Wikipedia:Files for discussion/2016 July 18



File:Andres Neumann with Peter Brook and Jack Buckley.jpg

 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  06:02, 26 July 2016 (UTC)
 * File:Andres Neumann with Peter Brook and Jack Buckley.jpg ([ delete] | talk | [ history] | links | [ logs]) &#x20;– uploaded by Tommaso.desantis ( [ notify] | contribs | uploads | upload log).

Unclear whether the uploader is copyright holder. Kelly hi! 13:06, 18 July 2016 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section.

File:DFLewis01.jpg

 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  06:02, 26 July 2016 (UTC)
 * File:DFLewis01.jpg ([ delete] | talk | [ history] | links | [ logs]) &#x20;– uploaded by Beavey ( [ notify] | contribs | uploads | upload log).

Unused file, unclear license terms. Kelly hi! 13:41, 18 July 2016 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Diakos.jpg

 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  06:02, 26 July 2016 (UTC)
 * File:Diakos.jpg ([ delete] | talk | [ history] | links | [ logs]) &#x20;– uploaded by Dragases ( [ notify] | contribs | uploads | upload log).

Delete, unused file. Insufficient information to confirm public domain claim. Kelly hi! 13:47, 18 July 2016 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Trans O&

 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  06:02, 26 July 2016 (UTC)
 * File:Trans O& ([ delete] | talk | [ history] | links | [ logs]) &#x20;– uploaded by Cisumiv ( [ notify] | contribs | uploads | upload log).

Uploader is asserting the file is CC-BY-SA but the given flickr page states it is also NC (non-commercial) making this image insufficiently free for Wikipedia. Whpq (talk) 13:51, 18 July 2016 (UTC)


 * Delete: recent upload with unacceptable non-commercial use license is most unlikely to have been changed by the Flickr user. ww2censor (talk) 16:32, 24 July 2016 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Daniella Chavez.jpg

 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  06:02, 26 July 2016 (UTC)
 * File:Daniella Chavez.jpg ([ delete] | talk | [ history] | links | [ logs]) &#x20;– uploaded by Cisumiv ( [ notify] | contribs | uploads | upload log).

Uploader is aasserting CC-BY-SA license but the source flickr page states NC (non-commercial) which is not sufficiently free for Wikipedia Whpq (talk) 13:53, 18 July 2016 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section.

File:FlyingSorceress3a.jpg

 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  06:02, 26 July 2016 (UTC)
 * File:FlyingSorceress3a.jpg ([ delete] | talk | [ history] | links | [ logs]) &#x20;– uploaded by Myoet ( [ notify] | contribs | uploads | upload log).

Fails NFCC#3 and NFCC#8. Non-free images are included in the article, this does not represent keeping use to a minimum and neither is the image used in any way that adds to the article. Nthep (talk) 14:01, 18 July 2016 (UTC)
 * Remove from article. File is not being used as the primary means of identification of the episode in question and it is not itself the subject of any sourced commentary within the article, so the context required by WP:NFCC is not clear. Per WP:FILMNFI, "Since a film article's "Plot" section contains descriptive claims about the information found in the primary source (the film) and not information found in reliable sources regarding the film, the section is not considered critical commentary or discussion of film. Thus, non-free images need to belong in other sections in which they can be supported by critical commentary." This file seems to be simply being used to illustrate a particular plot point, not any technical aspects particular to the way the cartoon was filmed, etc.; therefore, its use appears to be mainly decorative which is generally not allowed by the NFCC. -- Marchjuly (talk) 00:57, 19 July 2016 (UTC)
 * Delete The screenshot is used in the plot section against WP:FILMNFI in that the plot section describes the film and is not critical commentary of the image itself. There is no critical commentary of the image itself in the article, it does nothing to increase the reader's understanding of the film and its exclusion is not detrimental to the understanding of the film, thereby failing WP:NFCC. Aspects (talk) 00:46, 20 July 2016 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section.

File:TomandJerryTitleCard3.jpg

 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  06:02, 26 July 2016 (UTC)
 * File:TomandJerryTitleCard3.jpg ([ delete] | talk | [ history] | links | [ logs]) &#x20;– uploaded by MartinP1983 ( [ notify] | contribs | uploads | upload log).

Fails NFCC#3 and NFCC#8. Non-free images are included in the article, this does not represent keeping use to a minimum and neither is the image used in any way that adds to the article. Nthep (talk) 15:09, 18 July 2016 (UTC)
 * Remove from both Blue Cat Blues and The Flying Sorceress per nominator. File is not being used in the main infobox of either article as the primary means of identifying the episode in question. File is also not itself the subject of any sourced commentary in either article, so the context required by WP:NFCC is not evident. As explained in WP:FILMNFI, using screenshots like this can be acceptable when the screenshot is "for critical commentary and discussion of the cinema and television", but that does not seem to be how the file is being used in either article. Decorative use such as this is not really allowed by the NFCC, so the file should be removed unless some sourced discussion about it is found and added to the articles. -- Marchjuly (talk) 00:51, 19 July 2016 (UTC)


 * Delete The screenshot was used in the plot section in The Flying Sorceress against WP:FILMNFI in that the plot section describes the film and is not critical commentary of the image itself. The screenshot was used in the themes section of Blue Cat Blues.  Each of these films has a screenshot located in the infobox, so this screenshot fails WP:NFCC in that the title cards are already used in the article for means of identification and fails WP:NFCC because there is no commentary about the cover thereby doing nothing to increase the reader's understanding of the book and its exclusion is not detrimental to the understanding of the book. Aspects (talk) 00:53, 20 July 2016 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section.

File:NickandPoosa.jpg

 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  06:02, 26 July 2016 (UTC)
 * File:NickandPoosa.jpg ([ delete] | talk | [ history] | links | [ logs]) &#x20;– uploaded by Mutai ( [ notify] | contribs | uploads | upload log).

Orphaned image. Likely uploaded for Poosa (AfD). Not enough context to determine additional future encyclopedic use. ★ Bigr   Tex  16:11, 18 July 2016 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section.

File:AkshitGupta.jpg

 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  06:02, 26 July 2016 (UTC)
 * File:AkshitGupta.jpg ([ delete] | talk | [ history] | links | [ logs]) &#x20;– uploaded by SlimShady1017 ( [ notify] | contribs | uploads | upload log).

No reason to believe that the uploader owns the rights of this image even if it is claimed to be them. Has a bad history of such claims including on Commons where he has uploaded random web images claiming them to be locations within India that he visited and the images weren't even of those places! &mdash; Spaceman  Spiff  18:14, 18 July 2016 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Mohammed D Abubakar.jpg

 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  06:02, 26 July 2016 (UTC)
 * File:Mohammed D Abubakar.jpg ([ delete] | talk | [ history] | links | [ logs]) &#x20;– uploaded by Pilotjay ( [ notify] | contribs | uploads | upload log).

Looks like a photograph of a photograph. Most likely a professional photo taken in the line of duty, not the work of the uploader. It's also orphaned, having only been used in a WP:FAKEARTICLE on the uploader's talk page. clpo13(talk) 21:08, 18 July 2016 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section.

File:SAARC2-EU.PNG

 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  06:02, 26 July 2016 (UTC)
 * File:SAARC2-EU.PNG ([ delete] | talk | [ history] | links | [ logs]) &#x20;– uploaded by Szali3 ( [ notify] | contribs | uploads | upload log).

Orphaned map from uploader with no contributions in more than 9 years, likely uploaded for use on South Asian Association for Regional Cooperation, but I can find no evidence that it ever was. Not enough context in the description to determine future encyclopedic value. ★ Bigr   Tex  21:47, 18 July 2016 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section.