Wikipedia:Files for deletion/2015 February 27



File:Post Office Logo.PNG

 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  07:05, 7 March 2015 (UTC)
 * File:Post Office Logo.PNG ([ delete] | talk | [ history] | links | [ logs]) – uploaded by Cloudbound ( [ notify] | contribs | uploads | upload log).

Unused logo. Superced by File:Post Office Logo.svg. Cloudbound (talk) 21:39, 27 February 2015 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom.  kashmiri TALK  01:26, 28 February 2015 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section.

File:SouthamptonAirportLogo.svg

 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the discussion was: Kept - Peripitus (Talk) 05:47, 7 March 2015 (UTC)
 * File:SouthamptonAirportLogo.svg ([ delete] | talk | [ history] | links | [ logs]) – uploaded by JaJaWa ( [ notify] | contribs | uploads | upload log).

Unused logo, superceded by File:Southampton Airport logo.png. Cloudbound (talk) 22:04, 27 February 2015 (UTC)
 * Keep - it's in use and we should prefer SVG logos over PNG. --B (talk) 23:15, 5 March 2015 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Club House de Cercle de la Voile de Paris à Meulan.jpg

 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the discussion was: Deleted - For two reasons, NFCC#8 and NFCC#1. I doubt though that the image is copyrighted (age) but without clear proof I have to assume it is. The building still exists (see here - Peripitus (Talk) 05:45, 7 March 2015 (UTC)
 * File:Club House de Cercle de la Voile de Paris à Meulan.jpg ([ delete] | talk | [ history] | links | [ logs]) – uploaded by NED33 ( [ notify] | contribs | uploads | upload log).

It seems very unlikely that no photos of the venue would have been published at the time of the event, in which case this image is replaceable by a published image. Stefan2 (talk) 22:49, 27 February 2015 (UTC)
 * Well find me one. Photography was not as common in 1900 and 1924 as it is now! This picture is published in the official report of the 1924 (http://library.la84.org/6oic/OfficialReports/1924/1924.pdf) Olympics. So it is highly probable that it is taken 1n or before 1924. _/)_/)_/) ˷˷˷˷˷˷˷˷ _/) NED33talk 10:04, 28 February 2015 (UTC)
 * For example, pictures were probably published in advertisements for the event in 1900, in which case there are images which can be used under the copyright tag PD-US-1923-abroad. Have you searched for such advertisements? The infobox in Sailing at the 1900 Summer Olympics also says "Status: Complete", which seems to be different from "Status: Destroyed" in a different infobox in the same article. Does this mean that it is "Status: Not destroyed"? In that case, the image violates WP:NFC §1, as new photographs can be created. --Stefan2 (talk) 15:44, 28 February 2015 (UTC)
 * Again. Find me one! Certainly I have investigated for other possibilities. However without succes. The building distroyed is a completly different building in Le Havre not in Paris. The Paris building of 1900 1924 still exist but the configuration is completly different now more than a century later. Sailing was one of the olympic disciplines but posters does nog show the club house but the yachts. If you can find one of the 1900-1924 configurationele ill be happy to replace this one. I always keep searching for alternatives. But untill it is found ill plea tot keep this one. _/)_/)_/) ˷˷˷˷˷˷˷˷ _/) NED33talk 17:20, 28 February 2015 (UTC)
 * There is also another issue. I'm not sure that a picture of the building is needed to understand the subject of the article. The image seems to violate WP:NFCC. It also violates WP:NFCC. --Stefan2 (talk) 21:56, 28 February 2015 (UTC)
 * The official report fount it justified to support to the subject why would we disagree with them. Besides that we try to show for each sailing Olympic the harbor conditions. This usually gives a perfect view on the atmosphere of the time and circumstances in witch the sailors had to live. _/)_/)_/) ˷˷˷˷˷˷˷˷ _/) NED33talk 14:33, 1 March 2015 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Earthless - Live at Roadburn cover.jpg

 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  07:05, 7 March 2015 (UTC)
 * File:Earthless - Live at Roadburn cover.jpg ([ delete] | talk | [ history] | links | [ logs]) – uploaded by IllaZilla ( [ notify] | contribs | uploads | upload log).

Violates WP:NFC §2 and WP:NFCC. Stefan2 (talk) 23:00, 27 February 2015 (UTC)
 * Comment I forgot I couldn't use it in userspace. I've been hit with that before. I've removed it, so the second one shouldn't apply now.  Lazy Bastard  Guy  01:58, 28 February 2015 (UTC)


 * Keep, I don't believe that the first criterion applies here either. It's not just a list, which is what that criterion seems to be referring to. It's not a list like Nirvana discography or Slayer discography.  Lazy Bastard  Guy  01:12, 2 March 2015 (UTC)
 * It's just a discography. Images like this should only be used in the article about the product, not in other articles. Compare with for example MOS:FILM and the footnote to WP:NFCI §1 (about articles about bands) which deal with this situation in other contexts. --Stefan2 (talk) 22:32, 4 March 2015 (UTC)
 * Then how do we explain this? This has two non-free images in it and it's a list by the same criteria.  Lazy Bastard  Guy  02:32, 6 March 2015 (UTC)
 * See WP:OTHERTHINGSEXIST. --Stefan2 (talk) 22:19, 6 March 2015 (UTC)
 * No, sorry, I don't buy that. It's exactly the same thing as we're discussing here.  Lazy Bastard  Guy  22:27, 6 March 2015 (UTC)
 * Yes, and those pictures should be deleted for exactly the same reason. --Stefan2 (talk) 23:44, 6 March 2015 (UTC)
 * Thank you. That's all I wanted to know. At least we're being consistent here. If I can't make an adequate case I'll see about splitting these articles back off.  Lazy Bastard  Guy  00:14, 7 March 2015 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Earthless - Sonic Prayer cover.jpg

 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  07:05, 7 March 2015 (UTC)
 * File:Earthless - Sonic Prayer cover.jpg ([ delete] | talk | [ history] | links | [ logs]) – uploaded by IllaZilla ( [ notify] | contribs | uploads | upload log).

Violates WP:NFC §2. Stefan2 (talk) 23:00, 27 February 2015 (UTC)
 * Keep, I don't believe that criterion applies here. It's not just a list, which is what that criterion seems to be referring to. It's not a list like Nirvana discography or Slayer discography.  Lazy Bastard  Guy  01:12, 2 March 2015 (UTC)
 * It's just a discography. Images like this should only be used in the article about the product, not in other articles. Compare with for example MOS:FILM and the footnote to WP:NFCI §1 (about articles about bands) which deal with this situation in other contexts. --Stefan2 (talk) 22:32, 4 March 2015 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Earthless - Rhythms from a Cosmic Sky cover.jpg

 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  07:05, 7 March 2015 (UTC)
 * File:Earthless - Rhythms from a Cosmic Sky cover.jpg ([ delete] | talk | [ history] | links | [ logs]) – uploaded by IllaZilla ( [ notify] | contribs | uploads | upload log).

Violates WP:NFC §2. Stefan2 (talk) 23:00, 27 February 2015 (UTC)
 * Keep, I don't believe that criterion applies here. It's not just a list, which is what that criterion seems to be referring to. It's not a list like Nirvana discography or Slayer discography.  Lazy Bastard  Guy  01:12, 2 March 2015 (UTC)
 * It's just a discography. Images like this should only be used in the article about the product, not in other articles. Compare with for example MOS:FILM and the footnote to WP:NFCI §1 (about articles about bands) which deal with this situation in other contexts. --Stefan2 (talk) 22:31, 4 March 2015 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Ultraman Festival 2013.JPG

 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  07:05, 7 March 2015 (UTC)
 * File:Ultraman Festival 2013.JPG ([ delete] | talk | [ history] | links | [ logs]) – uploaded by Ryulong ( [ notify] | contribs | uploads | upload log).

Violates WP:NFCC as it is used twice in the article Ultraman although the fair use rationale only covers one use. Also violates WP:NFCC as a picture of a cosplayer, taken from a random website, isn't very helpful to identify the subject of the article. Ideally, the article should instead use an image from the TV series, for example File:Ultraman gyango ruffian from outerspace 19660925.JPG. Stefan2 (talk) 23:18, 27 February 2015 (UTC)
 * Delete There is also a question of permission regarding the actual subject of the photo. Would the guy IN the picture agree to using the picture like this?  Lazy  Bastard  Guy  04:25, 28 February 2015 (UTC)


 * Delete I had assumed this was a fan pic, but apparently it is not, it says it is copyright the show's producers. Give it does not accurately depict the character as he appeared in the series, as a 200-ft tall spuerhero fighting godzilla-like monsters, and trampling trees and buildings, it serves no illustrative purpose. μηδείς (talk) 17:56, 28 February 2015 (UTC)
 * Keep Per Medeis this isn't a random cosplayer but a promotional shot from the producers of the show. There is a better rationale for using a promotional shot of a character in an article then using a screen grab from a copyrighted work. — Strongjam (talk) 23:51, 28 February 2015 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section.