Wikipedia:Files for deletion/Replaceable fair use/File:Jaynemansfield.jpg


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of a fair use image as a replaceable image. Please do not modify it. 

The result was to delete the image.

NFCC?
Does this image really adhere to every WP:NFCC criterion as claimed? No it adheres to only half of them. —teb728 t c 09:27, 26 July 2009 (UTC)
 * 1) No. It is replaceable by File:Jayne Mansfield The Girl Can't Help It.jpg and File:Jayne Mansfield.jpg, both of which also show what she looks like.
 * 2) Yes. It respects commercial opportunities.
 * 3) No. Seven non-free images are used where only two are needed. And this image is high resolution (325 × 450 pixels).
 * 4) Yes. It was distributed by 20th Century Fox
 * 5) Yes. If this were a free image, it would be acceptable.
 * 6) No. As it says at Image use policy, "since Wikipedia aims to be a free-content encyclopedia, not every image that qualifies as fair-use may be appropriate."
 * 7) Yes. It is used in an article.
 * 8) No. The article would be perfectly understandable without it.
 * 9) Yes. It is used only in an article.
 * 10) No. The fair use rationale does not explain how the use meets the Non-free content criteria, as required by Non-free use rationale guideline. In particular it does not state what purpose the image serves in the article. The only stated purpose is "to illustrate the article."


 * 1) No free equivalent. Yes. It was one of the last attempts of 20th Century Fox to publicize her. Though Kiss Them for Me was a box office disappointment and was described as "vapid" and "ill-advised" still made good in publicity riding on pictures of Mansfield. But, even with the regular publicity around her physical presence failed to revive her career significantly. - A historically signicant hallmark in the subject's career.
 * 2) Respect for commercial opportunities.
 * 3) Minimal usage. Yes.
 * 4) Minimal extent of use. Yes.
 * 5) Previous publication. Yes.
 * 6) Content. Yes. A historically significant milestone serving an encyclopedic purpose. Other non-free images serving to illustrates other milestones are irrelevant in judging this particular image.
 * 7) Media-specific policy. (per Image use policy) Yes. It has copyright tags, the source is attributed.
 * 8) One-article minimum. Yes.
 * 9) Significance. Yes. The existence of all art/promotional work can always be understood without an image. The impact/context can never be understood without an image.
 * 10) Restrictions on location. Yes. Used in an article and out of a gallery.
 * 11) Image description page.
 * 12) Identification of the source of the material'. Yes.
 * 13) A copyright tag (per Image copyright tags/Non-free content). Yes.
 * 14) The name of each article (a link to each article is also recommended). Yes.
 * 15) A separate, specific fair-use rationale for each use of the item (per Non-free use rationale guideline). Yes. It has now, at least for the article in dispute.