Wikipedia:Files for discussion/2017 January 29



File:USP Lee.jpg

 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  11:06, 6 February 2017 (UTC)
 * File:USP Lee.jpg ([ delete] | talk | [ history] | links | [ logs]) &#x20;– uploaded by KimChee ( [ notify] | contribs | uploads | upload log).

A PD-USGov image of a federal prison. Horrid-quality: it's tiny (200x150 px), it's blurry, and it only depicts a tiny portion of the subject. I drove past the place today and have a photo to upload (6016x4000 px), so this image will soon be replaced. This nomination should not be closed as "delete" until I come here and leave a link to the new photo or until the new photo's on the prison article. Nyttend (talk) 01:12, 29 January 2017 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Jeff Ragsdale4.jpg

 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  11:06, 6 February 2017 (UTC)
 * File:Jeff Ragsdale4.jpg ([ delete] | talk | [ history] | links | [ logs]) &#x20;– uploaded by RichardPeterson44 ( [ notify] | contribs | uploads | upload log).

Probably violates copyright. Can be found [https://www.google.com/search?tbs=sbi:AMhZZisMZsmUC58uEdq-FhBjvH5dkvzIazlW117uqz1eOixINzwuKyLQ_13ike3zjuCSFf0uZY7lIdREYDKAjqs6hH0Apf3tsV6-wJap-sRaMQV70jPjXajI2X0oH9RPBYvk5X3pAk38UmttAPCo2YEHbh22soSfUz8NMpAVTsNDZg5cyQQ_1HviZHzVU6BeHMYYArD41qIVirM1n_1UsrzXmmkGssOP3ScGn8BtLQo61OjQCIGBvYy_1mKQwdoU3auK-XRNoLdkRNFh05k_1VrhcUl4xGWsVZauMCycAn3dMqo1jQFzjeMv9ZGDCbagXMWcw3VPisdKqhtpfMGzj4bOC_1xzemz7GMZF4GaRhcawBqrzYGVRJU0iSqFmZwXBVaGYlAEjvcUfC3r3xz8DO-VN_18JZUEK1HnoGJcIhEaj3Q5ARxXSJuJ9GpcjNwMVMGKchu1FCpJ-0_1D0rn5u0aMpK_1IADXN8P2SMARlGIJaOL_1nzgQcMfRCESZduwTn0TPvtTefdHIPfOJPwySNAFBCX3EWb2cIPUKGteDN4HD1NrojApf8HvA0EQ6rv5m_1gsCNIRXkZZgQRQqDrZ_1sBQ0EsMCOoGOwwq3NCrKRFOsK7ldUDPujZ1wHXTZAPJcz7eyK-OV1ZDJzHPqzTKJN78So-5ZfV8PFDZItXD2bc6bdN4Xq90tsLZE0Gw7I984El_12E3gOHxacQgZ8sCmW0L-nbobdfm7-WKBn0J0Y6RSYqwzyaLMliz9_1ZvXb0gOLswxJQYqPxznNDVFrfWC31oiXqvU9cOD6Ia-XHkV6hH1inv9ATzgwaeYxpHQMH-A7KF8lIUqPfsOp4qp5xUqAlaWeM0EUuVOfI3mzf7sK48Um4uoGM4-wiBEKglpI76k6TABAsPFC-w1C6U3iE9YKzOWxpUG-FKFvo-LQbzXMigrQaUYHPlWB0akDCC7eds3Vg8erwrG9Psfk0k0iXi-AWf6wcaXlyvdZIftHwCxPcGjS85DwcvedvbksvjjAMp_1gLRyPDPjdppKMVcwVv8nI0ezh6SBQsUhbKpHy8EnGvbsKmflOzSPfw-oHsDgyzSv9Z2UDta791_1k-HEJy0fgQs4Vuaxdwy3Pv1FwdZBL1dxwvvzl-ywv8ELOnIOwItPmXX_1LsdsI4d1UPx4I3spf2rUZXw9AwAhqnx8BMZ1-eiinArAk_1HSRkvRznomz9AGsBxdjyTHcXd4KmmJKZeNgaafDLmSvAciL6NWb4bxOPELbu9U7E7phfFm2rA5RYMoA0Ta5UXVbRj6hps80Q846fjbSeT7aYNaIDWIXJxD8yAI188TUpB-w2l8OuFZh2OiX8HLpLotlbPy9oP3omRzhOlLuI_1SNdHjajPFE0BBAG2CEt-p3J4icKkqNWRbupvs2IJ6zqtn4y9RagBN5c6G41k0IeXwlYsolC1cYWuOn_1952Vlzbe6KT2pI7BI7PNtk6o9KuxyM_14GnJnAVbHJehbSO_1oc3i7aPHcRQiHuItMhPrBPYgiv21rLdnn7GdeGYa5IvQHcypjvhYId0hTlGtt48hzODsd2Ye8lfDII6ZGu8gBNtO_1L2j-InvVTCWpATaBDAzn8914pGitYu92ISz94uF_1EvZmQGvR6seIE38-K7hQAHsabBJaCSlaOo1PrDW-wefBMa0f2jVqUBecqYZ1sRbIoexYGRwO7GNrjOXeCg using Google] on other websites. Techyan （Talk） 05:39, 29 January 2017 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section.

File:2013 Now TV box.jpg

 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  11:06, 6 February 2017 (UTC)
 * File:2013 Now TV box.jpg ([ delete] | talk | [ history] | links | [ logs]) &#x20;– uploaded by Danielcrawford91 ( [ notify] | contribs | uploads | upload log).

Seems like this image may fail WP:NFCC - the object shown looks mostly utilitarian (and images thereof thus not derivative works), as such a free image could be obtained by photographing it. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 10:05, 29 January 2017 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section.

File:ASSET logo.jpg

 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted as F8 by A file with this name on Commons is now visible. AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:01, 7 February 2017 (UTC)
 * File:ASSET logo.jpg ([ delete] | talk | [ history] | links | [ logs]) &#x20;– uploaded by HIST406-13jlsilver ( [ notify] | contribs | uploads | upload log).

Not sure if this logo meets the "selection and arrangement" standard for copyright protection as it's mostly coloured text. Opinions? Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 10:10, 29 January 2017 (UTC)
 * It is an American logo so it is most certainly PD-textlogo. The US has a much higher TOO than that. --Majora (talk) 19:29, 29 January 2017 (UTC)


 * Appears to be below TOO. Relicense to to PD-log and transfer to Commons. Also organise for the prior version to be restored. Salavat (talk) 11:23, 30 January 2017 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Aerial Warfare in Battlefield 1.jpg

 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  11:06, 6 February 2017 (UTC)
 * File:Aerial Warfare in Battlefield 1.jpg ([ delete] | talk | [ history] | links | [ logs]) &#x20;– uploaded by LoudLizard ( [ notify] | contribs | uploads | upload log).

A screenshot of copyrighted work cannot be released under a free license. The copyright still belongs to the creators of that work (in this case Electronic Arts). So this would have to be under fair use. Which I don't believe qualifies as a screenshot from a singular mission does not significantly increase the reader's understanding of the game itself (WP:NFCCP #8) Majora (talk) 19:27, 29 January 2017 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Rio 2011 Soundtrack.jpg

 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  11:06, 6 February 2017 (UTC)
 * File:Rio 2011 Soundtrack.jpg ([ delete] | talk | [ history] | links | [ logs]) &#x20;– uploaded by DBZFan30 ( [ notify] | contribs | uploads | upload log).

Per WP:FILMSCORE, the current project consensus is "against having cover images in the album infoboxes in the film article. The poster image in the film infobox is sufficient for identification of the topic, and having cover images in the film article's album infoboxes is considered extraneous." The film poster at the top of the Rio (2011 film) article is nearly identical to this soundtrack cover. Mz7 (talk) 20:04, 29 January 2017 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Rio 2 Soundtrack Cover.jpg

 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  11:06, 6 February 2017 (UTC)
 * File:Rio 2 Soundtrack Cover.jpg ([ delete] | talk | [ history] | links | [ logs]) &#x20;– uploaded by DBZFan30 ( [ notify] | contribs | uploads | upload log).

Per WP:FILMSCORE, the current project consensus is "against having cover images in the album infoboxes in the film article. The poster image in the film infobox is sufficient for identification of the topic, and having cover images in the film article's album infoboxes is considered extraneous." The film poster at the top of the Rio 2 article is nearly identical to this soundtrack cover. Mz7 (talk) 20:06, 29 January 2017 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Wreck It Ralph Soundtrack.jpg

 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  11:06, 6 February 2017 (UTC)
 * File:Wreck It Ralph Soundtrack.jpg ([ delete] | talk | [ history] | links | [ logs]) &#x20;– uploaded by DBZFan30 ( [ notify] | contribs | uploads | upload log).

Per WP:FILMSCORE, the current project consensus is "against having cover images in the album infoboxes in the film article. The poster image in the film infobox is sufficient for identification of the topic, and having cover images in the film article's album infoboxes is considered extraneous." The film poster at the top of the Wreck-It Ralph article is sufficient to identify this soundtrack. Mz7 (talk) 20:08, 29 January 2017 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Rob Rainford (November 2006).jpg

 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  11:06, 6 February 2017 (UTC)
 * File:Rob Rainford (November 2006).jpg ([ delete] | talk | [ history] | links | [ logs]) &#x20;– uploaded by Will2006ad ( [ notify] | contribs | uploads | upload log).

No proof of permission to use. Iazyges  Consermonor   Opus meum  20:51, 29 January 2017 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Julie Maybury holding a framed photo of her daughter Kylie Maybury.jpg

 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted as G7 by AnomieBOT ⚡  02:01, 30 January 2017 (UTC)
 * File:Julie Maybury holding a framed photo of her daughter Kylie Maybury.jpg ([ delete] | talk | [ history] | links | [ logs]) &#x20;– uploaded by Paul Benjamin Austin ( [ notify] | contribs | uploads | upload log).

We already have two non-free images of the person on the article. This one is a violation of WP:NFCCP #3a and does not increase the reader's understanding of the topic at all. Majora (talk) 22:34, 29 January 2017 (UTC)
 * I thought that having a picture of Kylie's mother was OK. I'm happy to remove it if i was wrong. Paul Benjamin Austin (talk) 22:44, 29 January 2017 (UTC)
 * Thank you for removing it. You can speed up the process if you want by tagging it with db-g7 as that will signal that the uploader requests deletion. --Majora (talk) 23:19, 29 January 2017 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section.