Wikipedia:Files for discussion/2017 February 1



File:Dhamaal music.jpg

 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  02:01, 9 February 2017 (UTC)
 * File:Dhamaal music.jpg ([ delete] | talk | [ history] | links | [ logs]) &#x20;– uploaded by DJWalia ( [ notify] | contribs | uploads | upload log).

Fails MOS:FILM and WP:NFCC. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 08:20, 1 February 2017 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Sanam-re-pos-2016.jpg

 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  02:01, 9 February 2017 (UTC)
 * File:Sanam-re-pos-2016.jpg ([ delete] | talk | [ history] | links | [ logs]) &#x20;– uploaded by Ankit Sihag ( [ notify] | contribs | uploads | upload log).

Fails MOS:FILM and WP:NFCC. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 08:27, 1 February 2017 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Benedictus Arbuthnot.jpg

 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  02:01, 9 February 2017 (UTC)
 * File:Benedictus Arbuthnot.jpg ([ delete] | talk | [ history] | links | [ logs]) &#x20;– uploaded by Kittybrewster ( [ notify] | contribs | uploads | upload log).

Don't believe this is in the source, at least the one I checked. I checked the illustration list in IA copy of the listed source, but the closest image was this. Is it in a different edition? Or is the citation wrong? czar 18:17, 1 February 2017 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Olympiques honourees.jpg

 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the discussion was: Keep Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 09:37, 10 February 2017 (UTC)
 * File:Olympiques honourees.jpg ([ delete] | talk | [ history] | links | [ logs]) &#x20;– uploaded by Flibirigit ( [ notify] | contribs | uploads | upload log).

Derivative work of 2D works, no FoP for 2D works in Canada. ~ Rob 13 Talk 05:50, 23 January 2017 (UTC)
 * Hard to call this a derivative work. It is clearly a scenic picture encompassing the banners showing how they hang in the rafters. -DJSasso (talk) 12:33, 23 January 2017 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, czar  22:11, 1 February 2017 (UTC)
 * I don't see the FoP case here. The banners are simple, the logo is de minimis, the background is not substantive enough to be a FoP case. Move to Commons. czar  22:12, 1 February 2017 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section.

File:PorterGardenTelescope.JPG

 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the discussion was: Delete; not clear who the copyright holder/photographer is Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 09:38, 10 February 2017 (UTC)
 * File:PorterGardenTelescope.JPG ([ delete] | talk | [ history] | links | [ logs]) &#x20;– uploaded by Kowloonese ( [ notify] | contribs | uploads | upload log).

questionable copyright status; uploader is not the user cited as the author  F ASTILY   09:28, 23 January 2017 (UTC)  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, czar  22:14, 1 February 2017 (UTC) , was an error? czar 22:15, 1 February 2017 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section.

File:EquatorialSundial.JPG

 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the discussion was: Delete, given the uncertainty of who the copyright holder is and thus whether the license is correct Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 09:40, 10 February 2017 (UTC)
 * File:EquatorialSundial.JPG ([ delete] | talk | [ history] | links | [ logs]) &#x20;– uploaded by Kowloonese ( [ notify] | contribs | uploads | upload log).

questionable copyright status; uploader is not the user cited as the author  F ASTILY   09:28, 23 January 2017 (UTC)  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, czar  22:16, 1 February 2017 (UTC) , was a typo? czar 22:16, 1 February 2017 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section.

File:ASOUE VFD Eye 2.png

 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the discussion was: Delete; not a case of PD-simple, and not enough evidence that the file is under a free license either Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 09:41, 10 February 2017 (UTC)
 * File:ASOUE VFD Eye 2.png ([ delete] | talk | [ history] | links | [ logs]) &#x20;– uploaded by Victor hoffnung ( [ notify] | contribs | uploads | upload log).

Not so sure this is below TOO Sfan00 IMG (talk) 10:09, 23 January 2017 (UTC)


 * Pardon, what exactly is the objection? Victor hoffnung (talk) 17:54, 23 January 2017 (UTC)

<div class="xfd_relist" style="border-top: 1px solid #AAA; border-bottom: 1px solid #AAA; padding: 0px 25px;"> Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, czar  22:17, 1 February 2017 (UTC) , see WP:TOO re: threshold of originality. I agree that this image is too original to warrant its PD-simple tag. We need the permission of the copyright holder to license it under a free license—none is stated on the website, though I imagine they're not the copyright holder either. czar 22:19, 1 February 2017 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section.

File:1616 Winnie after rehab.jpg
<div class="boilerplate ffd vfd xfd-closed" style="background-color:#f3f9ff; margin:1em 0 0 0; padding:0 10px 0 10px; border:1px solid #aaa;">
 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the discussion was: Relisted on }}
 * File:1616 Winnie after rehab.jpg ([ delete] | talk | [ history] | links | [ logs]) &#x20;– uploaded by Banjosantos ( [ notify] | contribs | uploads | upload log).
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section.