Wikipedia:Files for discussion/2018 August 14



File:Unreal Engine 3 Samaritan Demo Screenshot.jpg

 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the discussion was: Remove from First Person Shooter article. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 07:14, 22 August 2018 (UTC)
 * File:Unreal Engine 3 Samaritan Demo Screenshot.jpg ([ delete] | talk | [ history] | links | [ logs]) &#x20;– uploaded by Engineguyman ( [ notify] | contribs | uploads | upload log).

Non-free screenshot being used in Unreal Engine and First-person shooter engine. Based upon discussions at User talk:Masem and User talk:Hakken, it appears that the non-free use in the former is probably OK while the use in the latter is probably non-NFCC compliant. Using non-free content in broader genre-type articles generally seems to require that the screenshot itself be the subject of sourced critical commentary to provide the context required by WP:NFCC. Unreal Engine is mentioned by name within the "First-person shooter" article, but most of the relevant details are found in the stand-alone article as is typical WP:SS. There's really no reason per item 6 of WP:NFC that a link/hatnote to that article where the screenshot can be seen is not a sufficient alternative to actually using the non-free image per WP:NFCC and WP:NFCC. Suggest keep for "Unreal Engine" and remove from "First-person shooter". -- Marchjuly (talk) 01:33, 14 August 2018 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section.

File:SG 39 Cipher Device.jpg

 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the discussion was: relisted on. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 07:16, 22 August 2018 (UTC)


 * File:SG 39 Cipher Device.jpg ([ delete] | talk | [ history] | links | [ logs])
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Tide Mills tidal and wind mill.jpg

 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the discussion was: relisted on. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 07:16, 22 August 2018 (UTC)


 * File:Tide Mills tidal and wind mill.jpg ([ delete] | talk | [ history] | links | [ logs])
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Year 2000 North Korea stamp commemorating the North Korea-loyal &

 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the discussion was: relisted on. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 07:17, 22 August 2018 (UTC)


 * File:Year 2000 North Korea stamp commemorating the North Korea-loyal & ([ delete] | talk | [ history] | links | [ logs])
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section.

File:1984–85 Illinois Fighting Illini men&

 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  05:02, 22 August 2018 (UTC)
 * File:1984–85 Illinois Fighting Illini men& ([ delete] | talk | [ history] | links | [ logs]) &#x20;– uploaded by Rhino83166 ( [ notify] | contribs | uploads | upload log).

Fails WP:NFCC. Though the fair use rationale on the talk page says "the article as a whole is dedicated specifically to a discussion of this work", the article is actually not about this photo - it's about the team depicted in the photo. It is certainly possible to discuss a basketball team without seeing a photo of them. B (talk) 12:27, 14 August 2018 (UTC)
 * Organisations change their name and / or branding, but we do not keep their old logos unless the logos themselves are the subject of significant sourced commentary. -- Whpq (talk) 20:43, 20 August 2018 (UTC)
 * Is this intended to be posted under a different thread? The issue here is about the photo of the basketball team, not about the logo that is incidentally incorporated therein. --B (talk) 17:58, 21 August 2018 (UTC)
 * Indeed it was. Was meant for the discussion below. Thanks for noticing.  -- Whpq (talk) 20:00, 21 August 2018 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section.

File:DOEACC Logo.jpg

 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the discussion was: relisted on. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 07:18, 22 August 2018 (UTC)


 * File:DOEACC Logo.jpg ([ delete] | talk | [ history] | links | [ logs])
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Giovanni Feroce Handshake.png

 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  05:02, 22 August 2018 (UTC)
 * File:Giovanni Feroce Handshake.png ([ delete] | talk | [ history] | links | [ logs]) &#x20;– uploaded by Cameron Pearson ( [ notify] | contribs | uploads | upload log).

This image has been uploaded with a claim of a PD license. The a flckr link has been provided which also shows a PD license. However, the flickr account has only this one image as its upload and was uploaded the same day as it was uploaded to Wikipedia. The https://www.feroceforgovernor.com/ web site uses a version of this image which hasn't cropped out some elements like this one. OTRS confirmation would be needed to verify permission. Whpq (talk) 23:55, 14 August 2018 (UTC)
 * Comment - this image is also on Commons as File:GF Handshake.png. It was previously deleted on Commons twice for lacking evidence of permission.  Has anyone tried reaching out to Cameron Pearson to ask if this is an official account for the campaign? --B (talk) 18:18, 21 August 2018 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section.