Wikipedia:Files for deletion/Replaceable fair use/File:Chamber SL Parliament.jpg


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of a fair use image as a replaceable image. Please do not modify it. 

The result was to delete the image.


 * What's stopping someone from taking a picture inside this chamber and releasing it under a free license??? --Hammersoft (talk) 14:25, 22 April 2008 (UTC)
 * Because its restricted !!! Due to security and legal (customs of parliament) reasons no one (including the MPs) can not take any photos inside the chamber!! On one cant take in camera phones either. So how on earth is there going to be any pics under free license, if no one is willing to go to prison for taking it???? Nitraven (talk) 16:10, 22 April 2008 (UTC)
 * Why don't you ask them for release of the image under a free license? Even so, it's possible this can be replaced with free license imagery. Also, the article this is used in doesn't HAVE to have an image of the interior. --Hammersoft (talk) 16:42, 22 April 2008 (UTC)
 * Ya, Could ask them but not sure if they will give. If they give I'll be sure to put it but till then I think it should stay cause most articles on Parliaments do have pics of the Chamber, because that is the center of government .Nitraven (talk) 17:21, 22 April 2008 (UTC)
 * We don't do things in that order. If it becomes evident that a free use image can't be obtained, then we permit the fair use image. We don't permit the fair use image then hope we can get a free use one. --Hammersoft (talk) 18:18, 22 April 2008 (UTC)


 * The only place from which to gain a free image is the Parliament Secretariat, however according to a recent circular, photography in or near government buildings were VIPs attend on a regular basis must be stopped and publishing of images limited, due to terrorist treats. Therefore the Parliament Secretariat gives out images of the building or allows photos to be taken inside the building only to registered media institutions after their request are evaluated by the Serjeant-at-Arms. Nitraven (talk) 07:17, 24 April 2008 (UTC)
 * ''The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it.