Wikipedia:Files for deletion/2015 June 6



File:Stori.jpg

 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted as F8 by AnomieBOT ⚡  14:06, 14 June 2015 (UTC)
 * File:Stori.jpg ([ delete] | talk | [ history] | links | [ logs]) – uploaded by Emal_Stori ( [ notify] | contribs | uploads | upload log).

Orphan – The file is not used on any pages in Wikipedia.78.34.161.55 (talk) 11:11, 6 June 2015 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section.

File:&

 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted as F9 by AnomieBOT ⚡  14:06, 14 June 2015 (UTC)
 * File:& ([ delete] | talk | [ history] | links | [ logs]) – uploaded by Vidyasagar17 ( [ notify] | contribs | uploads | upload log).

Uploader is claiming as own work. However, the uploader has previously uploaded an image that was a copyright violation. Rather unlikely that they had a free image and chose to upload a copyvio instead the first time around. Whpq (talk) 17:57, 6 June 2015 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Pooch spanky.JPEG

 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  14:06, 14 June 2015 (UTC)
 * File:Pooch spanky.JPEG ([ delete] | talk | [ history] | links | [ logs]) – uploaded by Oanabay04 ( [ notify] | contribs | uploads | upload log).

The screenshot is used in the plot section of The Pooch against WP:FILMNFI in that the plot section describes the film and is not critical commentary of the image itself. There is no critical commentary of the image itself in the article, it does nothing to increase the reader's understanding of the film and its exclusion is not detrimental to the understanding of the film, thereby failing WP:NFCC. Aspects (talk) 23:48, 6 June 2015 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Tough winter fetchit.JPEG

 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  14:06, 14 June 2015 (UTC)
 * File:Tough winter fetchit.JPEG ([ delete] | talk | [ history] | links | [ logs]) – uploaded by Oanabay04 ( [ notify] | contribs | uploads | upload log).

The screenshot is used in the production section of A Tough Winter. There are two sentences in the production sentence, one unsourced sentence about the dog used in the film being poisoned in real life and one unsourced sentence about perceived racism against African Americans. Just because the dog and an African American adult are in the screenshot, does not mean that the image backs up either of these sentences. There is no critical commentary of the image itself in the article, it does nothing to increase the reader's understanding of the film and its exclusion is not detrimental to the understanding of the film, thereby failing WP:NFCC. Aspects (talk) 23:55, 6 June 2015 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section.