Wikipedia:Files for deletion/Replaceable fair use/File:9781741143874.jpg


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of a fair use image as a replaceable image. Please do not modify it. 

The result was to delete the image.

Incorrectly tagged as non-free. This image is freely usable and the publisher provides cover images for free use by media and for the purposes of research and study. Dbromage 01:29, 19 June 2007 (UTC)
 * The license in the link is not a free license and to include the image on Wikipedia it has to be fair use. The image is being to illustrate a living person and is replaceable and therfore violates WP:FUC. Rettetast 14:27, 19 June 2007 (UTC)
 * This is a copyrighted image that has been released by a company or organization to promote their work or product in the media. Copyright of the image remains with the publisher but is provided for free use by media to illustrate the person(s), product, event, or subject in question. This is fully permitted within Australian law. Dbromage 01:35, 20 June 2007 (UTC)
 * It may be permissible within Australian law, but it does not meet all ten points of the Non-free content criteria.  howcheng  {chat} 20:18, 21 June 2007 (UTC)
 * Barry Jones (Australian politician) has written several books and these are listed in the article. Fair use rationate is given and the copyright holder gives blanket permission for the use of publicity images to illustrate the books and the authors. Tagging this as "Publicity photographs with missing fair-use rationale" is simply incorrect. Hint: Look after the words Fair use rationale under "Licensing". Dbromage 23:40, 21 June 2007 (UTC)
 * This does indeed have a fair use rationale. It's not tagged as "Publicity photographs with missing fair-use rationale". It's tagged as a "replaceable fair use image", because a new free photograph could be made to replace this image. – Quadell (talk) (random) 00:40, 22 June 2007 (UTC)
 * "Publicity photographs with missing fair-use rationale" is indicated at the bottom of the page. This is incorrect. Anyhow, please explain how books written by Barry Jones can be illustrated without an illustration of one of said books. Copyright remains with the publisher but the publisher gives blanket permission for use of such publicity material. This image is used beyond simple identification and is entirely consistent with Non-free promotional tagging. Dbromage 03:35, 22 June 2007 (UTC)
 * "Free use" means it can be used by anybody for any purpose, including making derivative and commercial works. All other images for the purposes of Wikipedia are non-free. See WP:NONFREE: Cover art may not be used for identification without critical commentary of the item in question, as is the case here. This image happens to serve a dual purpose, not only identifying the book but the person on the book cover as well, which is why it runs afoul of WP:NONFREE item 1 too.  howcheng  {chat} 17:47, 22 June 2007 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it.