Wikipedia:Files for discussion/2019 August 12



Hanging on the Telephone

 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the discussion was: no consensus. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 09:20, 20 August 2019 (UTC)
 * File:Blondie - Hanging On The Telephone (UK).jpg ([ delete] | talk | [ history] | links | [ logs]) &#x20;– uploaded by Dreamer.se ( [ notify] | contribs | uploads | upload log).


 * File:Blondie - Hanging On The Telephone.jpg ([ delete] | talk | [ history] | links | [ logs]) &#x20;– uploaded by Dreamer.se ( [ notify] | contribs | uploads | upload log).

Two cover arts are used in the "Hanging on the Telephone" article. Normally, one cover art should suffice for a single. On one hand, the US picture sleeve should be used because the band is American and the song was produced in the US. On the other hand, the song wasn't charted in the US but overseas instead, including the UK, and the UK picture sleeve should reflect that. Personally, I would lean toward the American sleeve, but I'm torn. If charts weigh more than mere nationality and intended primary targeted demographics (i.e. American listeners of the time), then the UK sleeve it is. Can we have one cover or both? George Ho (talk) 23:37, 5 August 2019 (UTC)  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus. Relisting comment: I reverted the speedy NAC. This is a NFCC discussion, particularly criterion 3.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, —&thinsp;JJMC89&thinsp; (T·C) 00:44, 12 August 2019 (UTC)
 * Comment: the relevant consensus about when to use an extra non-free cover can be found at: Template:Infobox album. Specifically, "An alternative cover that is significantly different from the original and is widely distributed and/or replaces the original has generally been held to pass this criterion." – Finnusertop (talk ⋅ contribs) 17:06, 12 August 2019 (UTC)
 * Speedy keep, both images are fine because they convey relevant information. This discussion didn't need to be reopened. What is there even to discuss? This is beyond pedantic. Ten Pound Hammer • (What did I screw up now?) 21:42, 12 August 2019 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Cinema Cinema Publicity Image.jpg

 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  02:02, 21 August 2019 (UTC)
 * File:Cinema Cinema Publicity Image.jpg ([ delete] | talk | [ history] | links | [ logs]) &#x20;– uploaded by SteakSpecial ( [ notify] | contribs | uploads | upload log).

Fails WP:NFCCP #3a. There is one more non-free image in the same article. Regards. Titodutta (talk) 09:46, 12 August 2019 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section.