
 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  17:12, 11 September 2014 (UTC)
 * File:Swain& ([ delete] | talk | [ history] | links | [ logs]) – uploaded by J04n ( [ notify] | contribs | uploads | upload log).

Per WP:NFCC: unneeded extra cover. Stefan2 (talk) 20:50, 2 September 2014 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Reptilicuscomic.jpg
<div class="boilerplate ffd vfd xfd-closed" style="background-color:#f3f9ff; margin:1em 0 0 0; padding:0 10px 0 10px; border:1px solid #aaa;">
 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  17:12, 11 September 2014 (UTC)
 * File:Reptilicuscomic.jpg ([ delete] | talk | [ history] | links | [ logs]) – uploaded by Giantdevilfish ( [ notify] | contribs | uploads | upload log).

Per WP:NFCC: cover of side product. Stefan2 (talk) 20:51, 2 September 2014 (UTC)


 * I don't know what "cover of side product" means but I don't see how it violates #8 because it shows an aspect of the films production showing how the visual effects were accomplished. This film was unique amongst monster films because all of the creature effects were utilized not by an actual puppet, or stop motion or model animation but an actual marionette. This photo will help readers understand the production more by seeing an actual shot of the films special effects process.Giantdevilfish (talk) 15:05, 3 September 2014 (UTC)
 * See for example MOS:FILM. Covers of side products are typically only allowed in an article about the side product itself. If the side product doesn't have an article on Wikipedia, then the cover should not be on Wikipedia either. --Stefan2 (talk) 15:12, 3 September 2014 (UTC)


 * Good lord am I stupid. I thought you were talking about the other Reptilcus picture I uploaded with the guys standing around the marionette on the model building. This one File:Reptilicusbts.jpg. I didn't realize that you were talking about the comic book one. I was wondering what you were talking about when you mentioned "side product".;-) Anyway that particular file was to illustrate the sub section about the comic book. I didn't realize that you needed a separate article for those pictures to exist. I thought it would be OK because that section really has nothing to do with the film itself but rather its spinoff comic book series which wouldn't be indepth enough to merit its own article like Godzilla (comics) for instance.Giantdevilfish (talk) 16:03, 3 September 2014 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Aerie logo.png
<div class="boilerplate ffd vfd xfd-closed" style="background-color:#f3f9ff; margin:1em 0 0 0; padding:0 10px 0 10px; border:1px solid #aaa;">
 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  17:12, 11 September 2014 (UTC)
 * File:Aerie logo.png ([ delete] | talk | [ history] | links | [ logs]) – uploaded by Senator2029 ( [ notify] | contribs | uploads | upload log).

Per WP:NFCC: the logo of a sub-brand. Should only be used in the article about the sub-brand, but not here. Stefan2 (talk) 20:59, 2 September 2014 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section.