Wikipedia:Files for discussion/2018 November 20



File:North Shore Events Centre home court.png

 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  03:02, 28 November 2018 (UTC)
 * File:North Shore Events Centre home court.png ([ delete] | talk | [ history] | links | [ logs]) &#x20;– uploaded by Billy Liakopoulos ( [ notify] | contribs | uploads | upload log).

Web resolution, likely copyright violation from LTA account. Magog the Ogre (t • c) 00:54, 20 November 2018 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Arena Petrol 2013.jpg

 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by A file with this name on Commons is now visible. AnomieBOT ⚡ 03:02, 28 November 2018 (UTC)
 * File:Arena Petrol 2013.jpg ([ delete] | talk | [ history] | links | [ logs]) &#x20;– uploaded by Ratipok ( [ notify] | contribs | uploads | upload log).

Marked Do Not Move to Commons, but this photograph is probably too simple to garner any copyright for the architects. Magog the Ogre (t • c) 01:06, 20 November 2018 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Shingle Inn logo.svg

 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the discussion was: relisted on. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 09:23, 28 November 2018 (UTC)


 * File:Shingle Inn logo.svg ([ delete] | talk | [ history] | links | [ logs])
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Transgenderintersex-veterans-day-2017-jpeg.jpg

 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  03:02, 28 November 2018 (UTC)
 * File:Transgenderintersex-veterans-day-2017-jpeg.jpg ([ delete] | talk | [ history] | links | [ logs]) &#x20;– uploaded by *Treker ( [ notify] | contribs | uploads | upload log).

The non-free use rationale for this file says that it is used "to provide critical commentary on the film, event, etc. in question or of the poster itself, not solely for illustration" (emphasis mine). The article it is used on, Intersex people and military service in the United States does not provide any commentary on it whatsoever, and indeed uses it just for illustration. cymru.lass (talk • contribs) 20:21, 20 November 2018 (UTC)
 * Delete. The nominator's argument is exactly correct. The Big Bad Wolfowitz (aka Hullaballoo). Treated like dirt by many administrators since 2006.   (talk) 04:10, 25 November 2018 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Headshot of Mary Margaret McMahon.jpg

 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted as F7 by AnomieBOT ⚡  09:04, 21 November 2018 (UTC)
 * File:Headshot of Mary Margaret McMahon.jpg ([ delete] | talk | [ history] | links | [ logs]) &#x20;– uploaded by Mathlete1 ( [ notify] | contribs | uploads | upload log).

There are two problems with this image. Firstly, it has a proprietary watermark from a commercial image-hosting site embedded into the file, which photos intended for use on Wikipedia are never allowed to have. Secondly, the copyright claims are completely out to lunch: the source is claimed as "originally published in Toronto Star" with Getty Images as the "immediate source", but then the copyright tag claims Crown copyright — which would mean that (a) it was owned by the Canadian federal government, which it isn't, and (b) even if it were, it still couldn't be kept anyway because Crown-copyright content is incompatible with Wikipedia's copyright requirements and cannot be used here at all. As always, a user cannot just upload any photo they find on a web search, regardless of its existing copyright status, and call it "fair use" -- if they can't find an existing photo that's been licensed under GFDL, Creative Commons or public domain, then their only other alternative is to take a new photo themselves that they're willing to release under GFDL, Creative Commons or public domain from the jump. Bearcat (talk) 23:05, 20 November 2018 (UTC)
 * Speedy Delete per F7. It is clearly not Crown Copyright as claimed since this comes from the Toronto Star.  The Getty watermarking makes it clear that the photographer is intending to earn additional commercial revenue  by making it available through Getty Imaages. -- Whpq (talk) 23:55, 20 November 2018 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it.</b> Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section.