Wikipedia:Files for deletion/2015 June 17



File:Nzsp.gif

 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  10:04, 25 June 2015 (UTC)
 * File:Nzsp.gif ([ delete] | talk | [ history] | links | [ logs]) – uploaded by Nickyee ( [ notify] | contribs | uploads | upload log).

According to the uploader, this file was created from putting together clip art from Microsoft's clip art gallery. Microsoft clip art is not freely available under an acceptable free license, nor is it released into the public domain. Thus, this is a non-free derivative work of Microsoft intellectual property, and it can't be released into the public domain by the uploader. It should be deleted per WP:COPYVIO. Mz7 (talk) 17:56, 17 June 2015 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section.

File:BHQ-sample-page-Deut-1.pdf

 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  10:04, 25 June 2015 (UTC)
 * File:BHQ-sample-page-Deut-1.pdf ([ delete] | talk | [ history] | links | [ logs]) – uploaded by Wuschelkopf ( [ notify] | contribs | uploads | upload log).

Fails WP:NFCC. Stefan2 (talk) 18:35, 17 June 2015 (UTC)

" §8: Contextual significance. Non-free content is used only if its presence would significantly increase readers' understanding of the article topic, and its omission would be detrimental to that understanding." As I wrote in the description page, the purpose of use in article (WP:NFCC#8) is "In order to distinguish the layout, the fonts, the arrangement of the fifth instalment of Biblia Hebraica". The differences between the different editions of the Biblia Hebraica series solely exist within matters of layout, typesetting, fonts, notation, different implementation of the apparatus, so in terms of WP:NFCC#8 it increases the readers understanding for the motivation and need for new editions. The other two editions of Biblia Hebraica consistently have the info box and the sample page below (deleting this particular file seems dubious to me). If this file is freely available and underlines the purpose of the article (which it undoubtedly does) ...why delete it? Wuschelkopf (talk) 21:13, 17 June 2015 (UTC)
 * There is no sourced, critical discussion about fonts, layout, typesetting or footnotes, so you do not need to see any picture of that. --Stefan2 (talk) 19:40, 23 June 2015 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section.