Wikipedia:Files for discussion/2017 May 6



File:Malaimuthu mariyamman.jpg

 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  02:02, 15 May 2017 (UTC)
 * File:Malaimuthu mariyamman.jpg ([ delete] | talk | [ history] | links | [ logs]) &#x20;– uploaded by Yuvaraj Cs ( [ notify] | contribs | uploads | upload log).

possible derivative of non-free content (statue)  F ASTILY   01:40, 6 May 2017 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section.

File:The threads that bind us, David Hockney.jpg

 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by A file with this name on Commons is now visible. AnomieBOT ⚡ 06:04, 14 May 2017 (UTC)
 * File:The threads that bind us, David Hockney.jpg ([ delete] | talk | [ history] | links | [ logs]) &#x20;– uploaded by Bradford4life ( [ notify] | contribs | uploads | upload log).

There is no freedom of panorama for publically displayed 2D works of art in the United Kingdom per c:COM:FOP, so the copyright status of the underlying work itself needs to be taken into account. While the copyright of the photo is held by the photographer, the same cannot be said for the wall-hanging shown in the photo so permission from the two artists who created it is needed. It's possible that licensing on the photo itself can be self, but the wall-hanging most likely will need to be treated as Non-free 2D art, unless it can be clearly shown to have been released under a free license or into the public domain by the artists who created it. The problem with converting it to non-free is that the way the file is being used as the primary means of identification in David Hockney and the use in List of people from Bradford would not satisfy WP:NFCC and WP:NFCC (WP:NFLISTS), respectively. So, conversion to non-free only makes sense if the wall-hanging itself can be shown to have been the subject of sourced commentary and such content can be added to the Hockney article; otherwise, I suggest delete for the file. -- Marchjuly (talk) 07:47, 6 May 2017 (UTC)
 * It's a tapestry not a painting, school children and artists in Bradford were involved in the design and creating the art work.2A00:23C5:5E96:1700:95A7:2830:B797:8730 (talk) 19:58, 9 May 2017 (UTC)
 * I believe a tapestry would still be considered to be a "2D work of art" when displayed as such, even in public, under British copyright law, but perhaps someone else can clarify this. Also, the fact that it was partly created by school children does not mean there was no creative input involved. -- Marchjuly (talk) 02:29, 10 May 2017 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section.

File:RW08.png

 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  06:04, 14 May 2017 (UTC)
 * File:RW08.png ([ delete] | talk | [ history] | links | [ logs]) &#x20;– uploaded by Lordmwa ( [ notify] | contribs | uploads | upload log).

dubious "own-work" claim - probable copyvio Jon Kolbert (talk) 09:06, 6 May 2017 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Kust1.jpg

 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  06:04, 14 May 2017 (UTC)
 * File:Kust1.jpg ([ delete] | talk | [ history] | links | [ logs]) &#x20;– uploaded by Alex Bakharev ( [ notify] | contribs | uploads | upload log).

Non-free image of a work of art being used for decorative purposes in Dmitry Kustanovich, an article about the person who created it. Typically, non-free use would be acceptable as the primary means of identification in a stand-alone article about the work of art itself, but a much stronger non-free justification is required for other articles and other uses. This particular piece is not itself the subject of any sourced commentary within the article, so the context required by WP:NFCC is lacking. Unless sourced content specifically discussing this painting is added to the article, this type of non-free use is not allowed per WP:NFCC. There is a gallery of freely licensed images from Commons whihc are more than sufficient for showing examples of the artist's work, so a non-free image is not needed per WP:FREER. -- Marchjuly (talk) 14:19, 6 May 2017 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section.

File:YuriyTarnawsky Lviv.jpg

 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  06:04, 14 May 2017 (UTC)
 * File:YuriyTarnawsky Lviv.jpg ([ delete] | talk | [ history] | links | [ logs]) &#x20;– uploaded by Karina Zalewska ( [ notify] | contribs | uploads | upload log).

Require permission that the photographer sold the rights, as professional photographs are the copyright of the photographer. – Train2104 (t • c) 18:26, 6 May 2017 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section.