Wikipedia:Files for discussion/2016 October 6



File:Strychnos pungens00.jpg

 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the discussion was: I'll tag this as "no evidence of permission" pending permission. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 15:55, 14 October 2016 (UTC)
 * File:Strychnos pungens00.jpg ([ delete] | talk | [ history] | links | [ logs]) &#x20;– uploaded by Paul venter ( [ notify] | contribs | uploads | upload log).

"Painting by Barbara Pike ... obtained courtesy of Barbara Pike." But there is no evidence of such courtesy. ©  Tb hotch ™ (en-2.5). 00:51, 6 October 2016 (UTC)
 * That image was contributed a while back when my word was presumably sufficient - I do realise that criteria have become more stringent, so I shall try and obtain Barbara Pike's written permission (if she is still alive). Paul venter (talk) 14:12, 6 October 2016 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section.

King Kong Encounter images

 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the discussion was: reduce b/w, delete color czar  17:32, 25 December 2016 (UTC)


 * File:King Kong Encounter.jpg ([ delete] | talk | [ history] | links | [ logs]) &#x20;– uploaded by Davidcrown ( [ notify] | contribs | uploads | upload log).
 * File:King Kong Publicity Still.jpg ([ delete] | talk | [ history] | links | [ logs]) &#x20;– uploaded by Davidcrown ( [ notify] | contribs | uploads | upload log).

I'm not sure why two non-free publicity photos are needed for King Kong Encounter. Both files have a non-free use rationale for the article, but both do not seem to be needed per WP:NFCC. Either file could be used in the main infobox to show what the attraction looked liked and the images are close enough so that no new information is really gained from using them both. The black and white one seems a bit clearer to me so maybe that should be the one that is kept, but it might have to be reduced. If the color image is the preferred image, it should be moved to the main infobox and the black and white deleted. Regardless, both are not really needed unless they can somehow be converted to a free license. -- Marchjuly (talk) 00:59, 6 October 2016 (UTC)


 * We don't normally permit non-free images in galleries so yeah, one of these has got to go. The black-and-white tells us a little more about the ride experience so I think that one should be cropped and sized for fair use and the color one deleted. — Diannaa 🍁 (talk) 00:08, 11 November 2016 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Dolly.png

 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  02:43, 14 October 2016 (UTC)
 * File:Dolly.png ([ delete] | talk | [ history] | links | [ logs]) &#x20;– uploaded by Beppe.corrado ( [ notify] | contribs | uploads | upload log).

Unidentified dog, out of scope. Magog the Ogre (t • c) 01:02, 6 October 2016 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section.

Telus Sky images

 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the discussion was: keep skyline, delete close-up czar  17:34, 25 December 2016 (UTC)
 * File:TELUS Sky city.jpg ([ delete] | talk | [ history] | links | [ logs]) &#x20;– uploaded by GabeTelus ( [ notify] | contribs | uploads | upload log).
 * File:Telus Sky Redesign.jpg ([ delete] | talk | [ history] | links | [ logs]) &#x20;– uploaded by Chadillaccc ( [ notify] | contribs | uploads | upload log).

Non-free files being used in Telus Sky. Each file has a non-free use rationale, but it's not clear per WP:NFCC and WP:NFCC why two non-free files are needed to identify this currently under-construction building. Only one image can be used in the main infobox to serve as the primary means of identification, so any additional images should be themselves the subject of sourced commentary which within the article to provide the context required by WP:NFCC. Out of the two images, "File:TELUS Sky city.jpg" seems more suitable for the infobox because it shows the entire building as it would appear in the city's skyline and not just one side of the building; this image, however, might show a former design and may not be contextually relevant any longer based upon the information in the non-free use rationale of the other iamge. If this is the case, then there's no real justification for non-free use of image showing the former design and it should be deleted. If this is not the case, the skyline image should be added to the infobox and the other image deleted. -- Marchjuly (talk) 04:50, 6 October 2016 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Fionn midgley.JPG

 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  02:43, 14 October 2016 (UTC)
 * File:Fionn midgley.JPG ([ delete] | talk | [ history] | links | [ logs]) &#x20;– uploaded by Shakaib12 ( [ notify] | contribs | uploads | upload log).

Low quality image of no use to the encyclopedia. The other uploads by the same uploader are equally useless; they seem to be the uploader's classmates and a teacher. John of Reading (talk) 09:56, 6 October 2016 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Windows 2000 Server Startup&

 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the discussion was: File deleted by Explicit --Majora (talk) 03:43, 7 November 2016 (UTC)
 * File:Windows 2000 Server Startup& ([ delete] | talk | [ history] | links | [ logs]) &#x20;– uploaded by Matt Adrian Sugui ( [ notify] | contribs | uploads | upload log).

Non-free software screenshot. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 10:15, 6 October 2016 (UTC)

Thanks. Matt 11:03, 6 October 2016 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Sachin w Jazze.jpg

 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  02:43, 14 October 2016 (UTC)
 * File:Sachin w Jazze.jpg ([ delete] | talk | [ history] | links | [ logs]) &#x20;– uploaded by Sachin Jazze ( [ notify] | contribs | uploads | upload log).

Unused, personal file? Sfan00 IMG (talk) 10:17, 6 October 2016 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Clayton hall 2.JPG

 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  02:43, 14 October 2016 (UTC)
 * File:Clayton hall 2.JPG ([ delete] | talk | [ history] | links | [ logs]) &#x20;– uploaded by Sy061148 ( [ notify] | contribs | uploads | upload log).

Delete - unused, blurry. Clearer photos in c:Category:Clayton Hall. Kelly hi! 11:25, 6 October 2016 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section.

File:This is a collage of images in Thunder Bay taken by Ella Sabourin.jpg

 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  02:43, 14 October 2016 (UTC)
 * File:This is a collage of images in Thunder Bay taken by Ella Sabourin.jpg ([ delete] | talk | [ history] | links | [ logs]) &#x20;– uploaded by Eedk ( [ notify] | contribs | uploads | upload log).

The copyright holder has requested removal. (ticket:2016100410019175). I will write to the copyright holder and explain that, according to the terms of the license "The licensor cannot revoke these freedoms as long as you follow the license terms.". That said, I do note that it is a collage of family pictures and may not be particularly useful for Wikimedia. I also note that the photo is not currently used in any article; the only usage is in the copyright holders user page. I understand that we are not required to delete this upon request, but I'm also aware that we occasionally do courtesy deletions, especially when the photo has limited value for encyclopedic usages. Finally, I will point out that the description includes the phrase "The use of these photos is not permitted outside of Wikipedia.". Arguably, this means that the license was never issued properly as the license terms are in conflict with this statement. Perhaps we could argue for deletion on this basis. I would support deletion but will leave it to a consensus of editors. S Philbrick (Talk)  13:49, 6 October 2016 (UTC)
 * Delete per reasons above. Kelly  hi! 16:06, 7 October 2016 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Davidliem2014112001.jpg

 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  08:06, 13 October 2016 (UTC)
 * File:Davidliem2014112001.jpg ([ delete] | talk | [ history] | links | [ logs]) &#x20;– uploaded by David Ardi Laksono ( [ notify] | contribs | uploads | upload log).

Unused file, the draft article it was intended for was rejected and has since been deleted (Draft:David Liem Boonyasak). Highly unlikely the uploader was the copyright holder as claimed given the watermarks. January ( talk ) 16:52, 6 October 2016 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Romulus Mitchell Saunders.jpg

 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the discussion was: Added source info and re-tagged as PD-US. — Diannaa 🍁 (talk) 00:27, 11 November 2016 (UTC)
 * File:Romulus Mitchell Saunders.jpg ([ delete] | talk | [ history] | links | [ logs]) &#x20;– uploaded by Maoun ( [ notify] | contribs | uploads | upload log).

Claim of "self-made" seems pretty unlikely. Scan of a page from a book. (ESkog)(Talk) 17:07, 6 October 2016 (UTC)

This pic is +150 years old and therefore in the public domain, thanks ! (Maoun) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Maoun (talk • contribs) 05:54, 7 October 2016 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section.

File:US Minister James Williams.jpg

 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the discussion was: Delete, lacking source information. Wikiacc (¶) 15:13, 22 December 2016 (UTC)


 * File:US Minister James Williams.jpg ([ delete] | talk | [ history] | links | [ logs]) &#x20;– uploaded by Maoun ( [ notify] | contribs | uploads | upload log).

Claimed to be user created; based on photo style and image format, seems extremely unlikely. (ESkog)(Talk) 17:08, 6 October 2016 (UTC)

This pic is +150 years old and therefore in the public domain, thanks ! (Maoun) —Preceding undated comment added 05:55, 7 October 2016 (UTC)

Delete; we can't keep it without source information. — Diannaa 🍁 (talk) 00:31, 11 November 2016 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Baron Harry Kavanagh-Ballyane and wife Kate Graham Williams.jpg

 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the discussion was: Delete, lacking source information. Wikiacc (¶) 15:13, 22 December 2016 (UTC)


 * <span class="plainlinks nourlexpansion lx" id="File:Baron Harry Kavanagh-Ballyane and wife Kate Graham Williams.jpg">File:Baron Harry Kavanagh-Ballyane and wife Kate Graham Williams.jpg ([ delete] | talk | [ history] | links | [ logs]) &#x20;– uploaded by Maoun ( [ notify] | contribs | uploads | upload log).

Claimed to be user created; based on photo style and image format, seems extremely unlikely. (ESkog)(Talk) 17:08, 6 October 2016 (UTC)

This pic is +150 years old and therefore in the public domain, thanks ! (Maoun) —Preceding undated comment added 05:57, 7 October 2016 (UTC)

Delete; we can't keep it without source information. — Diannaa 🍁 (talk) 00:33, 11 November 2016 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section.

File:VicharnMinchainant2.jpg
<div class="boilerplate ffd vfd xfd-closed" style="background-color:#f3f9ff; margin:1em 0 0 0; padding:0 10px 0 10px; border:1px solid #aaa;">
 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  08:06, 13 October 2016 (UTC)
 * File:VicharnMinchainant2.jpg ([ delete] | talk | [ history] | links | [ logs]) &#x20;– uploaded by WikiAnonymusWriter ( [ notify] | contribs | uploads | upload log).

The source website (politicalbase.in.th) appears to include images from various sources, and therefore would not have the right to license these images under CC. Paul_012 (talk) 19:11, 6 October 2016 (UTC) Also File:VicharnMinchaiynunt.jpg, a cropped version. --Paul_012 (talk) 19:12, 6 October 2016 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section.