Wikipedia:Files for discussion/2017 May 12



File:Ilomska-sliv.jpg

 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  02:04, 20 May 2017 (UTC)
 * File:Ilomska-sliv.jpg ([ delete] | talk | [ history] | links | [ logs]) &#x20;– uploaded by Yahadzija ( [ notify] | contribs | uploads | upload log).

appears to be a map screenshot/scan, dubious self-work claim  F ASTILY   00:48, 12 May 2017 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Ahs-badge-logo-2015.png

 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the discussion was: convert to fair use. ℯ xplicit  00:22, 20 May 2017 (UTC)
 * File:Ahs-badge-logo-2015.png ([ delete] | talk | [ history] | links | [ logs]) &#x20;– uploaded by Maxnormal gb ( [ notify] | contribs | uploads | upload log).

school logo, dubious self-work claim  F ASTILY   01:01, 12 May 2017 (UTC)
 * Relicensed to non-free logo and added a fair use. Discussion should be good to close now. Salavat (talk) 02:11, 13 May 2017 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Flag of the Torres Strait Islanders.svg

 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the discussion was: no consensus. File will remain under fair use. ℯ xplicit  00:22, 20 May 2017 (UTC)
 * File:Flag of the Torres Strait Islanders.svg ([ delete] | talk | [ history] | links | [ logs]) &#x20;– uploaded by Andrwsc ( [ notify] | contribs | uploads | upload log).

Obvious pd-textlogo is obvious. KMF (talk) 04:05, 12 May 2017 (UTC)
 * Comment: I'm not sure how obvious it is because this file was discussed before at Wikipedia:Non-free content review/Archive 56 and Wikipedia:Files for discussion/2015 November 21, so if it was obvious it would've been brought up during those discussions. In fact, a comment in the 2015 FFD discussion seems to suggest this is not a case for "PD-logo". -- Marchjuly (talk) 04:49, 12 May 2017 (UTC)
 * If pd-textlogo was valid, it would apply to most flags, but it doesn't. -- Aussie Legend  ( ✉ ) 06:48, 12 May 2017 (UTC)
 * Umm... still uncertain - I realize that the image was reinserted into Indigenous Australians. The copyright of flag in the US is not easy to yet determine, but it's still copyrightable in Australia. The shape looks like a wig with the star below it. As said before, retag the image to "PD-ineligible-USonly" if no one minds it. --George Ho (talk) 05:55, 13 May 2017 (UTC)
 * Per the "centre of the flag shows a white dhari (dancer’s headdress) and is a symbol for all Torres Strait Islanders."  I do not think that component of the flag is an "obvious" simple geometric shape.  — Andrwsc (talk · contribs) 21:25, 15 May 2017 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Robert Barron, 2016.jpg

 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  02:04, 20 May 2017 (UTC)
 * File:Robert Barron, 2016.jpg ([ delete] | talk | [ history] | links | [ logs]) &#x20;– uploaded by VegaRamona ( [ notify] | contribs | uploads | upload log).

Possible copyvio, 300 × 372 versions of this image are found on many different websites. – Train2104 (t • c) 13:23, 12 May 2017 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Michael Jibson.jpg

 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  02:04, 20 May 2017 (UTC)
 * File:Michael Jibson.jpg ([ delete] | talk | [ history] | links | [ logs]) &#x20;– uploaded by Mikejibson ( [ notify] | contribs | uploads | upload log).

Uploader is claiming own work on this image of Michael Jibson. The user name of the uploader suggests that this person is Michael Jibson. However, Jibson is the subject of the photo and it is not a selfie. The EXIF data and the credit at IMDB state that the photo is by "Pip". We would need OTRS confirmation that this work is indeed freely licensed as the copyright normally rests with the photographer, and not the subject of the photo. Not that the uploader has uploaded a bunch of other photos as own work (where he is not the subjet) and have all been tagged for speedy deletion as copyright violations (by other editors, not me). Whpq (talk) 17:25, 12 May 2017 (UTC)

Addendum - There is another version in the history which is a different photo of Jibson, but it to is also not a selfie, and so reverting to that version is not likely to resolve the issue of licensing. -- Whpq (talk) 17:27, 12 May 2017 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section.