Wikipedia:Files for discussion/2017 September 8



File:Take the Long Way Home Eagle.jpg

 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  02:02, 16 September 2017 (UTC)
 * File:Take the Long Way Home Eagle.jpg ([ delete] | talk | [ history] | links | [ logs]) &#x20;– uploaded by FotoPhest ( [ notify] | contribs | uploads | upload log).

Unneeded. There is already a piece of non-free media to identify this release and this second cover isn't discussed critically. ―Justin ( koavf ) ❤T☮C☺M☯ 08:26, 8 September 2017 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Art instructor Ralph Bagley.jpg

 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  02:02, 16 September 2017 (UTC)
 * File:Art instructor Ralph Bagley.jpg ([ delete] | talk | [ history] | links | [ logs]) &#x20;– uploaded by Drkube ( [ notify] | contribs | uploads | upload log).

Fails WP:NFCC - another non-free image is used in the article File:Portrait of artist Ralph Leon Bagley.jpg Jon Kolbert (talk) 13:36, 8 September 2017 (UTC)


 * Delete - we do not need twp non-free images provide visual identification of the subject. -- Whpq (talk) 20:44, 8 September 2017 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section.

File:BelovStep.GIF

 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  02:02, 16 September 2017 (UTC)
 * File:BelovStep.GIF ([ delete] | talk | [ history] | links | [ logs]) &#x20;– uploaded by Mwelch ( [ notify] | contribs | uploads | upload log).

I do not see the merits of this non-free inclusion. The image (obviously a scan of old analogue tv) is well too fuzzy to be of any use. As an aside I did try to reduce to NFCC guideline size - but the poor quality of the reduced image causes any reduction to be unworkable. Ron h jones (Talk) 15:14, 8 September 2017 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section.

File:All Music Homepage circa 1999.jpg

 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  02:02, 16 September 2017 (UTC)
 * File:All Music Homepage circa 1999.jpg ([ delete] | talk | [ history] | links | [ logs]) &#x20;– uploaded by JSFarman ( [ notify] | contribs | uploads | upload log).

image doesn't accurately depict what the website resembled as many elements are broken, also not the subject of critical commentary in the article and as such fails the WP:NFCC Jon Kolbert (talk) 15:31, 8 September 2017 (UTC)
 * Delete as uploader: I didn't think it was a great image either; I took it from the All Music Facebook page (which described it as an early iteration) and I added it before I finished rewriting the article. I'd love to have a visual for the AllMusic home page from the early days but this isn't the one. JSFarman (talk) 15:45, 8 September 2017 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Operation Khyber.png

 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  02:02, 16 September 2017 (UTC)
 * File:Operation Khyber.png ([ delete] | talk | [ history] | links | [ logs]) &#x20;– uploaded by Mfarazbaig ( [ notify] | contribs | uploads | upload log).

Uploader is claiming image is public domain as it is material from Inter-Services Public Relations. I cannot find any information that would indicate that the material they produce are in the public domian. Their website specifically states "Copyrights 2017. ISPR. All Rights Reserved." Whpq (talk) 20:09, 8 September 2017 (UTC)
 * Keep - How has Express Tribune uploaded the video on their FB page? A low quality screenshot is taken at 00:32 sec and is fairly used for educational purpose. - Mfarazbaig (talk) 20:53, 8 September 2017 (UTC)
 * Comment - Your claim is that the image is in the public domain. Can you present any evidence that it is in the public domain?  The fact that a newspaper used material from a public relations source is not proof that it is in the public domain.  It's just business as usual for press release material. -- Whpq (talk) 21:01, 8 September 2017 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Josh Ekrem Boxer.jpg

 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  02:02, 16 September 2017 (UTC)
 * File:Josh Ekrem Boxer.jpg ([ delete] | talk | [ history] | links | [ logs]) &#x20;– uploaded by Stryker1981 ( [ notify] | contribs | uploads | upload log).

This is a photo of a person, and there is no evidence that the person is dead, so the photo seems to violate WP:NFCC and WP:NFCC. However, the file is also uploaded as a 'free' file to Commons:. If the file is free, then it should be deleted per WP:F8, and if it's unfree, then it should be deleted for violation of WP:NFCC. See also. Stefan2 (talk) 20:25, 8 September 2017 (UTC)


 * Delete - Agree that if the image is non-free, it's presence here on the English Wikipedia fails NFCC 1 and 7. If the image is actually free, then it can be sorted out on Commons where it would belong if it were free.  In either case, there is no need for the image on the English wikipedia. -- Whpq (talk) 20:49, 8 September 2017 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section.

File:One Piece, Volume 1.jpg

 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the discussion was: relisted on. (non-admin closure) Winged Blades of Godric On leave 16:26, 20 September 2017 (UTC)


 * File:One Piece, Volume 1.jpg ([ delete] | talk | [ history] | links | [ logs])
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section.