Wikipedia:Files for deletion/Replaceable fair use/File:JMPlic-300-1.jpg


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of a fair use image as a replaceable image. Please do not modify it. 

The result was to delete the image.

RFU dispute
This is a photograph from a press kit, which is permitted under fair use. Tvccs 01:38, 29 November 2006 (UTC)
 * But is it irreplaceable? You should only add the disputed tag if you believe the image is irreplaceable. --Abu Badali 04:21, 29 November 2006 (UTC)

Depends on your views whether the sloppy pic taken of him in the grocery store with a sopabox camera is worth the mutual embarassment and will provide the article's reader with an adequate information about the article's subject. The answer is no, by my book. As such, I dispute the tag in good faith. --Irpen 05:01, 29 November 2006 (UTC)


 * No one said anything about a sloppy pic in a grocery store with a sopabox camera. It's possible to take a high-quality photo of this person. – Quadell (talk) (random) 17:21, 29 November 2006 (UTC)

Hypothetically possible. Even to photograph the Moon's back side is possible. The issue what are the chances for such photo to be made and be adequate. IMO, they are small enough to keep the image. If however, a reasonable freee image is taken, we will discuss the replacement based on how useful the proposed image is for the article. Does it show the subject's face for instance is one of such arguments we will consider. --Irpen 21:45, 29 November 2006 (UTC)


 * In my view, it would unreasonable to expect that a member of the general public would photograph the dark side of the moon. It would not be unreasonable to expect that someone would meet and photograph this person. The wording at WP:FU seems to agree with me; see counter-example #8. – Quadell (talk) (random) 18:12, 30 November 2006 (UTC)
 * ''The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it.