Wikipedia:Files for discussion/2018 October 2



File:Santa Monica Camera Obscura.jpg

 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted as F8 by A file with this name on Commons is now visible. AnomieBOT ⚡ 03:03, 10 October 2018 (UTC)
 * File:Santa Monica Camera Obscura.jpg ([ delete] | talk | [ history] | links | [ logs]) &#x20;– uploaded by Jengod ( [ notify] | contribs | uploads | upload log).

Derivative work in respect of sign artwork shown? ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 19:26, 16 September 2018 (UTC)


 * How else could this building be depicted? The signage is incorporated onto the wall. I'm so confused. This is not a brand or a chain, it's just one 70+ yo building? jengod (talk) 19:38, 16 September 2018 (UTC)


 * The concern is that the logo is it's own (suculptral) artwork. ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 19:47, 16 September 2018 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 06:14, 24 September 2018 (UTC)  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 * Keep as non-free. When depicting buildings, it's reasonable to photograph the side that is most recognizable, even if it contains copyrighted elements. Because the logo is so prominent, it probably doesn't fall within the building FOP so it needs to be treated as a sculpture. The logo might be below TOO, or just PD due to formalities, but I'm assuming it's complex. – Finnusertop (talk ⋅ contribs) 09:36, 24 September 2018 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 05:51, 2 October 2018 (UTC)
 * Keep as free - the text is PD-ineligible. If it weren't, then I certainly don't think this would qualify for fair use here since it's not required for the reader's understanding.  But a trivially simple 3D-letter doesn't bar free photographs of the object.   --B (talk) 18:22, 9 October 2018 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Anatoliy Chepiga en wp.jpg

 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  15:10, 10 October 2018 (UTC)
 * File:Anatoliy Chepiga en wp.jpg ([ delete] | talk | [ history] | links | [ logs]) Insider (talk) 06:50, 2 October 2018 (UTC)
 * It has the wrong license. See commons:Commons:Deletion requests/File:Anatoliy Chepiga.jpg and revision history. --Insider (talk) 06:55, 2 October 2018 (UTC)
 * Keep per "news reports on events and facts, which have a purely informational character (daily news reports, television programs, transportation schedules, and the like)". Also, you are supposed to notify editors when you put an image up for deletion.--Kintetsubuffalo (talk) 00:57, 3 October 2018 (UTC)
 * News (simple messages about it) - yes, photo - no. I notified you. --Insider (talk) 06:02, 3 October 2018 (UTC)
 * You notified me that you tagged it, not that you put it up for deletion.--Kintetsubuffalo (talk) 18:30, 9 October 2018 (UTC)


 * This file is not PD-RU-exempt. The respective point about news reports is about news as themselves and it is not about specific text, image or video. So, this is not free file, and it can be used under WP:NFCCP only. Alex Spade (talk) 23:20, 9 October 2018 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Lair Ribeiro 2007.jpg

 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  20:15, 9 October 2018 (UTC)
 * File:Lair Ribeiro 2007.jpg ([ delete] | talk | [ history] | links | [ logs]) &#x20;– uploaded by Saisatha ( [ notify] | contribs | uploads | upload log).

This was uploaded as PD-self, but given the uploader was blocked for spam, I'm not sure if good-faith can be assumed, given the low-resolution and lack of background. ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 08:49, 2 October 2018 (UTC)
 * Delete, orphaned with questionable licensing. Salavat (talk) 01:45, 6 October 2018 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Rafael Montilla Marketer.jpg

 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  20:15, 9 October 2018 (UTC)
 * File:Rafael Montilla Marketer.jpg ([ delete] | talk | [ history] | links | [ logs]) &#x20;– uploaded by Saisatha ( [ notify] | contribs | uploads | upload log).

This was uploaded as PD-self, but given the uploader was blocked for spam, I'm not sure if good-faith can be assumed, given the low-resolution, and the fact that prior to a cleanup the page contained what was essentially promotional content. ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 08:50, 2 October 2018 (UTC)
 * Delete, orphaned with questionable licensing. Salavat (talk) 01:45, 6 October 2018 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Peggy Sue Nor Va Jak 1957.jpg

 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  03:03, 10 October 2018 (UTC)
 * File:Peggy Sue Nor Va Jak 1957.jpg ([ delete] | talk | [ history] | links | [ logs]) &#x20;– uploaded by Carl savich ( [ notify] | contribs | uploads | upload log).

There is already a single in the infobox. ―Justin ( koavf ) ❤T☮C☺M☯ 20:25, 2 October 2018 (UTC)
 * Delete, fair use file with a lack of critical commentary for its use in Peggy Sue. Salavat (talk) 01:46, 6 October 2018 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. <b style="color:red">Please do not modify it.</b> Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section.