Wikipedia:Files for discussion/2017 February 21



File:Skylar moore.jpg

 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  09:02, 1 March 2017 (UTC)
 * File:Skylar moore.jpg ([ delete] | talk | [ history] | links | [ logs]) &#x20;– uploaded by Gatoman101 ( [ notify] | contribs | uploads | upload log).

Dubious copyright claim of unused file. Exifdata implies a selfie but this file still fails to meet WP:WEBHOST criteria for inclusion. -- A Certain White Cat chi? 00:36, 21 February 2017 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Jillian Sipkins in Peanut Butter Jelly by Galantis.png

 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  09:02, 1 March 2017 (UTC)
 * File:Jillian Sipkins in Peanut Butter Jelly by Galantis.png ([ delete] | talk | [ history] | links | [ logs]) &#x20;– uploaded by Hellznrg ( [ notify] | contribs | uploads | upload log).

Quite obviously does not meet the Non-free content criteria. The only rationale given is that it's to illustrate a character in a video, but there is no reason given why it's important to illustrate this character (and it's not important, so no such reason can ever be given). 118.141.120.94 (talk) 05:56, 21 February 2017 (UTC)


 * She is the main character of the story. Kellymoat (talk) 12:36, 21 February 2017 (UTC)


 * Delete - Lacks the context needed to establish this image as essential for the understanding of the article. There is no sourced commentary about the image or its importance to the video. -- Whpq (talk) 14:46, 21 February 2017 (UTC)
 * Honestly, I was invited to discuss. I wasn't aware that this was a voting page. But I don't actually have a vote one way or the other.
 * In the video, she is the main character. She is the one that says "spread it like peanut butter" which sets everyone into a frenzy. The "band" is the not the center focus, they only make a cameo.
 * The image, as described on the file page, is a screen shot from the video. Kellymoat (talk) 12:29, 22 February 2017 (UTC)
 * This is a discussion on what action should be taken with respect to this non-free file. The !vote format is part of the guidelines for posting in this discussion.  See Files for discussion.  All non-free content must meet all of the non-free content criteria in order to be used.  In particular, for this image, the issue is whether WP:NFCC has been met. Neither the nominator nor I believe that point 8 has been met. -- Whpq (talk) 13:33, 22 February 2017 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Juliet Simms.jpg

 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the discussion was: Speedy deleted as a copyright violation RickinBaltimore (talk) 19:01, 21 February 2017 (UTC)
 * File:Juliet Simms.jpg ([ delete] | talk | [ history] | links | [ logs]) &#x20;– uploaded by Verminlord666 ( [ notify] | contribs | uploads | upload log).

Dubious claim of own work. Originally stated that license is PD because "idk": but then tried to claim it was an own work and license it under CC-BY-SA-4.0. Note the EXIF data. ~ Rob 13 Talk 06:45, 21 February 2017 (UTC)


 * Speedy Delete - C;lear copyright violation. See http://archive.jsonline.com/Services/image.ashx?domain=www.jsonline.com&file=33214315-mjs_warpedtour_julietsimms_01.jpg&resize=210*139 which is unsurprising given that that the EXIF shows the image to be copyrighted by a Journal-Sentinel photographer. -- Whpq (talk) 14:49, 21 February 2017 (UTC)
 * It can't be a rip of that off the web, since the resolution of this image is much higher than that image. That's why I didn't nominate it for speedy. It's a copyright violation, but not obviously so, at least in my opinion. ~ Rob 13 Talk 15:05, 21 February 2017 (UTC)
 * The archives at the Journal Sentinel have gone 404 for some reason. The link is to the image gallery, but clinking on the image (which one would expect to bring up the full-res image) leads to a 404 page missing notice.  I tagged it as a speedy since the EXIF data along with the image gallery make it (to me) quite obvious that this is a copyright violation. -- Whpq (talk) 15:10, 21 February 2017 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Sokun Nisa1.jpg

 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  09:02, 1 March 2017 (UTC)
 * File:Sokun Nisa1.jpg ([ delete] | talk | [ history] | links | [ logs]) &#x20;– uploaded by Wk56789 ( [ notify] | contribs | uploads | upload log).

Image is claimed as own work but is not credible. Uploader has previously uploaded copyrighted images. This appears to be a posed product placement photo, quite possibly from the subject's Facebook page. Whpq (talk) 14:43, 21 February 2017 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Charles Edison (draft registration card, 1918).gif

 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  06:02, 10 March 2017 (UTC)
 * File:Charles Edison (draft registration card, 1918).gif ([ delete] | talk | [ history] | links | [ logs]) &#x20;– uploaded by Richard Arthur Norton (1958- ) ( [ notify] | contribs | uploads | upload log).

Un-verifiable source information, unable to verify copyright status of file. F ASTILY  06:03, 25 January 2017 (UTC)  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, czar  16:03, 21 February 2017 (UTC)
 * Keep, obviously It is a US federal government form so not eligible for copyright. It was distributed in 1918 so copyright would have expired, even if eligible for copyright. The part filled in is ineligible for copyright since it contains only facts, the way a phone book is ineligible for copyright. The source is clearly marked as "Selective Service", the government agency responsible for the form. Why is there any doubt about this? --Richard Arthur Norton (1958- ) (talk) 02:12, 22 February 2017 (UTC)
 * Delete. Unused, no expected future use. His draft registration will not need illustration. Commons will want better sourcing if it were to be moved there. Most likely from Ancestry.com or something of that ilk. czar  06:11, 4 March 2017 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Foreigner - Agent Provocateur.JPG

 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the discussion was: relisted on. czar 06:05, 4 March 2017 (UTC)


 * File:Foreigner - Agent Provocateur.JPG ([ delete] | talk | [ history] | links | [ logs])
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Collins Kids in Israel.jpg

 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the discussion was: delete--Ymblanter (talk) 12:30, 3 March 2017 (UTC)
 * File:Collins Kids in Israel.jpg ([ delete] | talk | [ history] | links | [ logs]) &#x20;– uploaded by Collinskids1912 ( [ notify] | contribs | uploads | upload log).

portrait of notable individual. dubious own work claim  F ASTILY   04:36, 13 February 2017 (UTC)  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 19:15, 21 February 2017 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section.