Wikipedia:Files for deletion/2015 January 28



File:CityCentral Adelaide.jpg

 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  13:09, 5 February 2015 (UTC)
 * File:CityCentral Adelaide.jpg ([ delete] | talk | [ history] | links | [ logs]) – uploaded by Archidroid ( [ notify] | contribs | uploads | upload log).

Orphan, low resolution, likely no encylopedic use. Kelly hi! 00:02, 28 January 2015 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Hall 2.jpg

 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by A file with this name on Commons is now visible. AnomieBOT ⚡ 13:09, 5 February 2015 (UTC)
 * File:Hall 2.jpg ([ delete] | talk | [ history] | links | [ logs]) – uploaded by Teimbe ( [ notify] | contribs | uploads | upload log).

Unused, unidentified people. Stefan2 (talk) 00:07, 28 January 2015 (UTC)
 * Delete. This image speaks for itself. Actually screams for itself. Unused and unusable, it is uncontroversial cleanup. Best regards, Codename Lisa (talk) 01:42, 30 January 2015 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Adelaide from lofty fire tower.jpg

 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  13:09, 5 February 2015 (UTC)
 * File:Adelaide from lofty fire tower.jpg ([ delete] | talk | [ history] | links | [ logs]) – uploaded by Mazzone ( [ notify] | contribs | uploads | upload log).

Orphan, low resolution, likely no encyclopedic use. Kelly hi! 09:40, 28 January 2015 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Randy Lennox and Elton John.jpeg

 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  19:12, 6 February 2015 (UTC)
 * File:Randy Lennox and Elton John.jpeg ([ delete] | talk | [ history] | links | [ logs]) – uploaded by TorontoEdition ( [ notify] | contribs | uploads | upload log).

non-free image used to show two people together. Could easily be covered using text alone - image fails WP:NFCC and WP:NFCC Peripitus (Talk) 09:44, 28 January 2015 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Screenshot Russell Brand The Trews 29 July 2014.jpg

 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  02:02, 17 February 2015 (UTC)
 * File:Screenshot Russell Brand The Trews 29 July 2014.jpg ([ delete] | talk | [ history] | links | [ logs]) – uploaded by Wikimandia ( [ notify] | contribs | uploads | upload log).

Screenshot just shows Russell Brand making a face and gesture. Text alone could cover this more than adequately without significantly impairing reader's understanding of the topic. Peripitus (Talk) 09:54, 28 January 2015 (UTC)
 * Thanks for notifying me. The purpose of the screenshot: Brand is impersonating Sean Hannity because of the way Hannity interviewed his guest in a rather hostile manner (attacking him with loaded questions, not letting him respond, shouting at him, etc, etc), thus Brand's stabbing finger gesture and angry face. This video received widespread coverage and millions of views, not just because of Brand's opinion that Hannity was being a bully, but of this comedic mocking and impersonation of Hannity (captured in the screenshot). It seems to me it meets the criteria for fair use, and that having one small screenshot on an article about a well-covered web series does not seem to be excessive. Nor is it harmful to the copyright holder. I feel it's no different than say, a screenshot of a music video, which can also be described through text (and often are in lengthy detail) but are nevertheless prevalent on Wikipedia. Wikimandia (talk) 10:58, 28 January 2015 (UTC)


 * Delete per Peripitus, fails WP:NFCC. Kelly  hi! 17:51, 5 February 2015 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section.

File:1895 Isaac Holden.jpg

 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  13:09, 5 February 2015 (UTC)
 * File:1895 Isaac Holden.jpg ([ delete] | talk | [ history] | links | [ logs]) – uploaded by Graemp ( [ notify] | contribs | uploads | upload log).

It is a low resolution copy of commons file Isaac Holden.jpg. The Theosophist (talk) 13:15, 28 January 2015 (UTC)
 * It's definitely low-resolution, but those are different images. The commons one is a painting and the other appears to be a photo from when he was much older. Nevermind, it appears there are two files. When you click on the link here it takes you to a painting on Wikipedia with the same name. Here is the link to the commons file for comparison: Isaac_Holden.jpg at commons Wikimandia (talk) 13:21, 28 January 2015 (UTC)
 * I fixed that.--The Theosophist (talk) 11:06, 30 January 2015 (UTC)
 * Delete: As the original uploader, I agree with The Theosophist that this is a lesser quality duplicate. Graemp (talk) 12:37, 30 January 2015 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section.