Wikipedia:Files for discussion/2018 June 28



File:Australia Post Keypas.jpg

 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  08:06, 6 July 2018 (UTC)
 * File:Australia Post Keypas.jpg ([ delete] | talk | [ history] | links | [ logs]) &#x20;– uploaded by Supcmd ( [ notify] | contribs | uploads | upload log).

Is it really necessary for this to be under fair use? Even if the information is blacked out a free use version could be created that would serve the same purpose. All someone would have to do is take a photo of theirs. Majora (talk) 01:56, 20 June 2018 (UTC)  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 06:45, 28 June 2018 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section.

File:SmarTone logo.svg

 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the discussion was: relisted on. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 07:42, 6 July 2018 (UTC)


 * File:SmarTone logo.svg ([ delete] | talk | [ history] | links | [ logs])
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section.

File:RCA Bluebird 78 B-11230-B Glenn Miller.jpg

 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the discussion was: Relicense as free. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 07:43, 6 July 2018 (UTC)
 * File:RCA Bluebird 78 B-11230-B Glenn Miller.jpg ([ delete] | talk | [ history] | links | [ logs]) &#x20;– uploaded by Carl savich ( [ notify] | contribs | uploads | upload log).

File was prodded for deletion here and deprodded here, so I'm bringing it here for further discussion. Basically, this is decorative use of a record label in Sun Valley Serenade. Despite the non-free rationale's use claim to the contrary, there is no sourced critical commentary of this record label anywhere within the article so the context for non-free use required by WP:NFCC and WP:NFC is lacking. The claim that the song is famous and won a gold record are not in dispute, but they also don't require that a non-free image be seen by the reader and is information which can be more than sufficiently expressed through text and citations to reliable sources. This is quite similar to trying to use a non-free album cover of a movie soundtrack album in an article about the movie, which is something not allowed by Wikipedia's non-free content use policy or WP:FILMSCORE. Moreover, there is already a similar image File:Chattanooga3.jpg being used in Chattanooga Choo Choo so there's no need for two non-free images of essentially the same thing per WP:NFCC, so moving this file to the article about the song would not be appropriate.

The only way I can see this being kept is if its too simple for copyright protection, or its copyright has lapsed and was not renewed. The label is mostly text except for the RCA dog imagery of Nipper. I don't think that's simple enough to be considered below c:COM:TOO, but it might be old enough for its copyright to have lapsed per PD-US-not renewed. If this file doesn't need to be non-free than the one used in the article about the song also probably doesn't need to be non-free. -- Marchjuly (talk) 01:30, 19 June 2018 (UTC)  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 * I think it would be safe to re-tag it as pd-us. The Nipper logo was published as early as 1903. See this example. --Hammersoft (talk) 02:34, 19 June 2018 (UTC)
 * Converting the files to PD seems fine unless someone else disagrees. They would no longer be subject to WP:NFCCP and could be moved to Commons. -- Marchjuly (talk) 00:10, 20 June 2018 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 06:48, 28 June 2018 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Ulsan Flag.png

 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the discussion was: Relicense as PD-ineligible-USonly. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 07:44, 6 July 2018 (UTC)
 * File:Ulsan Flag.png ([ delete] | talk | [ history] | links | [ logs]) &#x20;– uploaded by ASDFGH ( [ notify] | contribs | uploads | upload log).

This is claimed to be unfree, but I'm not sure if it meets the threshold of originality. If copyrighted, then it should be removed from User:Leventio/sandbox per WP:NFCC. Stefan2 (talk) 16:56, 19 June 2018 (UTC)  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 * Comment. This would be PD-ineligible-USonly, at the very least. ℯ xplicit 03:50, 27 June 2018 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 06:49, 28 June 2018 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section.

File:2014 Stockton Bank of the West Robbery Ford Explorer.jpg

 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted as F9 by AnomieBOT ⚡  01:01, 29 June 2018 (UTC)
 * File:2014 Stockton Bank of the West Robbery Ford Explorer.jpg ([ delete] | talk | [ history] | links | [ logs]) &#x20;– uploaded by Tpistoia ( [ notify] | contribs | uploads | upload log).

Querying why this image was considered inelligble, as it's a photo, and clearly attributed to a news outlet. ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 08:34, 28 June 2018 (UTC)


 * Speedy delete as a straight up copyright violation (WP:F9) --Whpq (talk) 22:18, 28 June 2018 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Dongguan Sports Centre.jpg

 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  08:06, 6 July 2018 (UTC)
 * File:Dongguan Sports Centre.jpg ([ delete] | talk | [ history] | links | [ logs]) &#x20;– uploaded by Jezyl Galarpe ( [ notify] | contribs | uploads | upload log).

EXIF indicates the copyright holder is Gahl, Christian. WP:OTRS confirmation would be needed. Whpq (talk) 12:25, 28 June 2018 (UTC)
 * Delete. Yann (talk) 14:38, 3 July 2018 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Mister Rogers&

 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the discussion was: Relicense as PD-textlogo. I'll also undelete the old versions, as they only have different sizes and colours. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 07:46, 6 July 2018 (UTC)
 * File:Mister Rogers& ([ delete] | talk | [ history] | links | [ logs]) &#x20;– uploaded by Luigi970p ( [ notify] | contribs | uploads | upload log).

Retag as PD-textlogo or replace with PNG version of the logo. The underlying logo appears to be copyright-ineligible text. Not sure whether the SVG is sufficiently creative to be copyright-eligible; if so, we should replace the SVG logo with a PNG. RJaguar3 &#124; u &#124; t 14:32, 28 June 2018 (UTC)
 * Relicense as pd-logo and transfer to Commons. Salavat (talk) 15:42, 29 June 2018 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Langhaar.jpg

 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  09:07, 6 July 2018 (UTC)
 * File:Langhaar.jpg ([ delete] | talk | [ history] | links | [ logs]) &#x20;– uploaded by Cliché Online ( [ notify] | contribs | uploads | upload log).

Copied and pasted from File talk:Langhaar.jpg. Magog the Ogre (t • c) 21:14, 28 June 2018 (UTC) -- This photo is not own work. The uploader copied it from huwiki, but the Hungarian uploader did copyright violation, too. --Regasterios (talk) 08:59, 27 June 2018 (UTC)
 * @Regasterios: can you cite your reasons, please? This image has been around for 10 years and these are rarely copyright violations. Magog the Ogre (t • c) 01:22, 28 June 2018 (UTC)
 * This photo was not made by Cliché Online. He/she copied it from huwiki: hu:Fájl:Langhaar.jpg. Please, see the dates of uploading. Cliché Online signed a date when Lupusz (the Hungarian uploader) uploaded this photo on huwiki. I know it is not trouble per se. But please see what Lupusz uploaded from February 6 2008 to February 8 2008 (hu:Speciális:Fájlok_listája/Lupusz).

Google finds this photo on many pages, it is true not before 2008. Perhaps the photo was in Commons too but was deleted. I don't know. But I know these circumstances are really very queer.
 * hu:Fájl:Erdelyi kopo.jpg: no summary, but he claim by the license it is an own photo. OK, there are situations like this. But following by...
 * hu:Fájl:Hannoveri vereb.jpg: no summary, but he claim by the license it is an own photo. But this photo is not own because of it have been on Commons from 2006: File:Hannoverscher Schweisshund.jpg.
 * hu:Fájl:Jagd terrier.jpg: no summary, but he claim by the license it is an own photo. But this photo is not own because of it have been on Commons from 2006: File:Terier niemiecki myśliwski 721.jpg.
 * hu:Fájl:Fox terrier.jpg: no summary, but he claim by the license it is an own photo. But this photo is not own because of it have been on Commons from 2006: File:Fox terrier smooth.jpg.
 * hu:Fájl:Labrador retriever.jpg: no summary, but he claim by the license it is an own photo. But this photo is not own because of it have been on Commons from 2007: File:Labrador Retriever black portrait Flickr.jpg. And then...
 * hu:Fájl:Langhaar.jpg: no summary, but he claim by the license it is an own photo...

Finally compare these photos on Commons, see the dates and original uploaders: File:Duitse staande korthaar 10-10-2.jpg and File:Rovidszoru nemet vizsla.jpg. I think you don't need comment. --Regasterios (talk) 09:13, 28 June 2018 (UTC) Magog the Ogre (t • c) 21:14, 28 June 2018 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Modular Scalable Vest.jpg
<div class="boilerplate ffd vfd xfd-closed" style="background-color:#f3f9ff; margin:1em 0 0 0; padding:0 10px 0 10px; border:1px solid #aaa;">
 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  08:06, 6 July 2018 (UTC)
 * File:Modular Scalable Vest.jpg ([ delete] | talk | [ history] | links | [ logs]) &#x20;– uploaded by Scottburton-ba ( [ notify] | contribs | uploads | upload log).

The claim that this is an image created by the us army and as such is in the public domain is not mentioned on the source provided. Dom from Paris (talk) 21:51, 28 June 2018 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section.