Wikipedia:Files for discussion/2016 October 10



File:Legacy of MAU.jpg

 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  20:40, 18 October 2016 (UTC)
 * File:Legacy of MAU.jpg ([ delete] | talk | [ history] | links | [ logs]) &#x20;– uploaded by Rajmay2013 ( [ notify] | contribs | uploads | upload log).

Logo/seal; dubious self-work claim  F ASTILY   07:36, 10 October 2016 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Logo of MAU.jpg

 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the discussion was: Relicensed as non-free Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 19:11, 18 October 2016 (UTC)
 * File:Logo of MAU.jpg ([ delete] | talk | [ history] | links | [ logs]) &#x20;– uploaded by Rajmay2013 ( [ notify] | contribs | uploads | upload log).

logo/seal; dubious self-work claim  F ASTILY   07:37, 10 October 2016 (UTC)
 * Licensing changed to non-free logo, fair use added and sourced to the university. Discussion should be good to close now. Salavat (talk) 15:08, 15 October 2016 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Certificate3.png

 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  20:40, 18 October 2016 (UTC)
 * File:Certificate3.png ([ delete] | talk | [ history] | links | [ logs]) &#x20;– uploaded by VarunFEB2003 ( [ notify] | contribs | uploads | upload log).

Given his history of uploading copyright violations, and the obvious degree of skill which has gone into this image, I do not believe for an instant that the uploader drew the border himself, as he claims. (Quite aside from anything else, the leaves depicted are those of the Silver Maple, which grows only in eastern North America and seems an unlikely choice for an editor in India.) &#8209; Iridescent 16:01, 10 October 2016 (UTC)
 * This image was previously nominated for deletion (see Files for discussion/2016 October 3), where VarunFEB2003 claimed that the image border was a "fruity border created by my friend for a wedding invitation which I have copied." Given the lies about other images, I am not inclined to believe this claim. -- Whpq (talk) 01:03, 13 October 2016 (UTC)
 * Varun specifically edited the summary to say that the background image was self-created, so he's lying about the attribution somewhere along the line. &#8209; Iridescent 08:26, 13 October 2016 (UTC)


 * Delete - a history of lies about images from this uploader leaves me very doubtful that this is a free work as asserted. -- Whpq (talk) 01:03, 13 October 2016 (UTC)
 * Delete as probable copyvio. Andy Mabbett ( Pigsonthewing ); Talk to Andy; Andy's edits 11:35, 13 October 2016 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Lupita Nyong&

 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  20:40, 18 October 2016 (UTC)
 * File:Lupita Nyong& ([ delete] | talk | [ history] | links | [ logs]) &#x20;– uploaded by Davykamanzi ( [ notify] | contribs | uploads | upload log).

Kenyan author of this 2001 photo has copyright protection for 50 years after its first publication. No evidence of public domain release. commons:Commons:Copyright_rules_by_territory czar  17:59, 10 October 2016 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Mandrill monkey at Chester Zoo.jpg

 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  01:01, 11 November 2016 (UTC)
 * File:Mandrill monkey at Chester Zoo.jpg ([ delete] | talk | [ history] | links | [ logs]) &#x20;– uploaded by Black Stripe ( [ notify] | contribs | uploads | upload log).

Delete - unused, low resolution. Clearer images at Commons:Category:Mandrillus sphinx. Kelly hi! 22:09, 2 October 2016 (UTC)
 * Keep and transfer to Commons. MB298 (talk) 00:40, 3 October 2016 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 18:54, 10 October 2016 (UTC)
 * Delete. This is a terrible photo. There's no reason to use this over any pictures in the Commons category. — ξ xplicit  06:40, 19 October 2016 (UTC)
 * Delete. Per Explicit. We don't keep every photo just because it is free use if there are better alternatives available. Nor should we. --Majora (talk) 05:18, 30 October 2016 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Buddy Bregman - &

 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  01:01, 11 November 2016 (UTC)
 * File:Buddy Bregman - & ([ delete] | talk | [ history] | links | [ logs]) &#x20;– uploaded by BerkeleyS1 ( [ notify] | contribs | uploads | upload log).

Album cover. Dubious self-work claim, unlikely that uploader is copyright holder  F ASTILY   19:52, 2 October 2016 (UTC)

Thanks for the vote of confidence, Fastily, but, "yes," I did indeed create this ( my own draft album cover) on Microsoft Powerpoint, using already copyright-cleared photographs from the photographer whom I'd contracted to photograph that original (2006) recording session. If in doubt, see picture of Buddy Bregman conducting on Wikipedia page, taken at the same time, and accompanying copyright clearance statement. — Preceding unsigned comment added by BerkeleyS1 (talk • contribs) 10:02, 10 October 2016 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus. Relisting comment:, seems like this may be a derivative work of these photographs. We need evidence that their copyright was cleared. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 18:57, 10 October 2016 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 18:57, 10 October 2016 (UTC)

What more evidence?...What do you mean, derivative work?...I've stated repeatedly that I created this album cover / image using photographs I commissioned at my own expense for this one very specific purpose!...My photographer is a personal friend and has long-since emailed Wikipedia (and me) her explicit permission to use these photographs so as to latterly promote the work and memory of Buddy Bregman who is now in his mid 80s and very sick with dementia! See: OTRS Permission Archive Ticket #2015122210011342 — Preceding unsigned comment added by BerkeleyS1 (talk • contribs) 18:30, 19 October 2016 (UTC)
 * OTRS ticket checked and it has absolutely nothing to do with this particular image. Nor for any of the images within it. --Majora (talk) 05:22, 30 October 2016 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section.

File:SportsCenter logo.png

 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  20:40, 18 October 2016 (UTC)
 * File:SportsCenter logo.png ([ delete] | talk | [ history] | links | [ logs]) &#x20;– uploaded by Bovineboy2008 ( [ notify] | contribs | uploads | upload log).

Orphaned PD image; SVG logo has replaced this image. Corkythe hornetfan  (ping me) 21:20, 10 October 2016 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section.