Wikipedia:Files for discussion/2018 April 22



File:Sabah Heritage Party Flag.svg

 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the discussion was: di-orphaned fair use. czar 18:25, 27 May 2018 (UTC)
 * File:Sabah Heritage Party Flag.svg ([ delete] | talk | [ history] | links | [ logs]) &#x20;– uploaded by Molecule Extraction ( [ notify] | contribs | uploads | upload log).

The logo is not a simple geometric shapes, so it is not a PD logo. This is  Taiwania Justo  speaking (Reception Room) 01:48, 22 April 2018 (UTC)


 * Oppose The choice of US license may be incorrect, but I don't agree this file should be deleted because according to Malaysian Copyright Law, any "published literary, musical or artistic works" are belong to copyright "unless it's author (the person) are made to known". While for this organisation case, there is no one claim as the author of this work as evidenced from this organisation official website here. Molecule Extraction (talk) 04:52, 22 April 2018 (UTC)
 * Firstly, the logo you created is a derivative works from the logo of party, so the rights of reproduction should be kept by the party. "No members of party claimed the rights" dose not mean that they allow you to do that. Secondary, because of the copyrighted statues of the logo, you should change the permission to "fair use." This is  Taiwania Justo  speaking (Reception Room) 06:47, 22 April 2018 (UTC)
 * Thanks for notifying. I have changed the file license into fair use. But in the future if the party agreed to release their symbol under a free license, this file can be upload even to Wikimedia Commons right? Molecule Extraction (talk) 07:55, 22 April 2018 (UTC)
 * If the party release the logo to CC-by-sa or PD, the logo will be allowed to transfer to Commons. This is  Taiwania Justo  speaking (Reception Room) 08:48, 22 April 2018 (UTC)
 * Noted that. Thank you. Molecule Extraction (talk) 10:55, 22 April 2018 (UTC)


 * Delete: The article Sabah Heritage Party already uses File:Sabah Heritage Party Logo.svg to show the logo. Using this image in question is a violation of WP:NFCC, WP:NFCC. --Wcam (talk) 13:06, 17 May 2018 (UTC)
 * angys (Talk Talk) 14:16, 18 May 2018 (UTC)
 * Comment I have change the article link to the file for use on Pakatan Harapan article only. Molecule Extraction (talk) 23:38, 18 May 2018 (UTC)
 * Now the image's usage in Pakatan Harapan article is merely decorative and lacks contextual significance, still violating WP:NFCC. --Wcam (talk) 12:19, 19 May 2018 (UTC)
 * Since zh:File:Sabah Heritage Party Flag.svg because of the same reason, why doesn't English Wikipedia do the same thing for and not only delete in Chinese Wikipedia.  angys  (Talk Talk) 05:22, 23 May 2018 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section.

File:20130519 David Webb.jpg

 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  05:02, 30 April 2018 (UTC)
 * File:20130519 David Webb.jpg ([ delete] | talk | [ history] | links | [ logs]) &#x20;– uploaded by Ohconfucius ( [ notify] | contribs | uploads | upload log).

The file has an additional restriction "do not load to commons; do not delete" and violate the CC-by-sa permission. Therefore, the photo should be regarded as a copyrighted work. This is  Taiwania Justo  speaking (Reception Room) 01:58, 22 April 2018 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Heritage Elementary School.jpg

 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  05:02, 30 April 2018 (UTC)
 * File:Heritage Elementary School.jpg ([ delete] | talk | [ history] | links | [ logs]) &#x20;– uploaded by Brown.brett ( [ notify] | contribs | uploads | upload log).

Copyrighted - watermark states (c) 2014 Google hiàn 03:09, 22 April 2018 (UTC)


 * Delete - clearly copied from Google Street view. Aside from the copyright watermark noted by the nominator,  the image also has image stitching artifacts and discontinuities usually seen in street view images. --Whpq (talk) 14:53, 22 April 2018 (UTC)
 * Delete - it is certainly Google Street View. I an going to look through the uploader's uploads and I am going to niminate anything from Google Street view for deletion. Pkbwcgs (talk) 15:24, 22 April 2018 (UTC)
 * Delete, orphaned with questionable licensing. Salavat (talk) 23:46, 22 April 2018 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Britney-speaers-do-you-wanna-come-over-single-art-2016-glory.jpeg

 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  05:02, 30 April 2018 (UTC)
 * File:Britney-speaers-do-you-wanna-come-over-single-art-2016-glory.jpeg ([ delete] | talk | [ history] | links | [ logs]) &#x20;– uploaded by Femmefataletour ( [ notify] | contribs | uploads | upload log).

It appears to be fan art: http://britneyspearsmedia.ru/audio/fanmade/do-you-wanna-come-over-ep-single/ Kailash29792 (talk)  05:09, 22 April 2018 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Ganjamarsh.jpg

 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the discussion was: GFDL-with-disclaimers and move to Commons. czar 18:20, 27 May 2018 (UTC)
 * File:Ganjamarsh.jpg ([ delete] | talk | [ history] | links | [ logs]) &#x20;– uploaded by Aleksamil ( [ notify] | contribs | uploads | upload log).

File is not source code, so fail to see why this GPL. ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 11:32, 10 September 2017 (UTC)
 * You are right, on srwiki it says the file is GFDL and CC BY-SA 3.0, and not GPL. The license should be corrected.


 * PS. The file was reuploaded from the Serbian language wikipedia where User:Mladifilozof sent it into the public domain. Original file at https://sr.wikipedia.org/wiki/%D0%94%D0%B0%D1%82%D0%BE%D1%82%D0%B5%D0%BA%D0%B0:Ganjamarsh.jpg Aleksamil (talk) 08:44, 11 September 2017 (UTC)
 * The copyright tag on srwiki has GNU and CC logos, so presumably it's not in the public domain but licensed under some licences from those organisations. --Stefan2 (talk) 00:01, 15 September 2017 (UTC)
 * I was referring to the comment on 30 August 2006 which says "Предајем ову слику у јавно власништво." meaning the image is submitted to the public domain. The tag is gfdl-self. Perhaps the tag should be edited to gfdl, instead of gpl? Aleksamil (talk) 16:55, 17 September 2017 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Winged Blades of Godric On leave 16:22, 20 September 2017 (UTC)  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 08:56, 22 October 2017 (UTC)  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 * The original uploader may have claimed to have put the image into PD, but the copyright tag they uploaded is GFDL-self. So relicensing it as that seems to be the correct move. Or rather, when they uploaded the text of that template on srwiki was "subject to disclaimers", GFDL-with-disclaimers. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 09:01, 22 October 2017 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Hhhhhkohhhhh (talk) 16:48, 18 January 2018 (UTC)  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 * Note that the file wasn't uploaded with our GFDL-with-disclaimers but with a link to the Serbian disclaimer. I believe that we are required to link to the disclaimer chosen by the uploader (in this case, the Serbian one). Commons has c:Template:GFDL-disclamers which allows you to choose the right disclaimer, but I don't think we have anything similar. --Stefan2 (talk) 19:03, 1 February 2018 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Pkbwcgs (talk) 15:19, 22 April 2018 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Meandhaemae 090.jpg

 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  05:02, 30 April 2018 (UTC)
 * File:Meandhaemae 090.jpg ([ delete] | talk | [ history] | links | [ logs]) &#x20;– uploaded by Kmclcure ( [ notify] | contribs | uploads | upload log).


 * File:Meandzuzana.JPG ([ delete] | talk | [ history] | links | [ logs]) &#x20;– uploaded by Kmclcure ( [ notify] | contribs | uploads | upload log).


 * File:Meandzuzana1.JPG ([ delete] | talk | [ history] | links | [ logs]) &#x20;– uploaded by Kmclcure ( [ notify] | contribs | uploads | upload log).

Orphaned images of Katherine McClure. Uploading username suggests subject is uploader, but no OTRS permission (on the other hand, I can't find copies elsewhere online). Not sure if the licensing claim would pass muster at Commons. Thoughts? Ajpolino (talk) 16:47, 22 April 2018 (UTC)
 * Delete, orphaned with questionable licensing. Also all pretty poor quality. Salavat (talk) 23:46, 22 April 2018 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Cur sl 5 1982 r.jpg

 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  05:02, 30 April 2018 (UTC)
 * File:Cur sl 5 1982 r.jpg ([ delete] | talk | [ history] | links | [ logs]) &#x20;– uploaded by Kurun~enwiki ( [ notify] | contribs | uploads | upload log).

This is tagged as 'own' work, but seems to be a currency design, which are typically by a third party. It's also not marked "specimen". ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 17:45, 22 April 2018 (UTC)
 * Delete, orphaned with questionable licensing. Salavat (talk) 23:45, 22 April 2018 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Indian Summer (Mad Men).pdf

 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  05:02, 30 April 2018 (UTC)
 * <span class="plainlinks nourlexpansion lx ffd-file" id="File:Indian Summer (Mad Men).pdf">File:Indian Summer (Mad Men).pdf ([ delete] | talk | [ history] | links | [ logs]) &#x20;– uploaded by Lorikuns ( [ notify] | contribs | uploads | upload log).

Out of scope, per Magog the Ogre (t • c) 21:42, 22 April 2018 (UTC)
 * Delete, orphaned with no obvious value. Salavat (talk) 23:45, 22 April 2018 (UTC)
 * Delete per WP:NOTHOSTING. A PDF copy of the user's draft doesn't add value to the article or the encyclopedia. OhKayeSierra (talk) 03:51, 24 April 2018 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section.