Wikipedia:Files for deletion/2014 September 21



File:X deluxe edition cover.jpg

 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  05:03, 29 September 2014 (UTC)
 * File:X deluxe edition cover.jpg ([ delete] | talk | [ history] | links | [ logs]) – uploaded by Faux Ville ( [ notify] | contribs | uploads | upload log).

Redundant to File:Chris Brown X.jpg. See WP:NFCC. Stefan2 (talk) 14:20, 21 September 2014 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Mobile demo anal party iv.jpg

 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  05:03, 29 September 2014 (UTC)
 * File:Mobile demo anal party iv.jpg ([ delete] | talk | [ history] | links | [ logs]) – uploaded by Bbx ( [ notify] | contribs | uploads | upload log).

The FUR says the file is used to illustrate the subject of the article, but the content of the photograph (a specific demo) is not mentioned within the article at all, and the subject could be illustrated with a demo in the public domain (WP:NFCC). There would be no reason to use this specific unfree file as an illustration. czar ♔   18:29, 21 September 2014 (UTC)
 * Keep. It isn't about the demo but the platform it runs on. The image is a photograph of the screen of a calculator. Have you checked all 28 existing TI-8x demos for a public domain alternative? --Ondertitel (talk) 22:47, 21 September 2014 (UTC)
 * There isn't a discussion of a calculator or the importance of TI-8X demos in the entire article... It's not about replacing this image with a free use calculator image, but that the FUR says this image exists to discuss example demos and for that purpose there are public domain options (non-calculator). If the calculator demo was the subject at hand (I imagine it was at some time ten years ago), then and only then would that keep rationale suffice czar ♔   23:31, 21 September 2014 (UTC)
 * There is: "A demo running on a TI-86 calculator". Old revision: . How about adding some text back instead? Enough sources for you to go through first. Last part of that rule you linked: "that would serve the same encyclopedic purpose." Something else wouldn't be the same. --Ondertitel (talk) 21:21, 22 September 2014 (UTC)
 * What? That old revision does not discuss a calculator demo such that a visualization of it is required. And what text do you want added back? (I haven't removed any.) And why are you telling me to go through a bunch of sources that appear to have no link to the importance of a fair use graphing calculator demo image? Lots of questions. If you have a case for keeping in the article, I'm not opposed, be my guest, but the burden on making that case is not on me, as the article currently says nothing. As for the last line, the "same encyclopedic purpose" means that if the graphing calculator is only pictured to illustrate a "demo" (as its rationale currently states) and not a kind of demo or specific demo, then it can be replaced by an image like that used above it—a demo in the public domain. czar ♔   22:02, 22 September 2014 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Manchester Victoria redevelopment render.png

 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  05:03, 29 September 2014 (UTC)
 * File:Manchester Victoria redevelopment render.png ([ delete] | talk | [ history] | links | [ logs]) – uploaded by Stevo1000 ( [ notify] | contribs | uploads | upload log).

Construction work has now progressed to the stage that photographs can be taken  to give readers an impression of the redevelopment. As such, free alternative image now exists and it is now proper to delete the photo.
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section.