Wikipedia:Files for discussion/2016 February 8



File:Arsenal FC.svg

 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the discussion was: keep in Arsenal F.C., remove all other instances. — ξ xplicit  07:40, 16 February 2016 (UTC)
 * File:Arsenal FC.svg ([ delete] | talk | [ history] | links | [ logs]) – uploaded by Ngckmax ( [ notify] | contribs | uploads | upload log).

Non-free logo for the Arsenal Football Club being used in Arsenal F.C. (the main article about the team) as well as in Arsenal F.C. Reserves, Arsenal F.C. Academy and Arsenal L.F.C.. Each usage has a non-free use rationale, but based upon No. 17 of WP:NFC and similar prior FFD/NFCR discussions, such as Wikipedia:Non-free content review/Archive 68, Wikipedia:Non-free content review/Archive 69,  Wikipedia:Non-free content review/Archive 69, Wikipedia:Non-free content review/Archive 69, Wikipedia:Files for discussion/2015 December 2, Wikipedia:Files for discussion/2016 January 12, usage has generally only been considered acceptable for the primary team article (the "parent" article) and not acceptable for any of the sub-entity articles (the "child" articles). This type of usage was also discussed at Wikipedia:Media copyright questions/Archive/2015/November where the conclusion was the same. Each of the three non-main team article begins with a sentence which implies they are directly connected to the the main club. The academy and reserve team article seem to be unquestionably sub-entities of the main club while the women's teams say they are affiliated. In my opinion, this means all three teams are "child" entities of the parent club which would mean the logo should only be used in the main team's article. Would it be possible to use this used by the Arsenal Ladies F.C. on their it official Twitter account? It seems team specific, but it may be still too close to the main team's logo to be considered "different" enough.

Finally, I am wondering if the logo could possibly be considered PD-USonly because the text itself is not eligible for copyright protection, there are plenty of freely licensed shield shapes on Commons, and simple cannon images are elements sometimes used in freely licensed coat-of-arms. If there's no way this logo can be freely licensed, then I suggest keep for "Arsenal F.C.", remove from "Arsenal F.C. Reserves", "Arsenal F.C. Academy", and "Arsenal L.F.C." -- Marchjuly (talk) 05:11, 8 February 2016 (UTC)
 * This logo, which consists of rather simple arrangements of rather simple elements, was declared copyrighted in the United States, see c:COM:TOO. This logo seems to be unfree. --Stefan2 (talk) 10:18, 8 February 2016 (UTC)
 * Yes, I don't think we are looking at a simple logo here.Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 10:30, 8 February 2016 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section.

File:FoxUSVI.png

 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the discussion was: convert to PD-simple. — ξ xplicit  07:40, 16 February 2016 (UTC)
 * File:FoxUSVI.png ([ delete] | talk | [ history] | links | [ logs]) – uploaded by RingtailedFox ( [ notify] | contribs | uploads | upload log).

Non-free logo being used in WVXF and WEON-LP. A non-free use rationale is only provided for the inofbox of "WVXF". Non-free usage in "WEON-LP" fails WP:NFCC (almost same as infobox logo), WP:NFCC (not the subject of any sourced discussion within the article) and WP:NFCC (no non-free use rationale is provided) in "WEON-LP". Suggest keep in "WVXF" and remove from "WEON-LP", unless the file is considered too simple for copyright protection and OK to treat as PD-simple. Marchjuly (talk) 05:24, 8 February 2016 (UTC)
 * I'm inclined to say that this is below the threshold of originality. --Stefan2 (talk) 10:20, 8 February 2016 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Dzup2.jpg

 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  09:03, 16 February 2016 (UTC)
 * File:Dzup2.jpg ([ delete] | talk | [ history] | links | [ logs]) – uploaded by Nikbert16 ( [ notify] | contribs | uploads | upload log).

Obsolete DynamicSupport (talk) 05:28, 8 February 2016 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Gary Burton The New Quartet.jpg

 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by A file with this name on Commons is now visible. AnomieBOT ⚡ 09:03, 16 February 2016 (UTC)
 * File:Gary Burton The New Quartet.jpg ([ delete] | talk | [ history] | links | [ logs]) – uploaded by Cdl obelix ( [ notify] | contribs | uploads | upload log).

Non-free album cover art which is just a gray background and the name of the band and the record company in text. Appears to be too simple to be eligible for copyright protection. Record company's article says it is based out of German, so maybe this is not OK for PD-simple and Copy to Wikimedia Commons, but it seems acceptable to be at least PD-USonly -- Marchjuly (talk) 07:02, 8 February 2016 (UTC)
 * Uploaded to Commons. ECM seems to be an international company and Gary Burton seems to be from the United States, so USA is a more likely source country than Germany. It passes both c:COM:TOO and c:COM:TOO, though. --Stefan2 (talk) 10:31, 8 February 2016 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Disneyland Jungle River poster.png

 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  09:03, 16 February 2016 (UTC)
 * File:Disneyland Jungle River poster.png ([ delete] | talk | [ history] | links | [ logs]) – uploaded by Blm07 ( [ notify] | contribs | uploads | upload log).

Non-free poster art being used in Jungle Cruise. Usage has a very basic non-free use rationale, but I don't think it satisfies WP:NFCC. The poster itself is not the subject of any sourced commentary and it's not being used in the main infobox of the article as the primary means of identifying the attraction. Poster looks quite old and the caption calls it a first-generation poster, but I don't think its old enough to qualify as public domain (PD) since Disneyland opened, unless it possible as PD for another reason. Another possible problem may be WP:NFCC. I guess it's safe to assume that The Walt Disney Company, if anyone, would hold the copyright, but nothing specific about the source is provided for verification purposes -- Marchjuly (talk) 07:38, 8 February 2016 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section.

Non-free poster art in Disneyland Railroad

 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the discussion was: 'delete. — ξ xplicit  07:40, 16 February 2016 (UTC)
 * File:Disneyland Grand Canyon Diorama poster.png ([ delete] | talk | [ history] | links | [ logs]) – uploaded by Blm07 ( [ notify] | contribs | uploads | upload log).
 * File:Disneyland Primeval World poster.png ([ delete] | talk | [ history] | links | [ logs]) – uploaded by Blm07 ( [ notify] | contribs | uploads | upload log)

Two non-free posters being used in Disneyland Railroad. Each usage has a non-free use rationale, but neither poster is being used in the article's main infobox as the primary means of identifying the attraction. Posters appear to be for certain sections of the ride, which are discussed within the article, but the posters themselves are not the subject of any sourced discussion so I don't their usage provides the context required by WP:NFCC. The sourcing information provided for each poster is also not really given, so there may also be problems per WP:NFCC. -- Marchjuly (talk) 07:49, 8 February 2016 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Magic Kingdom - WEDway Peoplemover poster.jpg

 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  09:03, 16 February 2016 (UTC)
 * File:Magic Kingdom - WEDway Peoplemover poster.jpg ([ delete] | talk | [ history] | links | [ logs]) – uploaded by blm07 ( [ notify] | contribs | uploads | upload log).

Non-free poster art being used in Tomorrowland Transit Authority PeopleMover. File has a non-free use rationale, but the poster is not being used in the main infobox of the article and is not itself the subject of any sourced commentary within the article so I don't think it's usage satisfies WP:NFCC. Non-free use rationale claims it may have "future historic significance", but I don't think it qualifies as Non-free historic image per No. 8 of WP:NFCI. -- Marchjuly (talk) 08:04, 8 February 2016 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Euro Disneyland Map Poster.jpg

 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  09:03, 16 February 2016 (UTC)
 * File:Euro Disneyland Map Poster.jpg ([ delete] | talk | [ history] | links | [ logs]) – uploaded by Glenny127 ( [ notify] | contribs | uploads | upload log).

Non-free map/image being used in Disneyland Park (Paris). The image itself is not the subject of any sourced discussion within the article so removing does not seem detrimental to the reader's understanding per WP:NFCC. -- Marchjuly (talk) 08:14, 8 February 2016 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Saorview logo.png

 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the discussion was: convert to PD-ineligible-USOnly. The threshold of originality of Ireland is not known — ξ xplicit  07:40, 16 February 2016 (UTC)
 * File:Saorview logo.png ([ delete] | talk | [ history] | links | [ logs]) – uploaded by Saorview ( [ notify] | contribs | uploads | upload log).

Does the gradient on this logo qualify it as "original" enough to be copyrightable? Because if no, it should be retagged as PD-textlogo or PD-ineligible-USOnly Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 09:10, 8 February 2016 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section.

File:1881 Courthouse Museum front1.jpg

 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted as F4 by AnomieBOT ⚡  02:01, 12 February 2016 (UTC)
 * File:1881 Courthouse Museum front1.jpg ([ delete] | talk | [ history] | links | [ logs]) – uploaded by Boomer Vial ( [ notify] | contribs | uploads | upload log).

Image is not freely licensed. Boomer VialHolla 09:58, 8 February 2016 (UTC)
 * Currently being speedily deleted. If you, as uploader, agree, no further action is required of you. If you don't, comply with the instructions on the speedy deletion message. – Finnusertop (talk ⋅ contribs) 13:38, 8 February 2016 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Charles James Martin01.jpg

 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted as F5 by AnomieBOT ⚡  09:03, 16 February 2016 (UTC)
 * File:Charles James Martin01.jpg ([ delete] | talk | [ history] | links | [ logs]) – uploaded by Rotational ( [ notify] | contribs | uploads | upload log).

Fair use file, no longer needed as free file available and added (File:Portrait of Sir Charles J. Martin Wellcome L0017186.jpg) Deadstar (talk) 13:56, 8 February 2016 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Admiral Ackbar Force Awakens.jpg
<div class="boilerplate ffd vfd xfd-closed" style="background-color:#f3f9ff; margin:1em 0 0 0; padding:0 10px 0 10px; border:1px solid #aaa;">
 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  09:03, 16 February 2016 (UTC)
 * File:Admiral Ackbar Force Awakens.jpg ([ delete] | talk | [ history] | links | [ logs]) – uploaded by Ageofultron ( [ notify] | contribs | uploads | upload log).

Article already has a a non-free image (File:AckbarStanding.jpg) illustrating Admiral Ackbar's appearance. Whpq (talk) 14:25, 8 February 2016 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Rosemary Brown Canada.jpg
<div class="boilerplate ffd vfd xfd-closed" style="background-color:#f3f9ff; margin:1em 0 0 0; padding:0 10px 0 10px; border:1px solid #aaa;">
 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the discussion was: remove from New Democratic Party leadership election, 1975. — ξ <sup style="color:#000000;">xplicit  07:40, 16 February 2016 (UTC)
 * File:Rosemary Brown Canada.jpg ([ delete] | talk | [ history] | links | [ logs]) – uploaded by Truewhit ( [ notify] | contribs | uploads | upload log).

This file seems to fail WP:NFCC with its usage in New Democratic Party leadership election, 1975. Steel1943 (talk) 22:08, 8 February 2016 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section.