Wikipedia:Files for deletion/2014 September 6



File:Sighet ghetto, 1944.jpg

 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the discussion was: Consensus is to keep the lower resolution image.  TLSuda  (talk) 14:15, 17 September 2014 (UTC)
 * File:Sighet ghetto, 1944.jpg ([ delete] | talk | [ history] | links | [ logs]) – uploaded by SlimVirgin ( [ notify] | contribs | uploads | upload log).

Violates WP:NFCC. The article only uses 52650 pixels, but for some reason, the uploader insists on having 136420 extra unused pixels on the file information page. No rationale has been given for keeping these extra 136420 pixels. Stefan2 (talk) 13:40, 6 September 2014 (UTC)


 * Revert to the version of 06:02, 29 August 2014‎ by Theo's Little Bot. I see no visible difference between it and the current version. Cnilep (talk) 05:13, 15 September 2014 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section.

File:PeterDinklageAsBolivarTrask.png

 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  15:32, 17 September 2014 (UTC)
 * File:PeterDinklageAsBolivarTrask.png ([ delete] | talk | [ history] | links | [ logs]) – uploaded by Nightscream ( [ notify] | contribs | uploads | upload log).

Fails WP:NFCC: this is about a comic character, and his film appearance only has a short section. This can easily be understood with images from comics. Stefan2 (talk) 15:27, 6 September 2014 (UTC)


 * Because comics are a visual-dominant medium, comics characters are culturally defined by their appearance over other things, particularly at a glance. Showing how a character appears in an adapted media, such as film, provides contextual significance that text alone cannot achieve, which is why it is standard in articles on comics characters for the most significant adaptations to be represented by an image. Nightscream (talk) 15:40, 6 September 2014 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Zachara2.JPG

 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the discussion was: delete; deleted by. (NAC Armbrust The Homunculus 15:11, 18 September 2014 (UTC)
 * File:Zachara2.JPG ([ delete] | talk | [ history] | links | [ logs]) – uploaded by Mark Froelich ( [ notify] | contribs | uploads | upload log).

There is no evidence that this file is in the public domain simply because it was "published over 75 years ago." Unless there is more evidence of when it was published, if it were copyright and if copyright were ever renewed, we can never know the status of the copyright of this image.  TLSuda  (talk) 18:17, 6 September 2014 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section.

File:PS Feb2006.jpg

 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  15:32, 17 September 2014 (UTC)
 * File:PS Feb2006.jpg ([ delete] | talk | [ history] | links | [ logs]) – uploaded by Tenebrae ( [ notify] | contribs | uploads | upload log).

License is PD-USGov-Military-Army, however the cover consists of artwork by Joe Kubert, not an employee of the Federal Govt. moogsi(blah) 19:55, 6 September 2014 (UTC)
 * Kubert was working on contract for the government and his output for PS, The Preventive Maintenance Monthly is gov't property, hence public domain. Chris Troutman  ( talk ) 20:22, 6 September 2014 (UTC)
 * The template specifies "This image is a work of a U.S. Army employee, taken or made as part of that person's official duties." The reason it's so specific is that it's unclear whether works by contractors fall under the same exemption. See, for example Cornell's notes on the relevant legislation, US Code Title 17, Chapter 1, § 105 (the paragraph beginning "A more difficult and far-reaching problem is whether the definition should be broadened to prohibit copyright in works prepared under U.S. Government contract or grant."). TLDR: it's really not clear at all. Unless the author is actually employed by the Federal Govt, you can't assume their work is PD -moogsi(blah) 19:21, 14 September 2014 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section.

File:TFF Mothers Talk USA.jpg

 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  15:32, 17 September 2014 (UTC)
 * File:TFF Mothers Talk USA.jpg ([ delete] | talk | [ history] | links | [ logs]) – uploaded by MemoriesFade ( [ notify] | contribs | uploads | upload log).

This image is used to identify the USA re-recording of the Tears for Fears song and to contrast the main infobox image. However, this is a mere decoration. Readers may understand the whole article without this image, as there is already the main infobox image, the cover art of the UK vinyl single. It has been discussed in WP:NFR and the article talk page. Nevertheless, I guess nomination should be done now. Gh87 in the public computer (talk) 23:36, 6 September 2014 (UTC)
 * How exactly could it have been discussed on the article talk page if, in your own words, "there's no point in discussing it here"? I gave a perfectly logical explanation for why it shouldn't be deleted, and you ignored it. Good luck in your quest. MemoriesFade (talk) 01:42, 7 September 2014 (UTC)
 * When I said "here", I meant the talk page. The FFD is the best way for now. --George Ho (talk) 02:34, 7 September 2014 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section.